Quick and Dirty Hoffman analysis
We all know Trevor Hoffman has been having some problems this season, and much of the discussion has focused on the fact that he's not throwing as many change-ups as he usually does. A quick glance at the data bears this out; from 2007 to the present (the pitch-f/x era), Hoffman has thrown his changeup 31% of the time, but he's only thrown it 19.4% of the time this season. Clearly this is a discrepancy, but Hoffman's postgame quote suggests there may be more to this:
"I’m pigeon-holing myself into situations where the hitter can be a little more patient. He doesn’t have to offer at (the changeup). I’m pitching behind in the count. You do that in the big leagues, the numbers will indicate that. It’s more of an ‘out’ pitch than a ‘getting back in the count’ pitch. That’s the dynamic of that pitch."
In other words, Hoffman seems to be saying that he's throwing the changeup less often because he's not finding himself in changeup counts as often as he usually has in his career. As luck would have it, just today Fangraphs introduced pitch-type splits based on the count. The data are intriguing, to say the least:
The first table has Hoffman's career (since 2002, anyway) changeup splits, and the second table has his 2010 splits. Some patterns emerge. Obviously, Hoffman hasn't thrown any changeups with no strikes (except for one with an 0-0 count). He hasn't thrown very many of those throughout his career, though, so that isn't too strange. This year's numbers in 1-strike counts are also quite similar. However, for some reason, although the change up has been his bread-and-butter in two strike counts throughout his career, he's really not been throwing it in those counts this year. (It's not pictured here, but this doesn't seem to be a Pitch-f/x classification error; the decrease in change-up% is accompanied by an increase in fastball%). So, quite strangely, despite Hoffman blaming the lack of change-ups on the fact that he hasn't been in counts where he can use it as an outpitch, for some reason he's actually been throwing it less in those very counts. In particular, when he has an 0-2 count (an outpitch count if there ever was one), he's throwing fastballs 100% of the time.
Also, perhaps worthy of note, 100% of his pitches on 3-0 counts have been unclassified.
Anyway, about the only conclusion I can draw here is that, despite Trevor's protestations, it's not just a matter of not being in changeup counts; he's undeniably throwing the pitch less, even than when he usually would. I don't know why this is, but I do not think it bodes well.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Cubs fan here, and I come in peace.
First, let me say that whenever Hoffman comes in against the Cubs, he obviously isn’t a guy that I get worried about, I feel like we have a chance. I was actually coming over here wondering what the chances are that he loses his closer job, and if he does, who will get it? My guess is one of Hawkins, Coffey, or Villanueva. What are your thoughts?
Coffey is probably most likely for now.
Hawkins has struggled too much early on to merit being put in the closers job, and management seems to like guys who have experience closing, which would put Coffey over Villa. Eventually, Zach Braddock will probably take over the closers job though probably not anytime in the next couple months.
Because Hoffman is a guaranteed Hall of Famer, I’m sure management will give him plenty more chances. I could see him being taken out of the closers spot for a week or so, but as soon as he puts together a couple good relief outings he would probably be reinstated. His six hundredth save is so close that Ken Macha will give him ample opportunities to get it over the course of the year.
This is pretty much all just speculation as Brewers management hasn’t really said much of anything about the situation, but I feel pretty comfortable with my conjecturing.
"Probably won't make a decision until after the decision starts"
Agreed
Coffey is the best bet. No need to rush Braddock, as I have seen in other blogs.
Problem with Coffey is that the last time he had that “closers” role, he was released outright because of awful performance by the Reds. Although I feel the “closer” role is one of the most overrated in the game, I do realize there is a mental aspect to it, and maybe Coffey just doesnt have it. Much like Hawkins (see his time with the Cubs).
Was Coffey ever the de facto closer in Cincinatti though?
I know that he closed for a little bit, but looking over his stats it doesn’t seem like he was ever the “official” closer for any long period of time. And he doesn’t appear to have been closer when he was released either, just a bad relief pitcher. My problem with Coffey is that other than the last year and a half with Milwaukee, he has always given up a lot of baserunners and seems to be regressing back to that some this year.
I agree that Braddock shouldn’t be rushed—yet. But I think he should be the third or fourth option.
"Probably won't make a decision until after the decision starts"
Coffey wasn't even in the majors, much less a closer when he was released by the Reds
Failure is just success rounded down.
I hate to keep saying the same thing
but this is what you’d expect a pitcher to do, if he has no confidence in his control of a pitch. Before this year, Hoffman could choose between his fastball and changeup at will. This year, so far, he can’t locate the changeup where he wants to. Until he does, he will stay away from it early in the counts. Later in the counts, he’ll use it because he has no choice.
He can't locate the fastball either.
I’m wondering if his confidence in the change is stemming from a lack of confidence in the fastball
http://www.mlbsoup.com








































