Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White Announces Koscheck vs. Hendricks for UFC on FOX

Thursday's Frosty Mug

Some things to read while tapping your feet.

The Brewers were bad once again last night, and no one busts out the epic prose to describe bad baseball quite like Tom Haudricourt:

It was woeful starting pitching that bled into the bullpen in the early weeks of the season, quickly dropping the Brewers from the NL Central race. And it’s the starting rotation that’s now hurling them into oblivion, ending any faint hope of making a run toward respectability.

By allowing 12 earned runs last night, Randy Wolf cemented a pretty undesirable place in Brewer history. Last night's game recap has a look at where his performance stands among the worst in baseball and franchise history. Here's a note I missed, though: The Brewers are the first team to have four different pitchers give up 10+ runs in a game in the same month since the 1936 Philadelphia A's.

The Brewers likely won't see Pirates catcher Ryan Doumit in tonight's series finale: Doumit left last night's game in the fourth inning and was taken to the hospital for tests after complaining of feeling light-headed and nauseated. Doumit collided with Rickie Weeks early in the game, and has already missed some time this season for concussion symptoms.

Other notes from the field:

The Brewers will be looking for the split when Yovani Gallardo returns to the mound tonight, but should he? You can add Jaymes Langrehr of The Brewers Bar to the list of people wondering letting him pitch again this soon after straining his oblique is the right decision.

The Brewers will have to make a roster move today to make room for Gallardo, and it's widely expected that Lorenzo Cain will be sent down. It's also possible, though, that Jim Edmonds could make a return trip to the DL. Edmonds is nursing a sore Achilles, and this is what he told Adam McCalvy about it:

"Some days are better than others," Edmonds said. "But the days that are better are still pretty much unbearable."

If the Brewers do send Cain down today, it won't be a popular decision: 72% of voters in this week's BCB Tracking Poll think Cain is more likely than Carlos Gomez to become the Brewers' center fielder of the future.

Speaking of roster moves, Quevedo at the Buffet has some NSFW takes on what the Brewers should do with Dave Bush and Randy Wolf. And in a related note: Jen Lada and Howie Magner seem to agree that it's time to start questioning Rick Peterson's results.

Meanwhile, Bob Uecker is still expected to return to action tomorrow, and Adam McCalvy reports the WTMJ broadcasts will return to their normal pattern, with Uecker calling six innings and Cory Provus calling three.

Here's some trade discussion:

Corey Hart could be traded soon, so we're running out of time to do things like this: Wisconsin Sports Tap has a Sunglasses at Night-themed tribute.

Casey McGehee seems to have cemented himself as the Brewers' third baseman for the foreseeable future, but should that be the case? Jack Moore of Disciples of Uecker has a look at McGehee's value.

David Riske allowed two runs on four hits in 1.1 innings of work last night. Until reading this post at the Seattle Post-Intelligencer I didn't realize Riske is a former 56th round pick, making him a pretty unlikely major leaguer.

It's hard to tell if this will affect anything, but Rickie Weeks might be changing agents. Ken Rosenthal is reporting that Weeks' current agent, Lon Babby, has been named the new President of Basketball Operations for the Phoenix Suns.

In the minors:

Here's an interesting experiment, and hopefully it'll raise some money for a great cause: The August 10 game will be broadcast commercial-free on FSWisconsin and will feature a live charity auction for the Brewers Community Foundation.

We also have another set of nominations for the SBN Wisconsin Hall of Fame: Click here for FtJ's nomination of Eddie Mathews, and here for Anonymous Eagle's post on Wesley Matthews Jr.

Around baseball:

Astros: Claimed infielder Anderson Hernandez and pitcher Nelson Figueroa off waivers from the Indians and Phillies, respectively, and designated pitchers Polin Trinidad and Gary Majewski for assignment.
Dodgers: Pitcher Clayton Kershaw has been suspended for five games and manager Joe Torre for one game following an incident against the Giants on Tuesday. Kershaw appealed his suspension.
Marlins: Designated pitcher Nate Robertson for assignment and placed catcher Brett Hayes on the DL with a wrist injury.
Padres: Placed second baseman David Eckstein on the DL with a calf strain.

Today's strangest story comes via the San Francisco Gate, and details a long and interesting journey across Iowa for Lefty O'Doul's left arm. (h/t BBTF)

Happy birthday today to:

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have a new hero. (h/t The Book Blog)

Drink up.

Comment 205 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Please change the site tag line to

Milwaukee Brewers – Hurtling towards Oblivion.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 10:22 AM CDT reply actions  

I thought the Edmonds quote was about the team.

Bettman's Nightmare: Until Recently, the Biggest C**block in the NHL

http://bettmansnightmare.blogspot.com/

by Bettman's Nightmare on Jul 22, 2010 10:23 AM CDT reply actions  

Re: Hawkins

Macha may as well have said: Current bullpen isn’t broken, let’s leave Hawkins down there until it is. Probably the right decision, assuming he’s actually lost that much velocity.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 10:23 AM CDT reply actions  

This has nothing to do

With today’s Mug, but my biggest problem with MLB 10 the show is in the Road to the show mode, facing those pitchers with a 96 4-seam, 83 slider, 93 2-seam, 76 curveball, and 64 KNUCKLEBALL!!! You’re either a knuckleballer or not…

Okay, I have vented…

Goooooo-mez!

by Drew C on Jul 22, 2010 10:23 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

not true

Knuckleballers do have a mix of (usually slow) pitches and most of them didn’t start off that way, and then there’s the guys like Drew Storen who know how to throw it and want to do it as a trick pitch but aren’t allowed to….

by morineko on Jul 22, 2010 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

did you make it to the show yet? I got there after about 3 seasons and like 4 trades

"Cubs fans boo again – 99% of these people can’t see the plate." -Ueck

by dux2bux on Jul 22, 2010 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, after 3 seasons and two trades...

