Today's Matchups: Cincinnati (Willis) at Brewers (Wolf)
OK, so I'll admit I'm pretty excited about this one. I mean, Dontrelle Willis! He's back! You might remember him as the man who led the Marlins to the World Series and stole the NL Rookie of the Year award from Scott Podsednik in 2003 when he had a 3.30 ERA and 3.45 FIP in 27 starts. You might remember his 2005 season when he had a 2.63 ERA, a 2.99 FIP and was second in Cy Young Award voting to Chris Carpenter. He also was 11th in MVP voting that year. You might remember him from his funky pitching motion. You might remember him from the enormous trade that sent Willis and Miguel Cabrera to the Tigers for Andrew Miller, Cameron Maybin, Mike Rabelo and Eulogio De La Cruz--four, at-the-time, big-time prospects.
But it's more likely that you remember his fall from grace in Detroit. His shortened 2008 season when he had a 9.38 ERA (and 8.30 FIP) in just seven starts. His 7.49 ERA (which, coincidentally, was also his BB/9) in 2009 in just seven starts. Over those two seasons, he made 14 starts and had an 8.27 ERA, a 9.8 BB/9, a 5.5 K/9 and over a 2 WHIP.
Willis started 13 games last season for Detroit and Arizona. He was slightly better, with a 5.62 ERA and FIP. And the Reds picked him up in the offseason as a low risk, high reward candidate. They kept him down in the minors, where he had a 2.63 ERA and 3.13 FIP in 13 starts. He had his walk rate back down and his K rate back up. But that was in the minors. Now, the Reds have brought him back up to the major leagues where they hope that he can find his form from his Marlins' days and help Cincinnati in the stretch run. It's worth a shot, right?
Going off last year's data, Willis throws an 89 MPH four seamer, an 85 MPH changeup, and an 81 MPH slider. In his career, Willis has never faced a current Brewer more than seven times.
His opponent today is Randy Wolf (6-6, 3.72), who is having a fine season for the Brewers as their fourth or fifth starter. At this point, I'm not sure there is much I can say about Wolf that you don't already know. I will tell you, though, that he has faced eight different Reds' pitchers at least ten times. Here is how they have fared:
| PA | Slash Line | |
| Edgar Renteria | 45 | .244/.311/.341 |
| Joey Votto | 25 | .333/.440/.476 |
| Scott Rolen | 24 | .238/.333/.286 |
| Jonny Gomes | 21 | .579/.619/.947 |
| Jay Bruce | 20 | .444/.500/.833 |
| Brandon Phillips | 19 | .316/.316/.684 |
| Ryan Hanigan | 13 | .333/.385/.417 |
| Drew Stubbs | 12 | .222/.417/.222 |
Lineup:
I haven't seen it yet, but if you have feel free to post it in the comments.
In the bullpen:
Cody Scarpetta is freshly called up.
Marco Estrada pitched 1 inning (11 pitches) Friday and 1 inning (32 pitches) yesterday.
LaTroy Hawkins pitched 1 inning (14 pitches) yesterday.
Takashi Saito pitched 1 inning (19 pitches) yesterday.
John Axford pitched 1 inning (11 pitches) yesterday.
Zach Braddock pitched 1 inning (20 pitches) Friday.
Kameron Loe pitched 1 inning (14 pitches) Friday.
45 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Lineup per Rotoinfo.com
Weeks 2B
Gomez CF
Hart RF
Fielder 1B
McGehee 3B
Betancourt SS
Wilson LF
Kottaras C
Wolf P
Hey look, international soccer refs are screwing a US team.
Hope Solo rejects a bullshit penalty kick. So the ref gives Brazil a second one, saying Solo moved (which she didn’t), and now it’s 1-1, and the US is a player down.
I honestly don’t know that I’m going to watch this stuff anymore after today. It’s like watching the fucking NBA.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 10, 2011 11:55 AM CDT reply actions
I've never seen a ref call that.
It’s like if an umpire were to call a player back to the plate after being hit by a pitch because he didn’t do enough to get out of the way.
by Noah Jarosh on Jul 10, 2011 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions
It was completely ridiculous.
The original foul was iffy, in my opinion, and then they brought out the red card. When Solo stoned the first PK I thought the ref would exhibit a little shame and let them play after that. Instead the ref doubled down.
I’ve always enjoyed international soccer. I know we’re far from a soccer power on the men’s side, so I’ve always been willing to overlook what to me is an obvious anti-US bias in the men’s world cup. But this is beyond ridiculous.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 10, 2011 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions
so I’ve always been willing to overlook what to me is an obvious anti-US bias in the men’s world cup. But this is beyond ridiculous.
Spoken like a true fan of any team.
Maybe so. But it's not just American soccer fans that have noticed.
I’ve been told by English and German soccer fans that the American sides get screwed in the World Cup all the time. “They’ll never let the Americans into a semi…” is what I’ve been told about the US Men’s side….
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 10, 2011 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions
Third card of the half for the US Women's team.
And once again the English announcer says he doesn’t understand the call.
