St. Louis makes their big move
It's Jim Edmonds to the Padres for a prospect. The Cards get some salary relief (though I gather they are sending some money to SD), and a big hole in center field.
The Cards do have a solid CF prospect in Colby Rasmus, but he hasn't played above Double-A, so it's hard to imagine he'll make much of an impact before 2009. That means there's got to be another move coming. I would be surprised if the Cards got in on Mike Cameron...that wouldn't be much of an improvement, and it would likely mean multiple years, blocking Rasmus. Maybe Kenny Lofton as a rental? Corey Patterson?
Unless the Reds pull off something big, this is increasingly looking like another year of Cubs-Brewers, and not much else. The Astros might have made themselves worse even in the short term by acquiring Tejada, and while Edmonds isn't the player he once was, he's probably better in '08 than whoever replaces him. Prepare yourselves, folks: it'll be another year of the word "weak" attaching itself to "NL Central."
0 recs |
20
comments
Comments
Tweedle dee dee
Is it wrong to hope the Brewers win the division with 80 wins just so the media gets all crazy about them being in the playoffs? That or the Cubs implode and the Brewers get 100 wins playing against weak competition and the media stumbles over themselves in a rush to say how meaningless those 100 wins are.
by TheJay on Dec 14, 2007 11:55 PM CST 0 recs
Non-tendered, waived
Anyway, they picked up a guy in the Rule 5 draft, too.
by TheJay on
Dec 14, 2007 11:57 PM CST
up
0 recs
I'm thinking the Reds are neck and neck with us
by MunichBrats on Dec 15, 2007 1:37 AM CST 0 recs
The Reds?
(They're still in the running for Bedard, I guess, though that's far from a lock. It sounds like the Cards and Mariners are also in on that action. Even if the Reds get him, they'll have to give up some pretty good prospects to do so. Come 2009 or 2010, they may find that such a deal would have them hoisted by their own Bedard.)
In fact, given that they're being coached by Dusty Baker, I would say their starting pitching is about to get much, much worse.
Also, last year they finished 18 games under .500.
I guess it's had to say which teams will be good, bad, etc., especially this early in the offseason. But the Reds don't really scare me that much yet.
by roguejim on
Dec 15, 2007 6:43 AM CST
up
0 recs
Dusty is no help
by 80badger on
Dec 15, 2007 12:48 PM CST
up
0 recs
Dusty has an overall good winning percentage
by MunichBrats on
Dec 15, 2007 5:07 PM CST
up
0 recs
I wouldn't worry
For me, it's enough to say that the Reds need to make up 11 games just to be even with the Crew's record last year. That's HUGE, and they aren't making the moves/adding the prospects to do that. And that's even assuming the Crew won't win more than 83 games, and I'm optimistic that they will.
by Jeff Sackmann on
Dec 15, 2007 7:31 PM CST
up
0 recs
pretty much sums up everything i was going to say
by SunglassesAtNight on Dec 15, 2007 11:31 AM CST 0 recs
What's weird
Blowing a big wad on Cordero while (so far) not addressing their starting pitching doesn't make much sense to me. I believe as far as available payroll goes, the Reds are more like us than the Yankees and Cubs of the world.
Although $10 mil for Gagne was a lot, it addressed a need. The CoCo signing isn't addressing a need per se. (Granted, they can move Weathers to the 8th inning --- it's not a totally useless signing.) Still, unless they pull off a trade, like for Bedard, I'm not sure they'll be able to improve their pitching that much.
Unless they want Sheets... :O
by roguejim on
Dec 15, 2007 4:10 PM CST
up
0 recs
They must have a lot of stock in Bailey and Cueto
by MunichBrats on
Dec 15, 2007 5:03 PM CST
up
0 recs
They do.
by Braunstalker on
Dec 17, 2007 12:13 PM CST
up
0 recs
yeah...
the cardinals are going to go through a hardcore rebuilding year next year. they still have Pujols though, and he's a beast.
the reds are getting better...but not THAT much better. if they acquire bedard, however, we'll be talking about something different. harang-bedard would be absolutely NASTY!
by jimmyb1799 on Dec 15, 2007 3:59 PM CST 0 recs
Tejada
That would have been a terrible idea. The Astros had to give up FIVE high-quality prospects to get him. The Brewers should not do that...ever.
by jimmyb1799 on Dec 15, 2007 6:12 PM CST 0 recs
Miguel
I don't see five starters even listed on this teams depth chart.... The Astros might want to conisder luring Nolan Ryan out of retirement to pitch...if hes unavailable, I pitched a little bit in junior college, even touched 88 once. Think I could get a spring training invite...?
by ChicagoFever08 on Dec 15, 2007 8:55 PM CST 0 recs
If you're a lefty and have a pulse
by TheJay on
Dec 15, 2007 10:15 PM CST
up
0 recs
Using their current strategy
by stevie ray Braun on
Dec 16, 2007 1:17 AM CST
up
0 recs
No
by kingcharlesxii on
Dec 17, 2007 10:46 AM CST
up
0 recs
Are we getting too cocky?
by TrueBlueBrewCrew on Dec 17, 2007 1:16 PM CST 0 recs
Big Hole in CF?
by scoutingbook on Dec 19, 2007 1:39 AM CST 0 recs
















