Monday Frosty Muglet
KL Snow is in Iowa at a funeral and had plans for a Community Mug, but I didn't want to let the Felipe Lopez trade go undiscussed, so here's a muglet of Lopez trade discussions a few other links I found along the way.
Go ahead and add whatever links you're reading in the comments.
The MLB Daily Dish blog story on the trade includes a poll asking who got the better end of the deal. At last check, it was 70% in favor of the Brewers
Apparently Lopez's defense at SS was pretty sub-par, but the Transaction Oracle over at Baseball Think Factory says that has overshadowed his fully adequate abilities at 2B.
Al's Ramblings compares Lopez to Mark DeRosa
Bernie's Crew points out that it's not the blockbuster trade everyone's waiting for, but likes the likely compensation pick the team will pick up
Jon Heyman's Twitter says he's surprised the Brewers didn't go for Doug Davis in the deal, but wonders if that means they're aiming for a better catch
It took Roque Mercedes til age 22 to master A-ball, notes Baseball Musings, presumably implying his loss is not one the Brewers should worry about.
A deal for Roy Halladay will likely need to include four or five prospects, says Sheffield's House, meaning the Brewers aren't likely in the running - trading away eight prospects in one year would severely deplete the farm system.
Brewer Paradise Lost doesn't hate the trade, but doesn't like the idea of a McGehee/Counsell third base platoon
Team Wisconsin thinks that McGehee's struggles at third mean he's destined for the outfield and Jody Gerut is on his way out the door
And some non-Lopez links
ESPN.com has a BBTN Clubhouse column by Eric Young about Prince pointing out that he can't do it alone
Bernie's Crew does an incredibly extensive breakdown of what a trade for Halladay would mean for the Brewers by evaluating talent, cost, health and cost. Best breakdown and conclusion I've read on it so far.
This Chicago Tribune article looks at the different teams interested in Halladay and actually gives the Brewers credit for having the best farm system (link via Team Wisconsin)
Apparently on last night's TMJ4 10:00 pm news there was a pretty great in-depth piece on McGehee and his son Mack, who was recently diagnosed with cerebral palsy. There's a written article and a link to the video on their site, here.
Steve Clark of the Manitowoc Herald-Times Reporter thinks that the Brewers aren't likely candidates in the Halladay trade, but says fans shouldn't despair - he thinks the season can be salvaged by picking up bullpen arms.
Timber Rattlers games have become such a draw that police not just from Appleton, but nearby Grand Chute as well, have had to be called in to help control traffic.
112 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Another Look at the Trade
This one from Fangraphs.
BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.
No Halladay
I do like Bernie’s Crew’s breakdown… except for the conclusion. The cost of prospects is just too great
by Saberilliterate on Jul 20, 2009 10:24 AM CDT reply actions
That was my thought
Wow…that haul feels like just about half the Brewers system.
by Cheeseandcorn on Jul 20, 2009 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions
Post-season roster
The thing is, Halladay gives them a strong postseason roster over the next 2 years. I’d give up half the Brewers system for a Pennant, if not a World Series in 2009/2010.
I am not willing to swap a post season appearance for another 26 years of futility
by Saberilliterate on Jul 20, 2009 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions
thinking that this will empty the system is foolish. We're gonna get bank for Prince next season/offseason.
I wouldn't ever trade Prince
At least, not while he’s playing well.
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
Thinking that we are going to get bank for Prince @ the end of 2010 is foolish. Trading 3 2010 positional starters (Cain, Salomone & AE/Gamel) plus our best pitchers who don’t smoke week for a season & a half (maybe) of awesome is foolish.
I am not saying that Halladay isn’t worth it – I am just not willing to pay the price.
by Saberilliterate on Jul 20, 2009 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions
Best Halladay analysis
I will respectfully disagree with Saberilliterate above. The Bernie’s Crew breakdown has convinced me it’s a good deal.
I’ve never seen the love affair with Escobar, to be honest. I think the Brewers will be able to afford Hardy, even in free agency if they’re serious about keeping a high value shortstop. Gamel, I can understand as untouchable because 3B has been a long-term problem for the Brewers.
