On draft positioning
Last time we checked in with Andy Seiler, he had the Brewers projected to pick 12th in the 2010 June Draft. They've gone 1-3 since then to fall to 61-66, giving them a firmer grip on that spot. At present, they're still two games better than Toronto, who has the 11th spot, and a game worse than Houston, who holds pick #13.
With 35 games left to play, now seems like as good a time as any to take a look at how the Brewers can change their draft standing in the remaining month of the 2009 season. Follow the jump for the full table, but first, a few notes and disclaimers:
- For the purpose of projections, I assumed every major league team except the Brewers would continue on their current pace. This obviously won't happen but it gives us a basic starting point.
- Assuming teams continue on their current pace, the Brewers cannot finish with baseball's best or worst record. Going 35-0 the rest of the way would leave them at 96-66, five games back of the Yankees, who project to win 101 games. Going 0-35 would leave them at 61-101, three games better than the Nationals, who project to go 58-104. All other outcomes are possible, at least mathematically.
- 2010 draft order will be determined by 2009 record, with 2008 record being used as a tiebreaker. Because the Brewers had baseball's sixth best record in 2008, they only have a tiebreaker advantage over five teams.
- The Rangers (#15) and Rays (#31) will receive compensation picks in next year's draft for failing to sign this year's first round picks, so the final pick in the first round will be #32.
Follow the jump for more, and the table of outcomes.
| Brewer record | Draft Pick |
| 3-32 or worse | 2 |
| 5-30 or 4-31 | 3 |
| 6-29 | 4 |
| 8-27 or 7-28 | 5 |
| 9-26 or 10-25 | 6 |
| 11-24 or 12-23 | 9 |
| 13-22, 14-21 or 15-20 | 11 |
| 16-19 | 12 |
| 17-18 | 13 |
| 18-17 | 14 |
| 19-16 or 20-15 | 16 |
| 21-14 | 17 |
| 22-13 | 18 |
| 23-12 | 20 |
| 24-11 | 21 |
| 25-10, 26-9 or 27-8 | 22 |
| 28-7 | 23 |
| 29-6 or 30-5 | 24 |
| 31-4 | 26 |
| 32-3 or 33-2 | 27 |
| 34-1 | 28 |
| 35-0 | 30 |
I know this table is a confusing, jumbled up mess, so if someone has a better idea for how to display it, I'm open to suggestions.
Worth noting, though: Picks 1-16 (the first 15 picks, plus the Rangers' compensation pick) in the 2010 Draft will be protected, meaning the Brewers could not lose it as compensation for signing a Type A free agent. The Brewers will stay in the protected picks with a record of 19-16 or worse the rest of the way.
And, of course, this is not an excuse to root against the Brewers the rest of the way, just a nice silver lining to look at if they continue to play as they have lately.
0 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
One way to clean it up
Would be to eliminate the loss figures and just list wins. You could label it as “wins over the last 35 games.” Then “13-22, 14-21 or 15-20” becomes “13-15.”
by Cheeseandcorn on Aug 28, 2009 1:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Right
But when I tried it that way, it looked like a record. 13-15 becomes “13 wins and 15 losses.”
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Aug 28, 2009 1:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
how about "13 to 15"
or “between 13 and 15”
by PagsBrewCrew on Aug 28, 2009 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Assuming teams continue on their current pace
I think it is more likely that the brewers finish 35-0 then everyone else finishing exactly as they currently are. even if you give everyone a 50-50 shot of finishing with the same winning percentage that’s a likelihood of .5^29, or .0000002% chance.
Ok, so the brewers chance of going 35-0 is about the same as everyone else’s winning percentage staying the same. i think you can probably throw that table out the window tomorrow, so the formatting is not going to matter much.
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Aug 28, 2009 1:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I know that's unlikely, that's why I said:
This obviously won’t happen but it gives us a basic starting point.
"The reports are that he is getting better. The definition of better is nebulous."
by KLSnow on Aug 28, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i was just showing off my math skills.
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Aug 28, 2009 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and your charm.
Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.
by TheJay on Aug 28, 2009 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
i understand why you said that, and i forgive you.
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Aug 28, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
this is the basic starting point, right?
Team W L WPCT GL 1 WSN 46 82 0.359 34 2 KCR 49 78 0.386 35 3 BAL 52 76 0.406 34 4 SDP 54 75 0.419 33 5 PIT 53 72 0.424 37 6 CIN 55 71 0.437 36 7 ARI 56 72 0.438 34 8 OAK 56 71 0.441 35 9 CLE 57 70 0.449 35 10 NYM 58 70 0.453 34 11 TOR 58 67 0.464 37 12 MIL 61 66 0.480 35 13 HOU 62 65 0.488 35 14 MIN 63 64 0.496 35 15 CHW 64 64 0.500 34 16 CHC 63 62 0.504 37 17 SEA 66 62 0.516 34 18 ATL 67 60 0.528 35 19 FLA 67 60 0.528 35 20 DET 67 59 0.532 36 21 SFG 69 59 0.539 34 22 TBR 69 57 0.548 36 23 COL 72 56 0.563 34 24 TEX 71 55 0.563 36 25 STL 74 55 0.574 33 26 BOS 73 54 0.575 35 27 PHI 73 52 0.584 37 28 LAD 76 52 0.594 34 29 LAA 75 51 0.595 36 30 NYY 79 48 0.622 35
I dont think your table adds any new information
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Aug 28, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
...and the chance of brewers going 35-0 the rest of the way
is about .49^35, which is lower than .5^29
by PagsBrewCrew on Aug 28, 2009 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
you’re right (that’s why i tried to sneak in the “about the same” comment, they’re both about zero.)
Bring Back The Old Logo!
by jacob on Aug 28, 2009 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

























