Some Numbers to Think About
Here's something to think about as the traditional second half of the season begins. Remember how it seemed the Brewers couldn't drive in runners to save their lives before the break? It seemed the bases were left loaded at least once every game. Whenever a team struggles to drive in runs, more attention is paid to how the team does with runners in scoring position (RISP). Where did the Brewers stand through the All-Star Break this year?
| Team | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS |
| MIL | 3388 | 2941 | 411 | 749 | 146 | 22 | 100 | 352 | 681 | .255 | .339 | .421 | .760 |
| MIL w/RISP | 912 | 746 | 299 | 187 | 39 | 5 | 24 | 117 | 180 | .251 | .350 | .413 | .762 |
| MIL w/o RISP | 2476 | 2195 | 112 | 562 | 107 | 17 | 76 | 235 | 501 | .256 | .335 | .424 | .759 |
With runners in scoring position, the team is more willing to take a pitch at the expense of a little power and average. But even so, the team hits just about as well with runners in scoring position as they do without.
How did the first-half Brewers stack up against the rest of the National League? I'll keep it simple with just the slash stats in order not to be overwhelming with numbers.
| Team | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS |
| PHI | .266 | .373 | .454 | .827 |
| NYM | .281 | .377 | .419 | .796 |
| COL | .262 | .343 | .450 | .793 |
| STL | .261 | .360 | .408 | .767 |
| FLA | .263 | .353 | .413 | .766 |
| MIL | .251 | .350 | .413 | .762 |
| PIT | .267 | .349 | .410 | .759 |
| ATL | .261 | .358 | .394 | .751 |
| HOU | .262 | .338 | .410 | .748 |
| LAD | .264 | .368 | .379 | .747 |
| SFG | .262 | .341 | .392 | .733 |
| WSN | .251 | .348 | .377 | .725 |
| SDP | .237 | .366 | .343 | .708 |
| CIN | .240 | .328 | .378 | .706 |
| ARI | .228 | .328 | .377 | .705 |
| CHC | .218 | .326 | .359 | .684 |
| NL Avg | .255 | .351 | .399 | .749 |
Despite not hitting for as much power with RISP, the Brewers still outperform the average NL squad. Their willingness to take pitches also helps put them above average in the NL in hitting with RISP. Certainly taking walks and avoiding outs is a positive outcome. With that said, taking walks only helps bring runs in when the bases are already loaded. Otherwise it takes hits to score runs. There the Brewers lag a little behind the rest of the NL in batting average with RISP.
It seems like the Brewers' struggles with RISP has been a more recent development this season. Here's a month-by-month breakdown:
| Month | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS |
| April | 220 | 175 | 41 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 29 | 40 | .234 | .346 | .406 | .751 |
| May | 291 | 242 | 65 | 13 | 2 | 8 | 36 | 60 | .269 | .356 | .438 | .794 |
| June | 285 | 236 | 57 | 14 | 3 | 7 | 37 | 62 | .242 | .340 | .415 | .756 |
| July | 116 | 93 | 24 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 18 | .258 | .362 | .355 | .717 |
| Total | 912 |
746 | 187 | 39 | 5 | 24 | 117 | 180 | .251 | .350 | .413 | .762 |
The Brewers have suffered a power outage with RISP in July, but they've actually been picking up singles relatively often so far this month. In May, the Brewers were very good with RISP and were rewarded with an 18-10 record. The Brewers scored 136 runs in 28 games in May, good for 4.86 runs per game. Interestingly, the Brewers hit worse with RISP in June but still scored 133 runs in 27 games, or 4.93 runs per game. The key was overall hitting: while the Brewers hit well with RISP in May, they were pretty awful without. While they fell back with RISP in June, hitting in other situations got better, especially for power. Check it out for yourself.
All in all, the Brewers could certainly use a return to May's RISP numbers coupled with June's overall hitting numbers, especially given the uncertainty with the pitching staff. As it stands, however, the team is not awful with runners in scoring position. That said, July's offensive slump hasn't helped matters. Certainly last night's 7 for 14 effort with RISP (not included in the above numbers) is encouraging.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
Thank You for this!
To the fan side of me, there did seem to be a struggle with the bats when runners were in scoring position especially in clutch situations (go ahead runs, tying runs on base, etc.) But the statistician side enjoys this and comforts the fan side. Seeing that the Brewers were above the league average or around it, makes it a little better.
Wow at the Cubs though, that is just amazing.
Is there any way to measure how the Brewers do in “clutch” situations? The Brewers do score runs and hit pretty well, it just seems sometimes that they mess up when there are go ahead runs on. For instance, (again not citing any form of statistical analysis) I can remember times where the Brewers have bases chucked full with no outs and they manage to only pull 1 run. I would figure there would be a good chance to bring more runners across when things are going good. Those are the times where as a fan you just ache. You would like to see on more cases than not to bring in a couple runners.
But I appreciate this TheJay. I feel that things are going to come around for the second half and this reassurance is nice to see.
Looking to buy: General Manager Deputy Badge
by Bush League All Star on Jul 17, 2009 1:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Fangraphs has a "Clutch" stat
Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment.
Brewers, according to whatever this stat is actually doing, are 7th in the majors.
http://www.fangraphs.com/teams.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&type=3&season=2009&month=0
by warwick5s on Jul 17, 2009 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You want clutch?!?
I’m coming thru with THE BEST LINK EVER!!! That’s clutch
"That's not a weird stat. Rickie is a run-scorer," Yost said. "It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter," Yost told reporters. "See, you guys have no concept. He's a run-scorer. So there's nothing weird about it. That's what he does."
by Hyatt on Jul 17, 2009 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
whoa
I just remember this, a computer generated picture of what MJ would have looked like sans surgery:
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/MichaelJackson/Story?id=5680705&page=1
by warwick5s on Jul 17, 2009 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it possible to isolate the numbers for Prince's IBB w/RISP?
I don’t have numbers in front of me to back this up, but anecdotally it seems to me that the small increase in OBP might be completely attributable to the times when Prince comes up w/RISP and first base open.
by Brew Angel on Jul 17, 2009 1:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I looked it up.
Prince has 11 IBB this year. If you drop our BB numbers to 106 (assuming they were all done w/RISP and an open base — not 100% true, but I don’t have time to look up each case) and remove 11 PA, it drops our OBP to just over.341. So there seems to be some validity. Braun by comparison has only 1 IBB this season.
by Brew Angel on Jul 17, 2009 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fascinating
I find this type of information fascinating. Thank you for posting it.
by Sealord on Jul 17, 2009 2:23 PM CDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs

by 






