But yeah, it’s just because I’m a fan.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 10, 2011 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions
A Goalie is allowed to move as much as they want before the kick is taken
so long as it was not forward off the goal line
Sorry I wasn't clearer about the call...
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 10, 2011 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions
No problem
The game is only on Satellite here so I am not watching the game. I was just going off your description. I have looked at a couple of reports on the incident and they seem a little divided.
What you have here is what happens when a smaller team goes up against a bigger team in terms of reputation. The 50/50 decisions more often favour the bigger team. It a phenomenon that seems to happen it pretty much all team sports where there are decisions that referees can make that are open to interpertation.
And now (again according to the English play by play announcer)...
… they called the Americans off side on an “even” chance. Brazil had the next possession, went offside by 10ft in the corner, no call, and Brazil scores to go up 2-1.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 10, 2011 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Gamel down
Scarpetta called up link to al’s ramblings
by Applythebunt on Jul 10, 2011 12:18 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
LOL you have the eagle eyes to see someone stepping off the goal line...
yet miss the way obvious offside?
by Bush League All Star on Jul 10, 2011 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions
Brilliant goal though.
But hey, at least I have a new answer when my international friends ask me why Americans don’t watch football.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 10, 2011 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions
USA almost scored.
Probably would have been called off though somehow
by Bush League All Star on Jul 10, 2011 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Actually here in the UK
The women’s world cup a lot lower profile than it is the USA.
Even England’s games – the only games shown by the BBC – were on their 3rd channel
I'm sure that's true.
Probably wouldn’t even get coverage here either if our mens side were any good. :)
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 10, 2011 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions
actually espn covers it because it is a money maker
Every man must believe in something, I believe I'll have another drink.
It is kinda of indicitive of how people here feel about womens football
I do not want people to think that I am being sexist here but the best way that I can describe how most people here would describe womens football compared to mens is inferior and therefore not worth watching.
This is especially true of any international football of below a certain level of perceived importance eg:
The 2012 Olympic tickets have easily sold out of almost all sports but there are more than 50% tickets left for the mens and especiallty womens football.
I went to the Atlanta games as a young lad.
WAS AWESOME! Field hockey gold medal game for men’s and women’s. Awesome sport.
by Bush League All Star on Jul 10, 2011 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions
Field Hockey
Or “Hockey” as it is more accurately called (!!!) gained quite a bit of popularity over here a while ago which strangely coincided with the British team winning gold at the Seoul Olympics…
Less than proud owner of Marmol Says Knock McLouth (BCB League III)
"Now attribute that shit!" mpbMKE
I'd be very surprised
If more than about 3 or 4% of the population of Britain could name a single female football player…
Less than proud owner of Marmol Says Knock McLouth (BCB League III)
"Now attribute that shit!" mpbMKE
It's probably not that much different here.
I just happen to have relatives who got me to watch international football right about the time the US women’s team had some success.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 10, 2011 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions
The lack of interest elsewhere...
… does provide some explanation for why the US is actually competitive.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 10, 2011 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions
True
But I get the impression that “soccer” is seen by some (alot?) as a game for women not men in the US which is an idea that is fairly unique in the world as a whole.
Hmmm.
That might be overstating things a bit, but I do think it’s true that some of the best female athletes in the US play “soccer”, whereas the best male athletes over here almost always play other sports instead.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 10, 2011 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions
I think
as a participation sport its been gaining in popularity quite a lot recently. I know I’ve heard stuff about it being the fastest growing sport (but, then again, that normally just means that a minority sport has doubled participants over a few years from about 1,000 to about 2,000) but culturally over here it is looked at as very strange if you’re a girl and you play football…
Less than proud owner of Marmol Says Knock McLouth (BCB League III)
"Now attribute that shit!" mpbMKE
Honestly, I don't know why I'm surprised.
FIFA has historically (and very recently) been a completely corrupt organization. They make USC and Ohio State look like amateurs.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 10, 2011 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions
Yep
I think it is rare for an organisation to be as clearly corrupt as FIFA is for so long and for no change to be made at all. Any country that rocks the boat and makes an issue of the rampant corruption is penalised heavily. England has, quite correctly, made a big issue of the various dodgy deals and have been rewarded by being unlikely to get a World Cup for years. I really wouldn’t be surprised at any news coming from FIFA…
PS The same complete corruption has also been in evidence in the nefarious plots designed to keep Scotland from their clearly rightful place as World Cup Winners by fixing every qualifying draw to ensure that they have to compete against teams that can do things like pass the ball, shoot accurately and mark the opposition…
Less than proud owner of Marmol Says Knock McLouth (BCB League III)
"Now attribute that shit!" mpbMKE
by MrLeam on Jul 10, 2011 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
The problem is they have seen how inept we are when actually reach the final
That they are just saving us from the embaressment of another Iran or Costa Rica debacle
Where is the penalty in the box?
US should have been kicking penalties!
by Bush League All Star on Jul 10, 2011 12:45 PM CDT reply actions
These challenges by Brazil are sketchy.
Two so far and the ref looks away.
by Bush League All Star on Jul 10, 2011 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions

by 




































