Negotiations with Kentrail Davis have "gotten ugly"
"...they agreed to his figure and he wouldn't take it." Give you three guesses as to who his agent is, and the first two don't count.
Davis was the Brewers' second pick in this year's draft, #39 overall.
over 2 years ago
battlekow
23 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
39 is a compensation pick right?
So, if we don’t sign him we would get a pick in next years draft?
battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm
I thought that, too
But I asked KLaw, and he says supplemental picks are subject to compensation, so we’d get pick #39A next year.
It was a great selection of awesome.
what is the difference between 39 and #39A?
The designated hitter rule is like letting someone else take Wilt Chamberlain's free throws.
There isn't necessarily a #39A
all it means is that, if we don’t sign Kentrail, we get the pick after #39 next year. Technically the Nats second pick this year wasn’t #10 overall, it was #9A, since they picked (but didn’t sign) Aaron Crow with #9 the previous year.
Also, cheese.
by Jeff Sackmann on Jul 10, 2009 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions
Bus Cook?
battlekow: Bill is having an oppo-gasm
by Michael M on Jul 9, 2009 8:57 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
He would have retired
…and then go signed with the Cubs just to stick it to Melvin.
Blow Cubs Blow! Blow Cubs Blow! Hey Milwaukee, what do you say? The Cubs are going to lose today.
by RahRahBullCrap on Jul 11, 2009 12:25 AM CDT up reply actions
Ryan Braun?
Wants the team to save the green for pitchers. Don’t need no more OFers.
by Getting Yosted on Jul 9, 2009 9:55 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
He is the King of Deputies, you know.
"I will agree that the attitude [at BCB] is ridiculous and they have done so much to instigate animosity and then block us from responding. Real mature!"
I'll take Scott Boras
…for the win.
Blow Cubs Blow! Blow Cubs Blow! Hey Milwaukee, what do you say? The Cubs are going to lose today.
Good luck, Kentrail,
I hope you blow out your knees.
More Proof of how important signability is when drafting.
Maybe it is time to adjust the draft rules.
If a College Senior is taken in the draft and does not sign with the club that drafted him, he may not sign a free agent contract with another club for two years (instead of the one that it is now)
Sophmores & Juniors should have to declare for the draft like they do in the football & basketball. If you declare yourself eligible, then the same rules apply as a senior draftee. Sign or sit for two years.
I really don’t like wishing people harm – but Boras really pushes that… I hope the lug nuts come off of his Bugatti Veyron @ 190 mph
by Saberilliterate on Jul 10, 2009 7:52 AM CDT reply actions
It depends upon the goal of the draft
It’s really a fundamental question of the goal of the draft. If it’s truly supposed to be a way to increase competitive balance by giving the worst teams better players, then signability questions have to go out the window. If the only goal is adding order to what would be a completely chaotic process for signing rookies (see: college recruiting) signability is a perfectly acceptable aspect of the draft.
Personally, I would like to see a more stringent “slot money” set-up because I’m in favor of the balance aspect of the draft. It’s not very capitalistic, though.
I'm against any kind of restrictions of that sort, but...
a better alternative (to me) would be to give every team a draft “salary cap” — say, they can spend $20MM on draft bonuses, or whatever. That way if a team drafting at the very end of the first round wants to load up on a few overslot guys and only bother signing 25 of their picks, they can … if somebody else wants to sign 50 new players, they can do that too, but they couldn’t spend as much per pick.
Also, cheese.
by Jeff Sackmann on Jul 10, 2009 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions
I could buy that, but I agree with ecocd – it isn’t a very capitalistic plan. I think the other plan is to loosen the lug nuts on Boras’ car and let him go all James Dean
I don’t know what the solution is. I know that what we have sucks. And I don’t want to be one of those people that say something sucks without offering a possible solution.
by Saberilliterate on Jul 10, 2009 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions
"I could buy that, but I agree with ecocd – it isn’t a very capitalistic plan."
Neither is the very idea of a draft.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 10, 2009 3:04 PM CDT reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recent FanPosts
NL Central Standings
| W | L | PCT | GB | STRK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chicago
|
0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | Lost 0 |
|
Cincinnati
|
0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | Lost 0 |
|
Houston
|
0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | Lost 0 |
|
Milwaukee
|
0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | Lost 0 |
|
Pittsburgh
|
0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | Lost 0 |
|
St. Louis
|
0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | Lost 0 |
(updated 2.12.2012 at 7:02 PM CST)
Baseball Nation Recent Stories
In Association With
Big League Stew - MLB - Yahoo! Sports
- Photo: Padres fan regrets letting mother capture moment with Trevor Hoffman
- Marlins agree to unretire No. 5 for Logan Morrison, who will honor his father’s favorite player
- Weatherman Derek Holland does Dallas TV
- Ask Alex: Will Julio Teheran or Matt Moore win rookie of the year?
- Ku Klux Klan, umpires and bowling: Why the minor leagues tossed out Jim Evans academy
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
