Community Prospect Rankings: Voting for #2
by Kyle Lobner on Dec 18, 2008 12:13 PM CST
Email
PrintSo the polls have closed, and Alcides Escobar edged out Mat Gamel by 27 votes for the #1 spot. Here are the nominees for #2:
Mat Gamel, 3B
Rankings:
Brewerfan.net Power 50: 1
John Sickels: 1
Baseball Prospectus: 3
Age: 23
Seasons in minors: 4
Top level reached in 2008: Major Leagues
2008 Statistics:
Milwaukee (NL): 2 AB, .500/.500/1.000
Nashville (AAA): 21 AB, .238/.305/.381
Huntsville (AA): 508 AB, .329/.395/.537
Jeremy Jeffress, RHP
Rankings:
Brewerfan.net Power 50: 3
John Sickels: 4
Baseball Prospectus: 4
Age: 21
Seasons in minors: 3
Top level reached in 2008: AA
2008 Statistics:
Huntsville (AA): 14.2 IP, 5.52 ERA, 1.91 WHIP
Brevard County (A+): 79.1 IP, 4.08 ERA, 1.34 WHIP
Brett Lawrie, C
Rankings:
Brewerfan.net Power 50: 6
John Sickels: 3
Baseball Prospectus: 2
Age: 18
Seasons in minors: 0
Top level reached in 2008: Canadian Olympic Team
Did not appear in the minors in 2008
Jonathan Lucroy, C
Rankings:
Brewerfan.net Power 50: 7
John Sickels: 5
Baseball Prospectus: 8
Age: 22
Seasons in minors: 2
Top level reached in 2008: A+
2008 Statistics:
Brevard County (A+): 236 AB, .292/.364/.479
West Virginia (A): 239 AB, .310/.391/.510
Angel Salome, C
Rankings:
Brewerfan.net Power 50: 4
John Sickels: 6
Baseball Prospectus: 5
Age: 22
Seasons in minors: 5
Top level reached in 2008: Major Leagues
2008 Statistics:
Milwaukee (NL): 3 AB, .000/.000/.000
Huntsville (AA): 367 AB, .360/.415/.559
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Gamel in a landslide
Which is why I voted Jeffress ;)
Should go to prospect #3. Curious to see where the 3 catchers go in the end of this.
That is why I was going to vote for Lucroy – but didn’t want to skew the results
by Saberilliterate on Dec 18, 2008 1:43 PM CST up reply actions
I agree
I was just trying to figure out how the hell I’m going to decide which catcher goes where.
by MadJimiBrewha on Dec 18, 2008 4:26 PM CST up reply actions
KL, just curious how you are going to deal with the wide range of possible candidates once we get past prospects 3 or 4. I’m guessing that is when the voting will get interesting and a lot more diverse with some people getting votes that might not typically be considered.
I haven't decided yet.
Once we get outside the top 5, I may consider expanding the field to 10 candidates.
I don't specifically articulate my motives, because that wouldn't travel as well as a boo does.
I think that would be a good idea.
You could also include an “other” spot, in which the person could name their choice in the comments, though that might mean an extra amount of work, so I don’t know if you would want to do that.
Eric Gagne DL time: May 23-June 29 Brewers record in that span: 20-9
The extra work isn't what I'm worried about
It’s the unlikelihood of creating a viable candidate that way. Yesterday we had about 50 active commenters, but about 300 people voted for #1. A fair number of our readers (and voters) don’t have a login and couldn’t comment anyway.
I don't specifically articulate my motives, because that wouldn't travel as well as a boo does.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recent FanPosts
NL Central Standings
| W | L | PCT | GB | STRK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chicago
|
0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | Lost 0 |
|
Cincinnati
|
0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | Lost 0 |
|
Houston
|
0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | Lost 0 |
|
Milwaukee
|
0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | Lost 0 |
|
Pittsburgh
|
0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | Lost 0 |
|
St. Louis
|
0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | Lost 0 |
(updated 2.15.2012 at 7:03 AM CST)
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
