Brew Crew Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: MLB Hot Stove: blogging the rumors, trades, signings Bar-right-arrows



Maximizing 3B/LF

Mench is gone, Jenkins is gone, we've spent most if not all of the payroll dollars available, and we still only have one starter for 3B and LF.

That's not really a bad thing--we still have 16 or 17 pitchers for 12 spots, including as many as 8 starters, and it's likely that we'll deal one or two of them.  A 3B/LF could come back that way.  But, given what we'd get in exchange for Capuano or Vargas, I wonder how much that matters.

First off, I'm going to ignore the possibility of getting a CF and moving Bill Hall to 3B.  It makes sense, yes, but the Brewers aren't going to do it.  If I were running the Strat-O-Matic 2008 Brewers, I'd do it, but that's neither here nor there.  So, there are two possibilities: Braun plays third and LaPorta/Gross/Dillon/Gwynn/acquisition covers left, or Braun plays left while Counsell/Rottino/acquisition plays third.

Unfortunately, there are a lot of huge assumptions required in figuring out what would be best.  It's easy enough to project offensive performance for guys like Gross, Dillon, and Counsell, or targets such as Brandon Inge or Joe Crede.  It's most certainly NOT easy to project how bad Ryan Braun will be at third base next year, or how he'd handle left field, were he to move.

But...let's make some assumptions.  Even pinning down Braun's level of defensive "contribution" last year is hard, but if we throw together a bunch of metrics and multiply out to 162 games, he's probably at about -40 runs, or about -4 wins.    Needless to say, that's really, really bad.  Now, as Jacob pointed out the other day, that's not really the right way to do it -- we should regress some, even apart from the expectation that Braun will work hard at improving.  For various reasons I'm not going to get into here, I'm going to do so modestly, and say that, if Braun plays 3B for 155+ games next year, he's going to cost us 3 wins with the glove.

An even tougher assumption is how Braun would handle LF.  In many ways, he'd probably be good--he's fast, he's got a strong arm--but there would be an adjustment period.  Let's say that his glove would cost us 1 win in left field.

If those assumptions are correct, we gain 2 wins simply by moving Braun to left.  It wasn't that easy last year, when Menchkins was installed in left and we had a gaping, Mendoza-lining hole of Counsellino at third, but now that we have a collection of replacement-level talent at both positions with a few months to tweak the roster, it's simpler.

Given that Braun is (according to my WAGs) worth 2 wins more in left, it's obvious that we should look for a 3B.  Basically, a replacement-level third baseman is equal to a 2-win left fielder.  In more realistic terms, a platoon of Counsell and Rottino is worth about the same as Ryan Church, and only a bit less than Josh Willingham.  Put another way, a marginal win costs $3MM+ on the free agent market, so moving Braun saves us six mil.

The options

Given that we can put 3B options and LF options on equal footing by subtracting 2 wins from LFs because they leave Braun at third, let's look at some of our choices:


  • Counsell, or Counsell/Rottino platoon: The offense could be brutal -- let's say we'd get 230/320/330 -- but the defense would be pretty good.  Approximate runs created (RC) is 59 for that offense, and let's give Craig a win above average for his glove.  That's 69 runs, with no penalty for Braun.

  • Joe Crede: I project Crede at 323/453 OBP/SLG,  or 77 RC.  He's a good defender, maybe even as good as Counsell.  Give him a win above average, and he's at 87 RC.

  • Brandon Inge or Tad Iguchi: I project Inge at 313/405, and Iguchi at 335/387.  Both are 70 RC, not much above Counsell's.  Inge isn't a notable defender, and Iguchi would be switching positions.  These are worse options that giving the job to Counsell outright.

  • Gross/Dillon platoon: I project Gross at 338/410, which is mostly vRH, though with plenty of pinch hitting.  With a strict platoon, we might get 340/420 out of the pair, which is 77 RC.  The defense wouldn't be great, it might even be below-average.  Not only that, but we lose two wins because we play Braun at third in this case, which brings us down to...worse than Counsell.  In other words, Gross/Dillon is about 1 win worse than Counsell/Rottino, all things considered.

