Iguchi to Milwaukee, Braun to LF?
Rotoworld says:
Agent Rocky Hall said he's expecting the Brewers to extend a two-year offer to Tadahito Iguchi.
Iguchi would likely take over as the Brewers' third baseman, with Ryan Braun getting shifted to left. That's not the kind of upgrade the Brewers first seemed to be shooting for when they entertained the idea of moving Braun, but it might work out OK.
Source: Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel
0 recs |
30 comments
Comments
I actually like this (sort of)
2 Years/$3.25 million? I'll take it!
by stevie ray Braun on Dec 5, 2007 3:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Salary
by TheJay on Dec 5, 2007 3:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
According to B-R
I love this signing.
by hyattff2003 on Dec 5, 2007 3:31 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
can't billy hall play 3b...
by Jamie in LA on Dec 5, 2007 3:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
They don't want to move Hall again
by TheJay on Dec 5, 2007 3:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
Why get him if we have to trade him?
by MunichBrats on Dec 5, 2007 3:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i don't get it either
Move Billy to 3rd, Braun to left, sign a serviceable LF or CF or, worst case scenerio, give TGJ a shot. it seems so obvious.
I'm sorry if Bill has to change positions again, but guess what. I don't care. He's a man, he can handle it.
by SunglassesAtNight on Dec 5, 2007 5:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ya
melvin should just stop all this nonsense and dig out bill's old third baseman's glove.
no rolen; no iguchi.
ps: corey hart is the man; and no one should be playing center field but him.
by Jamie in LA on Dec 5, 2007 7:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Draft picks
by TheJay on Dec 5, 2007 3:46 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
A guy who has never played 3B before
Not too hot on this idea right now...
by MunichBrats on Dec 5, 2007 3:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
IF he's offered arb.
(At least I hope so, if we give up our 1st rounder for Iguchi I'm going to become a full-time Rays fan.)
by Jeff Sackmann on Dec 5, 2007 6:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gah! I always forget that!
"The Phillies released Iguchi in accordance with a clause in his contract that allowed him to bypass arbitration and become a free agent after his third season in the majors."
So we don't lose a draft pick if we sign him. <sheepish>
by TheJay on Dec 5, 2007 6:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The weird thing about that...
That invokes another rule, that if you release a player in the offseason, he can't rejoin your team until May 1st. In other words, his deal made it really hard for him to stay with his initial team. Didn't end up mattering re: ChiSox, since they traded him, but it's a little odd.
by Jeff Sackmann on Dec 5, 2007 7:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Iggy's stats
by roguejim on Dec 5, 2007 3:49 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Enh
by TheJay on Dec 5, 2007 3:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Apparently
Umm, I guess you don't, umm, hear about that much, anymore.
Anyway, I guess I wouldn't assume he's a plus at third base.
by roguejim on Dec 5, 2007 4:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't either
I guess my original point was that he doesn't have to hit particularly well if his defense makes up for it. Just like Braun's bad defense cost the team some runs in spite of his offense, a good glove can save the team some runs. Iguchi may be below average offensively for a third baseman, but we have decent enough producers at other spots to absorb the hit. In a perfect world, every spot would have guys that were above average with the glove and with the bat, but there's not that many plus-plus guys and you need to make a trade-off in some spots.
by TheJay on Dec 5, 2007 6:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Defensive upgrade is questionable
http://www.japanesebaseball.com/players/player.jsp?PlayerID=970
There's his Japanese fielding stats. I know he only played 2nd in the US.
He could be great there, he could be terrible. Tough to say yet.
by kingcharlesxii on Dec 5, 2007 4:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
he's exactly average
iguchi would essentially replace graffy. (have we heard anything about graffy?)
by jacob on Dec 5, 2007 4:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Last I heard
by roguejim on Dec 5, 2007 4:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We could always Counsellino it at third again...
I doubt someone is going to trade for Hall as a CF, they'll use him at SS or third. So why not give Hall a shot at third ourselves? I can't see him sticking around long term as the CF.