The thing is, the Brewers should get a pretty good package for Fielder after the 2010 season, shouldn’t they? I’d think at least 1 sterling prospect and one B-level prospect. The Brewers should be able to replenish their farm system enough to stay competitive when Fielder’s gone. How many of the B-level prospects Bernie’s Crew mentions would be really ready to play in 2011, anyway? A Fielder trade could restock the farm system right when the Brewers need it.
There’s also nothing saying the Brewers can’t shop Halladay at the trade deadline next year if things go badly and get some quality value back on him.
All that said, I think a bullpen arm or two is all DM is realistically hoping for at this point.
If Melvin moved Prince this off-season he could get back similar prospects to what he gives up for Halladay.
And Halladay will be a Type A FA, so they can get the Yankees 4th round pick in June 2011.
by Getting Yosted on Jul 20, 2009 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions
But why give up Fielder this offseason?
I think you’re right that the Brewers could get a pretty sweet deal for Fielder with 2 years of control left, but I don’t think the Brewers have any reason to trade Fielder in this upcoming offseason. He should still fetch a pretty penny on the market with only 1 year of arbitration available. The Brewers are going to compete in 2010 and I can’t see how it’d be a good deal to trade away a 35-40 HR guy for prospects.
Well
If you can get a similar return, you have traded a season of Prince* for a season and a half of Halladay. And you clear $10 million in salary to sign a CF, bullpen help and Russell Branyan.
*I don’t think anyone expects Prince to be around in 2011.
by Getting Yosted on Jul 20, 2009 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions
CF
If Cameron was a $10 million player two years ago, and most people think the Brewers got a big discount (maybe in part due to his pending suspension), I don’t know that that figure is going to fetch much a few years later, considering that we may need a CF, C, and closer.
I am fine with trading Prince in the right deal, but I don’t think the “money off the books” aspect is much of a factor.
by badgermaniac on Jul 20, 2009 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree on the quality of BC's breakdown
Two things I thought of while reading it:
1. If Gamel is the “untouchable” prospect in this trade, Green’s value is reduced assuming Gamel can stick at 3rd. Don’t get me wrong, I love the guy, but if Gamel is going to man the hot corner for years to come, including him in the deal is a lot easier to stomach.
2. The inclusion of Cain in the deal would be deal breaker for me. I think CF and C are two of the positions the team is going to need to find in-house cheap replacements for next year in order to handle the payroll increases. Outside of Cain, I don’t see anyone on the immediate horizon that is even close to manning CF.
I feel the inclusion of some combination of Lucroy/Salome and Green/Gamel would be the best bet for the Brewers of including high-level prospects without significantly impacting the holes in the organization.
BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.
by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions
The more I think about it
The more I would rather have Gamel included in the deal than Escobar. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think the next best SS in the organization behind Escobar is Brewer Shudder. At least at third McGehee could manage for a year or two until Green would be ready.
BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.
by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions
How did that Bold get in there…fail on my part.
BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.
by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions
I think it's perfectly appropriate
There’s no depth at short. I actually voted for “only Escobar” in the poll on the right sidebar. I love Gamel and it would take a lot for me to trade him away, but I don’t think people realize the value Escobar would have even if he’s barely a league average hitter.
E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).
Here's my issue with trading Escobar
If we’re going to be taking on a contract like Halladay, we need to replace major league contracts with cheaper minor leaguers if they’re available. Since there will be little drop in performance between Hardy and Escobar, compared to a big drop in financial cost, we need to fill in Escobar at SS to make the team competitive next year and beyond.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
Out of curiousity
Does Halladay meet your “a lot” requirement?
BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.
by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Yes
If they’re going to build a deal for Halladay, I’d obviously investigate keeping the top 3 out of it first but I’d be willing to offer Gamel and some pieces— one or two of the A-ball pitchers and probably one or two other decent position players. Less than what BC is offering, which amounts to about 5 top ten prospects in the system. I would look at options like Bedard if they weren’t interested.
E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).
Yeah
That is along the lines that I would expect and be ok with. In all honesty, when all is said and done I don’t think he will actually go for anything better than that once they get close to the deadline and realize that’s about as good of an offer as they will get.
BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.
by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions
they could still hold onto him, then
If they don’t get an offer they like, they can keep him til the offseason and regain control of trade talks.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
I think if you put a * before and after a word it bolds it. So * shudder * without spaces becomes becomes shudder
Hmmm
Good to know
BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.
by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions
DM
All that said, I think a bullpen arm or two is all DM is realistically hoping for at this point.
