Roundtable Discussion 1: Prince Fielder's Last Hurrah
Hello, and welcome to the Roundtable, where some of BCB's more esteemed and well-known contributors (present author excluded, unless you were trolling around the site when Trent Durrington and Victor Santos were on the team) weigh in on the team's most pressing issues. In our inaugural Roundtable post, -JP- and BrewHaHeather offer their thoughts on what the Brewers should do about Prince Fielder. Try to re-sign him? Let him walk? Trade him if (perish the thought) the team falls out of contention? The Roundtable begins after the jump!
When walking around Bastille Day today, I came across a kiosk selling "Pay Prince" tee shirts, promoting the idea of re-signing the slugger before he becomes available on the open market. This is a lovely thought, but is it realistic? The expectation for Prince's next deal seems to be in the neighborhood of $25 million per year for at least 5 years. Google for one doesn't seem to think the Brewers can pony up this kind of cash: if you google "Prince Fielder 2012," the first page of links has Fielder going to the Red Sox, Cubs (I don't want to even think about that), Blue Jays, Cardinals, Yankees, and Red Sox again, but nothing on re-signing with the Crew. -JP- and BrewHaHeather were kind enough to offer their thoughts on Prince Fielder as well.-JP-
What I think will happen is exactly what we think will happen. Fielder will be offered arbitration, turn it down, and then the Brewers put out the same offer as before. It won't be enough, and Fielder signs with another team.
Now, for what should happen. It hurts to say this, but honestly, I wouldn't even offer him the contract. Just offer him arbitration and take the picks. I can't imagine what life without Fielder will be like, but I'm going to find out next season. Mat Gamel is going to have some big shoes to fill, and there's only a small chance he's able to match what Fielder has done.
Looking at the contract situation for the Brewers, I just don't think it's possible. I went to Cot's Baseball Contracts to pull payroll information, and here's what I found. As of right now, I'd estimate the Brewers are going to have a payroll of around $78 million just for the players they are going to keep under contract or have to resign through arbitration. This is assuming the Brewers don't resign any free agents and even non-tender some arbitration eligible players. Here's the arbitration situation as it is today:
Year 1 Casey McGehee, Nyjer Morgan, George Kottaras, Mitch Stetter Year 2 Manny Parra Year 3 Shaun Marcum, Kameron Loe, Sean Green, Wil Nieves, Carlos Gomez
:
:
:
I'm assuming Sean Green and Wil Nieves are non-tendered, and Manny Parra and Mitch Stetter are under consideration (though I'm counting them in here). I'd say they take up about $18 million of the payroll between the eight that are tendered. Add on to that around $57.5 million for the guaranteed contracts (Zack Greinke, Randy Wolf, Corey Hart, Rickie Weeks, Ryan Braun, Yovani Gallardo) and the buyout for Yuniesky Betancourt. Plus, there's the players under 3 years experience that will take up a few million (John Axford, Chris Narveson, Zack Braddock, Jonathan Lucroy, Brandon Kintzler, Mat Gamel). That's a lot of money already, and they would still need to cover a shortstop, backup infielders (with at least one for security at first base), another backup outfielder, and around three or four bullpen pitchers. Some of that will be internal, but with the state of the farm system, there will be the need to sign at least a few free agents. Plus, with the state of the farm system's pitching, I'd look at trying to resign Greinke or Marcum later. However, I worry that Greinke's price will be too high and Marcum is too much of an injury concern to commit to long term.
The argument that comes up is that Fielder pays for himself with the fans that are drawn in. While the Brewers may lose some fans if Fielder leaves, I don't think the impact of him staying is worth it. There's still a lot to like about this team beyond him, and the fans will keep coming. The Brewers already have too much in guaranteed contracts sitting around. They have to keep some payroll flexibility. It just doesn't make sense to try and keep Fielder and destroy the limited maneuvering room they have left.
BrewHaHeather
Personally, I don't that they should try to make a serious play at resigning Fielder. I'm sure he'll be good for another few years, and I'd love to have him in Milwaukee for those years, but I don't think he'll age well. I see him being worth the kind of money he'll ask for for about half of the life of the contract, and then tailing off. I'd offer him something like 5/$20mil, maybe up it to six years, but nothing more. I see DM offering him something similar, obviously just as a gesture. Unless they expand payroll greatly, there's no room for him anyway. With contracts for Braun, Weeks, Hart, Gallardo all getting more expensive, there's no room. Hopefully we'll be able to add Marcum and Greinke to that list, although the latter is much more unlikely.