Corey Hart makes the most sense as the CF, Braun in LF, Gross / Whomever in RF, Hall at third. Improves the team without signing a single person. :-/
by warwick5s on Dec 5, 2007 7:59 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Iguchi a last resort
http://blogs.jsonline.com/brewers/archive/2007/12/05/melvin-tempers-enthusiasm-over-iguchi.aspx
I still kind of like Iguchi, but I'm glade Melvin has enough sense to exhaust more established 3B possibilities first.
by stevie ray Braun on Dec 5, 2007 8:04 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
"Glade":
by stevie ray Braun on Dec 5, 2007 8:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
gah
"We prefer to find a true third baseman, if we could. If we don't, we may go back his way. I think we've got to exhaust our other efforts first.
Looks like I'm wrong. I've been wrong before... can't remember when but I'm sure it's happened.
However, let's salvage this. My new theory on Melvin, which shouldn't surprise anyone given what we've seen over the years, is he is simply using the media to drive prices down. Right? So what have we heard... crede, iguchi, rolen, braun's moving to left... even braun said, i'd move to the OF to help the team... it's all too upfront. So let's assume that all of those messages have an alterior motive.
What would that be in this case?
The only thing I can come up with is this-- Melvin: "We don't need your LF, we can find a 3b and move braun..." This way, if it looks like there are lots of options at 3b, then whoever is dangling a LF has to compete not only against other LFs (not too many) but the whole 3b crop to make a deal with Melvin.
The weird thing in all of this is LaPorta. If he's on the braun track he's due here in about a season and a third.
I don't know... If i had to guess... something big is going to happen. something that brings in a Haren or other young cost controlled front of the rotation starter and creates holes other places.
Personally, fielder-weeks-hardy-braun across the infield and hart-hall-LF in the OF is so aesthetically pleasing I don't want to see that EVER change... I'm nervous.
by jacob on Dec 6, 2007 9:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
oops
Which is almost two conflicting statements... we need a 3b bad enough to look at iguchi, but we'd only take a 3b if we truly want to move braun...
Also, from Melvin's perspective. If he doesn't move braun, and he throws up a huge stinker in '08... well those are the kinds of things that GMs lose their job over. "you knew he was terrible, how could you sit threw a whole season of historically bad defense at third?"
of course he stuck with weeks which is almost an identical situation... weeks coulda been moved to center and hall to 2b...
by jacob on Dec 6, 2007 9:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
WAIT
=/
by CATALYST on Dec 5, 2007 8:08 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Well
by TheJay on Dec 5, 2007 10:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
IMHO
I applaud Melvin for "thinking outside the box" a bit, but I'm really leery of moving Braun to LF without knowing how he'd do and without giving him another opportunity to prove he can be our 3B. If (and of course it's a big if) he can be even average at 3B, we would be lightyears ahead of most teams in that position. Really, how many great offense 3Bs are there? Even in the Hall of Fame?
Moreover, I don't think that Melvin would be canned if Braun's defense only marginally improves. Yes, we knew about his defensive problems, but he also seems determined to prove the naysayers wrong. Maybe it's the small-market, longterm-thinking mentality, but I, for one, am willing to endure another year of defensive problems to see if Braun can prove himself at the position.
by oaklandbrewerfan on Dec 6, 2007 12:11 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Leave Braun at third --- if his 2008 defense is so abysmally horrible, then fine, we can move him next year. And I don't think Moustache would be canned either, not given Braun's inexperience at third. (Canned Moustache? Gross.)
We do need pitching help, though, and I don't know if that can be fixed from within. We have a lot of pitchers, but how many of them are any good?
I'm all for trading Sheets this offseason. There's no way we're going to have him in 2009 anyway, not with the salary he'd command as a free agent. It sounds like the Dodgers are interested and have outfielders to spare, thanks to the Andruw Jones signing. (If we can keep from losing the Crabbe man and Hall in the same week, though, that would be nice.)
by roguejim on Dec 6, 2007 12:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
























