Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White Announces Koscheck vs. Hendricks for UFC on FOX

Monday Frosty Muglet

KL Snow is in Iowa at a funeral and had plans for a Community Mug, but I didn't want to let the Felipe Lopez trade go undiscussed, so here's a muglet of Lopez trade discussions a few other links I found along the way.

Go ahead and add whatever links you're reading in the comments.

 

The MLB Daily Dish blog story on the trade includes a poll asking who got the better end of the deal. At last check, it was 70% in favor of the Brewers

Apparently Lopez's defense at SS was pretty sub-par, but the Transaction Oracle over at Baseball Think Factory says that has overshadowed his fully adequate abilities at 2B.

Al's Ramblings compares Lopez to Mark DeRosa

Bernie's Crew points out that it's not the blockbuster trade everyone's waiting for, but likes the likely compensation pick the team will pick up

Jon Heyman's Twitter says he's surprised the Brewers didn't go for Doug Davis in the deal, but wonders if that means they're aiming for a better catch

It took Roque Mercedes til age 22 to master A-ball, notes Baseball Musings, presumably implying his loss is not one the Brewers should worry about.

A deal for Roy Halladay will likely need to include four or five prospects, says Sheffield's House, meaning the Brewers aren't likely in the running - trading away eight prospects in one year would severely deplete the farm system.

Brewer Paradise Lost doesn't hate the trade, but doesn't like the idea of a McGehee/Counsell third base platoon

Team Wisconsin thinks that McGehee's struggles at third mean he's destined for the outfield and Jody Gerut is on his way out the door

And some non-Lopez links

ESPN.com has a BBTN Clubhouse column by Eric Young about Prince pointing out that he can't do it alone

Bernie's Crew does an incredibly extensive breakdown of what a trade for Halladay would mean for the Brewers by evaluating talent, cost, health and cost. Best breakdown and conclusion I've read on it so far.

This Chicago Tribune article looks at the different teams interested in Halladay and actually gives the Brewers credit for having the best farm system (link via Team Wisconsin)

Apparently on last night's TMJ4 10:00 pm news there was a pretty great in-depth piece on McGehee and his son Mack, who was recently diagnosed with cerebral palsy. There's a written article and a link to the video on their site, here.

Steve Clark of the Manitowoc Herald-Times Reporter thinks that the Brewers aren't likely candidates in the Halladay trade, but says fans shouldn't despair - he thinks the season can be salvaged by picking up bullpen arms.

Timber Rattlers games have become such a draw that police not just from Appleton, but nearby Grand Chute as well, have had to be called in to help control traffic.

Comment 112 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Another Look at the Trade

This one from Fangraphs.

BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.

by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 10:14 AM CDT reply actions  

No Halladay

I do like Bernie’s Crew’s breakdown… except for the conclusion. The cost of prospects is just too great

by Saberilliterate on Jul 20, 2009 10:24 AM CDT reply actions  

That was my thought

Wow…that haul feels like just about half the Brewers system.

by Cheeseandcorn on Jul 20, 2009 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Post-season roster

The thing is, Halladay gives them a strong postseason roster over the next 2 years. I’d give up half the Brewers system for a Pennant, if not a World Series in 2009/2010.

by ecocd on Jul 20, 2009 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

I am not willing to swap a post season appearance for another 26 years of futility

by Saberilliterate on Jul 20, 2009 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ah

Why are we trading Prince with a roster with Halladay, Braun, Yoga…

by Metagen on Jul 20, 2009 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't ever trade Prince

At least, not while he’s playing well.

"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"

RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving

by kirbir on Jul 20, 2009 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thinking that we are going to get bank for Prince @ the end of 2010 is foolish. Trading 3 2010 positional starters (Cain, Salomone & AE/Gamel) plus our best pitchers who don’t smoke week for a season & a half (maybe) of awesome is foolish.

I am not saying that Halladay isn’t worth it – I am just not willing to pay the price.

by Saberilliterate on Jul 20, 2009 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Best Halladay analysis

I will respectfully disagree with Saberilliterate above. The Bernie’s Crew breakdown has convinced me it’s a good deal.

