Slow News Day
But there is this small note:
4/10/03: 7.3 IP, 1 R, 7 H, 1 BB, 7 K, W
7/10/03: 9.0 IP, 4 R, 8 H, 0 BB, 9 K, W
7/18/03: 6.7 IP, 2 R, 9 H, 2 BB, 2 K, W
4/08/04: 4.0 IP, 6 R, 8 H, 3 BB, 4 K, L
4/25/04: 7.7 IP, 1 R, 3 H, 2 BB, 1 K, W
4/15/05: 8.3 IP, 0 R, 5 H, 2 BB, 3 K, W
4/26/05: 5.0 IP, 2 R, 5 H, 3 BB, 4 K, W
7/19/05: 6.0 IP, 3 R, 6 H, 0 BB, 3 K, ND
8/10/05: 7.0 IP, 0 R, 4 H, 4 BB, 2 K, W
9/25/05: 8.0 IP, 0 R, 6 H, 0 BB, 7 K, W
4/13/06: 6.0 IP, 3 R, 5 H, 2 BB, 2 K, ND
6/11/06: 4.0 IP, 5 R, 6 H, 5 BB, 4 K, ND
8/06/06: 7.3 IP, 1 R, 4 H, 1 BB, 7 K, W
9/20/06: 7.0 IP, 0 R, 6 H, 1 BB, 4 K, ND
9/30/06: 7.0 IP, 2 R, 5 H, 3 BB, 2 K, ND
Total: 100.3 IP, 30 R, 87 H, 29 BB, 61 K
Avg Start: 6.7 IP, 2.69 R, 5.8 H, 1.9 BB, 4 K
I mean, come on. He's been more than a little frustrating to the Brewers' bats and the Brewers' fans.
Anyway, given the Milwaukee's position on that list, it doesn't seem likely they'll sign Suppan, but I'm in favor of it.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
FA Market is Whacko!
The FA mkt is just nuts--see Ted Lilly/Jason Marquis, so it's a foregone conclusion
Suppan, who is on a higher plane than those two, is not ticketed here (no pun intended).
The Brewers best shot appears to be from one of the non-tendered guys.
Joel Pineiro (who didn't miss many bats!) looks like a fit at about $5 mil.
Otherwise, I'd favor the trade route (with Bill Hall as the bait).
usually...
But Suppan? Man. It IS that bad.
Given MIL's position on that list...
Well
I share your concern about his cost, but I think he'd significantly improve the team. I'd feel better about the rotation if it was Sheeter/Cappy/Bushy (Busher?)/Soup/The Kid, with Vargas and The Other Kid in reserve if Sheeter gets Sheeted or one of the others goes Carlos Silva on us.
His has a big name
I guess we're running out of big name pitchers, guys a GM call tell the city "look, we're in it to win it this year!" "Joel Piniero" just doesn't put the fans in the stands, you know?
(Though he does have a good sandwich shop.)
I guess I wouldn't expect an ERA under 4 for Suppan, and he's going to be making a ton of money. I guess I'd be just as happy to get him out of the NL Central. If we can have him for a reasonable amnount of money, sure, but I don't want to pay $9 mil a season just to see the Journal Sentinel's "Soup's On!" headline.
i couldn't disagree more
by the way, for a shameless plug, check out my formal thoughts on the subject at my new blog:
http://brewcityzen.blogspot.com/2006/12/melvin-looking-at-suppan.html
by Bill @ Brew Crew Ball on Dec 15, 2006 10:53 AM CST reply actions
he's a hot commodity
and his lifetime record of 106 wins was totaled through Boston when they were average, and the Royals with partial seasons in Pittsburgh and Arizona (when they sucked). We all know record isn't indicative of a pitchers real worth. His ERA is nothing special, but it comes down to do the Brewers want to A. win now? B. trade to do it or C. buy hi to do it. If you're going to buy hi, i'd rather have Suppan than Lilly. maybe that's just me.
4-0, 1.29 40 IP
I smell small sample size.
Gord Ash has talked about how important it has been for the Brewers not to get tied up with big contracts like that while they build. If Jeff Suppan makes them change their mind, someone check the pipes at Miller Park because something's getting into the water.
Paying $11-12mil per year for Soupie-doup is a move that a team very close to winning it all makes -- a team like the Mets or Cardinals. Improving from 75 wins to 80 wins from one season to the next is not the same as getting from 85 to 90. 90 wins puts you in the playoffs; 80 wins means you're mediocre. When we've won 85-90 games, and are missing a guy who can throw 190 innings of 100ERA+ ball, then I'd dish out the cash. Until then, it's pointless, especially since we have more pitchers waiting to break through than hitters down on the farm.




