I disagree.
I think he’s holding out hope that the Mariners falter and send Bedard or Washburn our way.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
I hadn't considered that
I guess I’m just not that excited about Bedard or Washburn, but I’ll freely admit they’re a big step up from the Bush replacements the Brewers are struggling to toss out there every 5th game. I don’t think they’re a step up from Bush himself, though.
wasn't there also talk earlier about the giants shopping cain?
"I'll be glad to have Ryan help if he wants to. I'll give him a badge and he can be my deputy."
-Sheriff Melvin
by sowingwildoats on Jul 20, 2009 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions
Doubt it
The Giants are leading the wild card race, they’re more likely to buy an offensive piece than to trade away anything.
by kingcharlesxii on Jul 20, 2009 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Gord Ash is scouting Halladay
The Toronto Sun is reporting that Gord Ash was at the Blue Jays game vs. the Red Sox scouting Roy Halladay. (h/t MLB Trade Rumors)
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
Interesting
This gives me that feeling that they might actually attempt to pull something off for Halladay. My thinking over the last several weeks has been that they wouldn’t be willing to part with the necessary prospects that would be required and that their interest was mostly superficial with no real weight, but the interest that management seems to be portraying makes me actually wonder if they are serious about going after the big fish for the 2nd year in a row.
BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.
by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions
I hope not
Unless the price comes down. DM and Ash HAS to due their due diligence to increase the cost of Halladay to keep him away from divisional opponents. I hope this is just posturing.
From a common sense standpoint
this really doesn’t do a whole lot. Lopez isn’t a big splash type guy. Plus now there’s a logjam of infielders – Hardy, Counsell, Lopez, Hall and McGehee, with two more close to being major league ready (Gamel and Escobar).
In my opinion, Melvin is setting himself up to make a big deal for pitching, or he’s setting himself up to make a big deal in the offseason.
The other shoe will drop.
Two questions: (1) When is the trade deadline? (2) What does Lopez’s contract look like?
by dishingoutdimes on Jul 20, 2009 12:06 PM CDT reply actions
Lopez...
Is a FA after the season, so he wouldn’t be setting himself up for any deal this offseason. He is a half season rental that should net us a supplemental pick in next year’s draft.
Trade deadline is July 31st.
by TheBurningRom on Jul 20, 2009 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions
Just to clarify
July 31st is the non-wavier trade deadline. August 31st is the wavier trade deadline.
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
What's the difference between the two?
by dishingoutdimes on Jul 20, 2009 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions
You should visit
this site. The explanation is pretty straightforward there.
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
Ha
Checked out the link to refresh my memory. Did anyone else immediately think Bill Hall when the read this:
Option 2: His team can just dump him and his salary on the team that claimed him, getting no player in return.
BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.
by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions
Hmmm interesting
I still think there’s gotta be another deal sometime soon
by dishingoutdimes on Jul 20, 2009 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions
An alternative...
What about another alternative? Deal JJ and Parra to the Reds for Harang and Arroyo. The Brewers need more than one pitcher to shore up their staff. Harang is a proven commodity with ace potential, if a change of scenery gets him focused. Arroyo is pitching extremely well lately, had a terrific second half last year, and is a proven big-game pitcher (Boston). This would give the Crew a five-man rotation with Gallardo, Harang, Arroyo, Looper and Suppan; and a post-season rotation of Gallardo, Harang and Arroyo. We have a ready replacement for Hardy in Escobar who would improve our defense and give us a legit top of the order speedster. The Reds get what they most seek: a power R-handed bat and the REds GM has stated he prefers this to be a SS. They also get a young leftie to add to Volquez and Cueto.
Hypothetically makes sense
But I don’t see such a significant intra-division trade happening. Additionally, if Dusty has any say in the matter I don’t think J.J. meets the minimum age requirement for trade targets.
BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.
by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Why?
We need pitching, and we’re not getting Halladay.
Parra is better than Arroyo, younger, cheaper, and controlled longer, and has more upside
So if they’re getting the better end of that part of the deal, we’re trading Harang for Hardy— not a terrible option, but we can do better than that for Hardy I’m pretty sure. That part of the deal matches up decently, but I’d want more than just Harang.
E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).