  • Tony Gwynn: I know somebody's going to bring him up.  I project him at 297/273.  His glove would be great, I'm sure, but in order to be as good as Braun in LF and Counsell at 3B, his defense would have to be worth about four wins.  That'd be historically good.

  • Josh Hamilton/Adam Jones: here are a couple of young trade targets (and, admittedly, very long shots).  I've got Hamilton at 366/524, and Jones much lower.  Hamilton's numbers give him a RC of 106.  His glove is good enough for center, so let's say he'd be 10 runs/1 win above average in left.  Subtract 2 wins for putting Braun at third, and we're down to 96.  That's considerably better than going with Counsell at third, by far the best option so far, but it's also probably the priciest (in talent, anyway--it would take AT LEAST Villanueva to pry away Hamilton). Jones is much more of a long-term project; I project him around 300/410, or about 4 wins worse with the bat than Hamilton. Andre Ethier is about half-way between them, so a probably upgrade, if a very modest one.

I'm sure there are other options out there, but none of them are going to be much different from one of the examples above.  For example, my projection for Rolen is very close to the numbers for Crede, and with his injury history, I don't figure he'll be much better with the glove.

The point of all this isn't to compare all these players, despite all the pixels I've spilled doing so.  I'm getting at a few things:


  • It's likely that Braun is better in left, even with some improvement at third, even with some adjustment to a new position.  I realize this isn't a consensus position, and I don't pretend that my numbers are accurate, but I do think that the difference is somewhere between 1 and 3 wins.

  • Craig Counsell's defense makes him a plausible starter.  In fact, he may be a better option that some of our supposed targets.

  • The gain in switching Braun to left means that any LF we acquire would have to be very, very good in order to make up for leaving Braun at third.  Such a player won't be available on the trade market for the likes of Chris Capuano, and the only free agent who fits the bill is probably Barry Bonds.

Moustache In Action

Here's the plan.  Sign or trade for a solid backup IF--a Counsell/Alex Cora clone who can play short.  Preferably someone righthanded to be a platoon partner of sorts with Counsell.  Let Counsell/new guy/Rottino battle it out in spring training for the 3B job, and tell Ryan Braun to start shagging flies.

Trade Capuano, Bush, or Vargas (or two of the above) for prospects, ideally a catcher, almost as ideally some more young pitching.  As I see it, the MLB roster is set; anything we do now would just up payroll and make very very minor improvements.  Better to shed some $$ by trading Capuano and keep a modest war chest for necessary in-season acquisitions.

Update [2007-12-10 14:15:50 by Jeff]: If you read this right after it was posted, you'll notice the RC numbers have changed. I was using the wrong formula for simple RC (it's simple, but apparently not simple enough), and some of the conclusions change a little bit too.

0 recs | Comment 55 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

great stuff
This is some great stuff here!!!  Don't forget that swhen we had Graffi and Counsell at 3B to start the year last year, we had the best record in baseball.  While it would be nice to get a 3B in the trade market, there aren't many options out there.  I would much rather trade for some solid prospects and replenish the farm system.  This is a great analysis, but I still expect Melvin to get some new blood in there somewhere.  We'll see though.

Come check out BrewersNation, the newest Brewers blog.  See the latest news in the minors and majors while discussing it with other Brewers fans!!!
http://sportsnationjb.blogspot.com

by jimmyb1799 on Dec 10, 2007 12:57 PM CST   0 recs

Ethier/Or
Feeling like offering Ethier as one of the options?  I'm curious to see how his projections fit into the mix.

Although it makes my brain go fuzzy, I think I get the math.  Still, it's hard to imagine Kendall and Counsell in the same lineup as a recipe for winning a division.  Even if they are salty veterans.

(I wonder: if we moved Braun to left, what numbers would our mystery 3B need to put up to equal last year's Braun/Menchkins combo?  Is Braun/Counsell better than Braun/Msnchkins?)

