Tuesday's Frosty Mug
I don't have an opening joke today. I'm not really in the mood for one.
It was another Tough Day for Suppan yesterday, on a day where he walked the tightrope for four innings, walked in a run and gave up a grand slam in the fifth, then was left in to allow four more runs in the sixth. Ken Macha sounded a lot like Ned Yost while defending his decision to leave Suppan in after the game, citing a tired bullpen but also mentioning that Suppan was "one pitch away" from getting out of the fifth. Opportunities to provide that "one pitch" came several times, but Suppan walked in a run and grooved a fastball instead.
The "tired bullpen" argument only works for so long here. Six members of the seven man Brewer bullpen have been overworked of late, including R.J. Swindle, who was called upon for two innings last night, just one day removed from pitching two innings for Nashville on Saturday. One arm, though, is hardly seeing any work at all: Trevor Hoffman has appeared in just five games (six if you count the All Star Game) in July, and will enter play today with a full week of rest.
It will be another long day for the bullpen today, as Carlos Villanueva makes his first start of the season (Also noted in FanShot). Villanueva is expected to pitch 3-4 innings and be followed to the mound by Tim Dillard, who isn't getting the start he expected today but is just happy to be here.
There's disrespect all around this decision. First, Macha decides to pitch Villanueva over Dillard because Dillard "is kind of limited in his pitches." Here's the problems with that logic, which I'll bullet point so I don't go on all day about them:
- The bullpen is exhausted and desperately needs someone to eat innings. Dillard pitched eight innings his last time out in AAA. Villanueva is expected to go 3-4 today.
- Villanueva has allowed 13 earned runs in his last 8.2 innings. View From Bernie's Chalet argues that Villanueva does not give the Brewers the best chance to win.
- Dillard takes shots left and right for not getting strikeouts or having weak secondary stuff, but he gets outs. He's averaging roughly 6.1 innings per start and posting a 3.66 ERA in AAA, where he leads the PCL with ten wins. He is exactly what the Brewers need in a starter right now.
The disrespect for Dillard doesn't end there. His seven inning, one hit shutout for Nashville last week earned him PCL Pitcher of the Week honors, but the award was presented to Tom Dillard. (h/t Rattler Radio)
Baseball Digest Daily says the Brewers can win the Central if they can go 38-25 the rest of the way. The Nationals need to go 61-3 and are scrambling to schedule 64 more games against the Brewers. The Bucky Channel is ready to admit this team is no longer a playoff contender. Over at Cute Sports, tristarscoop says she's embarrassed to be a Brewer fan right now. Quevedo at the Buffet is splitting time between lamenting the Jeff Suppan signing and looking ahead to next year. John Buchel says the beer doesn't even taste good in the Brewer clubhouse.
Some production from the catcher spot would really help the Brewers turn things around. Jason Kendall (ranked 22nd in catcher career WAR) has the second lowest OPS+ among players qualified for the batting title. If the Brewers are in fact sliding out of contention, and most signs point to it, it might be time for the Brewers to sit Kendall down and see what they have in Mike Rivera and Angel Salome.
Here's your daily lumping of trade market notes:
- Mike Wilner of Toronto's The Fan 590 says Roy Halladay would approve a trade to Milwaukee, for whatever it's worth.
- Larry Stone of the Seattle Times discussed trade rumors with Jarrod Washburn, who doesn't sound too eager to leave Seattle.
- Now that the possibility of trading J.J. Hardy for two months of Washburn has passed, Doug Melvin has moved on and is now offering Hardy in exchange for a 1969 Camaro.
The Brewers could free up one roster spot for a new player by cutting their losses on Bill Hall. Brewer Paradise Lost wonders if it's time to dump Hall once and for all and eat his contract. Keeping Hall on the roster just because he's getting money either way is just compounding a bad decision.
The Crew dropped seven spots to 18th in Inside the Majors' Power Rankings. That was the largest drop of any team.
Maybe, though, the Brewers can still get hot. Anyone can get hot, as it turns out: just ask the 2003 Brewers, the third worst team ever to win ten straight games.
Around baseball:
Giants: Acquired Ryan Garko from the Indians for a minor league pitcher.
Reds: Placed Micah Owings (shoulder stiffness) and Chris Dickerson (bruised shoulder) on the DL.
Twins: Kevin Slowey will have surgery to remove bone chips from his wrist and miss the rest of the season.
If you need some help making it through the day today, here's a section I'll call "It could be worse."
- The Brewers could be the Royals, who have lost eleven of twelve games but aren't planning on making any changes.
- They could be the Reds, who are 45-53, fifth place, 3.5 games back of the fourth place Brewers and seven back of the Cubs, but still see themselves as contenders in the Central.
- Or, they could be the Mets, who held a press conference yesterday to jump from one fiasco (the insanity of Asst. VP Tony Bernazard) to another, as Omar Minaya called out a reporter. The reporter's response is here. Jon Heyman is already making a list of new potential GMs.
A little Brewer history to close out today's Mug: On this day in 1997, Steve Woodard beat Roger Clemens 1-0 to earn his first major league victory. Exactly three years later, he was traded to the Indians in the trade that made Richie Sexson a Brewer.
Drink up.
0 recs |
247 comments
|
Comments
Kendall's hitting .300 over the last 2 weeks, and like it or not, Rivera sucks.
I’m all for getting one of the prospects catching time, but saying Rivera’s an improvement over Kendall is silly. Rivera’s 2008 was an aberration if I’ve ever seen one.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 9:20 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Huh. And his OPS+ is higher than Riveras. Go figure.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure if Rivera played more than 20 games a year, that might actually work as a comparison
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, he's been bad off the bench, and bad as a starter. I don't see why he deserves to play any more than he does. He's a backup catcher. And not a very good one.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And you've been bad in your 3 comments today.
Obviously, we should never give you another chance.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ouch :)
I get your point, but, shouldn’t we be evaluating the catcher of the future, not his backup? No one honestly expects Rivera to be this teams starting catcher, do they? Rivera’s a backup, and he’ll always be a backup. He’ll get more PT by necessity next year, anyway, won’t he?
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rivera may not be the catcher of the future, long term
But he very well may be a regular in 2010. So might Salome. Or Kendall might come back. At any rate, the groundwork for that decision could be laid now.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, if we could dump dead-weight bill hall, and get Rivera 1 starter and Salome 1 starter, then lets do it..
… but we can’t carry 3 catchers.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe instead of trying to dump him
We could send him down so a) he’s doing something and b) he’s improving himself or showing us he sucks too much to come back.
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I highly.. Highly doubt that Hall would accept an assignment. I’m sure someone out there would be happy to pay league min on Hall.
by SgtClueLs on Jul 28, 2009 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's highsterical
Dead-weight Bill Hall’s OPS this year? .602 in 198 ABs
Jason Kendall’s? .613 in 294 ABs
by Getting Yosted on Jul 28, 2009 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
TWSS!