I got drafted by the tigers, traded to the reds, then traded back to the tigers… We suck.

Goooooo-mez!

by Drew C on Jul 22, 2010 2:26 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I've been questioning Peterson since spring

white guy gherri curl, c’mon

but we can’t continue to chalk it up to the garbage in-garbage out. The influence of a pitching coach should be able to be seen by mid-season, and starters giving up double digit runs is the results.

"That's not a weird stat. Rickie is a run-scorer," Yost said. "It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter," Yost told reporters. "See, you guys have no concept. He's a run-scorer. So there's nothing weird about it. That's what he does."

by Hyatt on Jul 22, 2010 10:44 AM CDT reply actions  

Odd Rotoworld blurb on sidebar
The Brewers’ bullpen is overextended right now, but this really wasn’t fair to a classy veteran like Wolf. He was left in to suffer despite clearly not having his stuff and giving up six runs in the fourth inning alone. It’s the most earned runs Wolf has given up in his 12-year career.

My friend said Reynolds was giving Macha crap for leaving Wolf in too long on MLB Network last night as well.

I don’t really understand the rationale for pulling him early.

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 10:46 AM CDT reply actions  

Yeah

I understand the “don’t leave him in there to get hammered” argument, but it happens to a lot of good pitchers (not trying to pass Wolf off as a good pitcher), sometimes you have to take one for the team. Sure, it makes Wolf look worse than he actually is (hard to believe), but it’s necessary. The (new) bullpen has been one of the strong points of the team, and it’s ability shouldn’t be wasted in games like last nights. lord knows they can’t keep this performance up all year, might as well prolong the inevitable as long as possible.

To Wolf’s credit, he didn’t look/sound like he was frustrated with being left out there, it sounded like he was frustrated with how he was pitching, which is the appropriate reaction. I still like Wolf, even if he sucks. Can’t really expect this nightmare of a season to be a true indicator of his performance level. It might be, but I’d bet against it. We’ll see what happens with a new pitching coach (hopefully), but there’s no reason to give up on Wolf yet.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Highest

Comment to Subject line ratio in MyKenk history, right there.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Whoa

I did a double take when I saw how long that was.

Another thing to consider is that he is in year one of a 3-year deal so his stats aren’t going to affect his future income. If the Brewers left out an arbitration eligible guy or impending FA to get hammered I could possibly buy the argument a little more.

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

Not to mention who were they going to replace him with?

The bullpen had already thrown a lot of innings on Sunday and in the first two games of this series and there’s a guy coming back from the DL today presumably on a limited pitch count. If the bullpen is used for 6 innings yesterday, what would they do today? It’s easier to let a guy like Wolf take a beating on the mound than it is to make extra roster moves to avoid tsk-tsking about a classy veteran earning a bunch of runs.

Maybe he should play first base instead. That is, he should lie out there and we can step on him when we get a hit.

by TheJay on Jul 22, 2010 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Right,

I wanted to make that point, but typing so much wore me fingers out.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Also

Wolf is cashing his paychecks? Right?

He and his agents were the ones that drove up the asking price, so he should be expected to suck it up if he doesnt pitch well and earn his big paycheck.

by backtocali on Jul 22, 2010 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well

so should every pitcher, with that logic.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure

he has direct deposit. Otherwise the Brewers may have a risk management issue in their Finance department. Perhaps a webinar from Johhny Shoulderhand could correct the situation.

Welcome back Ueck!

by molitorfan on Jul 22, 2010 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

1936 Philadelphia A's

For every dynasty, there is an equal and opposite turd somewhere, flushed through the plumbing of baseball history. The Philadelphia A’s were such a turd. Connie Mack may have managed more games than any other manager in history, but the A’s of the 30’s and 40’s are why he lost more games than anyone too.

In 1936 the A’s were five years removed from their back-to-back World Series appearances (Jimmie Foxx, Al Simmons, Lefty Grove) and had become increasingly bad each season since. In 1936 they hit a relative low, losing 100 games with a pitching staff that had a combined 1.731 WHIP and a SO/BB ratio of 0.58s. Their starting rotation featured Harry Kelley (in his first season), 20-game loser Gordon Rhodes (in his last season), rookie Herman Fink, and Buck Ross – the only one of the four to still be with the team in 1938.