I’ve never seen the love affair with Escobar, to be honest. I think the Brewers will be able to afford Hardy, even in free agency if they’re serious about keeping a high value shortstop. Gamel, I can understand as untouchable because 3B has been a long-term problem for the Brewers.

The thing is, the Brewers should get a pretty good package for Fielder after the 2010 season, shouldn’t they? I’d think at least 1 sterling prospect and one B-level prospect. The Brewers should be able to replenish their farm system enough to stay competitive when Fielder’s gone. How many of the B-level prospects Bernie’s Crew mentions would be really ready to play in 2011, anyway? A Fielder trade could restock the farm system right when the Brewers need it.

There’s also nothing saying the Brewers can’t shop Halladay at the trade deadline next year if things go badly and get some quality value back on him.

All that said, I think a bullpen arm or two is all DM is realistically hoping for at this point.

by ecocd on Jul 20, 2009 10:33 AM CDT reply actions  

If Melvin moved Prince this off-season he could get back similar prospects to what he gives up for Halladay.

And Halladay will be a Type A FA, so they can get the Yankees 4th round pick in June 2011.

by Getting Yosted on Jul 20, 2009 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

But why give up Fielder this offseason?

I think you’re right that the Brewers could get a pretty sweet deal for Fielder with 2 years of control left, but I don’t think the Brewers have any reason to trade Fielder in this upcoming offseason. He should still fetch a pretty penny on the market with only 1 year of arbitration available. The Brewers are going to compete in 2010 and I can’t see how it’d be a good deal to trade away a 35-40 HR guy for prospects.

by ecocd on Jul 20, 2009 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well

If you can get a similar return, you have traded a season of Prince* for a season and a half of Halladay. And you clear $10 million in salary to sign a CF, bullpen help and Russell Branyan.

*I don’t think anyone expects Prince to be around in 2011.

by Getting Yosted on Jul 20, 2009 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

CF

If Cameron was a $10 million player two years ago, and most people think the Brewers got a big discount (maybe in part due to his pending suspension), I don’t know that that figure is going to fetch much a few years later, considering that we may need a CF, C, and closer.

I am fine with trading Prince in the right deal, but I don’t think the “money off the books” aspect is much of a factor.

by badgermaniac on Jul 20, 2009 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree on the quality of BC's breakdown

Two things I thought of while reading it:

1. If Gamel is the “untouchable” prospect in this trade, Green’s value is reduced assuming Gamel can stick at 3rd. Don’t get me wrong, I love the guy, but if Gamel is going to man the hot corner for years to come, including him in the deal is a lot easier to stomach.

2. The inclusion of Cain in the deal would be deal breaker for me. I think CF and C are two of the positions the team is going to need to find in-house cheap replacements for next year in order to handle the payroll increases. Outside of Cain, I don’t see anyone on the immediate horizon that is even close to manning CF.

I feel the inclusion of some combination of Lucroy/Salome and Green/Gamel would be the best bet for the Brewers of including high-level prospects without significantly impacting the holes in the organization.

BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.

by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

The more I think about it

The more I would rather have Gamel included in the deal than Escobar. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think the next best SS in the organization behind Escobar is Brewer Shudder. At least at third McGehee could manage for a year or two until Green would be ready.

BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.

by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

How did that Bold get in there…fail on my part.

BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.

by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think it's perfectly appropriate

There’s no depth at short. I actually voted for “only Escobar” in the poll on the right sidebar. I love Gamel and it would take a lot for me to trade him away, but I don’t think people realize the value Escobar would have even if he’s barely a league average hitter.

E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).

by Jordan M on Jul 20, 2009 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Here's my issue with trading Escobar

If we’re going to be taking on a contract like Halladay, we need to replace major league contracts with cheaper minor leaguers if they’re available. Since there will be little drop in performance between Hardy and Escobar, compared to a big drop in financial cost, we need to fill in Escobar at SS to make the team competitive next year and beyond.

Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".

by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Out of curiousity

Does Halladay meet your “a lot” requirement?

BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.

by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes

If they’re going to build a deal for Halladay, I’d obviously investigate keeping the top 3 out of it first but I’d be willing to offer Gamel and some pieces— one or two of the A-ball pitchers and probably one or two other decent position players. Less than what BC is offering, which amounts to about 5 top ten prospects in the system. I would look at options like Bedard if they weren’t interested.