I'll take No for $1,000 Alex
Bronson Arroyo: 1.47 WHIP, 87 ERA+, 828 OPS against on a 289 Babip
Jeff Suppan: 1.62 WHIP, 95 ERA+, 850 OPS against on a 315 Babip
Giving up your second highest ceiling pitcher for a Jeff Suppan clone as he starts the downside of his career isn’t a winning move.
by Getting Yosted on Jul 20, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions
It depends
Arroyo’s more likely than Suppan to pitch well in the 2nd half (as he did last year).
But if you think Manny Parra is going to be a 2 starter, then you’re right – the deal doesn’t work and the Hardy-Harang only deal makes more sense.
I see Parra as a 4 starter – 3 at best. I think Arroyo is also a 3, but has a more proven record (and has pitched well in the postseason).
Also, Arroyo’s ERA away from Great American Ballpark (hitter’s paradise) is 4.47 (compared to 5.64 at GAB)
When Arroyo is "on", he’s a very, very good pitcher. He appears to be "on" in his last two starts (as he was the 2nd half of last year):
Date
Opp
W
L
SV
IP
HA
ER
BBA
Ks
07/10
NYM
1
0
0
9.0
4
0
0
5
07/17
MIL
1
0
0
7.0
6
0
2
6
Parra has much better independent numbers in his career than Arroyo does
It’s a peculiar argument to make that Arroyo is on lately when Parra has 13 innings and 1 ER in his last two starts. In another note, Parra’s FIP is now at 4.5 after those two starts.
E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).
legit top of the order speedster
Please remember that as good as Escobar’s defense is and as much as he is young enough to develop with the bat, he is going to be a pretty bad offensvie player, at least for the time being.
His MLE projects to something like a .267/.297/.335 line (I did the translation a few days ago, but don’t recall off the top of my head).
He is basically Jason Kendall with quite a bit fewer walks and a bit more power (though my 7 year old has more power than Kendall).
I don’t know if I would be too excited about a guy with a .300 OBP leading off.
If they move Hardy and go with Escobar AND trying to win this year, they need to assume that whatever they are getting pitching wise is going to make up for the possibly significant loss in offense (at least for this year).
by badgermaniac on Jul 20, 2009 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions
Plug Escobar in for 15 SBs and more walks than Hardy (you want speed and OBP from the top of the order)
Hardy: .229 BA, 11 HRs, zero SBs.
Not saying he’s an upgrade on Hardy – just that he’s not an offensive downgrade. And he’s a better defender (making the entire pitching staff better.
Bottom line: we don’t lose offense, but we do gain pitching and defense.
Agreed...
But only because Hardy is very streaky…and the times when he’s hot seem to be getting shorter and shorter. If Hardy wasn’t as streaky as he is…he’d be the better shortstop overall.
by TheBurningRom on Jul 20, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions
You guys are right for the wrong reasons
I hate the streakiness argument. Two guys with the same production have the same value whether they switch off hot and cold or stay consistent.
MLEs are going to give you more predictive power with a veteran in 3A who could replace someone than with a 22 year old improving prospect. I’d expect something like .270/.315/.350 out of Escobar if he were to be called up right now. That has a lot of value if he’s a +10 or better shortstop. Hardy is almost certainly a +5 to +10 SS, and he’s an above average player as he is hitting so far this year— I’d expect a much better second half if his luck evens out.
Hardy’s a better player for the rest of this year. Not by a whole lot, but probably close to a win. But I’d rather trade Hardy.
E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).
Exactly
Not arguing Escobar is an upgrade this year, but that he’s not a downgrade. So we can add a pitcher without downgrading SS offensively.
Actually, he is most likely a downgrade.
Even if Escobar outperforms his MLE (and he very well could underperform them, what with being so young), as Joran suggest, that still puts him at a .660 OPS guy.
Hardy, as bad as he has been, is still at .675 this year. If he continues to hit at the same level, your argument makes sense.
If he reverts back to his established level of the last two years, that puts him in that .800-.815 range, and all of a sudden, you are looking at a significant offensive downgrade.
If Hardy has a big second half, as he did in the second half of ’07 (.840 OPS), then our gap is reaching 200 points.
I would also point out that Hardy (much like Parra) has been unlucky this year, with an abnormally low BABIP and a slightly depressed HR/FB rate. Both of those have a good chance at normalizing, which increases that gap even a little bit more.
