The Cost of Zack Greinke
We all know Zack Greinke is ridiculously good, and given the Brewers' payroll restrictions is probably the best pitcher the team has a possibility of pursuing. As with any trade rumor on the internet, I have also seen some pretty outlandish proposals for what it would take to get Greinke (not from Brewers fans in particular) in both directions. Luckily, there have been at least six roughly comparable trades involving ace pitchers or Cy Young winners in the past few years. I decided to take a look into what was involved in those trades, and figured others might be interested in what I found (no analysis here really, I'm just listing what other people had said about the prospects involved at the time):
Zack Greinke, 2011?
Stats at the time of the trade:
Career: 1108.0 IP, 169 GS, 3.82 ERA, 116 ERA+, 7.6 K/9, 1 Cy Young
Previous two years: 449.1 IP, 66 GS, 3.14 ERA, 137 ERA+, 8.5 K/9
Erik Bedard, 2008
Stats at the time of the trade:
Career: 658.0 IP, 111 GS, 3.83 ERA, 119 ERA+, 8.7 K/9
Previous two years: 378.1 IP, 61 GS, 3.47 ERA, 132 ERA+, 9.3 K/9
On February 8, the Orioles traded their ace starter to the Mariners for a package of five players. Bedard was coming off the best season of his career and a fifth place finish in the AL Cy Young voting. Bedard's career and previous two years stats were also remarkable close to Greinke's, as were their contract statuses (2 years remaining for both). Seattle gave up the following package of players:
Adam Jones - CF
Pre-2006, BA #64; Pre-2007, BA #28
John Sickels: B+, SEA #1 (December 28, 2007)
MLB: 147 PA, 139 AB, .230/.267/.353/.620
George Sherrill - RP
MLB: 128.1 IP, 0 GS, 1.208 WHIP, 122 ERA+
Tony Butler - SP (Butler is in the Brewers system now, interestingly enough)
Pre-2008, Unranked (February 25, 2008)
John Sickels: B-, SEA #6 (December 28, 2007)
85.1 IP, A (18 GS), 4.75 ERA, 7.7 K/9
Chris Tillman - SP
Pre-2008, BA #67 (February 25, 2008)
John Sickels: B+, SEA #4 (December 28, 2007)
102.2 IP, A+
Kam Mickolio - RP
Pre-2008, Unranked (February 25, 2008)
John Sickels: C (December 28, 2007)
24.0 IP, AAA (0 GS), 3.75 ERA, 10.5 K/9
The Mariners gave up a package that included a B+ centerfielder who had struggled briefly but was still the centerpiece of the trade (Jones), a B+ starter in the lower levels of the system (Tillman), a B- starter and C reliever who were sort of the throw-ins of the trade (Butler and Mickolio), and a solid MLB reliever (Sherrill). It seems like at the time the trade was generally considered an overpay by Seattle, at least based on the internet reaction.
Johan Santana, 2008
Stats at the time of the trade:
Career: 1308.2 IP, 175 GS, 3.22 ERA, 141 ERA+, 9.5 K/9, 2 Cy Youngs
Previous two years: 452.2 IP, 67 GS, 3.04 ERA, 144 ERA+, 9.5 K/9
On February 1, 2008, the Mets and Twins finalized a trade that sent Santana to New York in exchange for four prospects. Santana had just one year of team control remaining, but it's important to note that the trade was largely contingent on Santana signing a six-year extension with New York (which he did on February 1). The players involved were:
Carlos Gomez - CF
Pre-2007, BA #60
Pre-2008, BA #52 (February 25, 2008)
John Sickels: B, NYM #3 (November 25, 2007)
MLB: 139 PA, 125 AB, .232/.288/.304/.592
Deolis Guerra - SP
Pre-2008, BA #35 (February 25, 2008)
John Sickels: B+, NYM #2 (November 25, 2007)
89.2 IP, A+ (20 GS)
Kevin Mulvey - SP
Pre-2008, Unranked (February 25, 2008)
John Sickels: B, NYM #4 (November 25, 2007)
151.2 IP, AA (26 GS), 3.32 ERA, 6.5 K/9
Phillip Humber - SP
Pre-2005, BA #50; Pre-2006, Unranked; Pre-2007, BA #73
Pre-2008, Unranked (February 25, 2008)
John Sickels: B-, NYM #7 (November 25, 2007)
139.0 IP, AAA (25 GS), 4.27 ERA, 7.8 K/9
As funny as it may sound now, Gomez was basically the centerpiece of a trade for the undisputed best pitcher in baseball at the time. Can somebody trick Dayton Moore into thinking it's 2008? Along with Gomez, who Sickels graded as a B centerfield prospect, were a B+ starter, a B starter, and a B- starter with a stock on the decline.
