Royals Fan With some Questions.
Hey, guys. I am a Royals fan posting in unfamiliar territory (The only other MLB SBNation blog I follow is Royals Review), so I think it would be a good idea for me to introduce myself. I am 14 (One of the few guys under 16 over at RR), and I was born and am currently growing up in Kansas City. My dad's side of the family is from Wisconsin, we love our Packers (11-0 baby!), but my Grandpa grew up a Brooklyn Dodgers fan, and my dad grew up a Royals fan.
Now that that's out of the way, let me get some questions in:
1: What do you think of the Royals organization in general? Do you see it being in any way like the Brewers organization?
2: How does the Brewers front office tend to evaluate having "Team leaders"? A lot of us on Royals Review are a little pissed that Jeff Francoeur got re-signed to a two-year deal because of his intangibles for the most part. Do they value a stable clubhouse, or do they not care either way? A lot of us Royals fans hated Grienke because he was a "clubhouse cancer" and a "freak". I for one wouldn't mind seeing him back in KC in 2013, but only time will tell.
3: Do you think that the Royals look similar to the Brewers of the past 6 years or so in having a strong youth movement?
4: Out of Grienke, Gallardo, and Marcum, which pitcher would you feel the most comfortable in parting with?
5: A lot of Royals fans feel like a jump to contention is close in the next couple of years. Approximately how long did it take before you noticed a turnaround in the Brewers?
6: Here are the Royals current rotation candidates:
Luke Hochevar (28-year-old former #1 overall pick who has had struggles with inconsistency, but finally started to put it all together at the end of last season)
Danny Duffy (Young pitcher who showed flashes last season, but still for the most part sucked. Still has a lot of potential.)
Jonathan Sanchez (Okay pitcher who has had one awesome season and 3 crappy ones. Strikes out a lot, but still walks too many. We traded Melky Cabrera for him this offseason.)
Bruce Chen (Older pitcher with crappy peripherals, but has posted 12 wins in two respective seasons for the Royals. Lots of people are calling him "The next Jamie Moyer". We keep expecting him to just totally implode, but he keeps proving us wrong.)
Felipe Paulino (Guy with great peripherals who we got off of the scrap-heap last season. Performed well for us over 20 starts. A lot of people are comparing him to a poor man's Ubaldo Jimenez.)
Aaron Crow (Our lone all-star rep last year, Aaron Crow was our #1 pick in 2009, but had struggled as a starter in the minors. The Royals brought him up as a reliever, and he did awesome for the most part.)
Mike Montgomery (A top 20 prospect as voted by Baseball America in 2011, Mike Montgomery was projected to be up sometime in the late middle of last season early in the year. He had a really bad season, but then got back on track towards the end.)
Everett Teaford (A reliever last season, Everett Teaford gave us a few starts, and performed at a reasonable level. He was a really good starter in the minors, but got overshadowed by our "Young pitching fountain" [term coined by USA Today] in Montgomery, Duffy, John Lamb [Who got Tommy John Surgery and isn't expected to be back until late next year], and Chris Dwyer [Who posted an ERA above 6 in AA last season].)
Does this potential rotation resemble any of the Brewers rotations of the last 7 years?
7: In what season did Miller Park seem to get an attendance hike? Kansas City and Milwaukee seem to both be pretty good baseball towns when their teams are good.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Those are all the questions for now. The Brewers have always been my NL team, so I hope this post can be an opportunity for us to learn about our respective teams and the way they operate.
If you have any questions about the Royals, just comment with them.
6 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ok, I'll give it a shot
1. I think the Royals org has a lot of potential, but it seems like the window is always X years away. It probably shouldn’t be treated as a surprise when/if they start winning, but it will be because it’s been so long.
2. I think every team has a few guys they keep around despite limited at best tangible contributions. We certainly spent enough time this season berating decisions to overuse/misuse guys like Craig Counsell and Mark Kotsay.
3. I think there’s a fair comparison between the 2005 or so Brewers and this Royals team, but there have also been a lot of young teams that peak at that level. The similarities really have more to do with narrative (longtime losing franchise with a collection of young players) than actual style of play comparisons.
4. There’s absolutely no way the organization will part with Gallardo, as he’s the only pitcher of the three you mentioned signed long term. Between Marcum and Greinke, it’s a toss up and would really depend on what the team is getting in return. Greinke has a clearly higher upside, but also could net much more in trade. All told, I’d be surprised to discover they’re openly looking to move any of these guys. Randy Wolf might be a stronger possibility.
5. The Brewers started to show signs of life in 2005, took a step back in 2006, were over .500 and in contention in 2007 and made the playoffs in 2008 (before taking steps back in 2009 and ‘10 again). The Royals probably won’t resurface overnight unless the front office adds some pieces to complement their young stars. But they probably will have a nice long window once it opens.
6. I really don’t know enough about most of those pitchers to make a fair comparison to a Brewer staff. There appears to be some talent there but not a lot of depth and some reliance on players that haven’t done a lot as big leaguers.
7. The Brewers were over 2 million fans in 2004-06, but jumped to 2.8 million in 2007 when the team led the NL Central for a big chunk of the season. They took another step forward and were over 3 million for the first time in 2008.
Now that's great tasting chicken!
2.
Leaders are important to have on a young team like that. The idea is to groom the younger guys into leaders, themselves, so that they can take over when the old vet’s contract is up. But once you become a contender, you hope that your younger guys have become leaders, and you can ditch the expensive veteran who doesn’t bring as much to the field as he does to the locker room.
I don't know a whole lot about the Royals
And wasn’t following the Brewers too closely in ‘05-’06, at the point where the Royals are now, so I can only answer a couple of these.
