Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ohio State And Florida Target 2013 Receiver Recruits

April in Review

That was one heck of a first month.  There's a lot more positive than negative, that's for sure, and it's time to break it down.

The Good Stuff

  • The outfield corners: total production from Brewers left fielders is 370/400/630.  From right fielders: 293/365/446.  The latter is ok, the former is spectacular.  Corey Hart hasn't gotten nearly the playing time we'd hoped for, but the results have been all to the good.

  • Jeff Suppan: I pretty much covered this last night; he's been incredible.  Even bigger than his complete game win last night was his bullpen-saving eight-inning outing last week.  Just...wow.

  • The back of the bullpen: Against all odds, Derrick Turnbow has been one of the best relievers in baseball so far this year.  Under one baserunner per inning, no homers allowed, and an eyepopping K rate of nearly two strikeouts per inning.  One of the only guys who's been better is Coco Cordero.  Double wow.  11.3 innings, two hits, and 19 strikeouts.  The seven walks are little worrisome, but sometimes it looks like he's putting guys on just to give himself a challenge.

  • Rickie Weeks: he hasn't stood out in any one area, but he's slugging over .500, playing credible defense, and hasn't been caught stealing yet.  With Rickie, no news is good news, and until he was held out of the lineup with a finger injury last night, there had been no news whatsoever.

  • Prince Fielder: again, no news is good news.  He's just doin' his thing, playing solid defense and slugging over .500.  He's striking out a lot, too, but as long as the team is winning, we're not going to hear announcers preach about how you have to make contact, even if you're a slugger.
The Bad
  • Counsellino: Brewers third basemen are OPSing a craptacular .595.  Sure, they're providing some veteran leadership and looking pretty good on defense, but...Ryan Braun would have to give up a lot of runs with the glove to cancel out the offensive benefit of having his bat in the lineup.

  • Dave Bush: I love the guy, but a couple of bad innings have made his season look pretty awful thus far.  It's tempting to write those off, but it's always been the knock on Bush: some days, he leaves the ball up in the zone and gets crushed.  If he's going to have a long career in the big leagues, he'll have to stop doing that--in more than half of his outings.

  • Jose Capellan/Greg Aquino: I had hoped one of these guys would step up and become the seventh inning version of Turnbow.  Both (theoretically, anyway) have the stuff, but neither one seems anywhere close to turning into that guy.  Right now, there are a half dozen guys in triple-A I'd rather see on the mound in a close situation than either of those two.  I'm hoping one or both can turn things around--the potential is just too great--but I'm not putting money on it.

  • Brian Anderson: I was excited to send Daron Sutton packing.  Now...whatever.  Anderson never misses a chance to tell you all the wonderful things opposing coaches say about their players, and he's constantly showing us just how much he's learned from Bill Schroeder.  As with Capequino, there's a chance he'll turn things around, but as it stands now, I look forward to lots of effort synching up the video feed and the glorious tones of Bob Uecker.
The Jury's Still Out
  • Ben Sheets: Oh boy.  The numbers aren't that bad.  The strikeouts are awfully low, but he's essentially the pitcher we thought Suppan would be.  He could turn it around any day now...or we could discover it's some new side effect of vestibular neuritis.  I hope that when I do this exercise again in a month, he's at the very top of the first section, but we'll be watching closely in the meantime.

  • Ned Yost: it's easy to rag on your manager, and it's easier still when Corey Hart is sitting on the bench.  Nonetheless, it doesn't seem right to criticize every move your manager makes when your team is 16-9.  For the most part, Ned has pushed the right buttons at the right times, if not for the right reasons.  Let's hope for one of two things: either he's craftier than we think he is, or his luck holds.

  • Claudio Vargas: First two times out, awesome.  Last two: slooooooooooooooooooow.  I hope that the home plate umpire doesn't continue to determine whether good Claudio or bad Claudio shows up.  Then again, this isn't a big issue: if bad Claudio shows up too many times, good Yovani will start showing up instead.

  • J.J. Hardy: I really wanted to put him in the top category, but those three errors don't bode well.  I hope that's just an aberration; unfortunately, his .524 slugging percentage is probably an aberration, too.

  • Bill Hall: The fielding is coming around, but the bat is coming around a little slower.  Let's hope that by the time Hardy and Jenkins cool down, Hall starts to go on a tear.
That isn't quite everybody: I'd say Chris Capuano, Johnny Estrada, and the middle of the bullpen have performed just about up to expectations, and can be expected to continue to do so.  There are a surprising number of parts of the team that are underperforming: I figure that's just so many things that will help keep this team in the .600+ range.

