If Traded, Can Halladay Request Another Trade?
- Halladay's deal covering 2009 and 2010 was signed in March 2006, so this applies.
- If he requests a trade after the season and isn't dealt, he can become a free agent on March 16.
- He can request a trade and then withdraw the request by March 15.
- He may have forgone his ability to request such a trade by getting a no-trade clause as part of his current deal. I am unsure if his no-trade clause is part of his contract or from being a ten-and-five player.
- If he requests a trade after the year and is traded, he is then unable to request another trade or elect free agency for three years. This means whatever team he is traded to has him for three years, regardless of his contract status. Put another way, if the Brewers trade for him, he requests a trade after the year, and ends up going to Boston, he will be stuck in Boston through 2012 even though his current contract ends after 2010. Boston merely has to offer him arbitration for 2011 and 2012.
(4) Waiver by Player
14 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I Somehow Doubt...
His agent would ever allow the last bullet point to happen.
Yes – because if he is a douche about it, he will end up pitching for the Nationals – or you could really mess with him and send him to Colorado, Texas or some other hitters park
by Saberilliterate on Jul 21, 2009 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree
In all likelihood, the first trade is done per Halladay’s 10/5 approval, and he goes to a team where the “trade me at the end of the season” scenario wont even apply.
I wonder if he has a list like Peavy did. It has been reported that he wants to go to a perennial contender. I wonder if that knocks the Brewers out right away, since there is a shorter window of success, and the window may be closing fast without a ton of pitching coming up through the ranks.
Its probably something like Dodgers, Angels, Red Sox, Yankees, Cardinals, Cubs, Phillies, Tigers…
Yankees
If he goes to the Yankees that is a very scary rotation
by Saberilliterate on Jul 21, 2009 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions
I think even under the most pessimistic of projections
the Brewers will be considered “contenders” for at least this year and next year, and that’s how long Halladay’s current contract is.
Did you not see any of the preseason projections that had us finishing 4th or worse?
The sad fact is that you can’t be the king until you kill the king. So until Milwaukee wins the division against some non-injury depleted Cubs staffs or a Cardinal lineup that features someone batting behind Pujols, no one south of Hwy 50 or East of Lake Michigan will consider the Brewers a perennial contender. And the Brewers have not been helping themselves much lately in this regard.
by Saberilliterate on Jul 21, 2009 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions
True enough, but...
“…until Milwaukee wins the division against some non-injury depleted Cubs staffs or a Cardinal lineup that features someone batting behind Pujols…”
There will always be injuries to blame a Brewers division win on.
Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.
You're wasting your time.
From backtocali’s perspective, the Brewers have never done anything good that can’t be attributed to luck and there’s never any reason to assume the Brewers will improve in the future. No amount of logic will ever change his perspective, so don’t bother trying.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 22, 2009 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions
According to Cot's
He has a no trade clause as part of his contract. Remember that his first few years were split between the majors and minors, so he wasn’t accruing major league service time for the full seasons. Assuming that Cot’s is correct his first year of arb was 2004 which would make 2009 his ninth season of ML service time, so he isn’t even eligible for 10/5 protection.
Why are we able to piece this sh!t together, but the professional sports writers are fricking clueless.
For the same reasons that pitchers are still evaluated (and paid for) Wins & ERA
by Saberilliterate on Jul 21, 2009 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions
I suspect it's more like Tom H's response to that A ball trade rumor
Along the lines of people can’t actually be interested in this stuff, can they?
Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.
also as per Cot's
Halladay’s ML service time was 9 years 47 days at the end of 2008, putting him over 10 years at the end of this season
by CheezeconQueso on Jul 21, 2009 3:03 PM CDT up reply actions

by 



























