Untucking: Yea or Nay?
Earlier this week we had a small celebration in the comments of a FanShot when we learned that, despite Mike Cameron's departure, the Brewers will still untuck their jerseys after wins in 2010. But not everyone is excited about it, and I'm curious to hear what you think. Below you'll find a few paragraphs with the arguments for and against the practice: Take a look at them and vote in our poll.
The argument for:
I'm excited to see the Brewers keep the tradition of untucking their jerseys after wins. Over the past few years, it's become part of the identity and personality of this team. I think untucking is fun, harmless, and a nice tribute to a blue collar worker many Brewer fans are or can relate to.
As a fan of this team, I'm glad the Brewers do more after victories than the handshakes and half-smiles we've come to expect from other teams. Baseball is a game and a form of entertainment, so what's wrong with having a little fun when you win? Untucking is a nice way to celebrate as a team and part of a community - it's something the fans can do along with the players.
I know it draws occasional complains from the "respect the game" police and other traditionalists, but in the grand scheme untucking is pretty harmless, and certainly not a serious offense to the integrity of the game or the dignity of the other team. If the Brewers ran over to the opposing dugout after the game and untucked on their steps, that would be different. But this is a team oriented, harmless celebration. I have a hard time seeing complaints about it as being anything more than sour grapes.
Finally, the story behind untucking gives it a nice tie back to the community. As I'm sure you know, the tradition originated with Mike Cameron, who untucked his jersey after wins because that's what his dad did after a hard day's work. It's nice to see the Brewers, even those without blue collar ties or experience, embracing a tradition designed to remember the blue collar roots many of us can relate to.
The argument against:
As the site's most vocal opponent to untucking, I've invited backtocali to provide the argument against. Here is what he submitted:
I am pretty sure that I am in a very small minority here in that I am not a fan, at all, of the "untucking" "tradition" started by Mike Cameron a few years ago. I realize that this is a new millenium and that athletes, and anyone, for that matter, are allowed to express themself in any way they choose and that everyone is doing it, I have just never felt it is a good thing for the Brewers to do. A few of the main reasons that I dislike it so much are as follows:1) The type of person it is intended to honor, should be offended by it. Mike Cameron's dad was a blue collar guy, and at the end of a long, hard day at work, he would untuck his shirt and relax with his family.This type of gesture might have been just fine if it had just been Cameron untucking as a tribute to his father. But guys like Prince Fielder, Ryan Braun and the rest that do it on a regular basis, are multi millionaire professional athletes. They make their living playing a game. I realize that being a professional athlete takes a lot of hard work, concentration and dedication, but at the end of the day, they are doing a job that Mike Cameron's blue collar dad would have probably done for food money if he had the ability. There just seems to be something a little off about a bunch of millionaires who make their living playing a game putting themselves on the same plane as a person working in a factory all day for wages that might not ever add up in a lifetime what a rookie MLB player makes in a year.2) Plain and simple: It's showboating. This isnt the NBA or NFL. Although most of us find baseball entertaining, its not a "show" like those other sports are where flamboyance is required of its big stars. Brewer fans hate it when Alfonso Soriano does his little hop, or when Albert Pujols watches his many home runs, or when Jose Valverde points at the other team when he makes a save, or when Carlos Zambrano pumps his fist in the air after an inning ending strikeout. If you dont like it when those other players do those things when playing the Brewers, you shouldnt like it when the Brewers untuck.3) Pitchers and opponents have long memories. Prince Fielder and Ryan Braun have both been brushed back in the recent past because they have showboated after dramatic Home Runs. Untucking encourages retaliation. Prince Fielder is either going to be brushed back or thrown at high and tight when the Brewers face the Giants this year because of the "Shock Wave" which also included an untuck. People dont like to be humiliated. Humiliated, irrational types might send a fastball into the earhole. Why encourage it?4) The Brewers havent won anything (since about 1982). Last year the Brewers were 80-82. The team has one playoff appearance in the last 26 years. It seems a bit foolish for a team with a losing record, and no so great tradition, to celebrate in such an elaborate fashion. If you win the pennant, or a World Series, you have the right to be brash and cocky. Without the rings it just makes you a target, and makes you look like a punk.I am definitely old fashioned when it comes to home run celebrations and celebrations in general on the playing field. I like the old Vince Lombardi saying about "acting like you have been there before" after scoring a touchdown. I was a big fan of the 1990's Bobby Cox led Braves that were all business while winning and winning and winning. I personally dont need a big celebration to bring me to the park, or bring me back, I am always going to go to games, I will always be a fan no matter the outcome. There is no need to liven things up to make the game more exciting.
So, what do you think?
0 recs |
137 comments
|
Comments
Didn't even read backtocali's opposing take
I was drunk. Sue me.
by Dikembe Meiztombo on Feb 3, 2010 12:07 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
I agree with his first point
Except to say it’s harmless and not disrespectful of the other team.
Yes, the athletes (including cameron) make millions every year, so they shouldn’t play the “blue collar” card. But in the grand scheme of things untucking SHOULDN’T be offensive to the opposing team.
As to BtC’s listed showboat examples
Alfonso Soriano hop – I don’t think that tauting, I just think that it’s a stereotypy (but not for the same reasons) that is particularly annoying
Albert Pujols watches home runs – I’m fairly neutral on this. I get annoyed when it’s only barely over the fence, but if it’s a bomb, I’ve got no problem with it, Pujos, Braun or even Counsell.
Jose Valverde points when save – I’ve got an issue with this. He’s asking for a fight this way, but is protected by the rules of the game. In other words, it’s like taking a sucker punch. Not cool.
Carlos Zambrano pumps fist – no problem. I’ve got a problem with his watercooler busting, but not a little emotion on the field when he does something well. It’s not directed at the opposing batter/team, but is celebration for something that he did himself. More power to him
by PagsBrewCrew on Feb 3, 2010 12:18 PM CST up reply actions
I've got no problem with Zambrano busting the water cooler.