"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"

by roguejim on Dec 10, 2007 12:59 PM CST   0 recs

just added Ethier in there
him in left is probably a bit better than Counsell at third, but only a bit.  Definitely a better long-term option though.
Weird, but not weird.

by Jeff Sackmann on Dec 10, 2007 1:17 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Ok, this is a bit tricky
last year, we got ~110 RC from 3Bs (including Counsellino), say that we lost 30 defensive runs, for a net of 80.

in left, we got 86 offensive runs from Menchkins, figure Jenkins is great in left, so add 10 defensive runs, for a total of 96.

Total, then, is ~175.

The tricky part is projecting Braun.  I have him coming WAY back to earth, to .328/.501 instead of .370/.634.  Still good, but not great.  If he does that, and is one win below average in left, that's ~90 runs, or LESS than we got from Menchkins, if a little more at the plate.

For everything to be even, then, we'd need 85 runs, net, at third.  Crede is about that.

If you go with my 80% projection for Braun (342/538), he's at 110 offensive runs, 20 better than then median projection, for a net of 100 runs, meaning that Braun + Counsell just about replaces last year's production from those two positions.

Weird, but not weird.

by Jeff Sackmann on Dec 10, 2007 1:43 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Thanks
That seemed like a lot of work.

It's a neat little metric, and a useful one (I'd think) when putting a team together, even if there is a fair amount of guesswork involved.  

So Counsellino would be an 80 NRC (net runs created), where Crede is about 85.  I'd've guessed a bigger difference between the two (or three, I guess).  And Braun in left is projecting LESS than Menchkins, which also astounds me.  (Someday during the long offseason, you'll have to explain the big dropoff for Braun.  An estimated .829 OPS for 2008?)

If that dropoff actually occurs, that's a big deal.  Throw in the fact that you're semi-advocating starting Counsell, and our offense  could be hurting.

Are you in the camp where Braun should be moved to left regardless of LaPorta?  TheJay mentioned a while back that we should deal with that problem when/if it arises --- I don't know if I'm fully on board with that, but it might be the best approach.

"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"

by roguejim on Dec 10, 2007 2:25 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Braun vs. Menchkins
first, Menchkins was actually pretty good, especially factoring in defense.

but the big story is Braun's dropoff.  It might be that there's too much regression in my system, but keep in mind that any projection system is going to base a forecast on three years of data, and even a really strong performance in AAA isn't going to translate to MLB dominance.

also, Braun had an unsustainably high BABIP.  That doesn't account for all of the decline, but it does for some.  If I had to guess, I'd personally predict Braun will be closer to my 80% projection than my median, but most people would lose a lot of money betting against decent algorithms.

as for laporta, i'm torn.  I don't want to hamstring the 08 team because of a guy who may or may not be an impact player in a year or two ... but then again, moving Braun to left does have the potential of filling one gap and creating two.  (stopgap 3B, plus long-term 3B, instead of just long-term LF).  I suppose a really nice solution would be trading Sheets to the Dodgers for Andy LaRoche plus something, but as I've said elsewhere, I doubt Sheets will be traded, and for the wrong reasons.

Weird, but not weird.

by Jeff Sackmann on Dec 10, 2007 2:37 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

damnit.
i'm a total retard.  i used the wrong formula for RC ... multiplied by games instead of at-bats.  obviously very different.  am fixing now.
Weird, but not weird.

by Jeff Sackmann on Dec 10, 2007 1:09 PM CST   0 recs

as noted in the update
it is now fixed.
Weird, but not weird.

by Jeff Sackmann on Dec 10, 2007 1:43 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Just for the sake of discussion...
What would be the best solution using nothing but players we have on the roster? Moving Hall to 3b, Hart to CF, Braun to LF, and Gross / Dillon in RF?

by warwick5s on Dec 10, 2007 1:35 PM CST   0 recs

No Joe Crede
The Brewers need someone to play good defense and get on base if they decide to get a third baseman... in other words, not Joe Crede.  Crede, who does play good defense, just does not get on base.  His "breakout" year of 2006 produced a .323 OBP with 30 hrs and an OPS of 829.  A normal year from Crede is closer to .300 OBP and .750 OPS.  According to ESPN.com he's due to make almost $5 million in salary next year.  If the Brewers are going to go after a guy like this, I'd rather it was Pedro Feliz, who won't cost the Brewers anyone in a trade, puts up similarly bad OBP and OPS numbers, but is regarded as one of the best defensive thirdbasemen in the game and would probably cost less than $5 million a year as a free agent.