E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).

by Jordan M on Jul 20, 2009 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah

That is along the lines that I would expect and be ok with. In all honesty, when all is said and done I don’t think he will actually go for anything better than that once they get close to the deadline and realize that’s about as good of an offer as they will get.

BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.

by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

they could still hold onto him, then

If they don’t get an offer they like, they can keep him til the offseason and regain control of trade talks.

Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".

by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think if you put a * before and after a word it bolds it. So * shudder * without spaces becomes becomes shudder

by grant76 on Jul 20, 2009 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hmmm

Good to know

BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.

by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

DM
All that said, I think a bullpen arm or two is all DM is realistically hoping for at this point.

I disagree.

I think he’s holding out hope that the Mariners falter and send Bedard or Washburn our way.

Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".

by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 10:35 AM CDT reply actions  

I hadn't considered that

I guess I’m just not that excited about Bedard or Washburn, but I’ll freely admit they’re a big step up from the Bush replacements the Brewers are struggling to toss out there every 5th game. I don’t think they’re a step up from Bush himself, though.

by ecocd on Jul 20, 2009 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

wasn't there also talk earlier about the giants shopping cain?

"I'll be glad to have Ryan help if he wants to. I'll give him a badge and he can be my deputy."
-Sheriff Melvin

by sowingwildoats on Jul 20, 2009 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Doubt it

The Giants are leading the wild card race, they’re more likely to buy an offensive piece than to trade away anything.

by kingcharlesxii on Jul 20, 2009 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Gord Ash is scouting Halladay

The Toronto Sun is reporting that Gord Ash was at the Blue Jays game vs. the Red Sox scouting Roy Halladay. (h/t MLB Trade Rumors)

Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".

by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 11:22 AM CDT reply actions  

Interesting

This gives me that feeling that they might actually attempt to pull something off for Halladay. My thinking over the last several weeks has been that they wouldn’t be willing to part with the necessary prospects that would be required and that their interest was mostly superficial with no real weight, but the interest that management seems to be portraying makes me actually wonder if they are serious about going after the big fish for the 2nd year in a row.

BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.

by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

I hope not

Unless the price comes down. DM and Ash HAS to due their due diligence to increase the cost of Halladay to keep him away from divisional opponents. I hope this is just posturing.

by SgtClueLs on Jul 20, 2009 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

From a common sense standpoint

this really doesn’t do a whole lot. Lopez isn’t a big splash type guy. Plus now there’s a logjam of infielders – Hardy, Counsell, Lopez, Hall and McGehee, with two more close to being major league ready (Gamel and Escobar).

In my opinion, Melvin is setting himself up to make a big deal for pitching, or he’s setting himself up to make a big deal in the offseason.

The other shoe will drop.

Two questions: (1) When is the trade deadline? (2) What does Lopez’s contract look like?

by dishingoutdimes on Jul 20, 2009 12:06 PM CDT reply actions  

Lopez...

Is a FA after the season, so he wouldn’t be setting himself up for any deal this offseason. He is a half season rental that should net us a supplemental pick in next year’s draft.

Trade deadline is July 31st.

by TheBurningRom on Jul 20, 2009 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just to clarify

July 31st is the non-wavier trade deadline. August 31st is the wavier trade deadline.

"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"

RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving

by kirbir on Jul 20, 2009 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

You should visit

this site. The explanation is pretty straightforward there.

"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"

RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving

by kirbir on Jul 20, 2009 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ha

Checked out the link to refresh my memory. Did anyone else immediately think Bill Hall when the read this:

Option 2: His team can just dump him and his salary on the team that claimed him, getting no player in return.

BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.

by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hmmm interesting

I still think there’s gotta be another deal sometime soon

by dishingoutdimes on Jul 20, 2009 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

An alternative...

