Ohka versus Davis (versus nothing)
Last night's game reminded us that Tomo Ohka is not a savior; look back through old threads at this or any other Brewers site and you see plenty of frustration with our #4 starter. That issue is going to come up again this offseason when Doug Melvin decides whether to re-sign Ohka, and for how much.
As we're discussing here, there are plenty of candidates for next year's rotation: Ben Sheets, Chris Capuano, Dave Bush, Dana Eveland, Zach Jackson, and Carlos Villanueva, to begin with. Dennis Sarfate will probably also compete for a spot. There should also be mid-season candidates at Triple-A (just as there [gulp] were this year) in Tim Dillard, Steve Hammond, and Yovani Gallardo. However, after this year's disaster, in which Ned couldn't find a suitable replacement starter when Sheets and Ohka went down, I wouldn't be at all surprised if Melvin tries to sign a veteran starter to go along with Sheets, Cappy, and Bush.
Of course, there will be a few other pitchers on the market this offseason aside from Ohka and Doug Davis (like, ahem, Barry Zito), but let's stick to our two potential returnees. If you had asked around before the season, people in baseball would've told you to expect Davis to sign a pretty big deal before the '07 season, maybe $24m/3 years. He won't do that after his up-and-down performance this year; he might end up getting something closer to Cory Lidle money ($6.3m/2).
Ohka, on the other hand, will probably be more expensive. He is probably a better bet going forward, as well. He's also been inconsistent, but his overall numbers should look stronger to potential suitors. He may end up getting something like $20m/3 years, if only because there are never a whole lot of free-agent pitching options.
So, what do you think? Sign Ohka? Sign Davis for cheaper and give him a chance to bounce back? Sign no one and hope we get two starters out of Villanueva/Eveland/Jackson/Sarfate?
49 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Excuse me
by thekranz on Aug 3, 2006 8:16 AM CDT reply actions
That's ridiculous
Did you read that somewhere?
by Jeff Sackmann on Aug 3, 2006 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions
Sounds like a Brewers closer to me
Sarfate
by thekranz on Aug 3, 2006 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions
I wonder
I think Melvin will overspend to keep one or both, in an attempt to show an effort to "win now" with "salty, seasoned, veterans." I don't know if these two are the way to go, but I like the idea of veteran pitchers than our veteran hitters, if only because I have less faith in our young pitchers than our young hitters.
Of the two, I think Ohka is pitching better than he is, and will likely reveal that over the final few months. I'd like him a whole lot better as a #5 pitcher/swing man, assuming we had enough talent above him to make him a #5. Well, talent who wasn;t hurt all the time, I mean.
On second thought...
(As an aside, I wonder what they would have been worth right before the trading deadline: one you get over the fact that we're not going win the wild card, decent starting pitching at the deadline could have brought in a mint.)
After this year, though, when Mike Maddux has been cut down from immortal to merely mortal, I'm not so sure. My guess: Ohka goes, Zachson is called up, we overpay for Davis. I don't think Moustache could stomach letting two veteran pitchers going, for fear we might be accused of not trying to win in 2007.
The other option
by Jeff Sackmann on Aug 3, 2006 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions
I'd assume better
Davis & Ohka
As for Hendrickson, I have not gviven up completey. Throw in a few Melvin waiver finds (and maybe a free agent?) and we will have, if nothing else, good competition for the starting slots. That beats heading to Arizona with Scott Karl penciled in for a spot.
by TrueBlueBrewCrew on Aug 3, 2006 9:37 AM CDT reply actions
Choose Boof!
To sign both Davis and Ohka...
I vote for signing one of the vets and handing the 5th starter job to whichever young 'un pitches the best in spring training and is not named Hendrickson. Given the choice between either Ohka or Davis, I'd much prefer Davis, the one without the "slight" rotator cuff tear and better stuff.
TINSTAAPP?
why?
given tinstaapp?
Established, sure
Why
That's true
I'd be surprised if we were the highest bidder for him, but he might actually be worth it.
Actually, that's the thing with free agents: none of the big ones are ever worth their contracts.
I'm willing to bet
by thekranz on Aug 3, 2006 11:22 AM CDT up reply actions
I'd rather have Davis
Tomo Ohka p
1 year/$4.53M (2006), plus $0.1M in incentives
* re-signed 2/06, avoided arbitration ($5.2M-$4.25M)
* may earn $0.1M in incentives based on innings pitched
o $25,000 each for 185 & 195 IP
o $50,000 for 200 IP
* 1 year/$2.75M (2005), avoided arbitration 1/05
* 1 year/$2.3375M (2004), avoided arbitration 1/04
* 1 year/$0.34M (2003) 3/03
* 1 year/$0.24M (2002) 3/02
* 1 year/$0.225M (2001)
* ML service: 5.070
Doug Davis p
2 year/$4.75M (2005-06), plus $0.4M in incentives
* 05:$2.05M, 06:$2.7M
* 2005 salary increases by $0.3M with 34 GS in 2004
* 2006 salary increases by $0.5M with 33 GS in 2005
* signed extension 7/04
* 1 year/$0.45M (2004) (minor-league contract)
* 1 year/$0.4275M (2003) 2/03
* 1 year/$0.31M (2002) 2/02
* ML service: 4.138
From the amazingly up-to-date Cot's Baseball Contracts.