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
by roguejim on Jul 28, 2009 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions 5 recs
I'm debating unreccing
so that I can rec it again!
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
It is difficult to figure out
Rivera:
06-268/324/458 97 OPS+
07-231/286/692 141 OPS+
08-306/377/435 113 OPS+
Kendall:
06-295/367/342 88 OPS+
07-242/301/309 63 OPS+
08-246/327/324 72 OPS+
I for one am thrilled that the heaping pile of suck that is Mike Rivera isn’t allowed to take playing time away from the offensive juggernaut that is Jason Kendall.
by Getting Yosted on Jul 28, 2009 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Buried under larger sample sizes from 2006, 7 and 8.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough, but Rivera hasn't shown anything remotely close to what he showed last year, in more at bats...
… and 2007 hardly should be looked at by itself. Combine those three years, maybe, but he didn’t play in 2007
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"More at bats"
I’m reminded of a commercial where the cartoon M&Ms go into the boss’ office because they want a raise: they make nothing. So the boss doubles it.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Confused. He has gotten more PT than last year, has he not?
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right.
And last year, he played less than any other backup catcher in baseball. This year, he’s played slightly more. Still not enough for a realistic evaluation.
It’s like if you had a crappy job where you made $.10 an hour. They could pay you $.20 per hour and it’d be more, but is it enough?
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not finished?
They have identical OPS numbers for the year at .613, but if Rivera goes 3-4 with a walk and a double in his next start it jumps to .720ish. Obviously if he goes 0-4 it drops a similar amount. Kendall will have to be absolutely torrid for a month to raise or lower his OPS by anything substantial.
The 2006 season was the only time in his career Rivera had more than 150 ABs in a season, and I think we would all be thrilled if the catcher could come close to that 97 OPS+ for this team. The game is littered with guys who were ‘backups’ or ‘never will bes’ who when given a chance suddenly became solid pieces. Until we filter out the random noise created by Rivera’s limited ABs in a season, we will never know if he is nothing more than a backup.
by Getting Yosted on Jul 28, 2009 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't use the word "improvement" one time.
I did say, though, that the Brewers could take some time to evaluate Salome and Rivera.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, if you're going to concede the season, yeah. I'm still a week or three out from doing that, unlike apparently everyone else on this site.
And there’s far more than the catchers spot that needs evaluating. Although, I suppose they’re limited by the number of roster moves they can make without infuriating the “core”
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And there’s far more than the catchers spot that needs evaluating.
No argument here. I never said catcher was the only move that could be made, just mentioned it as a move.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not me!
If you’re seven games out at the end of July, you ARE still a contender. We’re 3 and a half games out, and we’re sellers now? That’s just silly.
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
by roguejim on Jul 28, 2009 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully you're not kidding, but, that's my belief.
Baseball seasons get hot and cold. This team hasn’t really been all that hot yet, it’s bound to get better.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No way
I mean, granted, if we keep playing with our heads up our butts, I might change my mind. However, it’s only July. If it’s the first week of September and we’re 3.5 games down, I’d still say we’re in it.
You know what I’d like to see? I’d like to see Mark A. address the team just for a minute or two, saying “I’m approaching the trading deadline as a buyer because I think we can win the NL Central. Now go out and win me my g-d division.”
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
by roguejim on Jul 28, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm Not Conceding The Season Either...
But I think a change should be looked at with the catching situation…and I say that as one of the biggest Kendall supporters there ever was. I think at minimum, Rivera should be paired up with a pitcher…Parra would probably be the best choice given past success….since Dave Bush looks to be out for quite some time yet. It will give Kendall a day off and will give Rivera some playing time….orrrrr you could call up Salome and have him catch Parra…though I’m not sure if Salome is ready yet.
by TheBurningRom on Jul 28, 2009 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, give Parra Rivera. We can't have a headcase pitcher and a rookie catcher paired together, that doesn't even SOUND like a fun idea.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They played together in the minors
Rivera caught Parra and they made a really good team.
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It worked both times it was tried.
I’m not saying it’ll work every time, but it’s worth continuing to try until it doesn’t.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Surely the "rookie catcher" part referred to Salome, not Rivera?
by Zeyes on Jul 28, 2009 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's because their names end in "-ra"
They’re, like, BFF.
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
by roguejim on Jul 28, 2009 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to sound like a ratard, but.....
Aren’t these two polemic arguments?
It worked both times it was tried.
and….
Still not enough for a realistic evaluation.
I’d say if the small sample size is too small to evalute Rivera being better than Kendall offensively, the same thing applies to Kendall/Parra VS Rivera/Parra, yes? Or you could just use your eyes and say that given the limited data it sure does seem like Parra prefers Rivera, AND that Rivera can hit much better than Kendall, sample size be damned.
(Long winded way of saying I agree that Rivera should catch Parra, and I agree with both of your points in a round-about way.)
Suppan, who has seen his ERA rise from 4.12 in his final year in St. Louis to 4.62 in 2007 and 4.96 last year, isn't an option in fantasy leagues - Rotoworld
by Adam P on Jul 28, 2009 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Carlos V and Dillard
I think that since we need to replace Bush for at least 6 starts, Carlos may be the best solution. He’ll get the start, though Dillard will probably throw more innings. Villy will probably be stretched out over the next few weeks, and Dillard can be a (very) long relief guy for his first couple of starts.
Given the way Bush and Parra have been/not been, I think its fine to give CV one more shot at starting. If it were just for one game then Dillard could start, but because its going to be several starts, lets see how it goes.
by grant76 on Jul 28, 2009 9:29 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree. I don't see any real difference between who starts, I figure they'll both get about the same amount of innings over the next few weeks, and will probably be piggybacked one way or the other the whole time. I can't see Dillard's stuff being that
good the 2nd or 3rd time through the lineup.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hoffman
I agree on Hoffman. He should be pitching at least every four or five days, even if its not a save situation.
And the starters/bullpen thing is cyclical. Starters go 5 innings → bullpen gets overworked → Macha tries to get 6 or 7 innnings out of a guy to save the bullpen → starter melts down → bullpen gets wasted anyway → Gallardo throws 120 pitches and his arm falls off.
by grant76 on Jul 28, 2009 9:33 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
There is no reason that Hoffman couldn’t have come in last night for at least one inning, if not more. The same goes for Coffey. There are other ways of getting around an overworked bullpen, but only three days left to do it in.
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Hoffman pitched >1 inning, he'd be down for the week.
I’m okay with holding him out until not needed. I wouldn’t have minded seeing Dillard, or Coffey as you mentioned, throw a few innings.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right
As good as he is, Hoffman isn’t exactly an innings-absorber.
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
by roguejim on Jul 28, 2009 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But there is no reason not to have pitched him.
He needs work.
He can eat up one inning.
by SgtClueLs on Jul 28, 2009 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ken Macha sounded a lot like Ned Yost while defending his decision to leave Suppan in after the game, citing a tired bullpen but also mentioning that Suppan was “one pitch away” from getting out of the fifth. Opportunities to provide that “one pitch” came several times, but Suppan walked in a run and grooved a fastball instead.