Roy Halladay, 2010
Stats at the time of the trade:
Career: 2046.2 IP, 287 GS, 3.43 ERA, 134 ERA+, 6.6 K/9, 1 Cy Young
Previous two years: 485.0 IP, 65 GS, 2.78 ERA, 155 ERA+, 7.7 K/9
On December 19, 2009, Toronto sent Halladay to Philadelphia for three prospects. Halladay only had a year remaining on his contract, but it seems like Philadelphia wouldn't have made this trade if they hadn't been extremely confident of an extension (which Halladay signed soon after). The players traded:
Kyle Drabek - SP
Pre-2010, BA #25 (February 3, 2010)
John Sickels: B+ (December 23, 2009)
96.1 IP, AA (14 GS)
Travis d'Arnaud - C
Pre-2010, BA #81 (February 3, 2010)
John Sickels: C (December 23, 2009)
540 PA, A (.738 OPS)
Michael Taylor - OF
Pre-2010, BA #29 (February 3, 2010)
John Sickles: B+ (December 28, 2009)
128 PA, AAA (.850 OPS)
Drabek and Taylor were both solid prospects, graded B+ by Sickels, and d'Arnaud was ranked alright by Baseball America as well. Between the track record of Halladay and Philadelphia's confidence in an extension, this might be the least comparable situation listed to any Greinke trade.
Cliff Lee, three trades (mid-2009, 2010, mid-2010)
C. LEE + B. FRANCISCO TO PHILLIES – 1.5 Seasons – (July 29, 2009)
Ben Francisco – OF (to PHILADELPHIA)
MLB: 1024 PA, 914 AB, .263/.330/.446/.776 (inc. 104 PA w/ Philadelphia)
Carlos Carrasco - SP
Pre-2007, BA #41; Pre-2008, BA #54, Pre-2009, BA #52
Midseason 2009, Unranked (>50) (July 9, 2009)
John Sickels: B, PHI #1 (October 28, 2008)
114.2 IP, AAA (20 GS), 5.18 ERA, 8.8 K/9
Jason Donald – SS
Pre-2009, BA #69
Midseason 2009, Unranked (>50) (July 9, 2009)
John Sickels: B-, PHI #4 (October 28, 2008)
230 PA, AAA (.629 OPS)
Lou Marson – C
Pre-2009, BA #66
Midseason 2009, Unranked (>50) (July 9, 2009)
John Sickels: C+, PHI #10 (October 28, 2008)
241 PA, AAA (.751 OPS)
Jason Knapp – SP
Midseason 2009, BA #25-50 (July 29, 2009)
John Sickels: B-, PHI #8
85.1 IP, A (17 GS), 4.01 ERA, 11.7 K/9
C. LEE TO SEATTLE MARINERS – 1 Season – (Dec. 15, 2009)
J.C. Ramirez – SP
Pre-2010, Unranked (February 23, 2010)
John Sickels: B- (December 18, 2009)
142.1 IP, A+ (27 GS), 5.12 ERA, 7.0 K/9
Phillippe Aumont – P
Pre-2008, BA #83; Pre-2009, BA #93
Pre-2010, BA #93 (February 23, 2010)
John Sickels: B- (December 18, 2009)
17.2 IP, AA (0 GS), 5.09 ERA, 12.1 K/9
Tyson Gillies – CF
Pre-2010, Unranked (February 23, 2010)
John Sickels: C+ (December 18, 2009)
242 PA, A- (.866 OPS)
C. LEE + M. LOWE TO TEXAS RANGERS – 0.5 Seasons – (July 9, 2010)
Mark Lowe – RP (to TEXAS)
MLB: 178.1 IP, 0 GS, 1.469 WHIP, 105 ERA+
Justin Smoak – 1B
Pre-2009, BA #23
Pre-2010, BA #13 (February 23, 2010)
John Sickels: A-, TEX #2 (January 6, 2010)
MLB: 275 PA, 235 AB, .209/.316/.353/.670
Blake Beavan – SP
Pre-2010, Unranked (February 23, 2010)
John Sickels: C+, TEX #16 (January 6, 2010)
110.0 IP, AA (17 GS), 2.78 ERA, 5.6 K/9
Josh Lueke - RP
Pre-2010, Unranked (February 23, 2010)
John Sickels: No Grade (January 6, 2010)
18.2 IP, AA (0 GS), 3.86 ERA, 12.5 K/9
Matt Lawson – 2B
Pre-2010, Unranked (February 23, 2010)
John Sickels: No Grade (January 6, 2010)
345 PA, AA (.809 OPS)
I think Lee and Bedard are the two most comparable pitchers to Greinke on this list since, like Greinke, both lack the long-term track record and consistency of Santana or Halladay. Lee was traded twice in the offseason, and it's probably useful to note that his value may have been higher then than it would have been in the prior offseason, as teams in contention (like Texas or the Phillies) will usually pay more to go all in. Both teams got to the World Series, so if they overpaid I guess they were right in doing so.
