Witrado on Trading Fielder: "I'm not saying it's a must, but they have to"
(OK, that headline probably isn't fair, since it would seem that Anthony meant to include "do something" or "listen to offers" or something like that at the end of that sentence. But that's not what he wrote, and he writes for a living.)
ANYWAY, in his latest blog offering, Anthony links to the FanGraphs article which advocates trading Prince for pitching -- and he wants you to know that he did not steal this idea, he "had this exact conversation during batting practice before I saw this thread."
As you might expect, Witrado's in favor of moving Prince if the team can't find another way to improve the pitching staff -- which, Anthony says, "as of now, injured or healthy, it isn't good enough to carry the team to the playoffs." (Bu-wha-huh? When is an injured rotation ever good enough to get a team to the playoffs? And, yes, I think I know what he meant to say -- even if everybody was healthy, this pitching staff ain't great -- but, again: not what he wrote, writes for a living.)
And, as you might also expect, while coming out in favor of the move, Witrado doesn't put any thought into who the Brewers could (or would) actually trade Prince for ... which makes sense, because there aren't a lot of teams who can offer top-of-the-line, Major League-ready pitching, which is what Doug Melvin would undoubtedly demand in exchange for a guy who has OPS'ed 1.001 this year and is a lethal left-handed weapon in a team devoid of left-handed hitters.
But, hey, what do I know? I wasn't chatting up this topic at the batting cage yesterday.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ugh
Not looking forward to a long, long offseason full of Fielder trade speculation and everyone’s theoretical trade packages, it is already getting old.
I'll trade him
for Matt Cain, Tim Lincecum and a 27 year old Bonds!
by Braunstalker on Aug 26, 2009 5:30 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Ideally, savings
But I’d settle for junk.
Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.
by TheJay on Aug 26, 2009 6:38 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I would try to get a vintage Willie Mays thrown in on that deal.
Fielder is too good for just those three.
Trade him to the '69 Mets
And get back Seaver and Ryan. Seaver would be in his last pre-arb year, and Ryan wouldn’t be arb eligible until 2011 so the deal gives the team financial flexibility to boot.
by Getting Yosted on Aug 26, 2009 6:52 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm enjoying this DiFelice segment a lot more than I expected.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
I was so pissed when i saw that
He claims that the brewers cant up grade their pitching this offseason but there are at least 8 pitchers that would be either quatilty number 2 or 3 pitchers. Does he consider that fielder and braun are the most productive 3 and 4 hitters from 2009? If the organization spends some money to get pitching and keeps fielder the next two years they may have a chance to get to the world series.
Contradickting Reportz
Its been whiles cinse I rote somthing mor than a lineup, so I wuz told to do some writings!
I are not saying we shouldn’t trade Fielder, but we should trade Fielder. Remembers that tyme he wuz all slapping Manny? Rememburing that time he wur all angered at the doors that said “,Dodgurs” on et? While i’m not sayn he can has angery problem, he has anger problenm. I tink dat team may need him to leave whil hes still rly good. We culd gett big playas 4 him, mabye evn top prospecks!
I wuld say who dey shuld tradings for, but I cants. Srsly, I dun no othr teams rosters lol!
hop u enjoid mii gr8 reports on why we shuldn’t but shuld trayd Pirnce Feildre! Tom sed’s it fills my quota four teh month finalle. One tyme, I used quotas in article. It was mai fav! k thx bai lol.
Anthony Witrado
PensBurgh penalty - Lavender - 2 Minutes for Excessive Stanley Cup Raising.
by Lavender on Aug 26, 2009 9:49 PM CDT reply actions 11 recs
I wuz talkin to Prinz
n I sed, ‘hay, r u mad that i sed dis team shuld trade u?’ N he sez, ‘Are u kidding, T-Bonz? U n me are BFF 4eva. LOL.’ N i sed, ‘Im gonna LOL too, cuz the people think dat u n me aren’t BFF, but I sed we wuz BFF, but we r TOTES BFF 4 realz.’
Prinz is totes fat, wit a “f” n a “ph.”
Paging TheJay
My roomate just asked, what’s the least number of pitches thrown in a CG?
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, ""That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
I'm not TheJay, but this is what I found...
It’s unofficially credited to Red Barrett, who threw 58 pitches in a CG shutout against the Reds in 1944. At least, according to the article about when Carlos Silva shut down the Brewers.
The first JS comment beat me to it...
I too wonder how much Witrado wants Fielder traded to the Dodgers. Of course, there’s that little issue from earlier this season…
Not to be an obsessive BA linker
But Jim Callis had this response in a recent chat: (subscription required)
Eric (brewerscubs.com)
Prince Fielder or a couple young, highly-rated pitching prospects?
Jim Callis (2:58 PM)
Fielder.
Callis > LOLjournalist
Braun's numbers
Remind me again what Braun’s numbers are when Fielder DOESN’T bat behind him? Better yet, what are the cumulative numbers of the player who has batted in front of Prince for his career? One need look no further than last night’s game. They load the bases for Prince, and while they started him off with a swinging strike, they then went at least 8 inches outside on the next four pitches….WITH THE BASES LOADED! I just don’t see hwo you trade away your best hitter (outside of Yo, of course).
I am in the No Trading Prince camp
Imagine the Brewers offense without Bill Hall. Wait. What?
by Dikembe Meiztombo on Aug 30, 2009 6:56 PM CDT reply actions
trading Prince
would make absolutely no sense. He’s still pretty young, and if I’m not mistaken he’s cost-controlled for some time. Now’s the time to lock him in to an extension and buy out his arb years and possibly a couple years of FA. He’s a franchise player, no doubt about it, and ought to be paid for as such.

by 


