Its hilarious!
"A D+ Grade? That must have been a Wittardo grade"- @73_MC
by BrewHaHeather on Feb 3, 2010 12:21 PM CST up reply actions
i think he's going to end up in prison before too long
I certainly wouldn’t want him in my dugout no matter how good he is.
by PagsBrewCrew on Feb 3, 2010 12:22 PM CST up reply actions
Exactly
I have no problem with any of these things. Don’t want me to do it? Then stop me. Easy as that.
I was drunk. Sue me.
by Dikembe Meiztombo on Feb 3, 2010 12:28 PM CST up reply actions
Me neither.
It’s impossible for me to imagine how anyone would find it offensive enough to muster more than two sentences in criticism of it without departing the path of reason.
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Feb 3, 2010 1:49 PM CST up reply actions 5 recs
As Long as Cam gives the OK, I love it.
It started as a salute to his father, but it became an act of team unity.
Continuing to untuck after Cameron is gone is a metaphor, sort of a passing of the torch. Cameron was brought in to mentor and lead the young players. Now that he’s leaving, those ‘young players’ are taking what they learned and becoming leaders, themselves.
I think Cameron will be happy to have left his mark on the club.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, "That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
Not only should the brewers do it, so should all the other teams.
Follow: @mykenk. Read thoughts: http://mhenk.blogspot.com.
I love the untucking
It shows unity and gives the team a little character.
The only problem I have with backtocali’s argument was #2. Its such a simple thing it can hardly be considered showboating. I don’t have any problem with Valverde pointing to the other team or Zambrano pumping his fist. They’re excited and its just an outburst of emotion. I do have a problem with Pujols staring at his home runs because he trashed Braun and Fielder for doing the same thing. That’s not right.
It’s not a choreographed dance in the end zone, its just untucking a shirt.
"A D+ Grade? That must have been a Wittardo grade"- @73_MC
How about the traditional "outfielder jump" the Brewers outfielders do after a win? Is that showboating?
"I held it like and egg...? I know he scrambled the son of a bitch!"
How about a fourth poll option?
“As long as they win, I don’t give a s**t how they celebrate.”
by Lisa73 on Feb 3, 2010 12:19 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
I'd say what's more disrespectful
Is the losing team not congratulating the winning team on a game well played (and vice versa). We did it in little league. Opposing coaches and quarterbacks and other assorted players do it in football. Why not do it after a professional baseball game?
I think it reeks of bad sportsmanship to NOT congratulate the opposing team after a game.
No, the millionaire athletes are not blue collar workers, but they were not always millionaires. They worked VERY hard to get where they are, and it should be OK to go back to their roots.
If winning is an acceptable reason for untucking, does that mean the Yankees can do whatever they want? Because they win all the time, does that mean they can give the other team the finger when they win?
The ONLY thing against the Brewers untucking is it looks somewhat sloppy. It kind of looks they are wearing a dress at the end. But, in the end, the Brewers are not hurting anyone, and are celebrating with their fans. It has been a long time since Brewer fans have been excited about anything. Isn’t it great that even with a “losing tradition” fans show up all the time, and are still so passionate about their team? As long as the Brewers are not showing up the other team and are just celebrating with themselves, it is fine.
The Braves? Really?
I was actually following along on the arguments until we got to the part where the 90s Braves are something to be emulated. On the winning front? Sure. But those teams demoralized their entire fan base to the point where they weren’t even selling out playoff games at the end of their run. Thanks but no thanks. I’ll take personality.
Can you elaborate on "demoralize"?
I think that those teams were professionals all the way. They just did their job and they did it well. If I’m not mistaken, they pretty much gave Kenny Lofton away because he was a bit too “loud” and flashy in the clubhouse and on the field. Star players were benched for not running out ground balls and hustling.
I know that they began to not sell out playoff games, but I think thats more a function of “Oh well, another playoff appearance” type of mentality. They did make 14 of 15 years.
I kind of liken them to “Iceman” from the Movie Top Gun. Nothing flashy, just did the job and did it well.
"I kind of liken them to 'Iceman' from the Movie Top Gun. Nothing flashiy, just did the job and did it well."
:o
You do realize that Iceman was the a-hole in that movie right? He was the guy with the 4 inch tall flat top with highlights, the guy who spun a ball on his fingertips between plays, and who apparently had his pecs greased up between shots on the volleyball court, and the guy who at one point snapped his teeth at another human being in the middle of an argument when he couldn’t think of a rejoinder.
I get what you’re trying to say when you say “nothing flashy”, but if you’re going to use a fictional character as a metaphor for that idea, you better look elsewhere.
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Feb 3, 2010 2:24 PM CST up reply actions
And the other thing:
Iceman didn’t do the job. Iceman was good at practice, but, when it came time to nut up and shoot down some MiGs, he was worthless and Mav had to bail his ass out.
It sure was.
You’d think Top Gun would be able to do something in that situation, other than crying for back-up. :)
Sigh...
1) Cameron was never a blue-collar worker either. He did it to honor his father, and when the Brewers are doing it they’re ostensibly doing it to honor the blue-collar fanbase in Milwaukee. It’s symbolic.
2) Despite the imaginations of baseball “purists,” what you call showboating has always been a part of the game. You’re supposed to get angry when a guy on another team (Pujols) does it but be glad when your own team does it, that’s how it works. Good players and teams that don’t celebrate are the exception, and probably much more boring to watch.
Consider the fact that the Brewers sold 1,000,000 tickets at the second earliest date ever… coming off a rather disappointing losing season. Maybe it’s not due to untucking specifically, but it doesn’t happen if the Brewers aren’t a bit of a “showboating” team. It makes them more fun to watch and more easy to get excited about if they do things like the Prince Fielder shockwave celebration and have charismatic young players like Braun/Fielder. I can’t fathom how anybody would be opposed to that.
