The Third Base Conundrum
Last night, Craig Counsell started at third against a right-handed pitcher, and according to Yost, we can expect more of the same.
"I'm going to have to do it a little more until some of these numbers come up for Billy," Yost said. "His left-handed numbers are as good as you can dream of ... but his right-handed numbers are about as low as they go."
It should be no surprise that Hall is struggling against righties; he's always had a pronounced platoon split. Taking his career numbers, he's 276/358/498 against lefties and 254/303/451 versus righties. That makes a lot of sense to me -- the biggest difference is in OBP, reflecting the truly awful pitch selection against RHP, when he can't see the ball as well.
Given the roster right now, a platoon for Billy means more playing time for Counsell. The problem is, Counsell's not a very good hitter against pitchers with either hand. He does have better career numbers vRHP--a ~700 OPS instead of a ~650 OPS. Compare that to Billy's career ~750 OPS vRHP, or even his 713 OPS vRHP in his disappointing 2007 season.
Ultimately, difference like this don't really matter, except that I often eat dinner during games, and I'd prefer not to see Counsell at the plate when I'm trying to digest.
The x-factor here, of course, is Russell Branyan. Branyan is a lefty, and his career numbers against RHP are 231/332/479 -- an OPS more than 100 points higher than Counsell's. We lose some with the glove, to be sure, but I suspect that 100 points of OPS is worth it. Plus, we gain a fearsome late-inning option against RHP on days he doesn't start--that's something we don't currently have, unless you're trying to digest, anyway.
Branyan's minor league numbers should be taken with a grain of salt, since he is the kind of guy who seems to drop off quite a bit between AAA and the majors. But if we take a look at his splits (as of this writing, they are updated through Tuesday), we see something that screams promotion. Not only is he OPSing over 1.100, his line against righties is a belief-defying 398/500/776.
Plug those numbers into my nifty new Minor League Equivalency calculator, and find that his equivalent line in Milwaukee would be 341/425/627. Hell, if he were putting up his current numbers in Double-A, he'd still have an equivalent line 329/413/609.
In general, I love platoons--they are a great way to get solid production out of less-than-solid players, as we did with Menchkins last year. But a platoon requires more than just a lefty and a righty; put another way, a platoon requires more than Craig Counsell.
We can make the roster space: Dillon has averaged less than an at-bat per day for the last two weeks, and there's nothing Gwynn can do that Kapler can't (except for pinch-running, and Ned doesn't use him that way).
Ned is being perfectly reasonable in taking playing time away from Bill Hall. But it's far from clear whether giving that playing time to Craig Counsell is the best decision.
0 recs |
17
comments
Read Related
Comments
far from clear
But it’s far from clear whether giving that playing time to Craig Counsell is the best decision.
it’s crystal clear it isn’t the right decision. branyan should replace dillon.
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on May 22, 2008 12:44 PM CDT 0 recs
remember
I’ve got to weigh my words if I’m going to keep my insider status :).
Also, cheese.
by Jeff Sackmann on
May 22, 2008 1:14 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Branyan's the only option?
I thought it would be a hoot to watch some of his games with the padres (was it last year?) and all it did was remind me how bad he looks the 90%* of the time he doesn’t run into a ball and launch it into orbit.
*Stats courtesy of the girl at Starbucks
by Marty McSuperFly on
May 22, 2008 2:13 PM CDT
up
0 recs
That's a terrible made-up stat
Adjust that up to 98%. If he hit a home run once in every 10 plate appearances, I’d be good with that.
by Marty McSuperFly on
May 22, 2008 2:21 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I hate to say this,
but Bill Hall has become my least favorite Brewer. Watching a Bill Hall AB is my least favorite activity on Earth right now.
Branyan please…....don’t care who you have to move to make it happen.
We don't need dolls, we need hits! ---Ozzie Guillen
by Adam P on May 22, 2008 1:09 PM CDT 0 recs
quick question
Plug those numbers into my nifty new Minor League Equivalency calculator, and find that his equivalent line in Milwaukee would be 341/425/627. Hell, if he were putting up his current numbers in Double-A, he’d still have an equivalent line 329/413/609.
Is that because the PCL is such a hitter’s league compared to whatever you used for the AA numbers (the Southern League, I presume), or is there really that little of a difference between AAA and AA in general as far as MLEs go?
by Zeyes on May 22, 2008 2:05 PM CDT 0 recs
hrmph
That was supposed to be a coloured quote block, but it only worked in the preview…
by Zeyes on
May 22, 2008 2:06 PM CDT
up
0 recs
some of both
also, the difference is probably less for walk-heavy guys, since walks change less than hits (i think).
the cool thing about my calculator is that you can tinker with all of stuff very easily once you’ve entered a player’s stat line. so you can see for yourself how the numbers change PCL vs. IL, or even from park to park.
Also, cheese.
by Jeff Sackmann on
May 22, 2008 2:14 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Billy's Turned Turnbow-esque
Hall has some serious rethink to do with a baseball bat in his hands. I’m still a fan, but platooning is the only option now. Actually, it was the only option two or three weeks ago, but hey, that wasn’t going to happen with Yost making the decisions.
PLATOON YOST!!
by heybatterbatter on May 22, 2008 2:07 PM CDT 0 recs
Really Branyan
Is your calculator broken? His past major league experience should be enough to see that his minor league numbers are a mirage. If he was a prospect I could see everyone being so crazy about him but we already had him. If he is our savior the season is truly lost.
by Junked on May 22, 2008 2:22 PM CDT 0 recs
if you're going to criticize
and least do me the favor of reading the whole article. I said:
Branyan’s minor league numbers should be taken with a grain of salt, since he is the kind of guy who seems to drop off quite a bit between AAA and the majors.
nobody (at least not me) is saying that Branyan is the “savior.” but whether you take his MLB numbers vRHP or look at the tear he’s on right now, he’s better than Counsell, which is what I’m talking about.
Also, cheese.
by Jeff Sackmann on
May 22, 2008 2:31 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I remember Russell Branyan.
His nightmares in the batter’s box are reminiscent of …. Bill Hall’s! Eventually, even stats take on a weird other-worldliness. I wouldn’t wish Branyan on the Cubs!! Stats are history revealed. Branyan is just history.
The Branyan gambit proposal makes me feel better about Counsel at third, ironically. I prefer the mediocrity I know over a previously-known and discarded mediocrity.
by heybatterbatter on
May 22, 2008 2:43 PM CDT
up
0 recs
is the scott rolen trade still gonna happen???
go get em' seth!
by Jamie in LA on May 22, 2008 3:12 PM CDT 1 recs
I haven't
by sheeter on
May 22, 2008 5:07 PM CDT
up
0 recs
easy solution, really
I say we convert one of our OF’ers. lets give this braun guy a shot
"You guys know me. I take a long time to analyze things."
- Ned Yost
by SunglassesAtNight on May 22, 2008 5:31 PM CDT 0 recs
I did read the entire article
A grain of salt. You have him hitting .341. That is the entire shaker plus a packet or two of Mrs. Dash. I wasn’t saying you think he would be the savior only that this line of thought is on every Brewer blog out there. I don’t even think he is on the 40 man roster which might also be why he isn’t moving.
by Junked on May 22, 2008 6:07 PM CDT 0 recs





