Summary
Some people argue that Greinke is especially valuable this offseason because of the lack of ace pitching past Lee, but I think that's slightly ridiculous. There are rarely multiple ace pitchers on the free market (if there are any) and teams are always interested in pitchers like Greinke. Given the above precedents, I think some people might be overvaluing what it would or should take to get him. Greinke reportedly wants out of Kansas City, and the Royals know they have to trade him, so they don't have the greatest leverage even with two years left on his contract.
John Sickels' top 20 Brewers prospects for 2011 isn't out yet, but I would guess that Odorizzi is probably a B+ starter now. Given the above trades and their degree of comparability to Greinke, I would offer something along the lines of: Jake Odorizzi (B+ SP), Manny Parra (MLB SP) since he really deserves a chance to start somewhere, someone like Kyle Heckathorn (B/B- SP), and since Kansas City reportedly wants middle infield prospects, maybe Eric Farris (B-/C+ 2B) since he would be more expendable if a Weeks extension is in the works. Anybody on the internet expecting Toronto to give up Drabek (an A- SP) and a number of other top prospects is dreaming, unless Greinke agrees to the parameters of an extension beforehand (unlikely).
I would really hate to give up Odorizzi, but Greinke would make the Brewers strong contenders in 2011, and if things don't work out the Brewers could flip him in mid-2011 or 2012 if an extension is impossible.
Long post, sorry. What does everyone else think?
89 comments
|
6 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I say go for it
I could give a long list of reasons and cliche’s why, but we need to win now.
I’ll worry about 2013 in 2013.
I guess I hadn't really thought about flipping him again after 2011.
The only top Starters on the Free Agent market next season are Wandy Rodriguez and Mark Buehrle. Greinke will be a hot commodity, and might net the same value of package as he would today. Sure, it would cost us some prospects, but our lineup is set for the next 3 years, outside of Prince, and the top of our rotation is set for the next two.
Unfortunately, our rotation wil be absolutely screwed in 2013 if we aren’t able to extend him or trade him. If we can keep at it and sign Weeks and Marcum to extensions, our year to seriously contend will be 2013.
1. Gallardo
2. Marcum
3. Odorizzi
4. Heckathorn
If Wolf is still playing well, we can pick up his 10 million dollar option.
Braun, Weeks, McGehee, and Hart will still be around. Cain, Escobar, and Lucroy should be over the rookie struggles, and getting into the prime of their careers.
It looks like it will be the year to go for it.
That puts a lot of pressure on Odorizzi and Heckathorn to continue to develop and reach their potential, though. I’m not so sure we can count on both of them to do it, though.
I would like to see Melvin go out and trade for a young, talented pitcher (Beachy, Minor) who will be around for 5 or 6 years. Then, even if one of Heckathorn or Odorizzi doesn’t pan out, we still have an extremely nice starting 4 in 2013.
http://www.mlbsoup.com
That should read, I would RATHER see Melvin go out and trade for a young, talented pitcher
Instead of Greinke.
Even if it means giving up the likes of Cain/Axford/Gamel/McGehee
http://www.mlbsoup.com
What about a trade to the Mets?
Fielder/Gamel, Parra, Jeffress, and maybe Narv for Mejia and Davis
just throwing around ideas at this point
I think Davis has better defense
And it seems that Mejia would have a higher probability of becoming a starter than Jeffress.
by ilikeburritos on Dec 13, 2010 5:01 PM CST up reply actions
Buehrle
Saw that the Sox would be willing to move Buehrle. This would cost us fewer prospects and be a one year rental. He eats innings and would be a really good #3. When he leaves we would get the draft picks and hopefully we would have a prosoect or two to slide into the rotation for 2012. What do ya think?
by Travis Bellman on Dec 13, 2010 8:57 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
what good is another #3??