This is the worst kind of baseball analysis. Manager says effectively “hey, sometimes you have to rely on the players to make pitches,” and the lame response, is “yeah, but it didn’t work out, so you made a mistake.”
Also, that “grooved” fastball was low and inside, exactly the kind of pitch willingham has struggled with this season… but don’t let the facts get in the way of the angry, “oh its all the manager’s fault” cliched rant…
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 9:48 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Okay, but
If you were the Macha and the bases were loaded and your pitcher had just walked in a run, wouldn’t you want to do something different than let him continue to pitch the team into such a terrible loss?
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no, definitely not. you let suppan pitch there, its a slam dunk. who was up in the bullpen? nobody, right?
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that was her issue. Not only did they not replace him, there wasn't a thought given to replacing him.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't have a problem with him pitching to Willingham in the 5th.
He had pitched 4 scoreless, and had 2 outs in the 5th with only one run in. If he gets that last out, maybe he can come back and pitch another inning or two.
After giving up the granny and it becoming a 6-5 game, maybe that was the time to bring in the relief, and try to keep it close.
Regarding Hoffman, I don’t think anyone is saying that he should have been brought in for the 5th or 6th innings yesterday. I think we are trying to say, is that if he pitched a few more innings when he is coming off 3 days rest, it would be a few less innings for the rest of the bullpen.
by grant76 on Jul 28, 2009 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
exactly.
I was at the game and closely eyeing the bullpen. By then (the 6th), there was somebody ready to go. Stetter had warmed up, and I saw another head throwing out there.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think that's a fair read of KL's point.
Of course you have to rely on the pitchers to make pitches — I think the point is that this “he was one pitch away” nonsense completely ignores the fact that Suppan was throwing the ball like crap last night. He was flirting with disaster in EVERY inning, and to roll the bones and say: “Well, maybe he can get out of it again” is foolhardy. Sooner or later, it’s coming up snake-eyes.
by Rubie Q on Jul 28, 2009 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
so what’s KL’s point, Suppan should not have gone out for the 5th inning? who would you have gotten up in the bullpen and when would you have done it?
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you read my response to your comment right below this one?
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes, kirbir, i did. and you can answer the question i put to rubie q, too, if you want…
who would you have gotten up in the bullpen and when would you have done it?
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dillard or Coffey. 4th or 5th inning.
Although, I’m not kirbir. Sorry!
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no problem, but you have the advantage of hindsight here, be more specific…
:)
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, from my comment below
You could probably guess I would’ve used Hoffman for at least an inning. I would’ve also tried to use Coffey before Swindle. I would’ve taken out Suppan as soon as the bases got loaded and he stopped throwing strikes, like a manager with a good bullpen wouldve done.
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok, so if you’re the manager…
suppan goes out for the fifth inning
he hits zimmerman, you make the call to the bullpen for hoffman
soup walks dunn
you bring in hoffman.
that’s how you woulda played it?
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt Hoffman would be in there that early...
… She said she’d use him for an inning plus, not necessarily in the 5th… No reason Coffey or DeFelice couldn’t have come in there.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, so you’re going to use coffey, instead of hoffman, right? so your scenario goes like this…
ok, so if you’re the manager…
suppan goes out for the fifth inning
he hits zimmerman, you make the call to the bullpen for coffey
soup walks dunn
you bring in coffey
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I'd probably have Coffey stirring in the 4th, then warming up whent he leadoff guy gets aboard in the 5th... and with 2 lefties, who knows, maybe I don't let Suppan pitch to Dunn at all, use Stetter or Swindle to get an out there...
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately I didn't follow every single part of the game last night
I can tell you, though, that when a pitcher who consistently has problems has just gotten the bases loaded by not throwing Ks, it’s probably time to take him out. I probably would’ve brought in Coffey first and kept him in as long as I could, then brought Hoffman in.
I think you need to calm down a little bit on this though.
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok, i’ll calm down. i just wanted to point out that it’s unrealistic for a manager to always have an overworked bullpen warming up. you have to take your chances with suppan given the staff the brewers have, that’s all there is to it. sometimes they don’t work out. it is not rational to blame the manager when they dont work out, but give him a free pass when it does.
you’re expecting your manager to be clairvoyant. and that, in my opinion, is pretty lame baseball analysis.
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not expecting him to be clairvoyant at all
Just to not be Ned Yost.
Plus, at the time it was easy for me to see that someone needed to be brought in. Mind you, I started following baseball in 2007 knowing little more than three strikes and you’re out. It’s pretty easy to see when the pitcher is going to implode on you, especially Suppan.
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
kirbir…
It’s pretty easy to see when the pitcher is going to implode on you
I’m not expecting him to be clairvoyant at all
i understand where you’re coming from, but these two statements… i have a hard time reconciling.
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You don't need to be clairvoyant to see something blatently obvious, I believe is her point.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't get it?
Clearly Suppan was having a problem. My family knows nothing about baseball and they were all screaming at the television. If they can see the problem, why can’t Macha?
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because Suppan's a wizened veteran?
My guess:
Suppan wasn’t pitching well, but neither was our overworked bullpen of late, either. If you think that neither one is going to be particularly more effective than the other, you might as well keep Suppan out there, hope the wily veteran can keep from giving up another grans slam, and try to rest the bullpen for tomorrow’s game.
Now that Suppan’s ERA is over 5 and a WHIP of 1.7, I think it’s time to move him to the bullpen, especially if Villanueva and Dillard are possible starters. Unless he has some breakthrough in a bullpen session or something, he’s not doing us any favors by starting.
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
by roguejim on Jul 28, 2009 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Clearly Suppan was having a problem.
was it clear? or was it only clear after he gave up the grand slam? after which pitch did you say, suppan will now implode?
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm going to go ahead and say he had a problem
When he loaded the bases and walked in a run. I think most of baseball would agree that raises a red flag.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, here are some of the situations Suppan found himself in last night.
Tell me which of these are not indicative of a problem:
Second inning: With one out, Suppan gives up a double to Josh Willingham and walks Josh Bard.
Third inning: Suppan gives up a leadoff double to the pitcher.
Fifth inning: He goes double, sac bunt, single, single, HBP, bases loaded walk, K, grand slam.
He had faced seven batters in the inning before the GS and gotten two outs, one of which was given to him. How is that not a clear problem?
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i don’t think you know much about baseball… clearly suppan was doing exactly what suppan does for the first 4 innings, to expect something better is complete insanity…
and the fifith inning, look closer…
double (fastball high, in off the plate)
sac bunt
single (fastball in on the black)
single (fastball away on the black)
hbp
bb (8 pitch at bat to adam dunn, just missed on 3-2)
now it’s clear he should be removed? get somebody up in the bullpen?
and he strikes out Nick Johnson on 4 great (for soup) pitches…
and now you would bring in a reliever to face willingham?