All in all, the only way it isn’t an offensive downgrade is if you take the most optimistic view of Escobar and the the most pessimistic view of Hardy. Neither is very reasonable.
Regardless, I don’t want a guy with a .315 OBP hitting leadoff either way
by badgermaniac on Jul 20, 2009 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions
walks
Hardy is walking about once every 10 at bats.
Escobar is walking about once every 15 at bats, and that is against AAA pitching of course (expect the rate to go down in the majors).
Escobar’s OBP projects to be about .300. Hardy has been in the .325 to .350 range.
Escobar obviously has more speed, but the rest of your comment has little support.
I wonder if people have really looked at what Escobar is right now, not what they want him to be or what he might be in a few years of development, but what kind of a hitter you are getting. As good as his defense is, his offense is that poor.
by badgermaniac on Jul 20, 2009 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions
Hardy's OBP
His OBP stats should read….“over the last two years”.
by badgermaniac on Jul 20, 2009 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions
also...
will macha have escobar steal, even if he is fast enough to steal?
by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 20, 2009 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions
I was ready to post the same thing
I don’t think you can sketch in SB’s because Macha just is such an opponent of make out on the bases
by Nicole Haase on Jul 20, 2009 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions
Man, the players never get to have any fun!
Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.
paradise by the dashboard light style
mmmm…meatloaf.
(not the person, but the food)
by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 20, 2009 7:12 PM CDT up reply actions
Brad Penny instead of Halladay?
From Olney’s blog:
Possible fit: the Brewers, who have been looking for a starting pitcher and might be a match for one of the second-tier starters (Penny, Jon Garland, etc.). The Red Sox almost certainly would not offer Penny arbitration, so it makes sense for them to move him before the July 31 deadline just to recoup a little value.
I think they'll be asking for too much
He was available for 1 year $5 mil before the year. He shouldn’t fetch anything more than a middling prospect. He makes some sense, though.
E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).
Penny seems to not be doing all that well
And it’s the Bo Sox so they’ll want a ton in return
by dishingoutdimes on Jul 20, 2009 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Why is Penny still considered a valuable trade target?
It’s no longer 2007.
Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.
Will Lopez be available tonight?
I’m curious what the lineup will look like when he’s here.
2B Lopez
CF Cameron
LF Braun
1B Fielder
3B McGehee
SS Hardy
RF Hart
C Kendall
Perhaps Hardy and Cameron are switched. Maybe even put McGehee at 2. Either way, I don’t think we’ll have to worry about Kendall batting leadoff anymore!!
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 12:37 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
"Either way, I don’t think we’ll have to worry about Kendall batting leadoff anymore!!"
rec
BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.
by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions
Looks pretty good to me.
I wonder how many starts Counsell will get at 3B against LH pitching. If Counsell is starting, I would plug him into the 7 slot and move Hart up to 5. That puts LH batters in the 1, 4, and 7 slots.
No one thought they'd have to worry about Kendall batting leadoff, even after the Weeks injury
So we aren’t quite out of the woods until Kendall’s not on the 25-man roster anymore.
Counsell could bat second and play third against a RHP with Cameron hitting fifth or sixth, ahead of or behind Hart.
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
Right
Although we didn’t think Kendall would be batting leadoff when Weeks went down, there was still the question of who it was going to be. That question, barring injury, has been answered.
As for Counsell, I love being able to bring him off the bench if we put runners on base late in the game. I agree that he will be in the 2-hole when he plays. Don’t forget, he can take starts at SS if Hardy needs a day off, or be put there in a double switch if hardy is having a horrendous game
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
"That question, barring injury, has been answered."
Barring injury or a slump necessitating a veteran’s veteran atop the order.
Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.
I suppose it's possible
the team could go through extreme grithdrawal atop the order
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
If Fielder misses a game
Does the lineup suffer girthdrawal in the middle? :)
Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.
Bernie's Crew offer is hugely overboard
That’s a ridiculous offer. There are only a few players in all of baseball that I would trade that package for. That’s on the verge of spreading misinformation, I am pretty sure he’ll get traded for a lot less than that.
E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).
Who would you trade that package for then,
if not for one of the best and most durable pitchers in the game?