Comment 35 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

hardy
no way hardy belongs in the "jury's still out" category.

despite the errors his defense has been spectacular, and his bat has more than silenced the doubters, so far he's exceed expectations.

i think most people would've been very happy to see hardy hit .270/.330/.420

his babip is .264, it seems like the only outs he is making are smoking line drives right at OFs.

to say the jury is still out on hardy is to suggest you expected rollins or reyes. After those two guys, i dont think there are any others i'd rather have so far (maybe hanley ramirez... is he a good fielder?).

Otherwise pretty good write up, though i also disagree on Yost, who's improved quite a bit despite a handful of bullpen gaffes, and Brian Anderson who's sane enough to not be noticed, which i appreciate.

eh, maybe i disagree on bush too, i'd take his season so far. 26k:5bb, his babip against is a horribly unfortunate .383 and he's cut his HR/9 in half so far...

not too much to complain about...

:)

Go Brewers!!

Bring Back The Old Logo!

by jacob on May 1, 2007 12:37 PM CDT reply actions  

As a doubter
I have been silenced.  Hardy is now the shortstop that he was projected to be.  That doesn't mean I agree with bringing him up when he still sucked :)

by Marty McSuperFly on May 1, 2007 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hear hear
Although I think the way he got here was the least likely way to encourage long-term success, now that he's here, he sure is playing well.  For the first time, I actually look forward to his turn in the lineup.
"C'mon, boys, let's get 'em some RUNS!" --- Daron Sutton, pretty much every game of the 2005 season.

by roguejim on May 1, 2007 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Plus
he turns outs into outs.

Though, really, that doesn't seem like a big feat, seeing how they were already outs in the first place.

"C'mon, boys, let's get 'em some RUNS!" --- Daron Sutton, pretty much every game of the 2005 season.

by roguejim on May 1, 2007 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

long-term
Although I think the way he got here was the least likely way to encourage long-term success

I think it was the most effective way to encourage long term success. He had missed the previous year with a shoulder injury ('04). Had he gone back to AAA, Hardy would've had to make adjustments coming back from shoulder surgery, then another adjustment period after coming up to the Majors. Handing him the starting SS job in '05 killed both those birds with one stone.

There was no better way to handle Hardy than to throw him into the fire. Same way there is not a better way to handle Hall in CF other than just patience. Had the brewers panicked in '05 and sent hardy down, the brewers would not be in the great shape they are in so far this season. It's not luck or a coincidence, it's been great player development and management by Yost & Melvin (Doug mostly).

Bring Back The Old Logo!

by jacob on May 1, 2007 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

i'm impressed
if you can not notice BA.  ugh.

I haven't been all that wowed by Hardy, actually.  He's solid, sure, but the mistakes he's making aren't the sort of thing you want to see with someone with his defensive rep.  It may be a blip, I hope it's a blip, but until he either a) proves it's a blip, or b) starts making adam everett-like plays to compensate, or c) puts up another month of ridiculous numbers for a shortstop, I stick with my categorization.

by Jeff Sackmann on May 1, 2007 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

blip
a) usually you throw out the small sample until a larger sample proves them, rather than accepting the small sample until the larger sample disproves it. but if you are going to use errors to measure defensive performance in april then yes, i suppose you could argue that his defense was shaky.

b) he is making adam everett (4 Es, still best SS in baseball) like plays ...

c) is this a small sample alert? you aren't denying he put up great numbers in april but saying that he didn't have a great april cause it wasn't may & june as well?

You are certainly entitled to your categorization, but an OPS+ of 128 and spectacular defense despite 3 Es don't back you up. For April he was 3rd or 4th best SS in the game, you could make a player-of-the-month argument for Hardy.

I do like that you expect more from him, nothing wrong with setting the bar extremely high.

:)

Bring Back The Old Logo!

by jacob on May 1, 2007 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

ok
it's not about the numbers.  obviously you and I are seeing different things.  hardy's mistakes have been on things he shouldn't have made mistakes on; and I haven't seen more than maybe a couple of the spectacular plays you mention.  

If he's going to be an excellent defensive shortstop, he's got to be either a) nearly perfect, or b) spectacular.  As I've seen it he has been neither.  Good, yes, but that's all.

by Jeff Sackmann on May 1, 2007 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

context
A couple of the boots that Hardy made were in Chicago, on a wet field with a hard transition between the grass and the dirt.  I don't hold those against anybody.