They should have finished last in the league in ERA, but in addition to horrible pitching, the A’s also couldn’t field. They committed 209 errors in 153 games and made 122 of the runs they surrendered unearned.

by nullacct on Jul 22, 2010 10:52 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

The 1915-1916 As were exceedingly awful, too

After the team appeared in 4 of 5 World Series, Connie decided to make money by not spending on players. The 1915 club went 43-109, committed 338 errors leading to over 200 unearned runs, on top of an ERA of 4.29 (ERA+ of 68). A record 24 different pitchers started at least one game for the club and 10-22 Welden Wyckoff was the best of the sorry lot. Future Hall of Famer Herb Pennock was waived in June (although he was pretty bad that year). 1916 saw even worse results as the team went 36-117, the worst AL record ever. Whitey Witt committed 78 errors at short. Jack Nabors had one of the worst seasons ever, going 1-20. He roomed with Tom Sheehan, who went 1-16. They finished 8th, 40 games behind the 7th place Senators.

I think Connie also subscribed to the philosophy of staying in the race just long enough to make a profit before selling like mad in other years.

Maybe he should play first base instead. That is, he should lie out there and we can step on him when we get a hit.

by TheJay on Jul 22, 2010 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Cappy is cursed

he wins, so now the rest of the team must lose.

by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 22, 2010 10:55 AM CDT reply actions  

How do you remove a curse?

That standard baseball curse, I’m not even going to argue whether it’s real or not, there’s enough lore to support its existence; how does a person go about actually removing it? Are we supposed to appease the entity that cursed us? If so, whodunit, and what do they want?

by nullacct on Jul 22, 2010 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

It doesn't sound all that hard, actually.

Step 1: Do not acknowledge the curse exists. Since curses are primarily ill wishes and bad thoughts, so believing a curse does not have power over you is the easiest way to get rid of it. The Psychics & Mediums Network believes curses are a telepathic transfer of negative energy that takes advantage of your inner fears. Therefore, the best way to deal with curses is to ignore them all together by thinking and acting positively. Consider the words of Eleanor Roosevelt: “No one can make you a victim without your consent.”

Step 2: Pray. Cultures that believe in the power of curses also believe in the power of prayer. Heal My Life says all you need to do to remove a curse is to let God know you want to be freed from it. When you ask for divine intervention, you must be ready to let go of the power the curse has over you and have faith that God will take it away.

Heal My Life suggests using imagery when you pray and picture God standing with you as you confront those who cursed you. Instead of asking God to curse those who sent you the bad wishes, ask God to stand between you and the curser, to break the power the curse had so it does not have any more powers and to protect the person that cursed you.

Step 3:Stop cursing others. From the Heart Feng Shui states that people who curse other are more susceptible to curses. Those who practice Feng Shui believe there is positive and negative energy, or “qi.” If a person has a “cursing” qi, he must first rid himself of it. Once a person rids himself of the negative energy they self-instilled by cursing others, they will no longer be susceptible to curses aimed in their direction.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

So, apparently this team

is surrounded by negative energy. Whoops.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

the key

is to make sure we play at least 3 consecutive games against the Cards. Pujols will be risen before the 3rd game.

Welcome back Ueck!

by molitorfan on Jul 22, 2010 7:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good luck convincing baseballers to listen to Eleanor Roosevelt

Maybe he should play first base instead. That is, he should lie out there and we can step on him when we get a hit.

by TheJay on Jul 22, 2010 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think we need to pull Mykenk.

He’s gone way over his word count for today. We need to keep him healthy for the playoff drive. (the SBNation blog playoffs that is)

Applying Simpsons and Star Wars quotes to Brewers discussions since 2009.

by Yar Nivek on Jul 22, 2010 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm sure he'd say he's good for another inning

Sometimes the manager just has to take the ball out of his hands.

by ecocd on Jul 22, 2010 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

he just had his

Will Ferrell during the debate scene in Old School moment.

Welcome back Ueck!

by molitorfan on Jul 22, 2010 7:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Does anyone think Melvin will or should keep his job after this season?

Personally, I don’t think he should be there now and they should just name Bruce Seid to the interim position, which would allow him to make the trades of Hart, Fielder (if possible), ect…since he knows the minor leaguers.

I used to love Melvin and found him to be a shrewd evaluator of talent but it’s time for a change and complete overhaul of philosophy IMO.

Just curious if anyone thinks Attanasio will do it or should?

I was disappointed with the lack of hookers but the pancakes were delightful

by Michael M on Jul 22, 2010 11:12 AM CDT reply actions  

In the offseason, maybe. Right now, not a chance. I don’t want an interim guy making organization changing trades. Then again, I’m not all that keen on letting a lame duck make those trades either.

Just wondering, what do you think the “new” philosophy should be? The whole “draft lotsa pitching” thing only went into play a couple years ago, so we don’t really have the experience period needed to determine whether or not the current philosophy is working anyway.

And to answer your question: No, he won’t do it, and no, he probably shouldn’t.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Philosophy

I was more thinking along the lines of relying more on pitching/defense. You’re right they have drafted more pitcher in the last few years and we do need time to evaluate that.

But the current team(s) have been built around power and out-slugging your opponent, but where Melvin (and maybe more so Jack Z or just plain bad luck with injuries) failed was in supplementing good pitching around the offense.

Idk…I’m frustrated like everyone else and I’d just like the whole damn thing started over with a new/fresh mind in the front office.

I was disappointed with the lack of hookers but the pancakes were delightful

by Michael M on Jul 22, 2010 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think he needs to be fired

8 years is plenty of time to leave your mark on a team and demonstrate clear signs of progress. The big league team is clearly awful while being quite expensive, and the minor league teams are losing more than they are winning. I wouldn’t make a move mid season, but I wouldn’t let him make free agent decisions this offseason either. He has not shown an ability to spend money effectively, put in place a quality coaching staff, or consistently identify and develop talent.

by dtmeyers on Jul 22, 2010 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Once we get past August 1, I think I'd be ok with a move.