A large part of the reason the 1982-era Brewers are still so popular in Milwaukee isn’t just because they got to the World Series, but because that team was so charismatic and had so much character. Why would you want the current Brewers to act like robots?
Ryan Braun: He loves it.
Agree with all of this
to add,
3) Whats wrong with that? If pitchers want to throw at our hitters, great. Getting on base is a GOOD thing.
4) Please explain what the success of unrelated players years ago has to do with present-day players’ celebrations. So if Franklin Stubbs was a superstar and led the Brewers to a World Series in 1990, that would make it ok for the current roster to celebrate when good things happen? Sorry, I don’t understand the logic at all.
by richardhkirkando on Feb 3, 2010 1:24 PM CST up reply actions
Hold on now
Getting hit isn’t always a good thing. Remember when Jeff Karstens (It think it was him anyway) threw at Braun and hit him in the back. Yeah, Braun got on base but he missed a couple games after that. Not a good thing.
"A D+ Grade? That must have been a Wittardo grade"- @73_MC
by BrewHaHeather on Feb 3, 2010 1:35 PM CST up reply actions
Two playoff appearances in 27 years
And a losing season all but 3 of the last 10. It just doesnt seem like the kind of team that should be celebrating.
Yeah, how dare they!
The culture should be a losing culture, not one that celebrates itself when it wins.
Sorry, that’s assinine.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Feb 3, 2010 1:42 PM CST up reply actions
Ugh
So should the Nationals be celebrating? How about the Detroit Lions?
I’m just saying that I think it looks a little bit foolish for a team to celebrate in any way unless you have achieved your goals, which for any professional sports team should be winning championships, whether its NL, AL or WS crowns.
So?
You’re saying the culture should be a losing culture, and they don’t ‘deserve’ to celebrate until…what? They go to the playoffs 14 of 15 times like your Braves example?
You are damn right. Winning that one game, the Lions should have been ecstatic. You can either be a half-full guy or a half-empty guy. In my line of work, it pays to be a half-full guy. In sports, it pays to be a half-full guy. You want these guys to be half-empty until they have a very large measure of success, and then they can maybe give a little smile at the end of the game as they stiff-leg it off the field? Come on. You’re being melodramatic.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Feb 3, 2010 1:49 PM CST up reply actions
Don't the Nationals do the high five/hip bump thing?
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, "That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
Yes everyone employed by the nationals
should wear a solemn frown on his face until he has won a world series. Dude, baseball is a game rife with failure and I’m sure at the end of the day many players have goals other than to win the world series. Any expectation that they dont is simply naive.
I mean I’m assuming you celebrated at least a little when they made the playoffs two years ago.
The Lions
had a freaking party on the field after their first win this year, and it was cool to watch, because the talented players on that team deserved a win after a year and a half.
I actually thought....
… that was one of the most moving moments from this past NFL season. There were guys on that team who hadn’t won a game as a pro and/or who hadn’t won a game in 2 years. Some of them were openly crying as they walked off the field.
(Old guy story alert). My first year in little league I played on the worst team in the league. We lost something like a dozen straight games to start the season. When we won our first game (17-15 on a “look what I found” catch by our right fielder who pretty clearly had no idea where the ball was until it turned up in his glove), everybody on the team went mental. Kids were running around, hugging each other, and we all ended up in a pile in right-center field.
With all due respect anyone who says that we shouldn’t have done that because we were 1-12, or whatever it was, doesn’t understand why it is that human beings even play sports at all.
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Feb 3, 2010 6:43 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
So next year no team should celebrate except for the Yankees and Phillies?
I mean, damn, the Phillies shouldn’t either, they haven’t won a WS since ’08 and have the most losses in the history of any professional sporting franchise. For a losing culture like that to look anything BUT somber and sorrowful is a disgrace.
Let me ask this again
What exactly is the connection between celebrating a win now, and whether or not previous teams made up of completely different players (but happened to play in the same city or stadium) ever won anything?
And why isn’t winning a game considered to be a goal? You can’t win championships if you don’t win games.
by richardhkirkando on Feb 4, 2010 11:39 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Winning is more special when it doesn't happen often
Therefore, they should celebrate.
"A D+ Grade? That must have been a Wittardo grade"- @73_MC
by BrewHaHeather on Feb 3, 2010 1:44 PM CST up reply actions
Damn
What did the Nats do to celebrate wins last year? On-field orgies? Coke and stripper parties? Get Bowden to swallow loads of candy, hook him up in the air pinata-style and beat him with bats until he regurgitated them?
"I hope your name is Rick"
I think those celebrations are reserved for the current New Jersey Nets (4-43, 0.085 W%)
Ryan Braun: He loves it.
by SRB on Feb 3, 2010 2:57 PM CST up reply actions
Thats the NBA
Like they need an excuse for coke-and-stripper parties.
When there is a scuffle in Ireland, there’s no need to specifically mention in the news story that alcohol was involved
by Getting Yosted on Feb 3, 2010 2:58 PM CST up reply actions 5 recs
haha
rec
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Feb 3, 2010 3:27 PM CST up reply actions
Here's a completely different take on things...
I just think it’s stupid. I think it looks dumb and Hart, Braun and Cameron (and now Gomez) doing the 3-way high five reminds me of high school girls softball.
But yeah, I’m in that minority also.
another different take
cameron’s dad untucked when he got home, not at work. so i don’t really buy the analogy. on field = at work.
i’m all for personality and charisma – someone else mentioned that the ‘82 brewers are popular not only for winning, but their personality – and i think that’s right. so show some personality, but maybe in a different way.
that said, i don’t get all huffy when the team does it. i also don’t find it irritating when other teams complain, though.
a different way?