I agree with your criteria for an excellent defensive shortstop, and from what we've seen, JJ is going to qualify on the nearly perfect side.  He has trouble moving side to side (except to cut off plays in front of Rickie...he could play back left a little more), and I've never been amazed with his range getting to any ball.  If one goes in his area, I'm shocked when he doesn't make the play, though.

So, as a former doubter, I think he's been nearly perfect this year, given the circumstances surrounding a couple of the errors.

by Marty McSuperFly on May 1, 2007 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bush's FIP
Is much better than his ERA.  I'd expect him to get better but I couldn't agree more with your comment about leaving the ball up.  I actually wonder if throwing more balls might help him.

by dixieflatline on May 1, 2007 12:38 PM CDT reply actions  

I'd add
our road record to the Good Stuff category.  It's also nice to see the rest of the division playing to their low expectations.  As soon as the DVD contest results go official, I'll really be loving April :-)

by John Brew on May 1, 2007 12:48 PM CDT reply actions  

yeah
I think you maybe being a littler hard on hardy, we all know he is known for his D, but his offense has been huge so far for us this year. I think he belongs in the first catagory. HE is still really good on D, and if you think otherwise, then you have not been watchin him for the last three years, he will come around, I am not worried about his D at all, and I don't think too many other Brewers fans are either. But otherwise a very good sum up of the first month!

by Bigdogg2002 on May 1, 2007 12:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Are you on crack?
(Just wondering) Great write up - I might put the RS-RA in the "Jury's Still Out" category. Have the Brewers been a bit lucky so far? Definitely more good than bad, hard to complain about this very nice start.

by jax and rajah on May 1, 2007 2:33 PM CDT reply actions  

lol
yeah, the rs/ra is definitely an issue.  i just figured we flogged it to death the other day, no need to raise it again so soon :)

by Jeff Sackmann on May 1, 2007 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

3rd Base
I agree that the current situation at 3rd is not ideal.  It appears to be that Braun is ready to at least get a shot at the show, but unless there is an injury, I don't see where there is room for him on the roster.  There has not been anyone who really sticks out for demotion.

The Crew has 16 wins.  I say stick with what has been working.

by stork02 on May 1, 2007 2:36 PM CDT reply actions  

6/1
That's the date to extend the Brewers' 'possession' of Bruan for another season, so don't expect a call-up before then.  I think the Brewers would best try and find a suitor for Graffanino (teams w/ needs at 2B/3B/whatever else he can play) and ease Braun into the lineup with Counsell hitting the righties.

That's if the Brewers want to call him up, of course.  They could also send Gwynn to AAA and keep Counsellino.  Just rambling here ...

by nmc on May 1, 2007 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

i like the thought...
could you explain to be the value to 6/1 though?  ooo, when he was drafted probably? something like that...now who's rambling. :)
Brewers in 07!

by Michael M on May 1, 2007 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

anything but...
a Braun/Counsell platoon with Craig as the long half, please. That would be nearly as much of a waste of a prospect as Corey Hart's 2006 from April to July was.

Anyway, I'm also interested to know how you got June 6/1...

by Zeyes on May 1, 2007 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

ESPN Article
Hey Guys,

If you haven't seen it yet; Jason Stark wrote a pretty awesome article and the Brew are all over it.  

It even mentions the injury to Mr. Ned Yost.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?columnist=stark_jayson&id=2855072

By the way, shouldn't they be asking us if there's room on the Brewers bandwagon?  We were here first.

by engbjm06 on May 1, 2007 2:38 PM CDT reply actions  

cnnsi.com coverage
In contrast to the positive Stark column, on cnnsi.com, John Donovan's, in his new power rankings, sneaks in a little dig at the Crew ("As much as the Brewers say they're contenders ... well, we'll see.") There's also Tom Verducci, who - in his defacto role as AL East beat writer - continues to primarily cover the Yankee demise, but was able to get in a poke at the Crew as well (cautioning us fans not to plan a victory parade yet...thanks dickwad).

Frankly, I wouldn't mind if we stay below the radar for awhile. Much rather have the national media beat the Death of the Yankees story into the ground than give the team any bad karma.

by DC Brewer on May 1, 2007 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

You know how it is
When the East Coast Media Cabal is rolling, in their perfect world baseball only has 3 teams.  The Yankees and Red Soxs get to fight to play the Mets in the World Series.