Because aside from a few September callups and perhaps a waiver claim/trade, there’s not much for a GM to do after the deadline anyway. Making an early change would give the new guy a chance to get his feet wet before the offseason.

Now that's great tasting chicken!

by Kyle Lobner on Jul 22, 2010 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

Very good point

Although I’d like (at all costs) to avoid an interim GM. If they have a guy lined up to take over on 8/1, that’s fine, pull the trigger, but if they’re gonna shop for a new GM in the offseason, they need to keep DM around until then.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

as mykenk alludes to...

do you being interviewing for a new GM before you fire the current GM? If you do and the current GM has power, he could exact a vendetta by, eg, trading Braun for Juan Pierre. If you try to do the interviewing secretly: good luck with that. If you fire first, then look for a new one, you’re still stuck with an interem (or without a GM). If you strip away DM’s power temporarily, you can’t effectively negotiate with another club.

I still don’t see Mark A. making a move after the “trading deadline” as they could still go with a waivers-claim trade. Maybe after September 1st and 40 man rosters for playoffs have to be set (so, any negotiations would be for trades that affect next years’ teams).

by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 22, 2010 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

If he ever wants another job again

He wouldn’t submarine a franchise. Although it’s a formality, I would assume the owner has to sign a piece of paper for any organizational change, anyway.

by ecocd on Jul 22, 2010 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I used to be a big Melvin fan too.

But I think it time for him to go. I’m just about ready for a fire-sale at this point.

I don’t think we necessarily need a new organizational philosophy. We’ve just been built around offense because that’s what we have. A few year from now when we’ll have a rotation of Gallardo, Odorizzi, Heckathorn, Scarpetta, Peralta (way too optimistic, I know) we might seem like we’re more built around pitching.

What we really need are scouts who can actually identify pitching talent.

My goodness.

by BrewHaHeather on Jul 22, 2010 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

agree

i don’t think drafting pitching is the problem, i think developing pitching is. we need scouts that can identify talent, sure, but something just doesn’t seem right in the organization in how pitchers are “brought up” and taught.

realistically, i see melvin sticking around (mark seems to like him) and macha going.

by Capt Science on Jul 22, 2010 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I've been on the FDM wagon for a couple of years now

I do not think that Attanasio will pull the trigger mid season, but he definitely should at year end. And with that change should come a full house cleaning. This should have been done when Attanasio took over, imo.

I think that one of the problems that may arise with a philosophy change though (a much needed on that suits the smallest market in MLB) might now be met favorably by Attanasio. I think they need to build around pitching and defense, with home grown players, with a continual moving out of players once they get too expensive. And NEVER bringing in high priced free agents

Unfortunately, Attanasio likes to spend money on salary for the team to improve it, but this is a short term philosophy. Building for the long haul isnt sexy and the ESPN’s and FOX Sports people dont like it because it takes time and its a gradual process. But the Rockies, Marlins, Rays, Padres are all teams that take this sort of approach, and they are winning.

by backtocali on Jul 22, 2010 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Marlins approach is to win a world series and sell all your parts

I was disappointed with the lack of hookers but the pancakes were delightful

by Michael M on Jul 22, 2010 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rockies actually remind me of the Brewers in terms of philosophy

They both have similar payrolls ($90M vs $84M).

Both locked up their best young player – Tulo/Braun
Both traded their Boras client before he hit FA (assuming here…) – Fielder/Holliday
Both overpay for relief pitching – Hoffman and Hawkins vs Street and Betancourt
Both have their aces locked up for the next few years – Ubaldo/Gallardo
Overpay mediocre pitching – Wolf/Cook
One awful contract taking up too much payroll – Suppan / Helton

So I’d argue that they do a better job developing their surronding parts than the Brewers have, but I don’t think its much of a difference of a philosophy.

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

One big difference

Is that they didnt go out and acquire their overpaid guys on the free agent market.

There was a great story in BA about their philsophy just recently, and it stated that they dont get tempted to overpay for a free agent, no matter what the short term reward might be.

I also think that the Rockies do a much better job at evaluating and developing players, primarily pitchers.

by backtocali on Jul 22, 2010 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

I also think that the Rockies do a much better job at evaluating and developing players, primarily pitchers.

Agree, that is the main difference.

The Rockies overpay their own guys, Brewers overpay for FA. In the end, both are overpaying. They still have a payroll almost exactly the same.

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

What changed?
I used to love Melvin and found him to be a shrewd evaluator of talent …

If it is your expectations that have changed and caused you to decide that, then the ‘problem’ is you, not DM.

It's called "playing the percentages."

by hilbelink on Jul 22, 2010 11:21 AM CDT reply actions  

You're saying you never found him to be a good talent evaluator?

I was disappointed with the lack of hookers but the pancakes were delightful

by Michael M on Jul 22, 2010 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

I should add

The team reached a plateau with Melvin that I didn’t expect it to. He came in and totally turned us around from the 56 win pile of **** that we were and made nice moves to keep us respectable on the field and promising in the minors.