How can you want someone to show personality and then disagree with the personality they show? Pesonality is a representation of self as defined by the current situation one is found
Untucking is how they decided to show team unity, celebrate a job well done, and give homage to the working class community of fans that love them so much. These types of things are what build teams.
Did everyone forget the Red Sox and their haggard looks and COWBOY UP attitudes that help propell them past the curse of the Bambino? I think I remember baseball purists disliking them as well. Or were they just given a free pass because they hadit so rough for so long. Thank God we have some small thing that is now ours that we can rally behind day in and day out.
But is it ours?
It’s Cameron’s…He will take it to the next destination (how stupid will it look when Milwaukee is still doing it along with the Yankees?)…
I don’t have a problem with it, per se, I’ve just never thought much of it…shrug
This is a much better argument against IMO
but I’m still in favor. I like seeing our players celebrating and having fun.
by richardhkirkando on Feb 3, 2010 1:25 PM CST up reply actions
Any references to Cammy should be erased
We need to make him an Unperson
so the shirts should stay tucked in except when playing St Louis ;)
Moving on ready look forward not backwards The 2009 season is over it never happen as far as I am concerned so lets boldly look forward to the 2010 season
Yeah, I don't get how untucking is an elaborate celebration
It’s no more elaborate than coming onto the field and shaking hands and patting each other on the back.
The other team can always, you know, win the game if they don’t like it.
Also, “Untucking encourages retaliation.” Prove it. They’ve untucked for two years and there isn’t one example given of retaliation because of untucking. Lame.
Lighten up, or if you can’t do that, go off and celebrate the Good Old Days of blatant on-field cheating and whatever else is far more morally acceptable than untucking a shirt.
by TheJay on Feb 3, 2010 1:23 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
Right
running on to the field, vigorously clapping and screaming after your team won while looking at the other players isn’t showboating. But untucking your jersey is.
This whole thing is just stupid.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Feb 3, 2010 1:44 PM CST up reply actions
Agree
I don’t get the idea that a team has to be historically or recently good to celebrate.
If you use the logic that you must have recent success to “earn” the right to celebrate then only 1 or 2 teams fall into that category each year.
If you look at historical succes it gets even harder. Are the Royals allowed to celebrate more because they were a great team in the 80s. Can the Blue Jays break any unwritten rule they want because they were one of the dominant teams of the early 90s? Should the Marlins be able to go nuts because of their success in the 2000s, even though their team turns over every couple years?
Get a ife broseph
I completely agree.
And what about on a walk-off homer when the whole team waits around home plate jumping up and down? Every team does that, and I think it could certainly be argued that it is FAR more show-boaty than untucking shirts. If nobody complains about celebrations after a walk off homer (other than the princeplosion, which I thought was awesome anyway) then nobody should complain about untucking shirts, in my opinion.
I voted 3rd option
I don’t particularly care either way, but I think its amusing that some people get soooooo worked up about it.
I also think that the ‘you don’t deserve to celebrate because you’re a losing culture. Get some wins and then you’ve ‘earned it’’ take is utter bullshit.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
To each his own, and....
…aren’t there bigger things to worry about?
Come on, Spring Training!
by PlusorMinusThree on Feb 3, 2010 1:48 PM CST reply actions
Welcome to the show
Baseball is a “show”, just like the NFL or NBA. The problem is people keep putting baseball on some kind of pedestal. I understand it’s considered America’s Pastime and it holds a special place above other sports, but it’s still a game. A game meant to entertain. Should Braun light off sparklers and run around the bases when he hits it over the fence? Probably not. But I don’t see how celebrating a victory after a GAME is a problem. Sure its showboating, but we pay them to give us a reason to be excited about something. They are paid to PLAY and when you play something you’re supposed to have fun.
Ha
I think you just gave Braun a new home run celebration.
BCB, the preferred above replacement level sarcasm supplier.
by MadJimiBrewha on Feb 3, 2010 2:42 PM CST up reply actions
If backtocali opposes it...
I’m all for it, don’t even need to read the reasoning. He is anti-Brewer everything, what validity could any of his statements possibly have other than the inevitable undertones of a bitter grudge he holds for unknown reasons.
Don’t feed the troll!
by GormanBraun28 on Feb 3, 2010 2:44 PM CST reply actions 3 recs
Hey now
It’s not quite that black and white.
I know BtC’s opinions aren’t always popular or well-received, but that’s not the same as “anti-Brewer everything.”
And, for what it’s worth, slightly more than 10% of readers are with him on this one.
That's all I've got for you today, unless you're interested in some Chris Capuano/Tom Haudricourt Fan Fiction.
And I'm sure...
that 10% has better reasons for it.
Stop on by the ESPN boards and the brewers.com boards once in a while. He has a long history of shenanigans basically bad mouthing the Brewers every chance he’s gotten, never anything positive to say about the team whatsoever.
Like the work you guys are doing here, but I’d be wise to take many, many of his comments with a grain of salt. He goes to great lengths to make his opinions heard and accepted despite how flawed they may be.
Don’t get me started on his changing account names to those such as “brewercomedyshow” with a picture of Gary Sheffield as his avatar and going to the Reds, Cubs, and Cardinals boards to share in their bashing of the Brewers.
by GormanBraun28 on Feb 3, 2010 2:59 PM CST up reply actions
You're right...
… having unpopular opinions and opinions that aren’t always well received isn’t the same thing as being “anti-Brewer”, but I think his anti-Brewer, anti-Milwaukee bias has been well established over the course of the last 2 years. I can see why it is that some folks, yourself included, believe that he has things to contribute to the conversation, (regardless of whether I agree with that belief). But if you think he conducts every analysis of the Brewers or even Milwaukee from substantive player/draft analysis to the silly (should they untuck) with anything other than a tendency to look for negatives in whatever it is the Brewers are up to, then it can only be because you haven’t been paying attention. Even his log-on name reveals his bias, for crying out loud. I’m assuming that you know all of that and believe that it adds to the value of the site because you’re too sharp of a guy to have missed it, but since the topic has been broached, we might as well all be honest about it, right?