He’s Dave Bush all over again
by BEARDEDJEFF on Dec 13, 2010 10:02 AM CST up reply actions
Buerhle has been way better than Bush lately.
by Noah Jarosh on Dec 13, 2010 12:10 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
My apologies, Jeff
But this could be the single most ridiculous statement currently in residence on this website.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 14, 2010 1:28 PM CST up reply actions
My point wasn't that Mark Buehrle is Dave bush, it was that the brewers don't need a #3

A new #3 doesn’t push a slightly better #3-caliber pitcher to #2 or #1 level
NORE
a guy who’s ERA has been climbing the last 4 years
Who’s H/9 has been climbing the last 4 years
Who’s K/9 has been dropping the last 4 years
AND
Who’s ERA+ has been dropping for the last 4 years
MY POINT
Is that Buehrle fills the roll that Dave Bush has been filling the last few years, adding him doesn’t make the brewers significantly better for the cost to obtain him and the cost to pay him
No, its not an opinion, its fact
Have a looksie at the numbers.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 14, 2010 1:44 PM CST up reply actions
Also
How is your point NOT that you think Buehrle and Bush are the same pitcher when your body text says:
He’s Dave Bush all over again
If you had said:
what good is another #3??
and just left it at that, I wouldn’t have taken issue with the statement. Drawing a parallel between Mark Buehrle and Dave Bush is utterly ridiculous.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 14, 2010 1:46 PM CST up reply actions
Bush?
He had an off year last year but otherwise his era has been in the upper 3’s lower 4’s with over 200 innings in every season of his career. I will bet we could get the Sox to cover part of the salary. Plus its only one year, very little risk. We have guys comming up and Buehrle would fill the gap. I would ask do we really need someone for 3 years when we have three other guys nailed down for at least two. This gives us a guy that helps us make a strong run next year without selling the future.
by Travis Bellman on Dec 13, 2010 11:07 AM CST reply actions
Who do we have that will be ready for 2012?
Odorizzi and Heckathorn are on pace to maybe make the majors halfway through the 2012 season, but how much can you really expect from them? I’d count them for the 2013 rotation.
And that being said, you can’t assume that they’ll both prospects will reach their potential.
Getting Buehrle leaves us with a nice rotation in 2011: Gallardo, Marcum, Wolf, Buehrle, Narvdog
But back to square 1 in 2012: Gallardo, Marcum, Wolf, ?, Narveson?
2013 looks pretty good if you lock up Marcum (Gallardo, Marcum, Odorizzi… Heckathorn).. But that’s a lot of ifs. I’d much rather have us trade for somebody who will be around through 2013, to solidify the rotation for the next 3 years.
http://www.mlbsoup.com
Rodgers will be ready, Jeffress assuming he is a starter.
I think we should go for it all this year with Prince around then take 2012 to regroup. If we unload the farm that is going to be difficult. This team is close and if things go right, we could contend. I honestly don’t think Garza or Greinke are going to happen, other teams want pitching. If we had that we wouldn’t be in this position.
by Travis Bellman on Dec 13, 2010 12:44 PM CST up reply actions
I'm going to assume Rodgers and Jeffress are both relievers in MLB
Until they show otherwise.
Get a ife broseph
I think that's the most logical assumption one can make about those two at this point.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 14, 2010 1:48 PM CST up reply actions
And I'll take it one further.
Jeffress is more likely to wind up as a starter than Rogers.
http://www.mlbsoup.com
I was referring to Buehrle not Bush. the subject line could make it confusing
by Travis Bellman on Dec 13, 2010 11:14 AM CST reply actions
Good catch
I read the subject line and post, and thought, “What Dave Bush have you been watching?”
Don't try to do too much with it. Just take the ball the other way.
by shooty babitt on Dec 13, 2010 11:43 AM CST up reply actions
without going into in depth sabermetrics
look at his ERA trend for the last 4 years:
3.63
3.79
3.84
4.28
notice something??
by BEARDEDJEFF on Dec 13, 2010 11:54 AM CST up reply actions
Would you evaluate a hitter solely on AVG?