The real target, assuming that the Cards don't come back about Rolen, should be Tadahito Iguchi, who has averaged a .347 OBP and .768 OPS since coming to MLB from Japan.  I'd take a risk on Rolen staying healthy and wanting to get back at the Cards even for a package of Cappy and a minor leaguer not named LaPorta or Parra.

by Chris on Dec 10, 2007 1:58 PM CST   0 recs

hamilton
so, in that hamilton is by far the best option, and that we wouldn't take on any salary by acquiring him, would it be worth parting with Villy to get him?  i'm guessing the consensus amongst readers here is no, but i'm a bit torn.  
"Cover your flesh." - Bill Haverchuck

by baumann on Dec 10, 2007 2:24 PM CST   0 recs

i'm totally in favor
i just suspect that Villy isn't enough.  that's the tough thing about armchair GMing...it takes so much guesswork to put yourself in the place of the GM.
Weird, but not weird.

by Jeff Sackmann on Dec 10, 2007 2:33 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Villy + Mench? :)
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"

by roguejim on Dec 10, 2007 2:46 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Brandon Inge
Inge isn't a notable defender

Per the Fielding Bible, Inge is an exemplary defender, making 61 more plays than the average third basemen from 2005-2007 (second only to Pedro Feliz's +64).

UZR loves him too, as do Win Shares.

by Eric Simon on Dec 10, 2007 2:36 PM CST   0 recs

i stand corrected.
thanks!
Weird, but not weird.

by Jeff Sackmann on Dec 10, 2007 2:38 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Inge
Just informally, from the games I watched and info I heard, Inge and Crede are both near the top of MLB 3B for defense.  Inge might be an ideal fit for us, a righty bat with ++D and avg OBP.  But he might be hard to acquire.  The Tigers would likely put a premium on prospects and appear to have no need of our excess SPs.

by balldeagle on Dec 11, 2007 10:33 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

I doubt he'd be hard to acquire
He's superfluous now, and he's got a big contract, and the Tigers are overbudget.

Now, Inge might be hard to acquire in the sense that we'd have to eat that salary ...he's making $6.5MM or so for each of the next three years.  That's not exorbitant, and he might even be worth it, but we don't have that money free (AFAIK).

It's easy enough to come up with a scenario to free it up, though, starting by trading Capuano (probably the most expensive of our surplus starters) for prospects, basically dumping his salary from the 08 books.

Weird, but not weird.

by Jeff Sackmann on Dec 11, 2007 11:06 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

are we??????????????
Are we assuming Braun can play left? iT's not that easy. Will he get bored in left having been in infielder most of his career. just throwing him out in left field isn't the easy answer. It takes a different mentality to play the outfield versus playing the infield. For instance look at Bill Hall. I'm not a fan of making two changes to fix something. I'd prefer leave braun at third. Hopefully he can cut his fielding in half like Scott Rolen did from year one to two. Then fill in at left. Gwynn in left isn't all bad.
Tim Bring back the chalet,frank charles at the wurlitzer organ, bob betts at the mic, and the barrell man logo!!!!

by storminTAZZ on Dec 10, 2007 3:20 PM CST   0 recs

Braun v Early Rolen
I was reluctant about a Braun transition to LF, but then I remembered Carlos Lee not so gracefully playing LF for the Brewers.  Even though we have no data from which to infer, I cannot imagine Braun can play LF any worse.  

In addition, Jeff's 50% projection for Braun probably compares favorably to Lee's projected numbers.  Hence, even a Braun regressed to the mean posts satisfactory offensive numbers.

Analogizing Braun to Rolen could be difficult.  Without having access to some defensive zone metrics, we don't know what kind of 3B Rolen was early in his career.  For example, Zimmerman committed 22 errors last season. However, he posted the third best RZR of NL 3B (thanks to his 71 plays outside of zone).  Thus, Rolen could have committed many errors but still made a great deal of plays.