What about another alternative? Deal JJ and Parra to the Reds for Harang and Arroyo. The Brewers need more than one pitcher to shore up their staff. Harang is a proven commodity with ace potential, if a change of scenery gets him focused. Arroyo is pitching extremely well lately, had a terrific second half last year, and is a proven big-game pitcher (Boston). This would give the Crew a five-man rotation with Gallardo, Harang, Arroyo, Looper and Suppan; and a post-season rotation of Gallardo, Harang and Arroyo. We have a ready replacement for Hardy in Escobar who would improve our defense and give us a legit top of the order speedster. The Reds get what they most seek: a power R-handed bat and the REds GM has stated he prefers this to be a SS. They also get a young leftie to add to Volquez and Cueto.

by ktym on Jul 20, 2009 12:27 PM CDT reply actions  

Hypothetically makes sense

But I don’t see such a significant intra-division trade happening. Additionally, if Dusty has any say in the matter I don’t think J.J. meets the minimum age requirement for trade targets.

BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.

by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

True, but...

he’s older than Rosales.

by ktym on Jul 20, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why?

We need pitching, and we’re not getting Halladay.

by ktym on Jul 20, 2009 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Parra is better than Arroyo, younger, cheaper, and controlled longer, and has more upside

So if they’re getting the better end of that part of the deal, we’re trading Harang for Hardy— not a terrible option, but we can do better than that for Hardy I’m pretty sure. That part of the deal matches up decently, but I’d want more than just Harang.

E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).

by Jordan M on Jul 20, 2009 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'll take No for $1,000 Alex

Bronson Arroyo: 1.47 WHIP, 87 ERA+, 828 OPS against on a 289 Babip
Jeff Suppan: 1.62 WHIP, 95 ERA+, 850 OPS against on a 315 Babip

Giving up your second highest ceiling pitcher for a Jeff Suppan clone as he starts the downside of his career isn’t a winning move.

by Getting Yosted on Jul 20, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

It depends

Arroyo’s more likely than Suppan to pitch well in the 2nd half (as he did last year).

  But if you think Manny Parra is going to be a 2 starter, then you’re right – the deal doesn’t work and the Hardy-Harang only deal makes more sense.

I see Parra as a 4 starter – 3 at best. I think Arroyo is also a 3, but has a more proven record (and has pitched well in the postseason).

Also, Arroyo’s ERA away from Great American Ballpark (hitter’s paradise) is 4.47 (compared to 5.64 at GAB)

When Arroyo is "on", he’s a very, very good pitcher. He appears to be "on" in his last two starts (as he was the 2nd half of last year):

 

Date
 Opp
 W
 L
 SV
 IP
 HA
 ER
 BBA
 Ks
 
07/10
 NYM
 1
 0
 0
 9.0
 4
 0
 0
 5
 
07/17
 MIL
 1
 0
 0
 7.0
 6
 0
 2
 6
 

by ktym on Jul 20, 2009 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Parra has much better independent numbers in his career than Arroyo does

It’s a peculiar argument to make that Arroyo is on lately when Parra has 13 innings and 1 ER in his last two starts. In another note, Parra’s FIP is now at 4.5 after those two starts.

E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).

by Jordan M on Jul 20, 2009 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

legit top of the order speedster

Please remember that as good as Escobar’s defense is and as much as he is young enough to develop with the bat, he is going to be a pretty bad offensvie player, at least for the time being.

His MLE projects to something like a .267/.297/.335 line (I did the translation a few days ago, but don’t recall off the top of my head).

He is basically Jason Kendall with quite a bit fewer walks and a bit more power (though my 7 year old has more power than Kendall).

I don’t know if I would be too excited about a guy with a .300 OBP leading off.

If they move Hardy and go with Escobar AND trying to win this year, they need to assume that whatever they are getting pitching wise is going to make up for the possibly significant loss in offense (at least for this year).

by badgermaniac on Jul 20, 2009 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Plug Escobar in for 15 SBs and more walks than Hardy (you want speed and OBP from the top of the order)

Hardy: .229 BA, 11 HRs, zero SBs.

Not saying he’s an upgrade on Hardy – just that he’s not an offensive downgrade. And he’s a better defender (making the entire pitching staff better.

Bottom line: we don’t lose offense, but we do gain pitching and defense.

by ktym on Jul 20, 2009 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed...