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 14, 2010 1:49 PM CST up reply actions
Yes they are on the decline but they also are similare to Greinkie’s and Garza’s (w/o Greinkie’s one big year) They are all a risk. Buehrle would just cost less, have less risk, but with less upside. Any one of these pitchers could have huge years next year or complete flops. Pitching is a crap shoot and the brewers have had horrible luck the past few years. Any other options you would consider?
by Travis Bellman on Dec 13, 2010 12:01 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Greinke doesn't have two i's in his last name.
by Noah Jarosh on Dec 13, 2010 12:17 PM CST up reply actions
I think the best comp is the Bedard trade
minus the Cy Young award. Both had two years left of “control” and both had acheived a productive consistency.The big difference would be that Bedard was cheaper. Without counting for inflation he was probably at least a $40 million surplus value player at the time.
Ive put Greinke at about $33 million if I remember correctly. So that would be at least two top pitching prospects and a spare player thrown in. Add in some sort of a premium and its 3 of some teams top prospects.
The only problem I have with using Sickels exclusively for the “ratings” is that it discounts whether a guy is a “top” prospect or not, in which case a players value can be increased dramatically over just a “B” or “C” grade.
Since we’ve learned that Milwaukee is not on Greinke’s “list” its a moot point, but the Brewers simply dont have the players to make a deal for him. The Royals want young cheap and good and at least one mlb ready guy. Parra doesnt fit into any of those categories and Odirizzi is what they are looking for but they would lack that one top mlb ready piece. I think if Heckathorn were thrown in as the extra guy, but again the one big mlb ready piece would be missing, and I dont even think anyone on the 40 man fits that bill either.
Cain could be that guy
But I’d be pissed if they gave up those three
Im not sure if Cain is that guy
I think he has a chance to be a solid major leaguer, but Lawrie is more “top” than Cain ever was or will be, not that he is mlb ready (Lawrie). I think that even if the Brewers had held onto Lawrie they probably would have been lacking that mlb ready arm.
I think if the Brewers attempted to move Odirizzi, Cain and Heckathorn to the Royals for Greinke they probably come up short compared to what a team like the Rangers would be able to come up with. I even think the Cubs could put together a substantially better package than the Brewers right now with a guy like Cashner waiting in the wings and Brett Jackson and a bevy of other B graded guys as well. The Brewers are just missing that one big piece. I’m sure Doug believes he has it in a guy like Salome or Eric Farris.
I don't think Salome's with the team anymore
But the fact that the Brewers would have to give up all of their prospects who aren’t relievers, and it still doesn’t look like a deal they can’t refuse, I doubt anything happens. The amount other teams are willing to pay might be less than you think, though. The Rays not being interested in anyone’s Garza offers I think shows that the deals aren’t necessarily there. This isn’t the old days when you could get half a team for a couple years of Richie Sexson.
As someone who doesn’t really know anything about prospects, I prefer Sickels’ ratings because I think Baseball America’s rankings can be kind of a crapshoot. It’s like the amateur draft; for the top 20-25 maybe everybody is sort of in agreement, but I imagine different teams and scouts can evaluate players ranked >25 way differently (and what’s the difference between he BA #56 prospect and BA #87 prospect supposed to be, anyways?)
Although, I’m not exactly sure how teams even evaluate prospects in trades. They can’t watch anybody play at this point in the year, but surely they don’t have in-depth scouting reports on every prospect in the minors? Maybe they rely on mainstream hype over actual talent evaluations as much as everybody else does.
Blue Jays/Texas could beat any offer we put out if they wanted to, for sure, but in the interest of not overbidding I think Parra/Odorizzi/Heckathorn/Farris is a decent starting point. If I were Melvin in those negotiations I’d be pointing out Greinke’s inconsistent track record and the fact that he had a 4.17 ERA last year too.
Shaun and Yo and pray for snow.
(Note: I know Greinke’s ERA last year wasn’t really indicative of how he pitched, vs. FIP/xFIP, but I’m sure with Melvin/Moore there would be a lot of talk of ERA/Wins/grit going on)
Shaun and Yo and pray for snow.
Every team has pro scouts
A pro scouts job is to know pretty much two teams from top to bottom, and they should have detailed reports. For example, the Brewers probably have a guy whose responsibility is the Cubs and White Sox, and that guy will watch those teams’ minor league games and have a report on each guy at each level of the organization.