And by the way, hello Brewcrew Ball. I have been lurking daily, sometimes multiple times per day, since opening day last year.  I thought it was time to quit being creepy.  

by mschroeder on Dec 10, 2007 3:40 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

just compared
Braun made 26 errors his first year.

rolen made 24 the first year and 14 the second.

Tim Bring back the chalet,frank charles at the wurlitzer organ, bob betts at the mic, and the barrell man logo!!!!

by storminTAZZ on Dec 10, 2007 3:49 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Errors
Thanks Stormin.  I shouldn't have been too lazy to check myself.  Though that still doesn't answer the question of if Rolen committed a bunch of errors but made a lot of plays, similar to my Zimmerman example, or he committed a bunch of errors and didn't display good range, like Braun last year. Braun's RZR was atrocious (.564, which is really low compared to the last two years of fielding data for NL 3B RZR.)  I realize Braun's throwing errors kill his RZR because most of the 16 were probably on plays in zone.  However, Braun still committed around the median amount of fielding errors for qualifying NL 3B in about 80% of the median chances.  In addition, he made very few plays deemed outside of zone.  

I will be happy to have Braun wherever he plays. I am just wondering if a move to LF plays less with his focus on raking at the plate than another year butchering balls at 3B.  

by mschroeder on Dec 10, 2007 4:08 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

welcome aboard!
lurkers are always welcome, but contributors are even more welcome :).
Weird, but not weird.

by Jeff Sackmann on Dec 10, 2007 4:15 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

mschroeder...
You wouldn't happen to currently reside in San Diego, would you?
"Happy Hanukkah" from your friendly Brewers Third Basem...er Left Fie...er...

by MadJimiBrewha on Dec 11, 2007 12:51 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

I am checking for cameras...
How the hell do you know that? We must know each other.

by mschroeder on Dec 11, 2007 4:27 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Check behind the wallclock...
J/K...Just a guess that you might be the M. Schroeder that recently moved out there from Madison. This is Josh from the HPL. Sound like the right M. Schroeder?
"Happy Hanukkah" from your friendly Brewers Third Basem...er Left Fie...er...

by MadJimiBrewha on Dec 11, 2007 5:48 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Schneider Lab Josh?
Yes, you're correct.  How are the hairy little bastards? I miss science.  Law school will provide me the opportunities I want, but research and research people made for some good years.

I hope you're doing well. Finals must be fast approaching.  Good luck.

PS - As I told Angie over an on-line bout of scrabble. I hate Marquette. That loss stung.

by mschroeder on Dec 11, 2007 7:59 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

GO MARQUETTE!

by oaklandbrewerfan on Dec 12, 2007 4:34 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

HPL? Human Prairie League?
Didn't they sing that song, "Aimee?" Wow! Who'da thunk we'd get a celeb on the BCB? Kudos, guys!

by kgaul on Dec 11, 2007 10:40 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Zimmerman
Zimmerman was charged with 22 errors last season but he really only committed something like 15 or so.  Dimitri Young is so terrible at 1B that every off target throw went as an error.

The same can be said about Braun though, I'm sure throwing to Pujols (best defensive 1B in baseball) would have reduced those errors a good bit.

by Ender on Dec 10, 2007 5:20 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Braun's Errors
Could Braun not be compared to Aramis Ramirez?  He absolutely blew as a 3rd baseman, and in time he became an OK (not bad) fielder.  Most of Braun's errors came by easy throws that he would air-mail over to Fielder.  He is an athletic 3rd baseman, I feel that his error total will be much lower next year.  Will he ever be Brooks Robinson, NO, but I saw a improvement in Weeks last year and I think the same can be said of Braun.  

by kjbsam on Dec 10, 2007 3:50 PM CST   0 recs

Hamilton, Braun, Bill James 2008 Projections
Jeff,

I agree Hamilton would be ideal, especially if he stays healthy.  How about Villy + middle reliever.  The Reds have always seemed eager to stockpiling them.    