I hope they keep over looking the crew and not believing they might be for real.

by WSB Chris on May 1, 2007 3:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Disappoints
With the Brewers, I am most concerned about middle relief, Wise (he's getting hit too hard for my tastes), and the hitting.  I'm concerned that the Brewers will forget how to hit for power later in the season and just be a singles hitting team.  I know this may be unjust with the team being near the top in every offensive category, but still ... individual power numbers could plummet if they're consistently looking for that "nice approach."

by nmc on May 1, 2007 2:56 PM CDT reply actions  

wow
how proud were you of yourself when you came up with Capequino?
Can we bring back the huge Keg and cup for Bernie?

by grobbins on May 1, 2007 3:09 PM CDT reply actions  

lol
eh, i've probably mashed together the last names of every two players on the roster at some point.  it's an algorithm with occasionally entertaining results.

by Jeff Sackmann on May 1, 2007 3:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd like to see Bill Hall at 3b...
...just so we could have a centerfield platoon of Gwart.
Don't try to do too much with it. Just take the ball the other way.

by shooty babitt on May 1, 2007 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

quick question for Jeff
I respect your opinion alot and I agree with most of your articles, but are you really concerned with JJ's defense?? I am many many more things I am concerned with on the this Brewers team then JJ's defense, he will be fine, and I would be willing to bet that from here on out he will play an above average D

by Bigdogg2002 on May 1, 2007 3:55 PM CDT reply actions  

also
let's say he hacked it up out there this April. pretend he had as horrific a month as Hall did in center. Didn't JJ's offense more than make up for it?
Bring Back The Old Logo!

by jacob on May 1, 2007 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think he probably will silence the doubters
but I'd like to see more.  That's all.  As i said in the article originally, I was tempted to put him in the "good" section...I'm certainly not saying Hardy is a bad defensive shortstop or anything of the sort.  Just that he's not likely to remain a masher, and I'd like to see the spectacular (or spectacularly steady) D that we've been promised.

by Jeff Sackmann on May 1, 2007 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

If...
If you put up a poll that asked Brewers fan how many think Hardy's defense in april makes then nervous going into the rest of the season, I bet the percentage would be pretty low

by Bigdogg2002 on May 1, 2007 4:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Hardy
He is two spots ahead of everett in fielding precentage of the shortstops in the national league, so while everett may make the spectacular play, he is not alays turning outs into outs :) while he bats 42 points higher and has five more HR's, I will take Hardy anyday

by Bigdogg2002 on May 1, 2007 4:08 PM CDT reply actions  

I forgot to say...
I LOVE that you put Brian Anderson in the BAD column.  He is BAD enough to mention...

the JJ stuff has been covered; but I would have put him in the good column; he gets to balls Billy Hall dreamed he could get to last season...

by engbjm06 on May 1, 2007 7:15 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Brew Crew Ball is dedicated to providing a friendly atmosphere for intelligent Brewer conversation. Click here to view our Posting Guide and Community Guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Nohuddleblueew9_small
BP C'mon Back Club
Small
Help- How to "Cut the Cable" and Watch Live Games
Barrelman_small
BCB Advanced Stat Pseudofantasy League - PART II
Small
Interview with a Former Brewer Part Two
Small
Catching Up With a Former Brewer
Barrelman_small
BCB Advanced Stat Pseudofantasy League
People_studying_small
Does Fielder's Contract Outdo Pujols'?
Dr-teeth_small
Fielder: It's all about health
Barrelman_small
NPB Position Players
Braun
2012 Payroll Early Estimate

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

NL Central Standings

W L PCT GB STRK
Chicago 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Cincinnati 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Houston 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Milwaukee 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
Pittsburgh 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0
St. Louis 0 0 .000 0 Lost 0

(updated 2.13.2012 at 7:02 PM CST)


Moderators

Newavatar_small Kyle Lobner

146_-_street_map_plaza_from_pop_tower_with_bars-tiltshift_small TheJay

Communist_party_small Jordan M

X1pxoywqu4sjf73f7drxq2lmqys7mzsyx7pa9necepiffk_ewcuwmuazb-o17ukmbriclcdkn4lk-4xposaawiq4j8hzdsccpjwatqpz2o2p-i0nnqjlyt7pmytaycsaknszvaktpshtcu9sjle1qchlw_1__small NoahJ

Hikaru_50_small morineko

Picture_069_small Nicole Haase

Gogol_bordello_small BrewHaHeather

Anon-md_small Rubie Q