I appreciate a site mod/manager trying to give everyone the opportunity to voice their opinions (though again I might disagree with it at times), but I cannot for the life of me understand why it is that this site has recently gone out of its way to feature his work, and in this instance, essentially force him your readers.
But what do I know? It’s your site, and you can run it how you like. Those of us who don’t care for backtocali’s style or his bias can either keep reading the stuff we like or “vote with our feet”, as the saying goes…
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Feb 3, 2010 3:58 PM CST up reply actions 8 recs
There's a bunch of "agree to disagree" comments in there
But mostly, I just don’t understand how one gets so worked up over it.
I don’t ban dissenting opinions around here for the sake of it. Sometimes I encourage them because they’re good conversation starters. I don’t see anything in the post that I view as personal or unnecessarily controversial, which is my definition of trolling. The responses, on the other hand, include several straight-out personal attacks.
Today, for example, I had hoped to have a rational conversation about the merits and drawbacks of untucking jerseys after wins. And while I’m certainly getting the “conversation,” not everyone is coming forward with the “rational.” Which is a shame, because this is a really silly topic to be that worked up over.
That's all I've got for you today, unless you're interested in some Chris Capuano/Tom Haudricourt Fan Fiction.
FWIW
I don’t think its rational to say that the Brewers should not celebrate until they have had a large measure of success. Which was a component of backtocali’s original argument.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Feb 3, 2010 4:28 PM CST up reply actions
I didn't say I agree with his argument.
In fact, I wrote the opposing viewpoint in the post. I just said that I don’t find it personal or unnecessarily controversial.
That's all I've got for you today, unless you're interested in some Chris Capuano/Tom Haudricourt Fan Fiction.
Right, I don't think its either of the two latter descriptors
but I did find that particular line of reasoning rather irrational, which you were saying many of the comments were. For the record I’m not disagreeing with that assessment, just pointing out that I felt like BtC’s original post had some irrationalities as well.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Feb 3, 2010 4:31 PM CST up reply actions
I'm not worked up at all, for what it's worth.
Mostly, I’m just confused about a number of things and I tried, apparently in an ineffective way, to express my lack of understanding.
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Feb 3, 2010 5:13 PM CST up reply actions
I do hope that you're referring to someone else when you mentioned "personal attacks"...
… because noting a commenter’s perceived bias, pointing out the use of a inapt metaphor, and suggesting that anyone capable of writing multiple paragraphs to the act of untucking is being unreasonable don’t appear to be personal attacks to me.
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Feb 3, 2010 5:21 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Ok, here's one copy and pasted from this post:
“what validity could any of his statements possibly have other than the inevitable undertones of a bitter grudge he holds for unknown reason.”
I don’t know why BtC isn’t allowed to express his opinion on this issue, or any other, without being labeled as “anti-Brewer” and “holding a bitter grudge.”
The guy disagrees with your opinion. That doesn’t make him the antichrist.
That's all I've got for you today, unless you're interested in some Chris Capuano/Tom Haudricourt Fan Fiction.
It's not just that he disagrees with an opinion.
It’s that he disagrees with basically any positive opinion about the Brewers. His negativity is off the charts and certainly comes off as anti-Brewer. There’s a reason why most people put that label on him.
by NoahJ on Feb 3, 2010 6:27 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
"I don't know why btc isn't allowed to express his opinion on this issue, or any other, without being labeled as anti-Brewer and "holding a bitter grudge."
That would be a fair point if this was the first time we heard from him. Part of the reason I keep floating back to SBN is you do get to know, to a limited degree, the personalities of the folks who comment here. I know when I see a comment by roguejim that I’m probably going to to end up laughing by the end. I know when I see a comment or post by TheJay that I’ll probably learn something before I’m done. I know (or knew) not to click a link left by battlekow when we’re playing the Reds. And I know, based on his past comments and articles elsewhere (see below) that backtocali doesn’t like Milwaukee, doesn’t like Ryan Braun (the guy he gasp compared Tulo to favorably a couple of days back), and doesn’t care for the way the Brewers pursue the draft. In that context, when he comments or posts something, it’s fair for anyone to consider the source and say they’re doing so.
As for me, I don’t know why suggesting, based on past evidence, that btc bears a grudge against Milwaukee and is anti-Brewer is seen as a personal attack.
But whatever. I’m sure I’ve bored everyone whose bothered to read this nonsense, and I’ll stop now.
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Feb 3, 2010 6:31 PM CST up reply actions 8 recs
I know when I read a TSSC post that by the end of it I'll feel like he wrote what I was thinking
You have to admire him for that
Get out of my dreams and into my Chuckie Carr
-Molitorfan 12/23/09
I question that motivation
I’ll refrain from using the phrase “with all due respect” here for it’s inherent disrespectful-ness.
I don’t think there is a rational conversation to have about the merits and drawbacks of untucking jerseys. It’s 100% subjective and there’s little to no gray area on this topic. There are no objective stats to quote and compare. Any comments generated by the discussion almost necessarily have to be emotionally-backed.
Given that (predictably) only 14% of the community agrees with dissenting opinion the entire conversation is inevitably going to be why people disagree with the dissenting opinion. There’s no opportunity for discourse when everyone in the conversation has the same opinion.
I think we can all agree that this community is probably one of the most rational communities we’re a part of on teh Internets, but even we can’t find a way to turn a subjective discussion into an objective one.
It's not necessarily 14% of this community.