Real question: how do you feel about Bill James' projections?  It predicts Prince for a .388/.591/.979 line.  However, his system loves Braun: .383/.660/1.042.  Does his system weight AAA and MLB heavily into players with a season or so of data?  You brought up Braun's unsustainable BABIP, similar to Hardball Times' writers.  I agree it was high, but the bottom never fell out of it last season like Carty predicted.  

Why do you predict the drop? I believe Carty bases it off Braun's high K rate and low BB rate.  However, shouldn't Braun regress to the mean in his BB%.  He averaged around 10% through the minors but only 6% last season.  Such an increase could soften the drop.  Nonetheless, you might have an entirely different basis for projections. I was just shocked to see the Bill James predictions for Braun since nearly everything else I read predicts a large regression from Braun's MVP-like offensive numbers last season.

by mschroeder on Dec 10, 2007 3:56 PM CST   0 recs

I haven't looked closely at Bill's projections
I don't think they do too well compared to PECOTA and ZiPS, but I really don't know.

Those projections shock me ... to say that Braun will OUTperform last year's SLG ... that's just crazy.

My BABIP's are projected in large part on line drive percentage.  For the most part, players with high OBPs have high LDPs too.  Going from memory here, Braun is above average in LDP, but not THAT far above average.  His LDP has bounced around a lot in the minors, so I'm not terribly confident in ANY projection for Braun, mine or otherwise.

My guess is that Bill's system either doesn't use minor league data (which would be a surprise) or is largely based on comps, and Braun has some great comps, like Miguel Cabrera or something.  Maybe somebody else knows more about them than I do.

Weird, but not weird.

by Jeff Sackmann on Dec 10, 2007 4:19 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Pottying on LaPorta
Isn't this conversation assuming left field will not be occupied shortly?  I've read one article that said after AZ fall league he might be ready to add more bad defense to the team from the get go.

by willkoky on Dec 10, 2007 4:30 PM CST   0 recs

josh hamilton
Josh Hamilton would be great, but I don't like the idea of giving Villanueva to a division rival.  Hamilton is not quite proven yet, and everyone forgets that the Brewers were in first place with Counsell at 3B.  Why be in a rush to change things while giving up a young prospect like Villy?  I'd rather see what we can get for Capuano or Vargas.

by jimmyb1799 on Dec 10, 2007 8:16 PM CST   0 recs

Hamilton
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/rumors/post/Reds-may-still-snag-Bedard?urn=mlb,56981
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/rumors/post/Reds-interested-in-Bedard?urn=mlb,56316

I would like to get Hamilton as well but the Reds first priority seems to be getting Bedard.  Once that plays out then maybe they will be willing to talk about Hamilton (if he isn't part of the O's potential deal).

by molitorfan on Dec 10, 2007 8:52 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Thoughts:
I still prefer the Grillynn tandem in left. If they leave Braun @ third, I think he'll have similar improvement to Weeks' last year, and Weeks will continue to make strides.

by kgaul on Dec 10, 2007 9:46 PM CST   0 recs

torres!
Torres is not retiring.  This is great news for the Brewers.  My blog has all that new news for you :)

Seems like Blalock is next on Melvin's wishlist.  We heard this rumor earlier, but it did not seem likely.  Maybe its changed!!!

Come check out BrewersNation, a new Brewers blog that keeps you up to date on ALL Brewers news and rumors. http://sportsnationjb.blogspot.com/

by jimmyb1799 on Dec 10, 2007 9:49 PM CST   0 recs

Blalock
I kind of hope not since he hasn't been able to hit outside of Texas. That said, Doug Melvin was the Texas GM when Blalock was drafted and Tony Gwynn Jr.'s almost been traded to the Rangers a couple times so it's not like the teams have never talked to each other.
Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.

by TheJay on Dec 10, 2007 9:56 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Yeah I'm not high on
Blalock either. He put up a .790 ops on the road last year, but thats just above average for 3rd basemen. And it looks like hes a pretty average fielder, after taking a quick look at his fielding stats.

I think we should give Braun one more shot at 3rd base. If he's brutal again, then that's plenty of evidence he doesn't belong there.