However Gamel does over the next few months really has no influence on opinions of what they should do with Fielder. There's no way that Gamel will ever match the production that Fielder puts up. I might be alone in this but I don't have a ton of confidence in Gamel anyway. He hasn't produced in his chances at the ML level yet (yes, yes, I know, small sample size, not consistent playing time, blah blah blah; I'll have confidence in him when he does something in Milwaukee, not just in Nashville).
My first thought is to do what -JP- did, head over to Cot's. We already have $62 million committed to six players: three pitchers (Greinke, Gallardo, Wolf) plus Hart, Braun and Weeks. If Prince is really going to take in $25 million a season, that will give us all of seven players, and we're at $87 million. Throw in the more than $5 million for giving Yuni and F-Rod their walking papers, and we're already paying more than the team ever has in salary. For seven guys. I don't think we could free up enough money through restructuring contracts to make re-signing Prince even a serious possibility. (Though, interestingly, it's been suggested that the Brewers might be a destination for Jose Reyes, the line of thought being Reyes + Gamel would be better and cheaper than Yuni + Prince. I don't think we'll have the money for that, either.)
How bad would it be if we don't re-sign Prince? Even if he ends up in the NL Central, it wouldn't be a disaster, though it might feel like it. For me, the key would be Greinke and Marcum, both of whom become free agents after next season. I think if we can get one of them to re-sign, coinciding with the arrival of our minor league talent, then maybe we'll be able to keep our playoff window propped open a few more years.
Oh, and next season, our regular first baseman won't be Gamel --- it'll be Kotsay. Remember, you heard it here first.
52 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Just a quick comment on my comments
They were written before the acquisition of K-Rod, so it doesn’t include the $3.5 million buyout on his contract for next year.
Contributor on Brew Crew Ball, Commissioner of Prognostikeggers, Owner of a broken sarcasm detector
Theres a possibility they dont extend either of those guys
Do you think the team draws that few fans?
Even with only one of them coming back after 2012, the prospect of a .500 team isnt too far past the imagination.
I dont know, but I think fans will come to see a winner, no matter who is on the team, whether its big star players, or no names. And the current model of spending big money on guys in their 30s cant be sustained for a very long time in this market.
But what's the alternative?
Greinker and Marcum are under team control for one more year, as is Wolf (though there is a club option in 2013). If you don’t want any of them brought back, who’s going to fill their spots in the rotation?
We pull our pants up and do our jobs here.
Find a FA, make a trade
And hope/pray that someone out of the farm system turns out OK by 2013.
I don’t want Fielder because his contract is going to be enormous, Marcum because of future injury, and Greinke because of performance reasons.
Get a ife broseph
Right, I get the "find a FA, make a trade" thing
and I realize now I muddled my point in response to BtC’s “we can’t continue to spend big money on guys in their 30s” argument. Here’s what I meant to say:
If you don’t want to bring Marcum and Greinke and Wolf back, AND you don’t want to pay big money to someone in their 30s, who’s going to fill out the rotation in 2013?
We pull our pants up and do our jobs here.
They'll have to pay some money I'm sure
Most successful teams have had to pay money for a pitcher in his 30s, its pretty much the norm.
I shouldn’t say don’t sign Greinke/Marcum – I’d be open to it for the right deal. They’ve spent a million draft picks on pitching, I’d wait a year to see how that is looking and make a move from there (I have no idea what the FA class looks like).
This won’t happen, but if Thornburg, Jungmann and Bradley all somehow take off, it makes things a lot easier.
Get a ife broseph
There would have to be a barrage of trades.
If they traded all those guys away for prospects, they would be essentially cutting the payroll in half. I’m not sure what they would do to fill up their payroll, without signing aging players to oversized contracts. I guess they could sign a couple bullpen arms to one year deals at huge prices, but the team would be awful until 2015.
By then, you will have lost a ton of fans, and won’t have had the attendance over the 2013-2014 seasons to afford a payroll at the current level.
You won’t be winning immediately because all of the talent that was acquired by trading Marcum and Greinke is still so young. Once you start winning, Gallardo, Hart, Weeks, McGehee, and Axford will all be gone.
So why not, sign some free agents to fill in those spots? Well, you could, except your payroll is still only up to $70 Million at this point, so there is only so much you can do.