Would the team be able to snag draft picks from either of these two leaving? I doubt it, but wondering if anyone in the audience knows.
Compensation
A Type A, B or C Player shall be a Player who became a free agent and ranks as a Type A, B or C Player under the statistical system of ranking Players set forth by the Elias Sports Bureau using statistics based on a two-year average for each respective position group.
Type A Players: Ranks in the upper 30% of his respective position group
Type B Players: Ranks in the upper 50%, but not in the upper 30%, of his respective position group
Type C Players: Ranks in the upper 60%, but not in the upper 50%, of his respective position group
They could both be Type A's.
I really doubt both would be Type A's
by Jeff Sackmann on Aug 3, 2006 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions
Given Davis' strong year last year
It would be nice if we knew what, exactly, Elias was rating them on. Matt Morris, for instance, was a type A last year.
good point
it would indeed be great if they made the ranking method public.
by Jeff Sackmann on Aug 3, 2006 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions
pitching
give up on the hendrickson thing. He's been given more than one opportunity and has choked on all of them. I think Dana Eveland may be the next Ben Hendrickson. After his free fall this season.
As far as free agents i don't see the brewers using smart money to sign any. sure you can go out and dump a bunch on mark mulder or Barry Zito but what do you really get in return. I dont' think its worth it. Usually on pitchers your paying for what they have done, not what they're going to do moving forward. I think they need to get a right fielder and settle on a centerfielder. Then stock up on pitchers. I"m sure Melvin will rescue another one.
The have a right fielder
If they go out and sign more freaking outfielder, I swear, I'll become a Roayls fan.
by thekranz on Aug 3, 2006 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions
pitching
Zito 5/75 million
Schmidt 4/45
Mussina 3/34
Mulder 3/30
Marquis 4/28
Wood 1/4
Eaton 2/11
Lilly 2/12
bargains:
Ohka, Meche, WEaver, Wolf
Big contracts who will have to take less:
Pettitte, park, radke
Possible minor league deals:
Mark Redman (who would or could be a good pick up given his arm and possbility of playing with a contender light a fire under him)
Tony Armas Jr (see above)
Redman
Weaver could be interesting, too. I think Armas will get a pretty lucrative deal (for him, that is).
The best deal
He was pitching well to start off the season, and I haven't really heard when the injury started bothering him, but if he can show he is healthy, I would gladly give him 10 a year for a short 3 years.
by thekranz on Aug 3, 2006 3:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Interesting
According to Hardball Times, his xFIP is in line with his '04 & '05 numbers, so he may be in for a rebound. Explanation of xFIP:
I dunno
From 2001-2003, he's had a WHIP under 1.2. Since then, it's been closer to 1.4, including a horrible 1.55 this year, when opponents are hitting .310. Those numbers will come down, I'd assume, but not enough for $10 million a season.
I think I'd rather take my chances with Jeff Weaver. This year hasn't been kinder than to Mulder, but before this one, he's had only one bad year, and that was with the Yankees (so he probably tanked on purpose to kill the Evil Empire). With Maddux's help, I think he'd be a reasonable bet to put up numbers comparable to Mulder's without the huge price tag.
Of course, there's de la Rosa...never mind.
Interesting
The same caveat would apply to Zito--Oakland has a freakishly good defense this year and last, and the pitchers (obviously) really benefit from that. Zito's a good pitcher, don't get me wrong, but if he were pitching in Miller Park in front of Fielder and Weeks and Jenkins and Lee/Mench, he wouldn't be about to rake in $75 mil.
I should point out I don't really think the Crew should shell out to sign him (for just that reason, in addition to the mistake of having $25mil, or more than 40% of payroll tied up in two pitchers) ...I just mentioned him in the post because I couldn't think of any other big names who'd be on the market.
by Jeff Sackmann on Aug 3, 2006 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions
Even if...
A rotation with Sheets, Cappy, Mulder, Davis, X looks pretty damn good from where I sit.
Also, the Brewers won't really have to worry about signing the kids until the Mulder contract is basically gone, so if a small market team is going to go out on a limb, seems like next year would be the year to do it, and even after this year Mulder is a more stable limb than Weaver.
by thekranz on Aug 3, 2006 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions
we'll see...
by Jeff Sackmann on Aug 3, 2006 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Capuano?
by familyguy on Aug 3, 2006 3:28 PM CDT reply actions
first year of arby...
by Jeff Sackmann on Aug 3, 2006 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions
Let's get a SP from the AL
I live in Chicago and every other day up to the 31st there was a story about how the White Sox wanted to trade Freddy Garcia or Vazquez. I personally would love to see Garcia in a Cerveceros uniform and he wouldn't even have to sell his home in the North Shore (about 90 minutes from Miller Park). From the list previously posted, perhaps Ted Lilly would fit. Another crazy idea might be Paul Byrd.
by TrueBlueBrewCrew on Aug 3, 2006 5:42 PM CDT reply actions
All this talk about Mulder, Zito, etc.
FINALLY we can get past that
by kjbsam on Aug 3, 2006 5:56 PM CDT reply actions
Ted Lily
Plus
by thekranz on Aug 4, 2006 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions

by 