That being said, a one year fill-in in left field would be perfect, and who better than Luke Scott? He's got a 125 career OPS+, has hit better on the road, bats left handed, and according to probabilistic model of range, he plays above average defense. The Brewers don't seem to be scared to trade within the division, and the Astros have outfielder overload with carlos lee, pence, and michael bourn. I have to believe the Astros would be willing to give him up.

by conan for president on Dec 10, 2007 10:52 PM CST   0 recs

indeed
Scott is being shopped.  at the same time, i think that we should look for a RH LF to platoon with Gross.  this might be a cheap solution.  Gross should be able to hit RHP pretty well, but i'm a bit worried about Dillon holding up his part of the platoon.  

still, luke scott is probably better that gross, and he wouldn't increase payroll any.  

"Cover your flesh." - Bill Haverchuck

by baumann on Dec 10, 2007 11:45 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

me either
I"m not that high on Blalock. I guess it would depend on what we have to give up. This third base thing is weird. you move Braun to left and hopefully it doesn't affect his hitting. Some want a third baseman who can field cleanly. Sounds like Rolen and Blalock make about the same amount of errors. Rolen is a better hitter which we really don't need. But would be nice if he could. I don't think a high OBP third baseman has been invented yet. Or do you go the way of good defensive with Counsell and forget about the hitting. Which we tried last year and that is the reason Braun was called up. it's kinda like the whole catching thing. Not many of them are good hitters and ya can't find a good hitting good defensive catcher very often. It's either good defensively and poor hitter or poor defensively good hitter. Like what we just picked up. i'm all for leaving braun where he is and just platooning in left, unless we can pry a young left fielder from the dodgers for a couple pitchers.
Tim Bring back the chalet,frank charles at the wurlitzer organ, bob betts at the mic, and the barrell man logo!!!!

by storminTAZZ on Dec 11, 2007 9:53 AM CST   0 recs

3b
i'm still worried that the $10 million ($10 million!) paid to gagne is going to prohibit the crew from getting a quality 3rd baseman. i guess it depends how bad the cards want to get rid of rolen and how much salary they want to eat. but to me it's seeming more and more likely the brewers are looking at a platoon at either 3rd base or left, involving multiple players that are mediocre at best.

i'm sick of platoons. get a guy that can hit righties and lefties and put him in there.

YoGanna win with Gallardo on the mound.

by Griswald on Dec 11, 2007 10:42 AM CST   0 recs

That got me thinking
Is it common to platoon infielders?  For whatever reason, when I think platoon, I think outfield.

Maybe it's just a result of the Menchkins overdose.

"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"

by roguejim on Dec 11, 2007 11:03 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

I don't know
But it's interesting to note that we had a platoon in the outfield and the infield this past season, at least to start: Menchkins and Counsellino.

Personally, platoons make me think outfield, too, just because it seems teams are more willing to deal with guys that can't hit well in the infield.

Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.

by TheJay on Dec 11, 2007 11:06 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

i just dont like the platoons...
cause it gives ned too many options to play "the hot hand" as we saw many times last year...
Jamie is a Softball Champion!

by Jamie in LA on Dec 11, 2007 12:14 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

I got a little lawyer for ya
Counsellino!

But yeah, I think it's generally common to platoon at offensive positions, so there are sometimes platoons at first, but very rarely at shortstop.

Weird, but not weird.

by Jeff Sackmann on Dec 11, 2007 11:07 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Damn Jim
you don't remember Councilino at the begining of the year?  I'm not sure if its common, but it definately happens.
Ryan Braun is the Ed Hochuli of Third Basemen. Prince is now Chubber Lang

by hyattff2003 on Dec 11, 2007 11:11 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Yes, fine
Though I never really considered the Little Lawyer as anything more than "well, who else are we going to put there"?  Menchkins was a lot easier to swallow as a Plan (capital P) than Counsellino.
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"

by roguejim on Dec 11, 2007 11:19 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Forgetting Counsellino is Understandable
But how could you forget, that legendary 3B platoon of Garth Iorg and Rance Mulliniks?  What did they call that one?  Morginiks?
Don't try to do too much with it. Just take the ball the other way.