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
For the record
Bernie’s Crew suggested: SS Alcides Escobar, LHP Zach Braddock, RHP Wily Peralta, C Angel Salome, and CF Lorenzo Cain
I think its a forgone conclusion that Escobar is required. Supposedly, the Jays want young pitching and in our case it would have to be very young pitching. Salome or Lucroy seem logical because we have a little depth with 2 catching prospects.
I’m not so sure about Cain. Toronto has Wells locked up for a long time, and we really need a CF after this year. I would try to substitute someone else there, but other than that, I think this is about what it would take.
No way
The Philly’s are 6.5 games ahead, no way we have to give up that much. If anything the longer we wait the farther it shifts into the brewers favor. I think the Jay’s want to get something out of him while they can.
But realistically, the brewers and the jays don’t really match up in terms of what they want vs what we want. If they get escobar, i wouldn’t be willing to give up much else, maybe 2 low level pitching prospects.
Yeah, but the Jays will be able to get something for him at the deadline next year, if there aren't enough buyers this year.
They might be okay with that, is all I'm saying.
Maybe next year there’ll be more bidders, and will drive the cost higher than expected.
My bet? Jay’s haul this year < 1 year of Halladay + haul next year.
Assuming there’ll be more potential buyers given the lower perceived cost, I think the best bet for the Jays would be to hold onto Halladay…
Then again, that assumes they’re trying to win now, which, obviously isn’t true…
It still makes more sense for them now
Trading him now would save them over $20 million alone in salary.
BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.
by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions
If they don't trade him now
He will get traded in the offseason.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
Well it's pretty close, I guess
But that’s the #1 prospect in the system, the two best pitching prospects, and the 3rd and 5th best position players probably. One of those two pitchers and one of those two hitters, and then sub in lesser replacements, would be my offer. Maybe it would take something like that, but if so I’m not as interested. And I’d trade Gamel or Lawrie before Escobar.
E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).
Agreed...
There’s a fundamental flaw in the Bernie’s Crew blogpost. He suggests a package that includes Escobar….and It’s widely accepted that the Jays are looking for a SS…and I’m sure they’d much rather have Escobar than Hardy. Very understandble. He also suggests a salary dump to help finance paying for Halladay’s contract. The two players that are going to increase the most in salary are Hart and Hardy…whom he suggests we could move. The flaw comes with the fact that if you trade Escobar, you can’t move Hardy. If you do, who starts at short? A FA? If so, there goes your cost savings….$$$ that you’d need to fill the C and CF holes created by the rest of the prospects traded away in that deal that would likely be with the club on opening day (Salome) or at some point during the season (Cain)…..unless Duffy is going to return from his meltdown…..
by TheBurningRom on Jul 20, 2009 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions
From CBS:
Rival teams say the Brewers have enough prospects to make a Halladay deal, even though they’ve suggested they won’t trade Alcides Escobar or Mat Gamel. One intriguing possibility: A team that talked to the Brewers was told that shortstop J.J. Hardy could be available “in the right deal.”
The Phillies, who have long been considered the most likely Halladay suitor, were also represented in Toronto this weekend, by former Phils (and Jays) general manager Pat Gillick. With Gillick and Brewers assistant GM Gord Ash (also a former Jays GM) in town, one rival official quipped: “They’re either trying to negotiate for Halladay or going for the Blue Jays president’s job.”
by dishingoutdimes on Jul 20, 2009 1:29 PM CDT reply actions
"They’re either trying to negotiate for Halladay or going for the Blue Jays president’s job."
It all makes sense now… Melvin’s gunning for a return to the homeland.
I will add this, regardless of the outcome of all this, trade talk is soooo much more exciting when your team is involved.
BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.
by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions
You have a typo there
trade talk is soooo much more exciting when your team is buying
by Getting Yosted on Jul 20, 2009 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions
hey now
buying > selling, but selling > nothing at all
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
You should run that theory by a Pirates fan
by Getting Yosted on Jul 20, 2009 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm saying solely excitement wise
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
You should run that theory by the Pirates fan
*fixed
Imagine the Brewers offense without Ryan & Prince.
-Bill Schroeder
by Dikembe Meiztombo on Jul 20, 2009 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Hardy + Gamel?