So, yes my expectations have changed but I don’t feel that was my problem. I had expectations because the moves he was making proved him to be a sharp man.

There should be expectations and I feel like your response baits me to apologize for them.

I was disappointed with the lack of hookers but the pancakes were delightful

by Michael M on Jul 22, 2010 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

That might be easy to do

If you mortgage a team’s future on making the most of the present. That which burns twice as bright burns half as long.

by nullacct on Jul 22, 2010 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

So, apparently things are hot and heavy

between the Astros & the Cards, w.r.t. Oswalt. Any thoughts as to how much that would suck?

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 11:33 AM CDT reply actions  

I think the Cards will choke in the playoffs

I’m looking at this as a positive as it will deplete their farm system even more than it already is.

Also, Pujols sucks.

(testing my theory that any time you type in “pujols sucks” on an internet forum 5-10 Cards fans will show up to yell at you)

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I tend to agree.

I meant, sure, those prospects will then be with the Astros, but I’m pretty sure that’s not going to make them any better…

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think that would be great

Trading for Oswalt is a ridiculous idea. Go for it, St. Louis!

Ryan Braun: He loves it.

by SRB on Jul 22, 2010 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh, and Cain's officially back to AAA

per Thwitter.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 11:35 AM CDT reply actions  

bummer

I was disappointed with the lack of hookers but the pancakes were delightful

by Michael M on Jul 22, 2010 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

The Kow Sez...

Peralta got moved to AA.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 11:41 AM CDT reply actions  

Interesting Keith Law chat response
Keith, who do you think has the most upside Minor or Hudson?

Klaw (1:19 PM)

Minor.

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 12:22 PM CDT reply actions  

That's too bad.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Disagree

I think Minor tops out as a #3 starter and Hudson as a solid #3. I.e. Minor would have to work his way up to being a #3.

In the end I kind of see Mike Minor as a Capuano/Suppan type, who lives on control and the best pitch is the change up. And with a guy who tops out in the upper 80s with his fastball, the second that command goes, or on days that the corners are missed, its just a batting practice pitcher.

At least with Hudson you get a low 90s fastball, and above average change up, and an average slider.

by backtocali on Jul 22, 2010 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Think you are reading old scouting reports

Minor sits at 91-93 this year which is probably why Law likes him more than Hudson. No idea if he keeps it up all year, but the “upper 80s” scouting report is from last year.

<a href="http://wwww.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=11527" >Kevin Goldstein from a couple weeks ago:

It’s long overdue to simply state I was wrong about Minor, but I was wrong for all the right reasons if you well. The player I evaluated entering the year, the pitcher we saw at Vanderbilt for three years, is not the player we’re seeing now, as Minor continues to flash an extra 2-4 ticks on his fastball from his college days, while retaining his command and secondary offerings. In three Triple-A starts, the International League is batting .197 against him, and some scouts think he could hold his own in the big leagues right now.

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ah

Yeah I was relying on the BA report in the Handbook.

That being the case I guess I would take Minor over Hudson, with the only difference between the two being that Minor has a 4th pitch that he uses.

I think both guys are #3’s and would not be sad to have either in the rotation next year.

by backtocali on Jul 22, 2010 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

btw, the price is right article was enjoyable

read it… other than some weird transitions by the writer, it’s interesting.

by Capt Science on Jul 22, 2010 1:11 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah

I lost about half an hour on it this morning. Kept meaning to put it down and come back to it, but I was entranced.

Now that's great tasting chicken!

by Kyle Lobner on Jul 22, 2010 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agree

I read it last week and really enjoyed it.

Who is your new hero – the guy who won or the ringer in the audience?

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

The guy who won.

Very impressive performance.

Now that's great tasting chicken!

by Kyle Lobner on Jul 22, 2010 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

you know...

other than seeing things as a range and selecting the top end of that range. Then adding your lucky number which is a high number.

if you overbid, you screw yourself.

by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 22, 2010 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

You don't lose anything, though, if you get it wrong

He was there for fun. They had to sell half the prizes anyway to cover the taxes. I would probably be the most unethusiastic game show winner of all-time. All I’d be able to do is worry about how I could afford the taxes on anything I won even as they were congratulating me on my win.

by ecocd on Jul 22, 2010 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, poor guy.

He had to sell his karaoke machine to pay for his free car and trips.

Now that's great tasting chicken!

by Kyle Lobner on Jul 22, 2010 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

I just meant that he many have won all those prizes

but it’s not like he got to keep them all.

I don’t think I could afford to pay the taxes on a $24,000 new car were I to win one. It would be exciting to win, but all the hoops you’d have to jump through to pay taxes on the car, then selling the car below MSRP, despite being taxed on the MSRP and then the sales taxes for selling the car at that lower price. You could clear a few thousand dollars. Not a reason to be terrifically excited.

Wheel of Fortune would be my game. Mostly cash prizes. Oh yeah. That’s what I’m talking about.

by ecocd on Jul 22, 2010 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

who was it that didn't know the price of something (a fancy coat or something)?

in the opening paragraphs it was the contestant

on the last page it was the ringer.