-——
you can make that argument, that there should’ve been someone warming up after 4.1 innings since the leverage index got up to nearly 3 after the hbp… but you’re going to burn through about 4 bullpens in a season of managing like that…
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Clearly, I don't know much about baseball, but this quote cracked me up:
clearly suppan was doing exactly what suppan does for the first 4 innings
Yes, and he has a 5.27 ERA to show for it.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He has a pretty solid point actually
Not to mention the bullpen came in and was awful
"Cubs suck. I own them" -Doug Davis
by Metagen on Jul 28, 2009 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
here’s his line for four innings: 4ip 4h 3k 1bb 0er
seriously, has he had a better start this season? for suppan that was a cy young performance over 4 innings… i don’t know why, if you follow this team, you’d have higher expectations of suppan, he’s not good.
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Results aren't always indicative of performance, however.
And just because a guy is cruising (note: Suppan was not cruising, even for Suppan), doesn’t mean that he’s going to continue to do so. If you see your starter getting into trouble, you need to do something about it.
Soup was in trouble all night.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you're missing Jacob's point (maybe not)
And Jacob can correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe he’s saying that Soup is in trouble whenever he pitches, you just have to hope that it’s one of those nights that he pitches out of it.
You’d kill the bullpen if you worked with Suppan like that all the time, and it’s already taxed enough.
battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm
by Michael M on Jul 28, 2009 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Suppan really gets into trouble like this every time he pitches (which he does), he shouldn't be on the team
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok fine, but he is on the team, not really fair to blame the manager for using his players is it?
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Put me in coach!
I’m ready to play for league min and can probably give up 2 grand slams a game.
In all seriousness, the clubs a mess. The more I think about it, the sadder I get. The Prince based era is about to come to an end, and all the suffering of the early 2000s waiting with the promise of “A Few more years our prospects will be up”, they are up and now they are about to be dismantled due to our market share. We got one sniff of the playoffs, crave more, and we are probably destined to suffer through a bit of the same till the next batch of prospects is ready and we can “go for it” again.
It’s very frustrating, all this talent, so little result.
by SgtClueLs on Jul 28, 2009 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you mean: results aren’t always indicative of future performance. that’s the relative point here, right?
what does that mean “soup was in trouble all night”
and if you’re just going to say you’d have brought coffey into the game in the fifth inning with 2 outs, fine, i hear that, (no need to repeat it) it’s a legitimate argument, but you’ll need about 30 or 40 pitchers to run a bullpen like that for the whole season.
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep, but no one anticipates using a bullpen like that for the full season, nor does anyone advocate it. If Suppan gave up 10 runs per start, he wouldn't be on the team long enough to seriously hamper the bullpen (on his own)
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you’re actually advocating using the bullpen like that… you’re saying anytime we’ve got an average pitcher on the mound with the bases loaded they should come out.
if you’re watching this season that’s like ALL the time.
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, it's not like this all the time, and I'm not advocating using the pen like that.
If Suppan had pitched a good first through 4th, I wouldn’t have a problem with him piching with the bases loaded in the 5th.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again, he pitched well for Soup
battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm
by Michael M on Jul 28, 2009 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, he really didn't.
Suppan usually has at least 1 decent inning, last night every one was a battle.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So now we're going to say one "decent inning" is good enough to keep him in?
I don’t get the argument, frankly. I expect Soup to struggled every time he pitches. When he goes 6/7 innings I’m happy. When he goes 4 or 5 I expect it.
battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm
by Michael M on Jul 28, 2009 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So, why wouldn't you have pulled him when he was in trouble in the 5th? If you don't expect him to be able to get out of it.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He had held them scoreless through four
battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm
by Michael M on Jul 28, 2009 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, results aren't indicative of performance. Just because he didn't allow a run in the 1-4 innings doesn't mean he pitched well.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
so what indicated to you that even though the results were good, he was pitching poorly?
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pitch count, number of runners, quality of opponents who were hitting him hard.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
again, and sorry to be repetitive, but let’s have an informed discussion. we have the benefit of hindsight here.
were his pitch counts abnormally high? number of runners? hard hit balls? i don’t think so, but i’m willing to look more closely at any facts you might share.
and if yes, he was pitching poorly based on those facts, then yes, it makes the argument for pulling him from the game stronger.
however, i think all of this blame the manager talk is nonsense and borne purely of frustration…
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it is borne out of frustration..
… and I know hindsight is 20/20.
Looking at the game log, you might be right, he was doing pretty well through 4 innings.
However, he didn’t have a clue in the 5th inning, and to not even get anyone up? Even as a “Look Jeff, get out of this, otherwise you’re done”?
Did Castro even visit the mound in the 5th?
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
castro did visit them mound… after the grand slam…
castro: “wow he really crushed that one”
don’t get me wrong, i’m not saying he pitched great, i’m simply saying he’s suppan, he’s going to work the count full, he’s going to try and get guys to swing at bad pitches and for the most part he did that…
but he’s a bad pitcher, and some times, it’s not going to work out.
if we can get through a suppan start while preserving the bullpen for games we’re more likely to win, i can get behind that strategy.
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
...then stick with that strategy?
why use 3 pitchers in the 5th and a new one in the 6th if you’ve already decided to forfeit because your pen is overworked?
by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 28, 2009 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
leadoff runners
runners in scoring position at some point during the inning.
I’d say those two stats he was doing worse than he does normally.
by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 28, 2009 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you're missing Jacob's point (maybe not)
And Jacob can correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe he’s saying that Soup is in trouble whenever he pitches, you just have to hope that it’s one of those nights that he pitches out of it.
You’d kill the bullpen if you worked with Suppan like that all the time, and it’s already taxed enough.
battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm
by Michael M on Jul 28, 2009 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So he was in trouble all night and got out of it each time.
Clearly should’ve been taken out.
"Cubs suck. I own them" -Doug Davis
by Metagen on Jul 28, 2009 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why is this such a hard concept.
You can’t take pitchers out just cause you feel like they might not get out of a jam. The bullpen would be pitching 6 innings everynight
"Cubs suck. I own them" -Doug Davis
by Metagen on Jul 28, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
when villa pitches 3-4 innings tomorrow.
Is what that was supposed to say.
"Cubs suck. I own them" -Doug Davis
by Metagen on Jul 28, 2009 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Amen to that
"Cubs suck. I own them" -Doug Davis
by Metagen on Jul 28, 2009 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The sites being super slow for me, I posted that like 20 minutes ago and not under this topic.
I am awesome though
"Cubs suck. I own them" -Doug Davis
by Metagen on Jul 28, 2009 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't Ned Yost have guys warming up all the freakin' time?
That wasn’t all that appreciated around here at the time, IIRC.
by Zeyes on Jul 28, 2009 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
At the very latest
Somebody needed to be up — and up in a hurry — after Gazpacho walked in the run.
by Rubie Q on Jul 28, 2009 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The “tired bullpen” argument only works for so long here. Six members of the seven man Brewer bullpen have been overworked of late, including R.J. Swindle, who was called upon for two innings last night, just one day removed from pitching two innings for Nashville on Saturday. One arm, though, is hardly seeing any work at all: Trevor Hoffman has appeared in just five games (six if you count the All Star Game) in July, and will enter play today with a full week of rest.