I could see a package centered around Hardy and Gamel working for both teams. The Brewers would probably still have to throw in a few more B/C prospects but they’d have SS set for the future with Escobar and would only have to worry about C, CF and possibly 3B next year. I think they’ll try to keep Cain to give him a shot to win the CF job next year. Catcher shouldn’t be any more of a hole than it is this year regardless of who they plug in, whether it is a stopgap FA or one of the young guys. If Casey McGehee keeps looking like the real deal, they won’t have a hole at 3rd and Gamel won’t be missed nearly as much.
by kingcharlesxii on Jul 20, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions
ONLY C, CF and possibly 3B
I don’t have faith in McGehee to continue his success through 2010. At least not at the level he’s been performing at.
C, CF, and 3B are a lot o fholes to fill without having any money to spend.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
Well, right
But this trade would only make 3B possibly worse than it already is and not everyone is convinced Gamel can even stick at 3B. (I personally think he’ll be passable there)
C and CF will be holes regardless of this trade and we have internal solutions that might work for both of those positions.
by kingcharlesxii on Jul 20, 2009 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions
Halladay handicaps our ability to fill those holes
because of his contract
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
Sorry, I read it as being centered around Escobar and Gamel
My bad.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
good lord
i don’t want hart in center or hall anywhere except with his pants stapled to the bench until the point where it’s financially possible to release him
We have to use him somewhere, he can't just be taking up a bench spot.
Even if it doesn’t pan out we have to have some sort of plan for him going into next season. I dislike him as much as everyone else btw.
he costs us more on the field than on the bench though
he costs the same $ either way, and on the bench he isn’t costing the offense by killing rallies.
by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 20, 2009 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions
With how lost...
Hart looks in right at times, I’m not sure I’d want him playing center. He has the speed, but doesn’t seem to have the instincts…some of the routes he takes to fly balls are downright atrocious.
His defensive skills have always been somewhat confusing to me. He was a SS in high school…which is a very defensive position…and yet he was moved from 1st to outfield in the minors due to defensive issues.
by TheBurningRom on Jul 20, 2009 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions
McGehee’s regression is still > Bill Hall
"Today is."
by juggernaut400 on Jul 20, 2009 2:55 PM CDT up reply actions
The Brewers are tied with the Dodgers for....
easiest second half schedule. Both have a combined opponent winning % of 0.477. Unfortunately the Cardinals aren’t far behind at 0.480 and the Cubs at 0.482.
Point being is that the Brewers have some cupcakes down the stretch, especially in the next month and a half. They’re only 3 back. A guy like Halladay can put them over the top. And having a bonafide leadoff hitter helps too.
Melvin needs to trade for a starter or the season is pretty much cooked. Simple as that.
by dishingoutdimes on Jul 20, 2009 1:56 PM CDT reply actions
I also wouldn't trade for Halladay
Giving up too much there.
I’d target Zach Duke from the Pirates. He’s a lefty, tied for the NL lead in complete games (3) and is 11th in the NL in WHIP (1.20). Plus the Pirates aren’t in a position to ask for a ton. Give them a couple of pitchers out of the farm and a decent other prospect.
Otherwise, I’d look at Erik Bedard. Brad Penny would be okay if we don’t have to give up a whole lot.
However, Melvin seems to make deals with teams that he either has a history with, or knows somebody in their organization – Diamondbacks, Mariners, Blue Jays. If I had to put money on it, I’d say a deal for pitching would come from Seattle, as he’s already done his deal with the Dbacks and I think he’ll stay away from Halladay because the price will be too high. Otherwise, he’ll make a minor deal for pitching depth rather than a front end starter with a team clearly out of the race – something like Lannan from the Nats, Volstad from the Marlins, Brett Anderson from the A’s, Pavano from the Indians, Meche or Bannister from the Royals, or Duke from the Pirates.
by dishingoutdimes on Jul 20, 2009 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions
anyone notice
that the brewers tend to play down to their opponents’ level?
In other words, I don’t see us doing extremely well in the second half, despite the easier schedule.
by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 20, 2009 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions
i strongly disagree
look at our schedule/record from the middle of April through May
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
Chiming in on something other than the possible trade
Time Warner Cable Field is in Grand Chute. That’s why the team is working with them on the traffic situation on game nights.
There's something other than the trade? :)
Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.
Did somebody say..
..something about a trade? ;)
by TheBurningRom on Jul 20, 2009 9:58 PM CDT up reply actions

by 



