But only because Hardy is very streaky…and the times when he’s hot seem to be getting shorter and shorter. If Hardy wasn’t as streaky as he is…he’d be the better shortstop overall.

by TheBurningRom on Jul 20, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

You guys are right for the wrong reasons

I hate the streakiness argument. Two guys with the same production have the same value whether they switch off hot and cold or stay consistent.

MLEs are going to give you more predictive power with a veteran in 3A who could replace someone than with a 22 year old improving prospect. I’d expect something like .270/.315/.350 out of Escobar if he were to be called up right now. That has a lot of value if he’s a +10 or better shortstop. Hardy is almost certainly a +5 to +10 SS, and he’s an above average player as he is hitting so far this year— I’d expect a much better second half if his luck evens out.

Hardy’s a better player for the rest of this year. Not by a whole lot, but probably close to a win. But I’d rather trade Hardy.

E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).

by Jordan M on Jul 20, 2009 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly

Not arguing Escobar is an upgrade this year, but that he’s not a downgrade. So we can add a pitcher without downgrading SS offensively.

by ktym on Jul 20, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Actually, he is most likely a downgrade.

Even if Escobar outperforms his MLE (and he very well could underperform them, what with being so young), as Joran suggest, that still puts him at a .660 OPS guy.

Hardy, as bad as he has been, is still at .675 this year. If he continues to hit at the same level, your argument makes sense.

If he reverts back to his established level of the last two years, that puts him in that .800-.815 range, and all of a sudden, you are looking at a significant offensive downgrade.

If Hardy has a big second half, as he did in the second half of ’07 (.840 OPS), then our gap is reaching 200 points.

I would also point out that Hardy (much like Parra) has been unlucky this year, with an abnormally low BABIP and a slightly depressed HR/FB rate. Both of those have a good chance at normalizing, which increases that gap even a little bit more.

All in all, the only way it isn’t an offensive downgrade is if you take the most optimistic view of Escobar and the the most pessimistic view of Hardy. Neither is very reasonable.

Regardless, I don’t want a guy with a .315 OBP hitting leadoff either way

by badgermaniac on Jul 20, 2009 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

walks

Hardy is walking about once every 10 at bats.

Escobar is walking about once every 15 at bats, and that is against AAA pitching of course (expect the rate to go down in the majors).

Escobar’s OBP projects to be about .300. Hardy has been in the .325 to .350 range.

Escobar obviously has more speed, but the rest of your comment has little support.

I wonder if people have really looked at what Escobar is right now, not what they want him to be or what he might be in a few years of development, but what kind of a hitter you are getting. As good as his defense is, his offense is that poor.

by badgermaniac on Jul 20, 2009 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hardy's OBP

His OBP stats should read….“over the last two years”.

by badgermaniac on Jul 20, 2009 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

also...

will macha have escobar steal, even if he is fast enough to steal?

by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 20, 2009 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was ready to post the same thing

I don’t think you can sketch in SB’s because Macha just is such an opponent of make out on the bases

by Nicole Haase on Jul 20, 2009 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Brad Penny instead of Halladay?

From Olney’s blog:

Possible fit: the Brewers, who have been looking for a starting pitcher and might be a match for one of the second-tier starters (Penny, Jon Garland, etc.). The Red Sox almost certainly would not offer Penny arbitration, so it makes sense for them to move him before the July 31 deadline just to recoup a little value.

by brew82 on Jul 20, 2009 12:28 PM CDT reply actions  

I think they'll be asking for too much

He was available for 1 year $5 mil before the year. He shouldn’t fetch anything more than a middling prospect. He makes some sense, though.

E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).

by Jordan M on Jul 20, 2009 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why is Penny still considered a valuable trade target?

It’s no longer 2007.

Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.

by TheJay on Jul 20, 2009 5:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Will Lopez be available tonight?

I’m curious what the lineup will look like when he’s here.

2B Lopez
CF Cameron
LF Braun
1B Fielder
3B McGehee
SS Hardy
RF Hart
C Kendall

Perhaps Hardy and Cameron are switched. Maybe even put McGehee at 2. Either way, I don’t think we’ll have to worry about Kendall batting leadoff anymore!!

Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".

by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 12:37 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Looks pretty good to me.

I wonder how many starts Counsell will get at 3B against LH pitching. If Counsell is starting, I would plug him into the 7 slot and move Hart up to 5. That puts LH batters in the 1, 4, and 7 slots.

by oconnobe on Jul 20, 2009 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

No one thought they'd have to worry about Kendall batting leadoff, even after the Weeks injury

So we aren’t quite out of the woods until Kendall’s not on the 25-man roster anymore.

Counsell could bat second and play third against a RHP with Cameron hitting fifth or sixth, ahead of or behind Hart.

"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"

RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving

by kirbir on Jul 20, 2009 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Right

Although we didn’t think Kendall would be batting leadoff when Weeks went down, there was still the question of who it was going to be. That question, barring injury, has been answered.

As for Counsell, I love being able to bring him off the bench if we put runners on base late in the game. I agree that he will be in the 2-hole when he plays. Don’t forget, he can take starts at SS if Hardy needs a day off, or be put there in a double switch if hardy is having a horrendous game

Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".

by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

"That question, barring injury, has been answered."

Barring injury or a slump necessitating a veteran’s veteran atop the order.

Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.

by TheJay on Jul 20, 2009 5:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

I suppose it's possible

the team could go through extreme grithdrawal atop the order

Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".

by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 6:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

If Fielder misses a game

Does the lineup suffer girthdrawal in the middle? :)

Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.

by TheJay on Jul 20, 2009 7:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bernie's Crew offer is hugely overboard

That’s a ridiculous offer. There are only a few players in all of baseball that I would trade that package for. That’s on the verge of spreading misinformation, I am pretty sure he’ll get traded for a lot less than that.

E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).

by Jordan M on Jul 20, 2009 12:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Who would you trade that package for then,

if not for one of the best and most durable pitchers in the game?

"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"

RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving

by kirbir on Jul 20, 2009 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

For the record

Bernie’s Crew suggested: SS Alcides Escobar, LHP Zach Braddock, RHP Wily Peralta, C Angel Salome, and CF Lorenzo Cain

I think its a forgone conclusion that Escobar is required. Supposedly, the Jays want young pitching and in our case it would have to be very young pitching. Salome or Lucroy seem logical because we have a little depth with 2 catching prospects.

I’m not so sure about Cain. Toronto has Wells locked up for a long time, and we really need a CF after this year. I would try to substitute someone else there, but other than that, I think this is about what it would take.

by grant76 on Jul 20, 2009 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

No way

The Philly’s are 6.5 games ahead, no way we have to give up that much. If anything the longer we wait the farther it shifts into the brewers favor. I think the Jay’s want to get something out of him while they can.

But realistically, the brewers and the jays don’t really match up in terms of what they want vs what we want. If they get escobar, i wouldn’t be willing to give up much else, maybe 2 low level pitching prospects.

by Metagen on Jul 20, 2009 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

They might be okay with that, is all I'm saying.

Maybe next year there’ll be more bidders, and will drive the cost higher than expected.

My bet? Jay’s haul this year < 1 year of Halladay + haul next year.

Assuming there’ll be more potential buyers given the lower perceived cost, I think the best bet for the Jays would be to hold onto Halladay…

Then again, that assumes they’re trying to win now, which, obviously isn’t true…

by Mykenk on Jul 20, 2009 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

It still makes more sense for them now

Trading him now would save them over $20 million alone in salary.

BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.

by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

If they don't trade him now

He will get traded in the offseason.

Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".

by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well it's pretty close, I guess

But that’s the #1 prospect in the system, the two best pitching prospects, and the 3rd and 5th best position players probably. One of those two pitchers and one of those two hitters, and then sub in lesser replacements, would be my offer. Maybe it would take something like that, but if so I’m not as interested. And I’d trade Gamel or Lawrie before Escobar.

E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).

by Jordan M on Jul 20, 2009 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

I don’t think Escobar is on the table. He’s to valuable. If anything Hardy will go first.

by Metagen on Jul 20, 2009 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed...