Wait, Hoffman should’ve come into the game in the 5th inning? is that what you’re saying? Or are you saying the “tired bullpen” defense is not legit cause the bullpen … is… overworked? wait, wtf are you saying?
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 9:50 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The argument is
Why would we use arms that are already tired and not well rested, like Swindle’s, if we have Trevor Hoffman – whose job it is, I might add, to get strikeouts in order to end a game – sitting on the bench twiddling his thumbs. He can pitch in innings other than the ninth without the four horsemen of the apocalypse showing up.
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's my argument, feel free to take a deep breath while reading it:
The bullpen is getting overworked because there are six men in it doing the job of seven. If Hoffman was used to occasionally finish off a blowout, that’s one less inning a week on the arms of six guys who are getting overworked.
So, to sum up, if the Brewers didn’t insist on using Hoffman exclusively in save situations, the load on the bullpen wouldn’t be quite as heavy.
Take Saturday, for example. The Brewers are up 2-0, Hoffman is warming and hasn’t pitched in five days. The Brewers score two runs and sit him down. Why? Why not use him there? Instead they warmed someone else and wasted a relief inning.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is a huge point. I think Macha's biggest problem is the bullpen slotting...
… you can usually predict who’s coming out when, and he refuses to take anyone out of their assigned “roles” unless they’re struggling in said role. Not a bad approach when your starters are consistently getting you 6-7 innings, but when the pen is pitching >3 innings a night, you just can’t manage a pen like that.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is probably every manager's biggest challenge
Yost struggled with it quite a bit. If you leave the starters in too long, the bullpen remains well rested. If you use a short leash, your bullpen will tire at the end of the year.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with the logic
The Book has a section devoted to whether or not a closer should be used in only save situations. However, Hoffman has proven this year and last year to not perform well in non save situations.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
although
I suppose I’m not disagreeing with your point at all. But last night, being down 6-5, I would have waited on Hoffman, thinking he might be able to get the save. I completely agree with getting him work to finish off blowouts
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I don't think anyone wanted to see him in the 5th or 6th... but he could have thrown the 8th or the 9th after the game was over...
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why?
We need him for the next 3 games!!!!!!!!!!!!!
optimism!!!
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
3 straight save opprtunities
after Hoffman pitching in a 14-6 blowout would be a dream come true at this point.
by grant76 on Jul 28, 2009 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
3 straight games with the Nationals closer than 3 runs makes me scurred.
Although, it sucks to say it’d be an improvement…
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow, the hits keep coming in this episode. now dillard is a better pitcher than villanueva because of his AAA ERA?
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 9:55 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe he's a better pitcher than CV because of CV's MLB ERA?
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
seriously? he has 320 innings, but you’re going to use his last 43 to say he’s a bad pitcher? even though he’s posted a 4.22 FIP? what happen to this place? i thought we got past these arguments 3 years ago…
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not saying he's a bad pitcher. I'm saying right now, Dillard's probably the better one.
CV’s probably a better long term option, but he’s looked pretty bad this year.
Results matter, not theoretical results.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dillard's not a very good option right now
say what you want about “getting outs” because opposing batters have been kind enough to hit the ball at fielders, his AAA FIP is over 5. That’s actually a tad lucky on the HR front — it should be 5.30. He’s not even getting an unusually high number of groundballs. MLE FIP is a cool 5.59. If we were to do some kind of in-season Marcel for him, we’d probably get something in the 5.25 range for him.
Who wants to set up the tee for Josh Willingham?
Also, cheese.
by Jeff Sackmann on Jul 28, 2009 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
what happen to this place?
Today, you showed up.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Was that really called for?
battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm
by Michael M on Jul 28, 2009 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
wow
totally not called for.
the guy is raising good points, and you (and kirbir) are acting like he’s pointing a gun at your dog.
Also, cheese.
by Jeff Sackmann on Jul 28, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions 4 recs
Thank you Jeff, missed you around these parts
battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm
by Michael M on Jul 28, 2009 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As a lurker
For over the last three years I enjoyed the witty dialogue, statistical analysis, and passion for the Brewers. However, I now come around much less frequently and enjoy the website significantly less. I imagine that is irrelevant to the community here since I do not participate, but I wonder if I am alone in my sentiments.
The dialogue is no longer as engaging; the quality or interesting analysis, although still sometimes enlightening (thanks Jordan), does not have the density of content it once did. I agree that the passion still persists, maybe even has increased. But the largest change is the stifling, maybe moralistic tone. I understand the demographics have changed. The changes, as I see them, are possibly the result of what was a small niche community of fans expanding into a more representative community of fans in general. A certain degree of protection to express ideas, no matter the quality of supportive evidence, must be maintained as the community grows. However, the tendency to protect is often unprofessional as was your comment above.
I appreciate all the effort you put into this site. It has provided me enjoyment and a Brewer community, the latter being much appreciated as I am in SoCal. It is still a quality site. However, (a) the enjoyable game threads are all but disappeared. (b) The analysis is drowned in increased content. © And the tone bothers me. I think the (a) and © are related and wonder whether that is why the contributes to what I perceive in (b).
I realize my opinion does not probably matter. But I used to tell my friends to check out the site. Now, I will check in even less.
I have too much time to get anything done
by mschroeder on Jul 28, 2009 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions 9 recs
No, I agree
“. The changes, as I see them, are possibly the result of what was a small niche community of fans expanding into a more representative community of fans in general.”
I think that’s a very large part of it. And that’s ok, it’s just I miss what it was. I still frequent here because I feel it’s still the best analysis for the Brewers I can find and I love the passion on here.
battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm
by Michael M on Jul 28, 2009 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
rec'd
i am in total agreement with you. i’ve been a lurker on here since 2007 and a poster since the beginning of this year. not quite sure what happened to this place.
i’m just kind of sick of the pissing matches people get into on here
"This one means 'Kill Kirk!!!!'... And also, 'hallelujah'... Depending on the context."
by trippingandy on Jul 28, 2009 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A-ha!
i’ve been a lurker on here since 2007 and a poster since the beginning of this year…
I think we have the source of mschroeder’s discontent. :)
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
by roguejim on Jul 28, 2009 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
pissing is fun though
much more enjoyable than a pooping match.
by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 28, 2009 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can say that again!
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But perhaps not a poop THROWING match.
I fear I’ve gone too far.
Yes, I’ve gone too far.
by Rubie Q on Jul 28, 2009 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even if I am pounding on a dead horse, I feel somewhat compelled to respond here.
For over the last three years I enjoyed the witty dialogue, statistical analysis, and passion for the Brewers.