by shooty babitt on Dec 11, 2007 11:44 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

me too
pay them, i say.

if they can bring in scott rolen, arguably the best 3b defender, i say pay him.

if it cost a pitcher (cappy/vargas/bush) and a prospecty player (gwynn/irribarren/escobar/nelson), i'd do it.

the cardinals are a smart team and know the value of defense, rolen is worth his contract and they are right to not want to send money. If they get a year or two from a #4/#5 type SP, one of those fringy MLs i listed above that's a good deal straight up for both sides.

another team that values defense correctly is going to swoop in and take rolen, i think, and after being opposed initially, i'm looking forward to this deal.

maybe it is because i'm used to melvin picking up guys coming off injury years... but i think it's the potential to pick up... what 4, or 5 games on defense alone? awesome upgrade... that upgrade alone is worth 20 million dollars a season.

if they move two of the three pitchers that frees up 2/3rds of rolen's salary...

i'm really not liking this gagne signing. he has to pitch a flawless 65-75 innings to be worth the upgrade from wise or mcclung...

Bring Back The Old Logo!

by jacob on Dec 11, 2007 11:33 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

If we do decide
to move braun to left, it would be nice to find a long-term solution at third base, since it appears we don't really have any future ML 3rd basemen in the minors (except for maybe taylor green). So i believe edwin encarnacion would be a great choice. he's young, a decent fielder, and a good hitter. Despite the fact that he's listed as #1 on the depth chart, the Reds don't seem to value him that much.

If we decide to go with a short-term fill in, I think there are options better than craig counsell, joe crede, or scott rolen. Morgan Ensberg would do the trick. he's got power and patience. Maicer Izturis is another option, similar to counsell except a better hitter. Jeff Keppinger has never seen much time, but he has a nice minor league track record and appears to be a good fielder. All of these guys have very cheap contracts.

As far as tradeability, you'd have to think that one of Keppinger or Encarnacion would be available. Ensberg is blocked by Kouzmanoff and maybe even Headley. And Izturis is still listed as the #2 shortstop at espn.com (not sure how reliable that is), even with Cabrera getting traded.

I'd just hate to risk throwing Crede or Rolen out there with their injury history, and I'd really hate to see a .600 ops by Counsell at third base.  

Lastly, I'm guessing we don't have anymore money to spend this winter, so if we want to make something happen, it will be by trading for a cheap 3rd base option.

by conan for president on Dec 11, 2007 11:20 AM CST   0 recs

Gamel
Gamel would be our next third baseman of the future, and he too --- like Braun and Hart before him --- can't field.

It seems we have a flaw in our minor league system when it comes to teaching defense.

"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"

by roguejim on Dec 11, 2007 11:43 AM CST to parent up   0 recs

Or the team is focused on offense
Everyone likes a gaudy .900+ OPS but many of those guys aren't great with the glove from the get-go...
Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.

by TheJay on Dec 11, 2007 12:05 PM CST to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Brew Crew Ball is made with whole grains and contains bits of real grit. It's the perfect dessert for a playoff berth that's been in the crock pot for 26 years. Guaranteed to enhance your sarcasm and sense of irony!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

61427post_foto_small
Rumorville: The Other Cordero
61427post_foto_small
Rumorville: Trevor Hoffman
61427post_foto_small
Rumorville: Mark Mulder
61427post_foto_small
Exiting Rumorville: Braden Looper
Prince-fielder-r_small
Hyatt's Fantasy Baseball Preview: OF
Prince-fielder-r_small
Hyatt's Fantasy Baseball Guide: SS
Prince-fielder-r_small
Hyatt's Fantasy Baseball Guide: 3B
Prince-fielder-r_small
Hyatt's Fantasy Baseball Guide: 2B
Prince-fielder-r_small
Hyatt's Fantasy Baseball Guide: 1B
Prince-fielder-r_small
Hyatt's Fantasy Baseball Guide: Catchers

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

Featured Poll

Poll
Now that the pitching market is starting to dwindle, has your opinion changed on Ben Sheets?

  287 votes |