To numbers 3 and 5, I do see a similarity between the current Royals and mid-2000s Brewers, and as someone who knows a lot of Royals fans, I’m excited to see them compete. I think a lot of it has to do with exactly how well these young guys turn out (duh, I know). It’s not enough to have all these players to develop into solid regulars; at least two of them need to be superstar-level players to make a playoff run, let alone a sustained one over several years.
The other aspect is how well the team fills around them with veterans and castoffs, which, unfortunately, is not something I trust Dayton Moore to do that well. The 2008 Brewers had Braun, Fielder, Hart, Weeks, and Hardy, but they still needed Mike Cameron and CC Sabathia to pull off a playoff run. Likewise with this year and Greinke, Marcum, Nyjer Morgan, etc. Melvin also worked around some massive missteps (Suppan, Jason Kendall, Bill Hall’s extension, etc.), so that’s encouraging for Royals fans. But for a small market team, a lot has to come together just right for a couple of playoff appearances, which is why they’re so satisfying when they finally happen.
Regarding #4, I agree with Kyle that the Brewers aren’t getting rid of any of those three this year. That said, though, I’ll be much less broken up when Marcum leaves than the other two. He’s just not quite in their caliber.
First of all, hi. You seem to have a pretty good baseball head on your shoulders for being as young as you are.
Francouer does seem to be pretty well liked in the clubhouse; at least that’s the line I get from the media. As for leadership, perhaps you could speak to his skills in that area better than any of us. The veteran presences of Craig Counsell, Mike Cameron, and Trevor Hoffman, to name a few, seemed to have been instrumental in the Brewers return to competitive relevance over the last few years. An important note, however, is that all of these players contributed not just through on-field performance, but also off the field as mentors and role-models to the Brewers young talent such as Braun, Fielder, Weeks, Axford etc. This young, homegrown core has become the team’s true leadership. If Francouer and other vets are willing to lead both on the field and off, they can be a valuable part of Kansas City’s return to relevance. If, however, the front office is giving playing time to and spending resources on mediocre, near replacement-level veterans at the expense of their young future core (Rick Ankiel, Melky Cabrera, Francouer from recent years come to mind) than I’d have to question that front office’s ability to create a truly competitive franchise. Weeks, Fielder, Hart and others were allowed to learn and grow (and sometimes suck) on the field at the Major League level.
I get the sense that the level of excitement among the Royal’s fanbase is pretty similar to the way we felt around 2005, with a farm stocked with young talent promising to bring an end to years of major league mediocrity. In reality, however, the Brewers didn’t make the playoffs until 2008, and even that required a combination of shrewd trades and acquisitions, and also luck. Such is the plight of building from within with a small-market budget. It is still a really exciting time, though, to be a Royal’s fan. A large part of Milwaukee’s recent success has been do to the tremendous support of its fanbase—strong attendence has allowed the franchise to spend the money necessary to play competitve baseball. I wish you all the best of luck, and am rooting for you (unless you’re playing the Brewers.)
Some answers for your questions
1. The Royals now kinda remind me of how the Rays were a few years back: a perennial doormat team who drafted high for so many years and got so many good players that they just couldn’t help but be good. The Royals aren’t quite as set in that respect because you don’t have anyone in place who’s Carl Crawford good, but Gordon finally looks like a good player and Hosmer had a solid rookie season. The added benefit is that the AL Central is a pretty lousy division with a lot of yearly turnover so the Royals could potentially make a quick ascent to the top.
2. Was Greinke really viewed THAT poorly? Although I guess he nearly quit on you guys a few years back, but still, he’s got legitimate issues that he had to work out and seems to have done so. Clubhouse stuff always seemed kinda overrated to me… things are always gonna be good when the team is winning and molehills are gonna look like mountains when the team is always losing (like the Royals). The Brewers definitely felt comfortable taking risks on questionable characters this year though with Greinke and Nyjer Morgan and it definitely paid dividends.
3. Yeah, I can see some similarities, considering the Brewers were a doormat team which hoisted itself into the playoffs on the back of home grown talent.
4. Out of those three, Marcum, hands down. He’s the oldest (I think) and has by far the worst medical history. Lots of scouts seem to think his delivery is horrid and just inviting arm trouble. He seemed to make it through this year without major issues, but he was godawful in the playoffs so you never know what was going on there.
5. Probably when Braun came up and destroyed the league. You never expect a rookie to come up and immediately do that kind of damage. With him, Prince, and Weeks in place, you could start to see the foundation for a solid team (offensively at least, we didn’t care about newfangled stats like defensive WAR or UZR back in the day).
6. Brewers haven’t had very many decent home grown starters. Sheets and Gallardo are the only two that come to mind. I don’t think anyone on that list will turn into that caliber of player, but Duffy had flashes and seems like he’ll be the best of the bunch. Hochaever looks like an innings eater at best. I’d try Aaron Crow in the rotation, if he can become a useful starter, he’s got a lot of potential too. It’s probably too early to just send him to the pen for the rest of his career, at least give him a shot. There’s certainly a lot more potential for a good home grown rotation with the Royals, however.
7. See Kyle’s answer.
He might be a "freak" but he's our freak.
I get the impression a lot of Brewers fans (including myself) like Zack Greinke because he’s so unlikeable. There’s no pretense, he says what’s on his mind, and he pretty much keeps to himself and expects people to respect that. I think we were so well-prepared for the type of person he is that no one expected him to be any different. Royals fans probably had to change their expectations along the way with him.
by mpbMKE on Dec 7, 2011 5:04 PM CST reply actions 1 recs

by 



