I’m sorry if you feel the site isn’t headed in the direction you’d like. I am the writer I am, and I do my best to provide quality, informative, thought/conversation provoking content. I’m not Jeff, and likely never will be on his level. The best I can do is apologize for not being there.
But the largest change is the stifling, maybe moralistic tone.
This is the charge I take issue with. I present my ideas and opinions, and I frequently argue on their behalf, but I think “moralistic” is a bit unfair. I present my opinions, frequently with a poll or an invitation to present the other side. This site would be a pretty boring place if no one had opinions. Not all of my opinions represent the consensus, nor do I expect them to. I write in a strong tone because that’s my style, and wishy-washy writing doesn’t really do anything for anyone. I don’t always respond well when called out, but who does?
The vast majority of conversation on this site stays pretty civil. I step out of line from time to time, as do others, but I could count the times on one hand over the course of this season where I’ve had to step into a conversation to keep it from spiraling out of control.
A certain degree of protection to express ideas, no matter the quality of supportive evidence, must be maintained as the community grows. However, the tendency to protect is often unprofessional as was your comment above.
I’d like to believe we offer pretty fair protection of expression here. I don’t delete comments that disagree with me, I typically respond to them, either to clarify my argument or further a point. If my comment above was out of line I apologize for that, and Jacob, if you’re still reading, I’m sorry if I offended you. With that said, seeing you commenting is usually how I know I’m in for a long morning or belaboring points and being called a moron.
I’m not out to protect an agenda, promote hostility or drive off those with opposing views. I’m here to offer my views (along with gathering the views of others in the Mug), and use them to inform/interact with thousands of Brewer fans who swing through daily.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
KL
I think you do a great job at writing a relatively unbiased mug every morning. Today, your emotions clearly took over. However, Tom H is a professional beat writer, and his emotions have taken over his posts at least as much as yourself. I wouldn’t sweat it too much.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Pounding on a dead horse"?
Is anyone else…disturbed by that image?
:)
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
by roguejim on Jul 28, 2009 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i wasn’t offended. actually, i kinda took it as a compliment…
here’s why:
Not all of my opinions represent the consensus
I think most, maybe all, of your opinions do represent the consensus. When i say you have bad baseball sense, i’m not calling you a moron as much as simply dubbing you, what crazy rambling al would dub you, a casual fan. and that represents the biggest change here, your leadership has shifted this from a place of insight, to one of reactionary fanboy enthusiasm. they both have their place, this one serves a larger audience so maybe it is right for it to have gone the same was as corporate media, or (worse) bleedcubbieblue.
but it’s a place where small samples rule, there is conversation about the number of comments, and speculation about what was thrown in the locker room are proxies for a certain level of passion the casual fan requires of their baseball players. i’ll always be a thorn in the side of these communities.
With that said, seeing you commenting is usually how I know I’m in for a long morning or belaboring points and being called a moron.
i don’t think it’s a coincidence that i’m now only posting once a month instead everyday… it’s a lot of work for me, too.
:)
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Jul 28, 2009 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
The best I can do is apologize for not being there
The change in content and writing is not directly indicative of you. I believe the departure, e.g. Dixie, or less frequent posting of some significant contributors, e.g. Battlekow, Jeff, etc., plays the more significant role in the dialogue change. Adding the readership expansion most likely increased the change in atmosphere, which is not in itself negative. As I said I do not directly contribute to the community so I realize my statement is somewhat irrelevant.
This is the charge I take issue with. I present my ideas and opinions, and I frequently argue on their behalf, but I think "moralistic" is a bit unfair.
I may have combined two separate things into one issue. First, the stifling I reference stems from comments like the one I called unprofessional. In addition, as with any community the dominant personalities and contributors dictate the discourse. That is acceptable. Discourse has both a content and tone. I may be unable to articulate how it has exactly changed, but I think the reaction Jeff references (sorry Jeff for bringing in your name) is a good example of something that occasionally happens. I stress occasionally because I do not want to exaggerate the point. However, I think it is in stark contrast to the typical atmosphere of the past where conflicts were in the more sabermetric-typical tone of snarkiness and condescension. I believe some people prefer the former, but I prefer the latter since, well, I am snarky and somewhat condescending at times. I do not think one is more appropriate than the other. It is just a matter of taste, which is what I was trying to express in my post.
The moralistic accusation stems more from the general movement away from tolerating f-bombs, pictures of excessive rally cleavage (and pics in general in game threads), DP references, and content related tone such as Braun’s clothing release party. I again stress that I can understand why these things change. The clothing line was not authoritative as you introduced it as a discussion topic so we can differentiate that from the others. We have more female contributors and I assume people that do not appreciate swearing. I do think some hypocrisy was expressed in the early season hoopla over the pictures in game threads, but I do not want to offend anyone with details. But let me say this: I enjoyed Brewers v Reds game more when the Reds Reporter guys more frequently posted in our game threads.
I’d like to believe we offer pretty fair protection of expression here.
That was my point. I sometimes think good discussion is stifled by protecting statements or cliches that are no longer chased away. I again stress that this is not necessarily bad. It is just different. This is your and the Brewcrew Ball community’s site. It is dynamic. I never want to be thought of as proposing preserving the past. Otherwise things will not change.
I do think you do a good job with this site for what I assume you are striving for. The main reason I return is to read your frosty mugs. I do miss the lively game threads, Battlekow game recaps, predominantly saber-inclined discussions, etc., but that does not mean the site is without value. It just does not appeal to me like it once did, and part of that reason is the tone. For some reason I simply felt inclined to finally contribute my sentiments on the change in response to your statement.
I have too much time to get anything done
by mschroeder on Jul 28, 2009 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
Rec'd for having the sheer gall to copyright your post.
:)
The rest of it was OK, too..
:) + Suppan = :'(
by NoahJ on Jul 28, 2009 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was about to say
If anything comes out of this mug, its that I have inadvertnently learned to © my posts…maybe I can® too….and™….wheeeee! What else am I missing?
by grant76 on Jul 28, 2009 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So much negativity today... maybe we all need to get wasted & hug it out...
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 10:12 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
ahhhh mykenk with the best idea i've heard all day
i for one am a firm believer that all can be solved with alcohol and hugging
"This one means 'Kill Kirk!!!!'... And also, 'hallelujah'... Depending on the context."
by trippingandy on Jul 28, 2009 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm a firm believer
that the only thing firm in such circumstances is not the hug.
nor does it stop with the hug.
by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 28, 2009 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This thread has to be on pace to set a BCB record for most comments
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 10:15 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts on last night
Suppan was left out to dry. Period.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 10:17 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I wonder
After grand slam #2…why take Suppan out? If you want to get your bullpen a break, give them a break, don’t waste them after 13 runs have come in.
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
by roguejim on Jul 28, 2009 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I hope the Brewer players
Are not melting down the way the Brewer fans are. If its the low point for us, its probably the low point for them.
