Jeromy Burnitz, Eric Young And Former Brewers On The MLB Hall Of Fame Ballot
If you were around yesterday or read the Mug this morning, you've probably heard this: The 2012 MLB Hall of Fame balloting has been announced, and former Brewers Jeromy Burnitz and Eric Young were named on a combined total of one ballot (a single vote for Young).
2012 is the eighth straight season where no player who has appeared in a Brewer uniform will be inducted to Cooperstown, but it was nearly the first in a long time where no former Brewers received votes. Last year three former Brewers were named on at least one ballot: Dave Parker (89 votes), Marquis Grissom (four votes) and B.J. Surhoff (two votes). 2011 was Parker's 15th and final season on the ballot, but he's given the Brewers at least one former player receiving votes each year since 1996.
Here's a quick look at the Brewers who have been on the ballot since Paul Molitor's election in 2004, and how they've fared:
| Player | Seasons on Ballot | Last Appearance | Votes |
| Dave Parker | 15 | 2011 | 89 (15.3%) |
| Marquis Grissom | 1 | 2011 | 4 (0.7%) |
| B.J. Surhoff | 1 | 2011 | 2 (0.3%) |
| Lenny Harris | 1 | 2011 | 0 (0%) |
| Jesse Orosco | 1 | 2009 | 1 (0.2%) |
| Dan Plesac | 1 | 2009 | 0 (0%) |
| Greg Vaughn | 1 | 2009 | 0 (0%) |
| Tony Fernandez | 1 | 2007 | 4 (0.7%) |
| Dante Bichette | 1 | 2007 | 3 (0.6%) |
| Devon White | 1 | 2007 | 0 (0%) |
| Doug Jones | 1 | 2006 | 2 (0.4%) |
| Jim Abbott | 1 | 2005 | 13 (2.5%) |
| Tom Candiotti | 1 | 2005 | 2 (0.4%) |
The last time the Brewers had no former players receive Hall of Fame votes was 1993. Darrell Porter and Cecil Cooper were both on the ballot that year, but were shut out.
1 comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
HOF criteria
Just mumbling a few thoughts on what it takes to be elected to the HOF… I remember when I heard that Greg Vaughn was going to be on the ballot and I actually laughed out loud, but I had forgotten that he had a couple of good years with the Padres/Reds after leaving the Brewers. Even so, I figured it must be an ‘automatic criteria’ thing, because with his career numbers I wouldn’t want to submit myself to a vote… speaking of which, if one of you extremely knowledgeable gentlemen (or ladies) could remind me how a person ends up on the ballot I’d be grateful.
I remember someone talking a few years ago about how he determined whether someone was worthy or not, when looking at career production. Sometimes the totals can be a bit deceiving if people had moderately productive careers that spanned two decades, or short but extremely productive careers, and what he did was take the 10 best years of their careers and compared them. I think he used something less meaningful than WAR, like total bases, but it was interesting to see people graphed against each other.
I was discussing (arguing nicely) in an earlier thread about how I thought Larry Walker was easily as deserving as Barry Larkin for the HOF – and I’m typing this before I run the numbers – what this guy would do is sort out his best years and compare them on a graph to show how different players would have a better performance over time, or a higher peak performance, or sustained ‘all-star-level’ performance, etc. So using WAR and cranking out a quick graph, let’s see how full of crap I am ;)

Ok, what we see is that in his best years, Walker was easily more productive than Larkin. When he was an MVP, he was even more valuable than Larkin as an MVP. After his two best years however, Larkin had a number of years where he put up 3- to 5-WAR seasons, about 1.0 to 0.5 WAR more than Walker per year for the bulk years of his career.
If we cut off the graph to show only the ‘10 best seasons’ they look competitive, but with Larkin being the steady performer, and Walker dropping from ‘MVP’ to ‘almost-all-star’ over the span. You be the judge. I like them both.
Mark Attanasio is the best.




































