Rob "R.J." Swindle's Debut
Doug Melvin burglarized the other 29 major league teams by signing Rob "R.J." Swindle to a minimum major league deal this off-season, and he made his season debut with the Brewers last night after an impressive week in AAA. He walked his first batter, former teammate Chase Utley, but then settled down and pitched 1 1/3 effective innings.
Jeff looked at Swindle's minor league numbers last week, but now we have some data from his outing to look at. 21 of Swindle's 31 pitches were strikes. He induced two swinging strikes, on the strikeouts to Howard and Coste, the first on an 81 mph fastball and the second on a 73 mph change-up. Swindle's top fastball was 82.7.
Then there is the pitch that Gameday calls "Unknown". It is Swindle's fabled curveball. I expected that the 55 mph figure we heard for the pitch was an exaggeration, especially after Bill Schroeder talked about it being in the mid-60s on last night's broadcast. Though they were not picked up by the radar gun for FSN, these three slow curves were thrown at 53.5, 54, and 54.5 mph. One was a called strike, one fouled, and one called a ball. Each crossed the plate at about 50 mph.
Swindle seems to have broken Gameday's pitch identification algorithm, but I can pick out what most of these pitches are. The ones I think are fastballs move much like two-seam fastballs would, breaking in towards lefty batters and away from righties, though not necessarily down-- they move on a pretty flat plane, which is to be expected from a side-armer like Swindle. They averaged about 81 mph.
The curveballs have some ridiculous movement; they are breaking 10-12 inches away from lefties and rising about 3 inches. Most breaking balls move far less horizontally and vertically (pitches usually "rise" by the pitch fx measurements).
I am pretty confident in saying he was throwing a 2-seam style fastball, a change, the slow curve, and one other pitch-- probably a moderately breaking slider or cutter, which is a tough pitch to identify-- even Randy Johnson's slider has about 0 inches of horizontal break (remember that it is more of a unit for measurement than a measure of the distance the pitch broke, a looping pitch that starts and ends at a point on a line would have 0 inches of break). It should be an effective pitch when mixed with the opposite-breaking fastball.
In any case, after the initial walk and wild pitch, Swindle settled down and pitched well. Most of his pitches are also on the same horizontal plane, so a hitter has to decide if the pitch is coming towards him or moving away from him without the clue of it breaking up or down as well-- and that is without considering the potential embarassment of being fooled by the curve. His stuff looks like it will give lefties a very tough time and he might be effective in mop-up situations against righites as well. If the decision next weekend is between dropping Julio or Swindle from the 25-man, I would keep Swindle. Having nasty stuff does not necesarilly mean that the pitcher throws hard.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Gameday is fixing RJ
I got a note from them this morning, they got hosed by his curveball. They had assumed anything under 55mph is a mistake.
Swindled
I loved the look on Ryan Howard’s face when RJ threw that slurvegyro ball. That deer in the headlights look alone makes him more valuable than Hoolio. As teammates, Howard has seen RJ pitch and still couldn’t do anything about it. I’m looking forward to unleashing RJ on unsuspecting hitters.
General Pitch F/X Question
You always hear that certain stadiums and TV use radar guns that are a little bit generous. Does Pitch F/X use the same guns, or are they more accurate?
doesn't use "guns"
it’s based on cameras mounted around the park.
This is all second-hand, since I haven’t done any pfx work myself, but the main issue is that the cameras aren’t all mounted in the exact same places at the exact same angles. So part of what made Josh’s (dixieflatline’s) work so valuable is that he did the math to adjust for the quirks in each park’s camera setup. I think that had more of an effect on judging movement than on speed, but I could be wrong.
Also, cheese.
by Jeff Sackmann on Apr 22, 2009 9:15 PM CDT up reply actions
So we could figure out which team hired him
By working out which stadium’s cameras moved around mysteriously this offseason? :)
Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.
I didn't mention it because it I don't think Dave Cameron was supposed to let it out at that point, but
http://www.draysbay.com/2009/4/3/821894/saber-buys-in-mlb-organizations
Scored three times and detonated an indisputable in four visits to the batting box.
Circus Act
Yeah it was an ugly game last night, but I just do not get this fascination the Brewers have with these side arming, “no stuff” lefties.
True, he got some people out, but its just so ugly watching him throw. But his overall day was not very good at all.
There is a reason guys like this come so freely (see also Mike DeFelice and Casey McGehee). He was hit hard, he didnt have very good control, and all of his inherited runners scored. ’Wright, or even Narveson is a better option.
He walked 1 batter
1 pitch got away from him. Had he come in with 1 runner on, it would have been seen as a successful outing. Who cares how ugly it is to watch him throw? I think Jeff and Jordan have done very good work in the last week to remove the “no stuff” tag. Just because he throws a slow pitch, gimmick or not, doesn’t mean he doesn’t have stuff.
You're pretty close to getting banned as a troll.
"I didn't realize his velocity was that high," said Macha, noting that radar readings aren't flashed during exhibition games.
Tell me one thing that I have said that was untrue.
Dissent is not the same as “trolling”. Thats the problem with a lot of fans, if you dont act like you are gung ho for the team, you are against the team in some way.
Without dissent you have nothing but yes men. That mentality took the Brewers a long way during the Selig years.
Oh please.
Yeah, this place is a veritable intellectual desert, made up of finely-ground, crushed dissent. Heated debates and diametrically opposed opinions were virtually unknown around here before you decided to grace us with your presence and your valuable insights.
Seriously, here’s what I’ve gleaned from your 30-odd posts here plus about 15 minutes browsing your posts (and the reactions they’ve resulted in) at mlb.com: You’re not actually a fan of the Brewers, you just live in Milwaukee – which for some reason compels you to pay attention to the team despite this newfangled internet thing which would just as easily allow you to follow some other team you actually like such as, say, the Giants.
Additionally, you fancy yourself an objective observer, which might even be superficially true – if it wasn’t for the curious fault that the overwhelming majority of the stuff you choose to objectively observe and comment upon just so happens to be soul-crushingly negative in nature. If that’s your thing, a blog of your own might be the thing you’re looking for.
by Zeyes on Apr 22, 2009 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions 7 recs
I think he throws pretty.
Scored three times and detonated an indisputable in four visits to the batting box.
by Jordan M on Apr 22, 2009 5:43 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
As far as I'm concerned
if someone is in a brewers uniform and getting outs right now, gimmicky or not, he deserves a spot and a shot to prove he can do so consistently. Our pitching staff is in no position to be worried about much else.

by 


