Any Cubs or Cardinals or any other teams fans that read this site can vote in it as well, so you have to account for that as well.
by NoahJ on Feb 4, 2010 8:21 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Well said, TSSC
I just wanted to follow up with saying that I’m not here to totally rain on the parade or anything. My own opinion is the untucking shouldn’t be a big deal, the game is over at that point and every Brewer has gone on record saying it’s not a dis at the other team, it’s just a fun tradition.
I did have to respond about backtocali though, mostly because his opinions aren’t just solely based on conduct of the actual players or total analysis of their stats, there’s like legitimate spite in every one of his breakdowns or rants, and I along with a whole other message board have had a long history with him before he started imposing his infallible knowledge around here.
To respond to KL once more, I appreciate the response and the opportunities you give everyone here, it’s a well run site and some good insight on the Brewers you don’t always get at places like brewerfan.net or what have you. Especially with sportsbubbler going down, I’ll be coming here for articles. Get pumped everyone, spring training is 2 weeks away!
by GormanBraun28 on Feb 3, 2010 5:07 PM CST up reply actions
I think
if you want his words to be neutrally received you have to post them as “from an anomyous” (however the f that’s spelled) contributor.
by PagsBrewCrew on Feb 4, 2010 12:14 PM CST up reply actions
My random thoughts on the subject
- I’m not sure how it can be okay for one person to do it but not the whole team.
- How is this so much worse than standing in the middle of an opposing team’s field and shaking each other’s hands after a win?
- Or, for that matter, jumping around home plate after a walk off homerun?
- BFD
- Don’t they untuck their shirts eventually anyway, what difference is it when they do it?
- Do people get as upset about Braun and Fielder’s 1-2 punch thing?
There just seems to be something a little off about a bunch of millionaires who make their living playing a game putting themselves on the same plane as a person working in a factory all day for wages that might not ever add up in a lifetime what a rookie MLB player makes in a year.
- If a person can’t make $400,000 in their lifetime he/she has bigger problems than worrying about a baseball player untucking his jersey after a game.
It is what it is.
If a person can’t make $400,000 in their lifetime he/she has bigger problems than worrying about a baseball player untucking his jersey after a game.
Or, he’s just a baseball writer.
That's all I've got for you today, unless you're interested in some Chris Capuano/Tom Haudricourt Fan Fiction.
Oh I don't know
at 25k a year, you’re on pace to make 400k after 16 years.
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Feb 3, 2010 3:28 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah
I’m on the 1000 year plan.
That's all I've got for you today, unless you're interested in some Chris Capuano/Tom Haudricourt Fan Fiction.
BASEBALL IS A GAME
Plus I voted yes, just so Tony “I ushered in the steroird era” LaRussa can get all bothered by it.
"You are only a success at the moment that you do a successful act"
-Tex Winter
Tony "I ushered in the steroid era while sitting wasted in my car" LaRussa
"If we want to sign a Type A free agent, we would lose a second-round pick, but we don't have a way to get picks back. Our whole Draft process needs to be redone."
~Doug Melvin
by Charlie Marlow on Feb 3, 2010 3:29 PM CST up reply actions
Plus one of the arguments against is because A. Pujols watched his home runs and we don’t like that. I don’t like it because PooHoles is a hypocrite.
Either don’t celebrate anything besides a WS victory or shut your mouth. This would be like Gary Payton complaining that someone trashed talked him.
"You are only a success at the moment that you do a successful act"
-Tex Winter
Yeah, I dont' think very many of us have a problem with him watching his Home Runs
I like it when players watch homeruns. I just don’t like it when those same players criticize others for doing the same thing.
There’s an important distinction to make there.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, "That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Feb 3, 2010 3:36 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Consider that backtocali has explained he's not a fan of the Brewers, just an interested observer
Personally, I don’t really care if a player watches a homer or whatnot. So that invalidates point 2, because I don’t hate it if players do those things. That’s a hindsight bias to deflect blame off of the team you like, just like blaming the refs for a loss in any other sport.
E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).
Actually I don't know why backtocali has a place in this argument at all
Would we let a Padres fan write the counterpoint for this article? Or a Cubs fan, or a Orioles fan?
E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).
by Jordan M on Feb 3, 2010 3:45 PM CST up reply actions 7 recs
If they were an active member of this blog, I'd imagine KL would have allowed it.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, "That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
Agreed
I invited BtC to be a part of this because he’s been a vocal critic of it here in the past. I suppose I could have done a blanket search of the internet to find a stranger, but it was easier to ask the critic I know.
That's all I've got for you today, unless you're interested in some Chris Capuano/Tom Haudricourt Fan Fiction.
His active dislike for the Brewers is what causes his stance on this issue, I think
If I was in a situation where I was an active member of the Bleed Cubbie Blue, and they asked me to write a counterpoint on the issue of “playing that damn song when they win”, I would say it is stupid. I think it is stupid because I am a Brewer fan. If I were a Cubs fan, I would probably like it. So there’s a bias already associated with disliking a team. I feel like this is like a sports-talk radio host saying something that doesn’t make sense just to provoke a bunch of response.
And I hope there is no dispute that the writer in question is, in fact, not a fan of the Milwaukee Brewers— and I surely hope that my point wasn’t considered a personal attack. I mean look at his profile page.

E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).
by Jordan M on Feb 3, 2010 5:48 PM CST up reply actions 7 recs
He is...
E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).
by Jordan M on Feb 3, 2010 6:04 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
My favorite quote in that article is...
“Enjoy him while he lasts Brewer fans. He’s no Robin Yount, he’s no Paul Molitor, and when he’s gone the Brewers and the city (not that having Braun helps this at al.) will go back to being the biggest dump in the NL Central.
Oh yeah, and Ryan, I’ll bring some kleenex for you the next time you feel like you’re being disrespected, after brushing the dirt off of your uniform as teh result of a high and inside fastball. Get used to it, you’re going to need a boatload of Kleenex this year for all the crying you will do."