I suppose probably neither knew, but that should have been a bit more clear. And how did they know the ringer didn’t know? Was he interviewed (by the writer or by the show)?

by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 22, 2010 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

also...the grill

was it $1100 more than once prior? The article made it sound like that was the item they ID’d that made them realize what the show was up to. Were they just lucky? I know it’s painful to go through hours and hours of footage for an article, and maybe it’s above and beyond the call of duty, but any chance the PiR database was wrong as to how many times the item had appeared?

by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 22, 2010 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

The grill

The point of the grill was that Terry (guy on show) nailed the price and said that he had seen it on the show before. However they looked at the database and noted that the grill was on before Terry and his wife starting watching. This leads to speculation that they only way Terry gets the price right is if he is taking cues from the ringer.

I think its fine for the author to rely on the database for the article, its going to be 99.9% right.

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

It'd be like doing a baseball article and not being able to use BB-Ref

If I write an article and say that Prince hit 50 HRs in 2007 am I required to go to the video archives so I’m 100% sure he did in fact hit 50 HRs?

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh

I think in the article it states they weren’t regular watchers until a couple ago. Once they started watching it constantly they would track what the prizes were and their costs. The grill was shown before they started doing the tracking.

So sure, there is a chance they randomly caught that episode and were able to remember it years later, but I think its a pretty small chance.

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're still not getting what he's saying

He’s saying that once they started watching it constantly, the show that featured the grill was replayed.

Pujols is the Barack Obama of baseball.

by sjlee on Jul 22, 2010 5:00 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

If they used the grill as a prize twice, as they said

And the price was listed as $900 the first time and $1175 the second time, then there are other questions to ask besides “How’d he know?”

I’ve been a lifelong Price is Right fan, but reading that article dramatically decreased my desire to ever watch it again.

Now that's great tasting chicken!

by Kyle Lobner on Jul 23, 2010 6:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Right

But that creates a small (percentage-wise) difference in price, to prevent memorization. I’m fine with that.

But if a grill appears on the show twice, and it’s the same grill, and the price is $275 different (from $900 to $1175), then that’s a pretty significant difference.

Now that's great tasting chicken!

by Kyle Lobner on Jul 23, 2010 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

yeah, that does seem a rather extreme flux

perhaps it was during times of an economic boom and the manufacturers did feel they could jack up the list price by $300. or alternatively a supplier that was previously selling it for cheap went out of business or couldn’t sustain the price.

I was never much into that show anyway because it seemed like their prices had no basis in reality. I love the audience reactions and watching the little women try to heave the big wheel around was always amusing. Not to mention the action old Bob Barker got from the hot chick contestants. But the game itself……

by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 23, 2010 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe it had Drew Carey drool on it one time

Maybe he should play first base instead. That is, he should lie out there and we can step on him when we get a hit.

by TheJay on Jul 23, 2010 9:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

Why is everyone calling for the firing of Melvin, Macha, and Peterson - but not Sveum?

Hart is leading the team w/ a .290 BA – and that’s terrible!! [not hart, but the teams BA]

Say what you want about the pitching, by the hitting SUCKS, and DS has to be held accountable, IMO.

Oh wait…. Prince hit a meaningless HR… big deal.

Trade Prince & Hart NOW for pitching & clean house after the season…..

by victor s on Jul 22, 2010 1:39 PM CDT reply actions  

backtocali has been beating the clean house drum for a while

backtocali in this very thread:

I do not think that Attanasio will pull the trigger mid season, but he definitely should at year end. And with that change should come a full house cleaning. This should have been done when Attanasio took over, imo.

I pretty much agree.

by ecocd on Jul 22, 2010 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

The hitting does not suck

It is actually quite good.

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

Team OPS+ is at 108.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

How about the Crew's BA w/ RISP???

I’m just curious… but it can’t be good. Maybe I’m wrong.

by victor s on Jul 22, 2010 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

BA isn't bad

just incomplete!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (exclaimation points to fit the mood of the sub-thread)

also: LOLLERSKATES

by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 22, 2010 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Stuff like that drives me crazy

How can batting average NOT be a good measure of hitting ability?

by nullacct on Jul 22, 2010 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I misspoke

It’s a good measure of hitting ability, but it’s not a very good measure of “At-bat” ability. As Pags said, it’s not bad, it’s just incomplete.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

it doesn't account for the value of walks, for example

Adam Dunn is a career .271 hitter, which isn’t bad, but he also walks 100 times a year and his career OBA of .382 and wOBA of .385 are very good. Mark Reynolds is hitting .218 this year, but has been a very productive hitter (wOBA .352).

by dtmeyers on Jul 22, 2010 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Mainly the hitting approach

he doesn’t seem to be able to fix more than one guy at a time. We’ve got fast guys physically incapable of bunting, and I think that’s his job. There’s a few other examples, but I’ve seen nothing but the status quo from the entire team but Hart. Not that the status quo is all that terrible, but I highly doubt the players we have are plateauing at this young age.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hit post too early.

I’d expect to see improvement from the rest of the team, not just constant. Again, not complaining about the output, just that I’d expect it to be increasing at their age, not staying put. Unless he already got the whole team to their max potential, which obviously is not the case.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

That makes sense

especially if he is the driving force behind Braun hitting more for contact and less for power

by dtmeyers on Jul 22, 2010 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm no expert.... but Braun seems to have WAY too much natural talent as a hitter

To not hit .300 or close to it.