Prince is probably on the warpath, struggling pitchers better have their head on a swivel. Maybe a dugout altercation is what the team needs. Or a players-only closed door meeting. Get it done Deputy!
by grant76 on Jul 28, 2009 10:24 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I can't imagine what was thrown in the locker room last night.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt it'd help him at all, sadly
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They could light a fire under his ass
by donating money to stem cell research
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 10:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's get a collection going right now
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 10:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would be awesome
“Jeff, I know you’re trying, but the results just aren’t there. The rest of the guys and I talked about it, and we decided that for every start where you don’t give us at least a quality start, we’re donating $50,000 to stem cell research.”
Not only might that help the team, but he might decide to leave the team after the season.
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
by roguejim on Jul 28, 2009 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions 4 recs
fully backed
aaaand rec’d
"I'll be glad to have Ryan help if he wants to. I'll give him a badge and he can be my deputy."
-Sheriff Melvin
by sowingwildoats on Jul 28, 2009 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm worried
That nothing was thrown. This team seems lifeless at times lately.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
From looking at each player on the field
there were only two possible things that would have happened in that lockerroom. Complete Silence, Pack and Leave. Or Door Slamming, Screaming, and Object Throwing.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Willie Harris
dancing in the outfield was pretty entertaining.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brewer Nation is showing up
We’re already over 100 comments.
Even McCalvy’s blog, which is rarely commented, has 5 comments on the Villa story.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 10:41 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Slightly off topic
I feel kind of bad for McCalvy.
He’s a good beat writer and maintains an informative blog, and no one ever comments. Sometimes I think about it, but I don’t want to be the only guy to comment, and I’m probably going to leave the comment over here somewhere anyway…
by grant76 on Jul 28, 2009 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think there are that many members of mlb.com. I’m also curious what his readership is. The JSonline blog clearly gets more traffic. Since there isn’t an established community over by McCalvy, I think a lot of people don’t bother signing up, just to leave 1 comment. I know I would never comment if I didn’t already have an mlb.com account.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, I went to read McCalvy's blog
Those five comments are all the same comment from the same guy.
by grant76 on Jul 28, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahahahah
I didn’t even check them.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And they're all by "A. McC."
That’s just sad.
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
by roguejim on Jul 28, 2009 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now there are 7 comments
In his and my defense, it’s really hard to leave comments on that blog
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Carlos blows up this start
we can kiss giving him away in a trade good bye…
::Another 95% plus FanGraphs win goes right down the fucking tubes:: Indians fan after Prince's Grand Salami
by Wizzyconsin on Jul 28, 2009 11:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I disagree. People still want Manny Parra, I think CV's got enough potential to still have value.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Id be very upset if we got rid of Parra, not so much with CV.
I know he had a tough run this year but when he got his head on straight, he pitched two solid games while the brewer bats were asleep. Also, I think the idea that Kendall doesnt allow him to throw as good of a game as Rivera needs to be investigated a little more.
::Another 95% plus FanGraphs win goes right down the fucking tubes:: Indians fan after Prince's Grand Salami
by Wizzyconsin on Jul 28, 2009 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe, but CV's had periods where he's been damn near unstoppable.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
unstoppable periods?
may as well flag me…
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
What a stupid reactionary post.
It’s clear who knows things around here and who just likes to talk like they do. I think it’s funny people bitching about how he didn’t go to the bullpen early when the bullpen was awful. Could they have kept it closer, probably, but what happens tomorrow when Villa
The “tired bullpen” argument only works for so long here. Six members of the seven man Brewer bullpen have been overworked of late
Classic.
I wish I could ignore the reality of the situation to appease reactionaries and to get more comments!
"Cubs suck. I own them" -Doug Davis
by Metagen on Jul 28, 2009 11:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ah, there's the rub
battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm
by Michael M on Jul 28, 2009 11:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Reply fail, meant to reply to Metagen
battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm
by Michael M on Jul 28, 2009 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I did it to.
"Cubs suck. I own them" -Doug Davis
by Metagen on Jul 28, 2009 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And, I've lost track of what's going on... think we need an overflow thread :)
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking that too
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm posting down here because the replies are failing in the discussion above
i appreciate what jacob is doing here by being civil and bringing up some points that make us have to think about laying out an easy blame on macha. i may not always be in his corner and i definitely question some of his lineup/pinch hit choices, but as far as balancing the bullpen, it’s nowhere near as i remember when ned yost was in.
"I'll be glad to have Ryan help if he wants to. I'll give him a badge and he can be my deputy."
-Sheriff Melvin
by sowingwildoats on Jul 28, 2009 11:52 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Considering at most times he has about 4 people in the bullpen that can come in and not give up runs.
I think he’s done pretty well. And now it’s probably closer to 1-2 guys who can actually pitch scoreless baseball. We really need 3-4 solid starts to get us back on track.
You need your starters to go at least 6 innings most of the time, and certainly not less then 6 on multiple days in the same week. Or else you get games like yesterday, where you have no other option but to cross your fingers and hope he gets out of it.
"Cubs suck. I own them" -Doug Davis
by Metagen on Jul 28, 2009 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly. we've been scrambling for pitchers to make it through six innings
at this rate, i think they just want 6 innings eaten up no matter what goes on (wasn’t he considered an inning-eater anyway?)
"I'll be glad to have Ryan help if he wants to. I'll give him a badge and he can be my deputy."
-Sheriff Melvin
by sowingwildoats on Jul 28, 2009 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As much as I don't like the disagreements, the bickering, whatever, it's effectively got me through the morning. Thanks guys!
Hugs & Whiskey all around.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 11:52 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
There was whiskey available this whole time?!?
NOW you tell me.
by Rubie Q on Jul 28, 2009 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll take a shot of that.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pass the bottle
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Suppan's stats, for the curious (or morbid)
- In 21 starts this season, he has a 5.27 ERA and whopping 1.70 WHIP.
- On average, he’ll get one out in the 6th inning before being pulled (so for your typical Suppan start, expect to need 3+ innings from your bullpen).
- Twice he’s pitched 7 innings, though not into the 8th inning.
- Soup is just as likely to get pulled before the 5th inning (4 times in 2009) as he is to pitch into the 7th inning (4 times in 2009)
- He has more strikeouts than walks, though just barely.
HOWEVER
- Of those 21 starts, 9 have been quality starts (6/3), which is astounding to me. Granted, 5 of them were in the first six weeks of the season.
- His ERA on July 17 was 4.43, the lowest it had been all season. Right now, a 4.43 ERA would easily be second on the team, behind Gallardo.
===
We all know Suppan is overpaid, something I’ve long given up trying to justify (IDWT). We all know he’s not very good, and that he often fails to meet even that very low bar.
Suppan is also not an innings-eater. Well, he is in that he’s rarely hurt, but he’s not the guy you want on the mound if you’re looking to give your bullpen a rest. If Macha was looking for that, as BA and Rock suggested last night, well, that’s just an error in judgment. While acknowledging that Macha has limited options, expecting a long, productive outing from Suppan…well, the numbers suggest that that just doesn’t happen.
