One Pitch Away
Seasons sometimes do turn on a single pitch. One second you can almost taste victory, the next you’re left wondering where you went wrong. Unfortunately, being ‘one pitch away’ has become a bit cliché in a season filled with mistakes and disappointment. I decided to go back and look at the games this season and figure out where changing a single pitch would have changed the outcome. So, here’s a short trip through a half-season of what-could-have-been.
One Pitch Away4/9 – Hoffman
4/14 – Bases loaded with two outs, Hawkins has Theriot 0-2 and gives up a 2-run single. CHC score 4 runs with two outs to win 7-6.
4/28 – Top of the first inning Narveson works both LaRoche and McCutchen to full counts, then surrenders solo home runs to each. Change one of those pitches and the game never goes to extra innings, where they lose to PIT in the 14th.
5/22 – Lots of opportunities in this interleague game vs. MIN. In the bottom of the first YoGa misses on a 3-2 pitch and walks Young to force in Morneau; if he makes that pitch he saves another run when Plouffe’s sacrifice fly becomes the 3rd out. In the 7th inning Estrada gives up a run-scoring double to Mauer on a 3-2 pitch; later in the inning when Young grounds out it becomes the 3rd out instead of driving in a run. Brewers go on to lose in the 12th inning.
6/1 – Nobody out in the bottom of the 7th vs. FLA, Hoffman blows the 3-2 pitch giving up a leadoff double to Coghlan. If he makes that pitch Coghlan doesn’t score on Cantu’s double, and Paulino never drives in Cantu and Ross, making Escobar’s 8th inning RBI the game winner.
6/5 – Two opportunities in the first inning vs. STL; an 0-2 pitch to Pujols by Narveson for a home run, and Holliday steals second. One good pitch to His Holiness or throwing out the runner and the Brewers win 4-3 or 4-1.
6/12 – Second batter in the 1st inning vs. TEX – If Manny makes the full count pitch on Mike Young he gets out of the inning with no runs scored and the Crew goes on to win 3-2.
6/19 – Kameron Loe gives up a single to Seth Smith on a two-out 2-2 pitch, Lucroy’s error complicates things and COL ends up with three runs after that in the inning and eventually win 8-7.
There were a lot of games where we held the lead and lost it in the 9th or grounded into double plays killing rallies, but they would have needed more than one pitch here or there to change the outcome. If the Crew had made those pitches and these decisions were overturned, this is what the standings would look like as a result:
Cent W L GB CIN 52 42 -- MIL 51 43 1.0 STL 50 43 1.5 CHC 41 53 11.0 HOU 38 55 13.5 PIT 31 61 20.0
11 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sounds a little like my "luck" wins last year
It all comes out in the wash and Pythagorean W-L record I think accurately tells you how much under or over performing you do during the year. One pitch away here, and one blow out there, or one bad pitching performance here, and a bad offensive performance there…it all balances out.
The 8th or 9th inning one pitches definitely impacted the final score.
But first and second innings? The original actions of the game may have forced the hitters to take different approaches at the plate, or the pitchers to make different pitches. Sure, the Crew would have gotten out of the inning without further damage, but the complexity of the game could change drastically.
"We’re gonna gather our nuts, and find out what the squirrels… we’ll be right back." - Brian Anderson
I actually looked at cascading effects
Trying to find situations where a double play had spoiled a rally and the hitter to lead off the next inning would have extended it, or consequences of a person striking out instead of a walk or vice versa, etc. Those are pretty rare; even second-guessing the lineup order doesn’t change the results a whole lot, to the point that as much as you can say the game would be different you can also say it wouldn’t.
In the end I just grabbed the obvious one-pitch low hanging fruit.
Suggest rephrasing the first one
“Hoffman misses with a 1-2 pitch to Stavinoha”
Stavinoha was on his knee when he hit that one out of the park. It was outside the inside corner of the plate and was pretty much exactly where Hoffman wanted it. That was a fluke not Hoffman.
The Reds would probably be tops on lucky wins this year. They’ll fall out of the playoff race not necessarily due to Dusty Baker blowing it so much as luck evening out.
I think the whole concept of "lucky wins" is horse-shit.
What begins in fear usually ends in folly.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 20, 2010 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions
If not lucky, then above average
Like anything in baseball, if something happens at a long-term rate of 50% (of whatever) and a team or player is clipping along at 85% for the first half of the season, that number almost inevitably falls back down. To call it luck isn’t necessarily fair, but “statistical aberration win total” is a bit wordy.
How are they getting lucky?
Their winning percentage (.556) is actually lower than their Pythagorean winning percentage (.566).

by 




