I know the season isn’t over, and he may get hot, but….

by victor s on Jul 22, 2010 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

he's been playing hurt

since hit in the elbow….which might be healed, but now he’s in a rut from trying to play through it.

by PagsBrewCrew on Jul 22, 2010 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

I could go either way with Sveum

I thought Braun and Fielder took big steps last year once Sveum took over, and Weeks this year. I don’t how much of that you can put on the hitting coach.

I think he should get a decent amount of credit for McGehee being a good MLB hitter. Jury still out on Escobar and Lucroy.

Eh.

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Make Sveum the manager

The players all seem to like him. Maybe they’ll play better if they’re trying to win for a guy who they actually like.

My goodness.

by BrewHaHeather on Jul 22, 2010 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

At the very least they won't be unhappy

Focusing on employee morale isn’t the worst thing in the world.

by ecocd on Jul 22, 2010 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

My point is..... there seems to be too much offensive talent on the Brewers

To have ONE guy hitting .290 – and he’s the team leader?!!

I know BA can be a bit skewed – but something aint right, IMO.

by victor s on Jul 22, 2010 2:08 PM CDT reply actions  

It's a matter of offensive philosophy, that's all

The Brewers were never meant to be slap-hitters and use small ball to create their runs. The Brewers are a slugging team. the ultimate goal of the offense is to score runs. The Brewers are the 2nd best team at doing that.

Both methods can produce runs, but the Brewers lean towards slugging rather than BA. Sure, we’d love to see ducks on the pond for Fielder, but when Weeks hits a HR to lead off the game, Fielder doesn’t have to get him home. :)

by ecocd on Jul 22, 2010 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

2nd in the NL in runs scored

That’s what counts right? Do you get an award for best BA?

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

The point of the game

is to score runs and prevent the other team from scoring. One half of this equation is not working and its not the offense.

My goodness.

by BrewHaHeather on Jul 22, 2010 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed.

Agreed.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Consistently.

Scoring 25% of your runs in 8% of your games only helps you win 8% of your games.

by nullacct on Jul 22, 2010 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yes, the offense is inconsistent

But what team doesn’t have inconsistent offense?

My goodness.

by BrewHaHeather on Jul 22, 2010 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

It's unfortunate that there's not a uniform spread of runs.

6 runs per game should do it. No more, no less.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

"of their beloved runs?"

Should they be spending less time scoring runs and more time focusing on their “precious, precious batting average?”

Now that's great tasting chicken!

by Kyle Lobner on Jul 23, 2010 6:39 AM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

The point of the game

Is to win (had a computerized voice in my head saying "is to not play Professor Falken).

Brewers are 5th worst in the league in winning. Thats what counts the most.

by backtocali on Jul 22, 2010 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

The point of having an offense

Is to score runs, correct?

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Right

You win be scoring runs and preventing the other team from doing so with good pitching and good defense. We do one of these things well, one of them ok, and the other one very poorly. The offense is not the main problem here.

My goodness.

by BrewHaHeather on Jul 22, 2010 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Cue Herm Edwards

“you play, to win, the game”

by 54438Crew on Jul 22, 2010 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

How many of those runs came in blowouts???

Atleast a few, I’d imagine.

I’m sick of seeing guys swing for the fences when all the team needs is a base hit. Their situational hitting is not good.

.252 w/ RISP is a joke.

by victor s on Jul 22, 2010 2:17 PM CDT reply actions  

Doesn't matter.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Okay, we're generally trying to be patient

You’ll have to meet us halfway here. We all recognize and observe that the Brewers aren’t hitting with runners in scoring position. It’s worth noting, however, that their team BA, in general is .261 on the season. They’re really not doing substantially worse with RISP than in general.

If you’ll be a little open-minded you’ll recognize that their OBP is .352 with RISP. A 100-point difference between the two stats doesn’t indicate that they’re swinging for the fences. They’re, in fact, looking at pitches and taking their walks when they don’t see something to drive.

To generalize Fielder’s power stroke and Gomez’s …. well, whatever you’d call what Gomez does … to the entire team isn’t really representative of their offense.

by ecocd on Jul 22, 2010 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Hart and McGehee not in the lineup tonight

Per McCalvy. Let the possible trade freak-outs begin.

My goodness.

by BrewHaHeather on Jul 22, 2010 2:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Not a bad idea to give the the days off

Using Inglett instead of Gomez, though?

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Or if they are currently packing their bags

And the property of another team….

Awaiting some tweedle involving Gamel being called up, followed by one involving a trade with players not bolted down.

by backtocali on Jul 22, 2010 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not gonna happen.

Hasn’t been nearly enough buzz today.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Didn't we predict this would happen yesterday?

Someone should start a Twitter rumor that Gamel is out of the lineup tonight.

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wait - Edmonds is starting?
“Some days are better than others,” Edmonds said. “But the days that are better are still pretty much unbearable.”

And he’s the starting CF tonight? Weird.

Get a ife broseph

by Supertramp on Jul 22, 2010 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

OMG

HART’S NOT IN THE LINEUP!

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 2:24 PM CDT reply actions  

OH NOES!

Yeah, well, sometimes I drink.

by Dikembe Meiztombo on Jul 22, 2010 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Right

They should be hitting a series of meaningless singles.

by dickie_thon on Jul 22, 2010 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

Anyone have the "Do Not Feed the Troll" image?