But hey, at least Mat Gamel is probably still around…
http://www.mlbsoup.com
I'm looking past 2013
My contention is that 2013 is going to look pretty bad. But that if you do things the right way with drafting and development, by 2015 you have yourself a nice consistent run of maybe 4 or 5 years of contention.
Lets do a little what if….traded Fielder last July to the White Sox for Daniel Hudson (and perhaps Viciedo), and you held onto Lawrie, you are potentially looking at a team that looks a lot like the one they have now, but younger and under team control for a lot longer, and less expensive, and it lasts for 4 or 5 years instead of 1 or 2.
Eh that team would be average
That’s a pretty good blueprint to have a .500 team for 4-5 years.
Get a ife broseph
I'm confused about your hypothetical:
we traded Fielder for Daniel Hudson, didn’t trade Lawrie for Marcum, and the team looks a lot like the one they have now? How? Did we still trade for Greinke?
We pull our pants up and do our jobs here.
Assuming not
Trading minor league players is almost always a bad thing.
Get a ife broseph
by Supertramp on Jul 15, 2011 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Its making the assumption that
Fielder 4 WAR type player, Marcum 3 WAR Type player, and Greinke 5 WAR type player is replaced (in a few years by) Lawrie, Hudson, Viceido, Escobar, Odorizzi. I have confidence that those players can easily add up to 12 WAR, throw in Escobar and theres your competitive team.
There's also the assumption that both Hudson and Viceido were offered
I’m not so sure they were.
Get a ife broseph
And given that Kenny Williams loves to deal prospects for Vets
There was probably at least one other player involved. I think the thing that held is up was DM asking for Gordon Beckham as well.
That was the rumor
There’s a big difference in that trade if Videido is involved.
I know he’s been decent this year, but I’m still not a big Daniel Hudson fan.
Get a ife broseph
Hard to believe
that Hudson was the best we could do for Fielder but thats what the rumors were. Looks like that Teixeira trade to Atlanta spooked a lot of teams from making that kind of deal. I cant blame Melvin if the best he could get for Fielder was Hudson and spare parts.
by bklynbrewcrew on Jul 15, 2011 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah, Prince is a 4 WAR player.
He’s at 3.8 right now… oh wait, it’s only the All Star break?!
"PLUSH ALERT: THERE WAS AN UNTUCKING AT FENWAY!"
by SRB on Jul 15, 2011 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
"Find a FA" = sign Doug Davis for about the same price as Marcum.
"PLUSH ALERT: THERE WAS AN UNTUCKING AT FENWAY!"
Has anyone ever done work on the influence of a team's prior year performance on attendance?
I have to imagine that it’s pretty substantial in cases of a team making the playoffs. This might be a slow Friday project for me…
by MillerParkSouth on Jul 15, 2011 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree
I think its time to start all over with a new GM. Melvin has had the fortune of having Fielder and Braun as well as Weeks and Gallardo yet he cant put together a championship caliber team. As much as I like Gamel I am starting to lose faith that he will be the really good hitter I always thought he would be.
If Melvin is still the GM I expect him to continue patching holes with stopgaps; think Derek Lee type for 1B and Marco Scutaro type for SS. We will take a massive step back without Fielder and lets face it we arent a great team with him. We have given up some elite prospects to acquire greinke and Marcum and still we are not that good.
I dont see how this team ever gets over the hump with our current cast and with no minor league system to speak of its time to rebuild with a new GM that will stress drafting and developing a lot more that Melvin and his new scouting director have. I realize I will get criticized for this but if we cant win with two hall of fame talents in Braun and Fielder as well as all star caliber players in Weeks, Greinke, Gallardo and Marcum then something is seriously wrong.
by bklynbrewcrew on Jul 15, 2011 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions
They're currently in the race
If they make the playoffs, does DM still go? Or what would this year’s team have to do to make you want to keep him?
Get a ife broseph
by Supertramp on Jul 15, 2011 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Make the playoffs
and win one game again like 2008 is not good enough. We are “all in” and really need to show a lot more than that for DM to keep his job. This team has more than enough talent to make a real run but for some reason we are underacheiving once again.