There’s a fundamental flaw in the Bernie’s Crew blogpost. He suggests a package that includes Escobar….and It’s widely accepted that the Jays are looking for a SS…and I’m sure they’d much rather have Escobar than Hardy. Very understandble. He also suggests a salary dump to help finance paying for Halladay’s contract. The two players that are going to increase the most in salary are Hart and Hardy…whom he suggests we could move. The flaw comes with the fact that if you trade Escobar, you can’t move Hardy. If you do, who starts at short? A FA? If so, there goes your cost savings….$$$ that you’d need to fill the C and CF holes created by the rest of the prospects traded away in that deal that would likely be with the club on opening day (Salome) or at some point during the season (Cain)…..unless Duffy is going to return from his meltdown…..

by TheBurningRom on Jul 20, 2009 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

From CBS:
Rival teams say the Brewers have enough prospects to make a Halladay deal, even though they’ve suggested they won’t trade Alcides Escobar or Mat Gamel. One intriguing possibility: A team that talked to the Brewers was told that shortstop J.J. Hardy could be available “in the right deal.”

The Phillies, who have long been considered the most likely Halladay suitor, were also represented in Toronto this weekend, by former Phils (and Jays) general manager Pat Gillick. With Gillick and Brewers assistant GM Gord Ash (also a former Jays GM) in town, one rival official quipped: “They’re either trying to negotiate for Halladay or going for the Blue Jays president’s job.”

by dishingoutdimes on Jul 20, 2009 1:29 PM CDT reply actions  

"They’re either trying to negotiate for Halladay or going for the Blue Jays president’s job."

It all makes sense now… Melvin’s gunning for a return to the homeland.

I will add this, regardless of the outcome of all this, trade talk is soooo much more exciting when your team is involved.

BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.

by MadJimiBrewha on Jul 20, 2009 1:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes.

I love it! Simply being involved in trade talks has to, in some way, create more revenue for the team.

Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".

by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

You have a typo there
trade talk is soooo much more exciting when your team is buying

by Getting Yosted on Jul 20, 2009 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

hey now

buying > selling, but selling > nothing at all

Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".

by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm saying solely excitement wise

Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".

by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

You should run that theory by the Pirates fan

*fixed

Imagine the Brewers offense without Ryan & Prince.
-Bill Schroeder

by Dikembe Meiztombo on Jul 20, 2009 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Hardy + Gamel?

I could see a package centered around Hardy and Gamel working for both teams. The Brewers would probably still have to throw in a few more B/C prospects but they’d have SS set for the future with Escobar and would only have to worry about C, CF and possibly 3B next year. I think they’ll try to keep Cain to give him a shot to win the CF job next year. Catcher shouldn’t be any more of a hole than it is this year regardless of who they plug in, whether it is a stopgap FA or one of the young guys. If Casey McGehee keeps looking like the real deal, they won’t have a hole at 3rd and Gamel won’t be missed nearly as much.

by kingcharlesxii on Jul 20, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

ONLY C, CF and possibly 3B

I don’t have faith in McGehee to continue his success through 2010. At least not at the level he’s been performing at.

C, CF, and 3B are a lot o fholes to fill without having any money to spend.

Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".

by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, right

But this trade would only make 3B possibly worse than it already is and not everyone is convinced Gamel can even stick at 3B. (I personally think he’ll be passable there)

C and CF will be holes regardless of this trade and we have internal solutions that might work for both of those positions.

by kingcharlesxii on Jul 20, 2009 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Halladay handicaps our ability to fill those holes

because of his contract

Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".

by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sorry, I read it as being centered around Escobar and Gamel

My bad.

Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".

by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

good lord

i don’t want hart in center or hall anywhere except with his pants stapled to the bench until the point where it’s financially possible to release him

by warwick5s on Jul 20, 2009 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

We have to use him somewhere, he can't just be taking up a bench spot.

Even if it doesn’t pan out we have to have some sort of plan for him going into next season. I dislike him as much as everyone else btw.

by Metagen on Jul 20, 2009 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

he costs us more on the field than on the bench though

he costs the same $ either way, and on the bench he isn’t costing the offense by killing rallies.

by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 20, 2009 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

With how lost...

Hart looks in right at times, I’m not sure I’d want him playing center. He has the speed, but doesn’t seem to have the instincts…some of the routes he takes to fly balls are downright atrocious.