We’ve been pointing out some legitimate statistics in support of the offensive approach the Brewers have and they’re falling on deaf ears. You’re approaching troll.

by ecocd on Jul 22, 2010 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

This one?

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

If the home run is meaningless

It’s because the pitching sucked once again and the game is out of reach.

My goodness.

by BrewHaHeather on Jul 22, 2010 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Those 2 posts back to back make me laugh.

I only wish I would have had my image ready.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 2:25 PM CDT reply actions  

In actual news:

MLB just announced minor league blood testing.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 2:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Yep

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

They should save on new batting helmets

No needing to get larger helmets as the season goes along.

by ecocd on Jul 22, 2010 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

One side effect of HGH is a larger skull

Bonds’ batting cap/helmet increased several sizes over his career. There are reportedly similar reports in the NFL for larger helmets between seasons.

by ecocd on Jul 22, 2010 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Re: McGehee

Trade Fielder for Beckham plus stuff, play Beckham at 2B, move Weeks to 3B, trade McGehee to Los Angeles or whoever, play Gamel at 1B.

(/will not happen)

Ryan Braun: He loves it.

by SRB on Jul 22, 2010 3:12 PM CDT reply actions  

Why not?

Except for Gamel the entire infield would have above average defense for the first time in eons, and if Lawrie sticks at 2B we can move Beckham to 3B.

Ryan Braun: He loves it.

by SRB on Jul 22, 2010 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sure.

Ryan Braun: He loves it.

by SRB on Jul 22, 2010 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're willing to

throw 2 people into brand new positions, at the major league level, in the middle of a season? May set a record for errors, that way.

Be easier to move weeks to 1st in that scenario, at least then there’s only 1 guy learning a new spot.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hopefully Gamel's head wouldn't explode trying to learn 1B.

Besides, even if they did “set a record for errors” (doubtful), this would be a good season to do it in.

Ryan Braun: He loves it.

by SRB on Jul 22, 2010 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

True

Still not gonna happen. Dare to dream, though.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

There appears to be opposition to this idea

Is it the trade McGehee, or no longer have atrocious defense part?

Ryan Braun: He loves it.

by SRB on Jul 22, 2010 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think it's the

Weeks to 3B idea. Or the have 2 guys learn a position in the big leagues part. The team does try to need to win games, and having our team look foolish on the field isn’t the best idea. Whether or not you think they’d look foolish is a matter of opinion, not really worth debating. Either that or it’s the “stuff” part.

Or it’s the trade Prince for Beckham part. That’s totally unnecessary. This team needs pitching, and can survive without Prince’s offensive contribution, provided that Gamel’s ready to contribute in a meaningful way (I’m not convinced). Trading him for something other than pitching would be a complete lateral move, and wouldn’t improve the team in the long run. And if we get Beckham, the “stuff” isn’t going to be quality pitching prospects, so you can’t cover it with that.

http://www.twitter.com/mykenk

by Mykenk on Jul 22, 2010 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

^^This^^^

Although my main beef was moving Weeks to 3B. There’s no reason to do that. Especially when Beckham played there all last year.

Also, the “and stuff” part. Prince should be traded for good pitching, not “stuff.”

My goodness.

by BrewHaHeather on Jul 22, 2010 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, I was referring to something like the Hudson/Beckham package that's been discussed

And I think there’s every reason to move Weeks to 3B because 1) he’s a poor defender at 2B, 2) Beckham can be an above average defender at 2B (a premium position), 3) Weeks would probably be a better defender at 3B.

If Gamel was around a league average 1B, we could be improving 3.0+ WAR just by shifting the infield around.

Ryan Braun: He loves it.

by SRB on Jul 22, 2010 5:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Brew Crew Ball is dedicated to providing a friendly atmosphere for intelligent Brewer conversation. Click here to view our Posting Guide and Community Guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Nohuddleblueew9_small
BP C'mon Back Club
Small
Help- How to "Cut the Cable" and Watch Live Games
Barrelman_small
BCB Advanced Stat Pseudofantasy League - PART II
Small
Interview with a Former Brewer Part Two
Small
Catching Up With a Former Brewer
Barrelman_small
BCB Advanced Stat Pseudofantasy League
People_studying_small
Does Fielder's Contract Outdo Pujols'?
Dr-teeth_small
Fielder: It's all about health
Barrelman_small
NPB Position Players
Braun
2012 Payroll Early Estimate

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

NL Central Standings

W L PCT GB STRK
Chicago 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Cincinnati 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Houston 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Milwaukee 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Pittsburgh 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
St. Louis 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0

(updated 2.13.2012 at 7:02 PM CST)


Moderators

Newavatar_small Kyle Lobner

146_-_street_map_plaza_from_pop_tower_with_bars-tiltshift_small TheJay

Communist_party_small Jordan M

X1pxoywqu4sjf73f7drxq2lmqys7mzsyx7pa9necepiffk_ewcuwmuazb-o17ukmbriclcdkn4lk-4xposaawiq4j8hzdsccpjwatqpz2o2p-i0nnqjlyt7pmytaycsaknszvaktpshtcu9sjle1qchlw_1__small NoahJ

Hikaru_50_small morineko

Picture_069_small Nicole Haase

Gogol_bordello_small BrewHaHeather

Anon-md_small Rubie Q