In 2008 everyone was happy because we had not made the playoffs since 82 but we need to do better this time. Lets face it without the Mets choking we dont even make the playoffs in 08. If this team doesnt start winning some games on the road I think we will miss the playoffs this time around and if that turns out to be the case Melvin needs to go.
by bklynbrewcrew on Jul 15, 2011 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions
Am I having an out of body experience?
by backtocali on Jul 15, 2011 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
So...
Making and winning one game isn’t enough – so you’d fire the GM if the Brewers make the playoffs but don’t preform well?
Get a ife broseph
There seems to me a basic problem with this argument
in that it focusses on the need to draft and develop talent. This isn’t actually wrong – in fact, given the fact that the Brewers can’t outspend their divisional rivals let alone the likes of the Yankees or Red Sox it is kinda necessary. The problem is that the Brewers are precisely where they are because they have, in the past, managed to draft considerable talent in the form of Weeks, Braun, Fielder and Gallardo. In other words, they’ve reaped the benefit of the approach you’ve suggested and now you don’t want to see it through…
Having drafted and developed this talent we are now in the position that we have to try to make the most of our opportunity and that means surrounding this talent with as many quality players as we can. Obviously there are questions about the exact players we have got to do this, but at least this stars and scrubs approach gives us the possibility of making upgrades.
Let’s say we go with your approach and seriously restock our minor leagues. If things go very well we’ll find ourselves perhaps in about six years with 4 or 5 really talented players. We’ll then have an argument on BCB about whether to go all-in or not and you’ll be arguing again that we should look to restock our minor leagues. Six years later, we’re lucky and have 4 or 5 talented players. We’ll then have an argument on BCB etc etc…
Less than proud owner of Marmol Says Knock McLouth (BCB League III)
"Now attribute that shit!" mpbMKE
by MrLeam on Jul 15, 2011 2:57 PM CDT up reply actions 6 recs
The successes the Brewers have had in the draft
Lack pitching and defensive success.
Being really good at tracking down hitters is one thing, and the result of it has been what happened in 09 and 10. But teams that use this approach successfully are able to use the draft well for pitching and hitting.
For small market teams, continual restocking and rebuiling has to be the norm. The Rays have been quite successful with it the past 3 years and will continue to be for the forseeable future, because of the way they draft. Teams that have a long term draft and develop plan, such as the Rays, Rockies, Twins, Padres, etc, all make it work. And none of the GM’s of those teams will be tempted to go all in to sacrifice future success for a one year fling like DM has done this year.
I would say that if you count playoff appearances
That would be your answer. The Padres are just beginning it, so the results wont be seen for a year or two. But those other teams are successful because of the way their organizations are run, consistently.
In last 5 years, Rockies have 2, Rays have 2, Padres have zero
None of the teams you listed will likely make the playoffs this year
Get a ife broseph
by Supertramp on Jul 15, 2011 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
And saying the Padres results won't be seen for a year or two
Is EXTREMELY optimistic. They’re farm system isn’t anything great, and their top pitchers (Castro and Kelly) haven’t shown much in the minors this year.
Get a ife broseph
The draft is much more about luck than organizational skill.
"PLUSH ALERT: THERE WAS AN UNTUCKING AT FENWAY!"
I get what you're saying
and I do think it is a valid argument but the difficulty is that you’re basically still saying that having Weeks, Fielder, Braun and Gallardo isn’t sufficient for us to try to downgrade the minor league talent and go all-in. In which case, the big question is exactly how much talent do we need to develop before we decide to actually make an effort and get some? Or are we having to miraculously develop a whole team so we aren’t sitting around for the next 20 years just thinking “damn, if only X and Y had panned out we could have had as much success as the Rays did a while back”?
Ultimately though, the Brewers are trying to get talent through the draft. Hell, there’s very few teams that aren’t trying to do that at present. Yeah, some teams have been successful in doing that more than others but that doesn’t mean that its an easy thing to do or something that would have benefits for the Brewers above most other teams. I’m sure pretty much everyone going along with the current strategy is well aware that there is a good possibility there are going to be some fallow years ahead and the big question is whether we’ll have something to look back on and feel good about
It seems to me that a) we might as well make the most of the talent we have developed and b) increasingly every team is trying to develop talent and draft well so the likelihood of it paying off for the Brewers is not as high as presumed.
