Hall Moves to the Outfield
Bill Hall, starting left fielder? That's what it looks like:
"I asked him afterward if he felt acclimated to the outfield and he said yes," said Melvin. "I think there's probably a pretty good chance he'll move to the outfield (for the Brewers). I personally think he's better suited to left field."
Left field, eh? Why not center?
Roberts, 34, would be a perfect fit for the Brewers. He would add much-needed speed, provide a legitimate leadoff hitter and solid defender in center and is known for being a positive clubhouse presence.
Oh God.
You're telling me that an outfield of Hall/Roberts/Hart is better than an outfield of Gross-Mench/Hall/Hart? Not likely.
This piece has a frustrating air of finality about it, summed up neatly by this passage:
"We do have numbers in the outfield," said Melvin, who indicated he might try to thin the herd via the trade market.
0 recs |
29
comments
Comments
No to Pierre, Roberts.
I've been trumpetting the Gross/Mench platoon in LF for a while. Glad to see an expert back it up. Hall in CF makes the LF platoon even more valuable.
I get the impressions that the team will be very active this off-season, especially with what Attanasio has said about expecting results. Don't mess this up Melvin.
by baumann on Nov 11, 2006 2:48 PM CST 0 recs
well...
(Didn't I tell you that before? :) )
by Jeff Sackmann on
Nov 11, 2006 3:39 PM CST
up
0 recs
Yeah, ugh
by Jeff Sackmann on Nov 11, 2006 3:02 PM CST 0 recs
WTF
Crap like this makes me wonder why Billy Hall would ever sign a long-term deal here.
by roguejim on Nov 11, 2006 4:40 PM CST 0 recs
2007 outfield
by kgaul on Nov 11, 2006 8:00 PM CST 0 recs
Why is it
by iluvlamp on Nov 11, 2006 8:02 PM CST 0 recs
don't get it...
however, one counter point to myself. I'd rather see a platoon of gross or mench/jenkins/insert name here and hall in cf, then hart in rf. than the proposed options said above.
by Michael M on Nov 11, 2006 9:24 PM CST 0 recs
The problem
by battlekow on
Nov 11, 2006 9:30 PM CST
up
0 recs
Right
Hall at short, though? Probably top 5 in the majors for total offense, certainly top 5 in the NL. (Imagine putting Pat Burrell at short?)
That's one of the reasons I'm not eager to just give JJ Hardy short back. I like Hardy, and am optimistic he can be a solid shortstop. But until he can do it without getting hurt, you don't inconvenience Hall so Hardy has a spot to play. It's like moving El Caballo around so you have a spot for Magruder.
It won't end up this way, but I'd rather play Hall at short and make JJ learn to play other infield positions, at least until he shows he deserves the shortstop gig.
by roguejim on
Nov 12, 2006 12:47 AM CST
up
0 recs
Trade JJ.
by baumann on
Nov 12, 2006 1:47 PM CST
up
0 recs
It's a pipe dream.
Anyway, while I think Hall ought to be SS, it's true that Hardy's trade value is pretty low. Maybe at midseason, or after '07, if he's been solid, then other teams will know what kind of property he is. At this point, I don't think he'd fetch much.
by Jeff Sackmann on
Nov 12, 2006 2:02 PM CST
up
0 recs
Right.
by baumann on
Nov 12, 2006 10:00 PM CST
up
0 recs
Here.
The Brewers have so many possibilities right now -- I'm so anxious to see how they are resolved.
by baumann on
Nov 12, 2006 1:54 PM CST
up
0 recs
J-S Poll
Yes (72.0%)
No (28.0%)
Sigh.
by battlekow on Nov 12, 2006 11:16 AM CST 0 recs
What the hell
by roguejim on
Nov 12, 2006 12:57 PM CST
up
0 recs
sigh is
by iluvlamp on
Nov 13, 2006 10:14 PM CST
up
0 recs
Unless
And if Koskie doesn't come back, I think all this talk is moot.
by nmc on Nov 12, 2006 11:33 AM CST 0 recs
Maybe for a few months
by battlekow on
Nov 12, 2006 2:18 PM CST
up
0 recs
But is he still the IF backup?
I haven't heard anything positive about Koskie coming back, so I'd say plant Hall at 3B and then when Hardy gets injured, bring up Braun at 3B and move Hall to SS.
I think as long as Hall isn't being moved around on a daily basis (like in 2005 and early 2006) and has a position for months at a time, he'll be OK with that. One of his great traits is his versatility, and keeping him at one position regardless of the injuries going on around him would be stupid.
by craigholl on Nov 12, 2006 4:34 PM CST 0 recs
But wait!
Melvin said another of his free-agent infielders, Jeff Cirillo, has decided to play in 2007 after discussing the situation with his family. Melvin said he has interest in bringing Cirillo back regardless of how things go with Graffanino.
"We could have room for both of them," he said.
How exciting!!!
by battlekow on
Nov 12, 2006 4:58 PM CST
up
0 recs
mench
Personally, i'd rather see Hall at 3rd. But 3rd, OF, whatever, it doesn't make too much difference. I think the upgrade from Hall to Hardy on defense at SS is too much to ignore, also indications still are that Hardy will hit. Giving up on their highly touted, very talented SS prospect to start the season is foolish. Though i'll happily admit that time is running out for Hardy. Had he started '06 the way he ended '05 this would not be an issue, but he needs to get back to second half '05 form far sooner than later.
Anyway, two things overlooked.
1.) Melvin says "I personally think he's better suited to left field." To me, this indicates that someone else thinks he's better suited to center (Neddily?). And that this is a point of open discussion with the team, CF or LF for Hall.
2.) Does it not appear that, with Melvin saying a.) Hall will likely move to OF, and b.) He's best suited for left; that Mench no longer has a role on the team?
I was really hoping that Hart could handle center field. (But i'm not as high on TGJR as others are).
It's clear to me, well, as clear as things get with Melvin, that he is definitely shopping for a CF as has been rumoured, and that Mench is probably moving on to a new club.
This opens up an IF spot for Graffy/Braun, and takes yet another OF spot away from Jenkins/Clark/Mench. That was quite a loaded quote from Melvin. Should be an interesting winter.
by jacob on Nov 13, 2006 9:53 AM CST 0 recs
Overlooked?
And where would you get the crazy idea that Melvin is shopping for a CF? Oh, that's right, from the original post again, featuring this quote from the article:
by battlekow on
Nov 13, 2006 10:59 AM CST
up
0 recs
You mess with the Kow
by roguejim on
Nov 13, 2006 11:13 PM CST
up
0 recs
OK..Mench
by iluvlamp on Nov 13, 2006 10:20 PM CST 0 recs















