Name that Catcher
by Getting Yosted on Jul 30, 2009 4:41 PM CDT
16 comments
We all know our beloved Jason Kendall has struggled at the plate recently, but exactly how bad has he been? Here is Kendall's average for the last 3 years: 243/317/309 and a 67 OPS+. For some historical perspective(and a fun guessing game) on these seasons of futility: What catcher, known for his innovative approach to catching knuckleballs, posted a 200/293/287/62 OPS+ career line? This career spanned six years in an era so dominated by pitchers it led to multiple rule changes.
0 recs |
16 comments
Email
Print
Comments
has to be Ueck
or was it just rhetorical?
by keephopealive on Jul 30, 2009 4:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
agree
plus i think he said that he waited for the knuckler to stop rolling and then would just walk over and pick it up.
by Capt Science on Jul 30, 2009 5:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree...
He considers one of of his two career highlights getting intentionally walked by Koufax. Go Ueck!
by bplatz on Jul 31, 2009 12:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the other...
Career highlights? I had two. I got an intentional walk from Sandy Koufax and I got out of a rundown against the Mets.
by Capt Science on Jul 31, 2009 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was that obvious, huh.
I just thought it weird that our starting catcher, who is so great he can’t sit for more than 30 games a year and bat lead-off periodically has put together three years comparable to a guy who’s offensive production is a punchline around baseball.
On the plus side, at least he’s being compared to a Hall of Famer!
by Getting Yosted on Jul 30, 2009 10:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Not that comparable...
Yes, if you compare Kendall’s last three seasons to Uecker’s career in terms of BA, OBP, SLG and OPS+, they do seem comparable… although Kendall’s is still better across the board.
If you check their stats a little closer, you’ll also notice that Uecker struck out quite a bit considering he wasn’t a power hitter. Yes, Kendall isn’t hitting nearly as well as he’s done in his career, but he is very patient at the plate and doesn’t strike out very much.
Although I do agree that Macha should play Rivera more.
by sjlee on Jul 31, 2009 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Although, with more ABs, we'd actually see how not very good Rivera is...
by Mykenk on Jul 31, 2009 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Possibly...
but the fact of the matter is that we already know what Kendall is capable of at the plate in 150+ games.
Rivera may only hit .250 with more ABs, but that would still be an improvement over Kendall. Plus, despite saying he’s fine playing this much, I think that Kendall would actually perform better with more rest.
by sjlee on Jul 31, 2009 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe i can look forward to his colorful commentary in 30 years
but for now, I just want him to ride the pine
by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 31, 2009 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's kinda sad to think
that the only way we’d be worse off is if Ueck or perhaps Chad Moeller were our catcher.
"That's not a weird stat. Rickie is a run-scorer," Yost said. "It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter," Yost told reporters. "See, you guys have no concept. He's a run-scorer. So there's nothing weird about it. That's what he does."
by Hyatt on Jul 31, 2009 9:54 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Your'e failing to take into account Ueck's game-calling skills
I’d like to point out that Ueck’s game-calling ability with Niekro was practically flawless which puts him on par with Kendall for that intangible.
by ecocd on Jul 31, 2009 10:33 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
well played
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Aug 3, 2009 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Brew Crew Ball
Related FanShots on Brew Crew Ball
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recent FanPosts
NL Central Standings
| W | L | PCT | GB | STRK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
St. Louis
|
91 | 71 | .561 | 0 | Lost 6 |
|
Chicago
|
83 | 78 | .515 | 7.5 | Lost 1 |
|
Milwaukee
|
80 | 82 | .493 | 11 | Won 3 |
|
Cincinnati
|
78 | 84 | .481 | 13 | Won 2 |
|
Houston
|
74 | 88 | .456 | 17 | Lost 3 |
|
Pittsburgh
|
62 | 99 | .385 | 28.5 | Lost 2 |
(updated 2.9.2010 at 4:45 PM CST)
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