Most of the time, he will never pitch “well.” He allows lot of baserunners, and isn’t likely to rack up strikeouts. (As Jacob pointed out above, for Soup to get through 4 innings without giving up a run is a stellar game for him. But Macha has to know that when Soupy is on the mound, you have your relief crew start warming up in the 5th no matter the score.)
You know, Suppan is what he is: he’ll usually get you 5 innings +, and when you pull him, and you almost certainly will have to before the 7th inning, you’re usually still in the game. Sometimes (like yesterday) you’re not, but then again, sometimes, he’ll shut down the Cubs in Wrigley over 7 innings, like on July 3rd. Most of the time, he’s pitching in trouble for most of the game, and he’ll let in 3 or 4 before you pull him.
Getting mad at Suppan is like getting mad at the stapler when you accidentally staple your thumb. I’m a little mad at Macha for expecting more out of Suppan, if that is indeed the case, and especially at Moustache for signing an aging, mediocre pitcher to such a bad contract. But part of it is just bad luck: although some regression was inevitable, Suppan’s stats over the previous 4 seasons did not predict this bad a performance. I mean, his WHIP in each of the last three seasons have been higher than anything he’s done since before 2000.
All that said…it’s clear we need a guy to absorb innings to protect the rest of the bullpen. Given that the difference between Suppan and your replacement pitcher is becoming negligible, and we’re stuck with his contract, I’d have no problems with making Suppan the swingman. Let Dillard or Villanueva or KL Snow start; I think it’ll give us a better chance of winning.
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
by roguejim on Jul 28, 2009 12:14 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Has anyone actually stapled their thumb? How dumb can you be? ;)
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
::cough:: no comment
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
by roguejim on Jul 28, 2009 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've done it
Oddly, trying to unjam the stapler. Hurts like a mo fo!
"If lovin’ Braun is wrong, I want to be a repeat offender!"
RIP Nick Adenhart - Stop Drunk Driving
by kirbir on Jul 28, 2009 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've managed just about every injury that results from lack-of-coordination
including 3rd degree burns to the feet from near-boiling water as well as falling of a cliff.
so, I’m pretty sure thumb stapling and hammering have both occurred at some point.
by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 28, 2009 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, so remember when the Brewers lost 9 of their first 13?
Things were looking pretty bad. And then they won 21 of 26.
by grant76 on Jul 28, 2009 12:19 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Thank You
When we won 21 of 26, we were playing a very similar level of competition. I still am looking for a strong August. I realize the Sept. schedule is tough, but we’re playing other teams in the playoff hunt (SF, STL, CHC, HOU). With a good series or two against some of those teams, we would create space between us and the competition, and put ourselves into the playoffs.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem is that we're already a week into the "easy stretch" of the schedule
against the Pirates, Braves, and Nats. And we’re 2-5 during that time.
by Brew Angel on Jul 28, 2009 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Optimism
grant beat me to it, but he makes the point. The Brewers still have the easiest schedule a team could ask for over the next 20+ games. Even after giving up the (first) grand slam, the Brewers hitters came back with some timely hitting of their own. They bounced back.
Has anyone else noticed Hart has heated up since the All-Star Break? Hitting .305, On-Base .372. Sure, they’re pretty much all singles, but it’s a breath of fresh air.
Before the All-Star Break, the Brewers only had 3 bats, Counsel, Braun, Fielder. The realistically, and improbably, needed 2 more bats to have a solid offense for a 2nd half run.
Counsel is continuing his baffling streak hitting .370 since ASB, Lopez is still red hot off the trade and Hart returning to his beginning-of-the-season form.
Their pitching can’t be that bad for that long. Just as they regress back towards the mean in sucking, they’ll swing back to form on the other. The team is poised to go on a good run.
by ecocd on Jul 28, 2009 12:25 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
an easy schedule doesnt mean anything
if we arent beating the teams we are supposed to beat.
::Another 95% plus FanGraphs win goes right down the fucking tubes:: Indians fan after Prince's Grand Salami
by Wizzyconsin on Jul 28, 2009 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which is... what I've been trying to say :) Welcome aboard the hope train...
… kool-aid’s in the caboose.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 12:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Really just wanted to use the word "caboose"
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
man, all that kool-aid went straight to my caboose
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Woodward...
… leadoff double then no hits through 8? nice.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 12:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
is was Woodard
not Woodward, wasn’t it?
Brewers fan lost in South Carolina.
by SCBrewer on Jul 28, 2009 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it was Bernstein
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
by roguejim on Jul 28, 2009 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Icing on that cake...
In the nightcap of that double-header, the Crew turned a 5-4-3 triple play, started by the Almighty Jeff Cirillo. I wish I would have left work earlier to see the first couple innings of Woodard’s start, but I still saw most of it. :)
It's called "playing the percentages."
by hilbelink on Jul 28, 2009 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wrecked morning
I had a lot to get done at work today but have accomplished nothing due to this thoroughly entertaining thread.
Casual fan alert:
Can I just say that since the plane that is the 2009 Brewers has crashed into the mountain, all options should be explored. I think the Bill Castro experiment has failed and it is time to bring Chris Bosio up from Nashville to handle the pitchers. He did a good job with Manny Parra and a shake-up needs to happen and this seems like a good one.
Now destroy me.
"I still consider myself the best third baseman in the league" -Bill Hall
by GoCrew on Jul 28, 2009 1:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, I've been labeled a casual today too
But I think that might be an idea worth exploring.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Jul 28, 2009 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was wondering that too
We’re 14th in the NL in ERA (4.68), quality starts (46), and WHIP (1.43), and 15th in opponents’ OPS (.790). It’s hard to determine what makes a good coach vs. a bad coach; then again, if we replaced Billy Castro with Fidel Castro, what’s the worst that could happen?
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
by roguejim on Jul 28, 2009 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know what the best that could happen is
Cuban Cigar giveaway games!
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now that’s something I can support.
by SgtClueLs on Jul 28, 2009 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boom, Roasted.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Jul 28, 2009 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The look on Bill Castro's face when a pitcher is melting down ...
reminds me an awful lot of the look Ray Rhodes had on his face throughout the entire 1999 Packers season.
And that ain’t a good thing.
by Rubie Q on Jul 28, 2009 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll never look at chewing gum the same way again
battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm
by Michael M on Jul 28, 2009 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Red Sox got something for Kotsay.
… okay, not really.
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 2:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The headline got me excited for a minute
Red Sox Acquire Brian Anderson For Mark Kotsay
then I realized it’s the other Brian Anderson
by CheezeconQueso on Jul 28, 2009 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
@Brewerash with his first Twitter update since... the draft?
“meetings and discussions continue with nothing imminent”
by Mykenk on Jul 28, 2009 4:08 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I know this is off-subject, but Favre is staying retired
according to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune.
by oconnobe on Jul 28, 2009 4:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
for what period of time?
the next 36 hours?
by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 28, 2009 6:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs



