His defensive skills have always been somewhat confusing to me. He was a SS in high school…which is a very defensive position…and yet he was moved from 1st to outfield in the minors due to defensive issues.

by TheBurningRom on Jul 20, 2009 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

McGehee’s regression is still > Bill Hall

"Today is."

by juggernaut400 on Jul 20, 2009 2:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Brewers are tied with the Dodgers for....

easiest second half schedule. Both have a combined opponent winning % of 0.477. Unfortunately the Cardinals aren’t far behind at 0.480 and the Cubs at 0.482.

Point being is that the Brewers have some cupcakes down the stretch, especially in the next month and a half. They’re only 3 back. A guy like Halladay can put them over the top. And having a bonafide leadoff hitter helps too.

Melvin needs to trade for a starter or the season is pretty much cooked. Simple as that.

by dishingoutdimes on Jul 20, 2009 1:56 PM CDT reply actions  

I also wouldn't trade for Halladay

Giving up too much there.

I’d target Zach Duke from the Pirates. He’s a lefty, tied for the NL lead in complete games (3) and is 11th in the NL in WHIP (1.20). Plus the Pirates aren’t in a position to ask for a ton. Give them a couple of pitchers out of the farm and a decent other prospect.

Otherwise, I’d look at Erik Bedard. Brad Penny would be okay if we don’t have to give up a whole lot.

However, Melvin seems to make deals with teams that he either has a history with, or knows somebody in their organization – Diamondbacks, Mariners, Blue Jays. If I had to put money on it, I’d say a deal for pitching would come from Seattle, as he’s already done his deal with the Dbacks and I think he’ll stay away from Halladay because the price will be too high. Otherwise, he’ll make a minor deal for pitching depth rather than a front end starter with a team clearly out of the race – something like Lannan from the Nats, Volstad from the Marlins, Brett Anderson from the A’s, Pavano from the Indians, Meche or Bannister from the Royals, or Duke from the Pirates.

by dishingoutdimes on Jul 20, 2009 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

anyone notice

that the brewers tend to play down to their opponents’ level?

In other words, I don’t see us doing extremely well in the second half, despite the easier schedule.

by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 20, 2009 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

i strongly disagree

look at our schedule/record from the middle of April through May

Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".

by tcyoung on Jul 20, 2009 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Chiming in on something other than the possible trade

Time Warner Cable Field is in Grand Chute. That’s why the team is working with them on the traffic situation on game nights.

by RattlerRadio on Jul 20, 2009 3:38 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Brew Crew Ball is dedicated to providing a friendly atmosphere for intelligent Brewer conversation. Click here to view our Posting Guide and Community Guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Nohuddleblueew9_small
BP C'mon Back Club
Small
Help- How to "Cut the Cable" and Watch Live Games
Barrelman_small
BCB Advanced Stat Pseudofantasy League - PART II
Small
Interview with a Former Brewer Part Two
Small
Catching Up With a Former Brewer
Barrelman_small
BCB Advanced Stat Pseudofantasy League
People_studying_small
Does Fielder's Contract Outdo Pujols'?
Dr-teeth_small
Fielder: It's all about health
Barrelman_small
NPB Position Players
Braun
2012 Payroll Early Estimate

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

NL Central Standings

W L PCT GB STRK
Chicago 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Cincinnati 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Houston 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Milwaukee 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Pittsburgh 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
St. Louis 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0

(updated 2.13.2012 at 7:02 PM CST)


Moderators

Newavatar_small Kyle Lobner

146_-_street_map_plaza_from_pop_tower_with_bars-tiltshift_small TheJay

Communist_party_small Jordan M

X1pxoywqu4sjf73f7drxq2lmqys7mzsyx7pa9necepiffk_ewcuwmuazb-o17ukmbriclcdkn4lk-4xposaawiq4j8hzdsccpjwatqpz2o2p-i0nnqjlyt7pmytaycsaknszvaktpshtcu9sjle1qchlw_1__small NoahJ

Hikaru_50_small morineko

Picture_069_small Nicole Haase

Gogol_bordello_small BrewHaHeather

Anon-md_small Rubie Q