The knock on Farris is that he wont be able to hit in the big leagues and probably every team knows that, and we all know what Parra can and cant do as would the Royals. I think Odirizzi is a nice starting off point and Lawrie would have helped that tremendously, but Heckathorn isnt really a top guy. The Royals reportedly want “top” guys coming over in a Greinke deal, and the Brewers only really have one of them left, and he’s probably only in the 75-100 range.
Sending Odorizzi and Heckathorn essentially takes the two best pitching prospects out of the organization, too.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 14, 2010 1:53 PM CST up reply actions
I don't think that's really how it works
They had a big discussion on the Baseball Prospectus podcast about this a while back.
Most pro scouts are advanced scouts who are in charge of traveling from game to game and giving scouting reports on tendancies. Its not that efficent to have a full time guy covering an AL team just for MLB trade prospects, especially when there is so much video available. They’ll tend to use more stat-based evaluations, provided the sample is big enough.
Most minor league scouts are in charge of an area or league. It’d be hard for one guy to be in charge of the entire Cubs system, which ranges from Illinois to Florida to Idaho. Much more practical to have a couple guys work the Midwest League or the Sally League and have reports on all the players that are potential targets.
If the BP guys lied to me or I misheard, then I apologize in advance for being wrong.
Get a ife broseph
by Supertramp on Dec 14, 2010 1:55 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I think also that if a team is really interested in another team's prospect
they send a scout out to watch him for a few games. I remember seeing Law and Goldstein posts about team scouts being in attendence at minor league games they were at last season.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 14, 2010 2:04 PM CST up reply actions
greinke and garza
to get greinke imo, odorizzi, cain, heckathorn, and farris would probably fall short. i think that garza could be had for cain and odorizzi, possibly a little less. in all honesty, i think i would rather have garza than greinke. garza has been consistent over the last 4 years as greinke has been more up and down. not to mention greinke’s mental disorders scare me.
your mental disorders should scare you more
or mine. mwhaaaha
by PagsBrewCrew on Dec 13, 2010 10:40 PM CST up reply actions
Well that was all fun to postulate
but now that the Rangers lost out on Lee to Philly, they will do what it takes to get Greinke
"That's not a weird stat. Rickie is a run-scorer," Yost said. "It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter," Yost told reporters. "See, you guys have no concept. He's a run-scorer. So there's nothing weird about it. That's what he does."
Odorizzi would be tough...
But I could see that scenario being okay. Though, trading Farris I don’t really approve of. They said they need someone up the middle, not necessarily in the infield. You can trade any number of the Brewers outfields, most notably would be Cain. Trading Cain might also save you one of the pitching prospects as well. The problem with Odorizzi is, he has great stuff, but no one can really project if he will be an ace, or just be a back of the rotation guy. Of course he could bomb once he gets to AA this year and then who knows. If you can get the most possible out of Cain and Odorizzi now then I say do it.
2 years to bolster the minor leagues back up with basically all of your MLB roster in tact. The only people leaving (other than Fielder) in the next 2-4 years are pretty minimal guys in terms of value. You have to keep in mind as well that the Brewers will have 3 picks in the 1st round this year (2 in the top 15) and at least 3 next year with Fielder leaving. I do agree as well that Greinke becomes expendable at the deadline in 2012 if you are going nowhere with him. That’s unlikely though. Greinke, Gallardo, Marcum, Wolf, Rogers/Narveson/Capuano is a force in the NL Central. Not better than the Phillies or the Giants, but close if Marcum can repeat his 2010 and 2008 performances.
It’s a tough pill to swallow, but it makes the Brewers heavyweight competitors for the next 2 years, barring extensions to either Greinke or Marcum.
by jmeks23 on Dec 14, 2010 6:42 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
"Not better than the Phillies or the Giants, but close if Marcum can repeat his 2010 and 2008 performances."
Even if Marcum exceeds his 2010 performance, I don’t see the Brewers rotation coming close to the Phillies rotation next season. Granted, that won’t be necessary to win the NL Central.
Pujols is the Barack Obama of baseball.
he WAS including Greinke in our rotation
:)our top 2 would be as good as the phils/giants of 2010, but obv the phils have upgraded
dodgers, mariners, marlins, tigers, redsox and chisox had solid starters, fat lot of good it did ’em
see also here
by PagsBrewCrew on Dec 15, 2010 3:31 PM CST up reply actions
I realize that, but I don't think he was referring to the 2010 Phillies.
but Greinke, Gallardo, Marcum and Wolf do not come close to Halladay, Lee, Oswalt and Hamels.
Pujols is the Barack Obama of baseball.
conceeded
you know, unless Wolf puts up a 10 WAR season
by PagsBrewCrew on Dec 15, 2010 4:00 PM CST up reply actions
Well, if a couple pitchers repeated their 2009 seasons instead of 2010 seasons :)
Greinke – 2.33 FIP (2009)
Gallardo – 3.02 FIP (2010)
Marcum – 3.74 FIP (2010)
Wolf – 3.96 FIP (2009)
Narveson – 4.22 FIP (2010)
Halladay – 3.01 FIP (2010)
Lee – 3.11 FIP (2009)
Hamels – 3.67 FIP (2010)
Oswalt – 3.76 FIP (2009)
Kendrick – 4.88 FIP (2010)
Shaun and Yo and pray for snow.
then compare salaries
clear win for the crew!:P
by PagsBrewCrew on Dec 15, 2010 4:37 PM CST up reply actions
I also stated that the Brewers still would not be better than the Phillies or the Giants rotation wise. I said they would be close, but not equal.
Disagree
I think Philadelphia’s rotation is obviously superior, but after Lincecum and Cain, you have Bumgarner, Sanchez and Zito.
I’ll absolutely take Greinke, Gallardo, Marcum, Wolf, Narveson over them.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 20, 2010 6:35 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
Unsubstantiated Twitter rumor!
“I’m hearing the #Brewers are making a serious move for Zack Greinke. Even have gotten names. Working to confirm before specifics, though…If source is correct, Greinke deal wouldn’t involve Odorizzi or Heckathorn. Would be 3 guys w/ big league experience though. #Brewers”
Some speculation from others that Escobar could be involved, but that seems virtually impossible to me. Nobody to replace him in the organization (Luis Cruz doesn’t count…) and the team would have neither the money nor the available free agents to add another everyday SS. Maybe something like Cain/Narveson/Parra??
Shaun and Yo and pray for snow.
They want guys who play up the middle.
It would almost certainly have to be at least one of Escobar/Cain.
tough pick
Just like SRB said, there really isn’t anyone to replace Escobar. And if Cain’s gone then the Brewers will have to deal with Gomez/Dickerson
by ilikeburritos on Dec 18, 2010 9:13 PM CST up reply actions
I think I can deal/tolerate Gomez/Dickerson if we have Grienke.
by ThroughBeingCool on Dec 18, 2010 9:51 PM CST up reply actions
Whaa...?!
@BerniesCrew: Source tells me #Brewers have traded SS Alcides Escobar, CF Lorenzo Cain, and RHP Jeremy Jeffress for RHP Zack Greinke, SS Betancourt + $2M.
Shaun and Yo and pray for snow.
Just saw this on my twitter feed
I can’t believe they’d give up on Escobar that quickly. And then take…Yunieksy Betancourt? Good Lord.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 18, 2010 9:45 PM CST up reply actions
I guess they DO have Anderson Machado in AA
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 18, 2010 9:47 PM CST up reply actions
Have you ever looked at his stats?
/cry
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 18, 2010 9:51 PM CST up reply actions
Did you make it to the bathroom in time?
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 18, 2010 9:52 PM CST up reply actions
Based on Baseball Reference WAR, Betancourt was worth 2.0 more WAR than Escobar last year (+1.3 vs. -0.7). He is pretty awful though.
Shaun and Yo and pray for snow.
Holy wow
That stat actually just blew my mind.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 18, 2010 9:53 PM CST up reply actions
Fanshot it?
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 18, 2010 9:48 PM CST up reply actions
I'm still in a state of shock that the Brewers could get Greinke
Jim Breen seems fairly credible though.
Shaun and Yo and pray for snow.
Not sure who his source is
but his most recent tweet says:
Feel hesitant about publishing false rumor, but feel comfortable w/ the source after another source came in. Decided to go with it. #Brewers
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 18, 2010 9:52 PM CST up reply actions
He's also got a post up on Bernie's Crew
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 18, 2010 10:00 PM CST up reply actions
*head explodes*
uhh… can someone help me clean up pieces of my brain and skull?
by ilikeburritos on Dec 18, 2010 10:01 PM CST up reply actions
ha
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Dec 18, 2010 10:52 PM CST up reply actions

by 

