It’s an entertaining riff and I’m sure it went over well at bleedcubbieblue, but it’s hardly the product of fair-minded, rational thought.
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Feb 3, 2010 6:15 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Yup
“He is a top notch player in a 2nd class city”
“The fact of the matter is that if he continues his antics, fans of the game, whether they be Brewer fans or not, will start to lose respect for him, pitchers will continue to throw at him, and that within 30 years, the Brewers will for most of their lifetime will be a losing franchise, and the city of Milwaukee will be swallowed up by Chicago within 30 years.”
“when he’s gone the Brewers and the city (not that having Braun helps this at al.) will go back to being the biggest dump in the NL Central.”
That’s fine that he posts here and he is pretty easy to ignore in the comments (most of the time), but you can’t honestly be surprised that he is received with hostility when given space for an article on this site.
Get a ife broseph
by Supertramp on Feb 3, 2010 6:17 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Your logic is circular here.
You say I should have found a Cub or Padre fan to make this argument. Now you’re pointing out that I picked a Giants fan. So where did I go wrong, again?
That's all I've got for you today, unless you're interested in some Chris Capuano/Tom Haudricourt Fan Fiction.
Actually, I'm pretty sure that Jordan's rhetorical question as to whether we'd ask a Padre fan, Cubs fan or an Orioles fan write the counter-point...
… was designed to elicit a response of “of course not”. I don’t believe he was actually suggesting that asking their opinion was what he wanted you to do.
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Feb 3, 2010 6:13 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
That's exactly it.
I was pointing out that a person who is not a fan of a particular team is obviously going to dislike the quirks of that team, as I was pointing out in the Cub victory song example. I also hate the Viking horn, etc. He’s going to disagree because he flat-out dislikes the Brewers. Why would you expect a quality discussion when a person who dislikes the team is critiquing a tradition of the team?
E: George 4 (5, throw, throw, throw, throw).
by Jordan M on Feb 3, 2010 6:16 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
KL you're being a bit obtuse here.
To the point that people are complaining about, Backtocali is unquestionably a troll, giving him validation does not benefit the conversation. This is a great site, and I appreciate all the work that you do to make it that way, but I’ve never understood the tolerance for this guy.
by Zorakathura on Feb 3, 2010 6:29 PM CST up reply actions 3 recs
Depends on your definition of Troll
KL sees a Troll as someone writing comments that are “personal or unnecessarily controversial”. While many of us may actually see some of his comments as unnecessarily controversial, I think it’s more that a lot of us have a broader definition of Troll. In my opinion, even legitimate criticism can be flamebait if not done correctly.
Ultimately, it’s KL’s site and only his opinion matters.
Which is why someone can be banned by two seperate moderators (shockingly, not me) and still get to make points on the front page.
by TheJay on Feb 4, 2010 7:47 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
"I feel like this is like a sports-talk radio host saying something that doesn’t make sense just to provoke a bunch of response."
that’s absolutely what it is. It’s Feb 3 and things are slow…
Get out of my dreams and into my Chuckie Carr
-Molitorfan 12/23/09
We should send an e-mail to Albert Pujols and ask for his thoughts.
by NoahJ on Feb 3, 2010 4:27 PM CST up reply actions 5 recs
Awesome.
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Feb 3, 2010 5:16 PM CST up reply actions
I am reminded of a Daniel Tosh quote.
He is talking about how people complain how football players dance in the endzone after scoring a touchdown. Basically what he says is:
His job is to catch a football. It’s not that serious. I don’t care if he gets in the endzone and has a ten minute tea-party, it’s just a game. Just don’t get mad at me when you’re paralyzed from the neck down after some safety takes you out and you look up in the stands and see me going “OHHH! Dance now you over-paid clown!”
I don’t care about Soriano’s little hop, but when he gets injured because of it of course I’m going to laugh at him. I really have no problem with any team/player celebrating after making a good play or winning a game as long as it isn’t blatantly making a fool out of the other team. Untucking one’s shirt shouldn’t offend anybody, that is ridiculous.
"Maybe V8 will sponsor a vegetable!"
"You have no honor!" - McClung to Fukudome
by zsxander567 on Feb 5, 2010 12:21 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I suppose in all fairness
BtC’s antics have not been as bad in the past couple months as they previously had been. Hell, he even had a comment go green recently…
by NoahJ on Feb 3, 2010 6:42 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
I was just about to write the same thing.
Since this thread has turned into a referendum on backtocali’s worth as a commenter, I think it’s worth noting that he’s become much more tolerable (and even helpful/enjoyable at times) over the past several months.
I think his tone changed quite a bit after he was called out en masse last year. He was a troll for most of last season, but not anymore. And opposing untucking, as nonsensical has that may be, is definitely not trolling.
by Cheeseandcorn on Feb 3, 2010 10:06 PM CST up reply actions
Exactly.
Correct me if I’m wrong, BtC, but you live in Milwaukee and attend/watch Brewers games. Now, it’s not clear whether or not you’re a fan of the team or not, but you certainly follow them, and you are most certainly interested/intrigued by them. I think that gives you a right to have and share an opinion on the team. Since you didn’t (I’m assuming) grow up with the team, you’re opinions are going to be very unbiased. Even if I don’t agree with many, hell, most of your opinions, I still appreciate the differing point of view.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, "That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
by tcyoung on Feb 4, 2010 12:36 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
"Since you didn’t (I’m assuming) grow up with the team, you’re opinions are going to be very unbiased."
I disagree. Not being a fan from childhood doesn’t automatically make someone objective or unbiased.
I guess my point there was that he's a fan of another team first.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, "That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
It makes him less biased than me.
I’d say I have a less biased view of the Mariners than someone at Lookout Landing does.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, "That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
He's been critical of the team, and some of his actions have been fishy to say the least
But I never got the impression that he actually didn’t like the team. There are aspects of the team that he doesn’t like, but why would he spend so much time at this blog talking Brewers if he blatently disliked them?