Less than proud owner of Marmol Says Knock McLouth (BCB League III)
"Now attribute that shit!" mpbMKE
by MrLeam on Jul 15, 2011 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
More importantly than debating the future of the Brewers
Just been watching the Cubs and some guy absolutely butchered “Take Me Out to the Ballgame”. Some guy called Barry who it sounds like is a TV antiques guy. Looked at least in his 60s and really really made a hash of it…
Less than proud owner of Marmol Says Knock McLouth (BCB League III)
"Now attribute that shit!" mpbMKE
Twins
Are they even following that strategy anymore? They signed Mauer to an 8 yr/$184M deal and their payroll is well over $100M.
And the Rays were in the basement of their division and one of the worst teams in baseball from 1998-2007. I would hope that having such high draft picks during that time would have led to some sort of success.
Pujols is the Barack Obama of baseball.
by sjlee on Jul 15, 2011 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
Braves, Rays, Rangers
those three organization always draft well and make good signings in the Latin American market as well. All three of these organizations are constantly in the playoff race and all of them have payrolls around the Brewers level or in the Rays case substantially lower. None of these teams have to go “all in” because they have great young talent on the horizon.
The Brewers on the other hand did well with their very high draft picks which got them Weeks, Braun, and Fielder. Other than Weeks, Fielder, Braun and Gallardo where are the impact players. When was the last time the Brewers have gotten a gem in the later rounds? The team badly needs to revamp their scouting department. It is my opinion that since they have done a terrible job in drafting impact pitching they are overcompensating and overdrafting several pitchers with low ceilings just to say they are trying. Seid looks completely overmatched and his drafts so far have been extremely underwhelming with the possible exemption of Tyler Thornburg.
In order to have sustained success a team must draft well and sign good Latin American talent as well. This is why we need a new developmental GM and top flight scouting director if we want to be more like Atlanta, Tampa, and Texas and less like a mediocre organization which is where we are at.
by bklynbrewcrew on Jul 15, 2011 6:30 PM CDT up reply actions
I'd only push to sign Greinke
Long-term, Greinke is the only one I’d be really confident in to produce. Marcum’s injury history and lack of velocity would worry me as he ages. Prince is probably just too expensive and could fall apart, though I’d more worried his defense would degrade than his bat. I’m picturing a David Ortiz aging curve rather than a Mo Vaughn one.
I still wouldn’t sign Greinke for more than 3 years though, pitchers are just too big an injury risk. Top-talent pitchers are the one thing you usually don’t see on the FA market or they’d be priced out of Milwaukee’s price range.
I'd love them to get like a 4 year/$50m deal on Grienke
I still think he’s one of the best pitchers in the NL! (not named Roy Halladay)
"I don't even know who Bryce Harper is — hah, hah, hah, hah, hah!" -Nyjer Morgan
I'd be happy with 3/$50
This down year is the only reason I think they’d be able to afford him at all.
by kingcharlesxii on Jul 15, 2011 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions
I say 13.5M for the rest of his career.
Just make it 10 club options at 13.5 each year.
http://www.mlbsoup.com
by tcyoung on Jul 15, 2011 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Nice read guys
I would have called it an exceptional read but for some reason you forgot to solicit the views of BUCKS (perhaps the most esteemed and legendary contributor of them all…)
Less than proud owner of Marmol Says Knock McLouth (BCB League III)
"Now attribute that shit!" mpbMKE
by MrLeam on Jul 15, 2011 1:40 PM CDT reply actions 3 recs
Then you'll definitely want to tune in next week
when the debate centers around whether we should RIDE BIKES~!
We pull our pants up and do our jobs here.
by Rubie Q on Jul 15, 2011 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
All I can say is
you’d better not disappoint me…
Less than proud owner of Marmol Says Knock McLouth (BCB League III)
"Now attribute that shit!" mpbMKE
1B Casey Kotchman?
Just looked up his stats
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/k/kotchca01.shtml
and I think he might be a good fit for the 2012 Brewers.
I like Prince, but he will be gone.
Why might Kotchman be a good fit?
- good defense, high OBP (the Brewers have enough power bats already)
- I’m not convinced Gamel can get the job done
- should be reasonable priced despite his great 2011 season
Some days ago I read a post about the link between “great teams”, “great pitching” and “great defense”. Kotchman was named in that article as well.
I’d also give Marcum a new 3-year deal, while I’m sceptical on Greinke.
watched my first MLB ever from July 7th til 9th in Toronto :)) Awesome experience!

by 





