He’s constantly saying how he would like to see the team rebuild through prospects and overhaul the draft process. Those are ideas you simply don’t propose for a team you dislike.
Cards Announcers On Gamel's First Career HR, "That’s all they need is another home run hitter".
If you think ripping the players, management, fans, and city is separate from liking or disliking the team
Then we’re seeing things very differently.
I don’t know why he feels the need to come here and bash the team. Frankly, I don’t know what he gets out of it or what this site gets out of it. I think everyone involved would be better off if it stopped. But obviously other people see it differently. Oh well.
by TheJay on Feb 4, 2010 8:36 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
Disliking makes all the difference.
I live in St. Louis, I go to the games, and I follow the team every step of the way. I love baseball and I find it interesting to follow the team where I live. At no time however am I not a fan of the crew. All of my opinions on the Cardinals and their players are colored by my love of the Brewers and my hatred for the Redbirds. I don’t comment on Vivia El Birdos (my drunk alter ego may have, but that’s out of my hands) even though I live in the Lou and follow the team. I think my opinions would be a waste of their time and my own. Even though I call St. Louis home my opinions would be just as biased as those from any other Brewer fan – no matter what city they call home.
by travwood81 on Feb 4, 2010 10:23 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
As a counterpoint
The clearly-non-anti-Brewers fans were all pretty down on the team for most of the offseason, so the entire tone of the site was negative up until a month or so ago. There were very few people happy with DM for failing to offer arbitration to Felipe Lopez (savvy move in hindsight) and there are entire threads of Troll comments by the faithful – myself included. There was very little material to Feed the Troll during the offseason.
Now that we’re all drinking the “it’s a new season and anything can happen” Kool-Aid, BCB has become a much more upbeat place. Wolf and Davis are legitimate improvements to the rotation, yet we can all blissfully ignore the offense lost from Cameron, Hart’s still-unproven ability to hit breaking balls, Parra’s unproven ability to be consistent, Gallardo’s unproven ability to go more than 5 innings on a regular basis, etc. As such, there’s going to be a lot of Troll Chow on the boards over the next month and more.
BtC’s definitely a built a foundation to build on from the offseason and I’m hopeful, but he lost the benefit of the doubt with his antics from last season from my perspective. He doesn’t have to be glowingly happy and optimistic, but the criticisms need to be in the right time and place. Spring Training is the time for heady optimism, not pessism.
by ecocd on Feb 4, 2010 7:26 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
"...he lost the benefit of the doubt with his antics from last season from my perspective."
I don’t see why he has any credibility here, even now, given the way he debuted on this site.
Also, if someone is antagonizing to the point of being banned twice (and that’s just for comments here, not on other SBN pages, but that’s a horse of a different color), expecting any respect for his or her viewpoint is foolish.
by TheJay on Feb 4, 2010 7:45 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Because he *has* had some posts and points to make this offseason
It’s some evidence of turning a new leaf. The credibility comes from his recent performance rather than long-term performance. You may cry small sample size, but a new trend has to start somewhere. Mind you, it usually isn’t a new trend starting, but we’d have crucified Macha for benching Kendall and Hart on May 1st given how well they started the season.
Does comparing BtC to Kendall count as a personal attack? Sorry about that.
by ecocd on Feb 4, 2010 7:59 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I just disagree
I think credibility takes longer to restore, especially when it was lost so egregiously.
But whatever, obviously other commenters are more forgiving than I am.
by TheJay on Feb 4, 2010 8:08 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I used the wrong language
I should have said, “Any credibility comes from” rather than “The credibility comes from.” Anyone watch red dwarf?
Kryten: Suggest we maintain course. That asteroid does not exist.
Rimmer: Suppose you’re wrong?
Kryten: Sir, I’ll stake my reputation on it.
Rimmer: Kryten, you haven’t got a reputation.
Kryten: No, sir, but I’m hoping to acquire one from this escapade.
untucking jerseys
I can’t believe that 73% of the respondents think “untucking” is cool! It just adds ammunition to the argument that Brewer fans aren’t really baseball fans (i.e. knowledgeable about the game), but just “Brewer” groupies. As they say in Chicago: The difference between White Sox and Cubs fans is that White Sox fans are baseball fans. Cubs fans are Cubs fans.
Also, if untucking is cool because it honors Cameron’s father’s ethics, than why don’t the players just drop their drawers when they win. Lots of factory dads, including mine, would take off their pants when they got home.
I'm glad you took the time to join our humble site just to say this
Thanks!
or,
Hi backtocali!
It is what it is.
yeah you're right
The Brewers players should either do everything that every factory worker ever does or did when they get home, or nothing at all. That’s the only way they could make the gesture work.
by richardhkirkando on Feb 4, 2010 11:49 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
What's wrong with untucking shirts?! I just don't get it.
How is it disrespectful? Nobody has been able to explain it to me. I’m not a knowledgeable about baseball because I enjoy that my team appreciates a win? That just doesn’t make sense.
"A D+ Grade? That must have been a Wittardo grade"- @73_MC
by BrewHaHeather on Feb 4, 2010 12:00 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I think after a hard game's work
The Brewers should just immediately grab their wives/girlfriends and have sex right there on the field.
Too far? I’ll see myself out…
by NoahJ on Feb 4, 2010 12:13 PM CST up reply actions 4 recs
I can guarantee...
if the Brewers copied what happened in my home when I return from work absolutely nothing like that would ever occur. Still, in my dark nights I’ll be comforted by the thought that at least NoahJ is getting a bit of action…
"I hope your name is Rick"
by MrLeam on Feb 4, 2010 12:33 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs































