Is It Possible Capuano Just Isn't Very Good?
I don't have the time this morning to take a really in-depth look at that question, but I think Cappy's awesome first half last year is seriously clouding our judgment. (I can't speak for the rest of you, I guess, but I know it has clouded mine.) He had a great '05, too, but has now been very mediocre for a solid year.
Thanks to the wonders of baseball-reference.com, here's a breakdown of Capuano's last full season or so:
Split W L ERA IP BB K HR Last 365 6 14 5.16 174.1 58 132 28 2 Half 06 1 8 5.17 92.1 22 62 19 July '06 1 3 5.94 36.1 6 20 9 Aug '06 1 1 2.32 31 3 28 4 Sept '06 0 4 6.39 38 13 21 6 1 Half 07 5 6 4.78 79 33 67 9 Apr '07 4 0 3.21 28 13 21 2 May '07 1 4 4.60 31.1 8 24 3 June '07 0 1 6.55 11 7 15 2 July '07 0 1 10.03 11.2 8 10 2Basically, he had good months last August and this April. The rest has been ugly, and even including those two months, he looks like the guy we're afraid Claudio Vargas is about to turn into.
The walks, incidentally, have only been a problem lately; in the last 365 days, his walk rate has been better than it was during his solid '05 campaign. There's a degree of unluckiness in this, I think, but now that we have a solid year of below-average performance to go on, I think it's time that we face the fact that Capuano is a #4 starter at best. We can't use the "Mike Maddux will fix him" line, because it looks like Maddux did fix him, and he's gotten unfixed. We can't expect him to improve up to a still-forthcoming peak, since he's 29 and it looks like his peak may well have been two years ago.
I don't know exactly what to make of this, but if we are aggressively looking for a way to get Gallardo into the rotation, it's possible that it would be better to drop Cappy from the rotation than Bush or Vargas. Unfortunately, it's a tough call: this rotation that I thought, coming into the season, had an ace and 3 or 4 #3 starters has ended up being stacked with #4s and #5s.
0 recs |
11
comments
Comments
Gallardo
Can anyone out there make me feel different about this subject?
by Zel123 on Jul 14, 2007 10:39 AM CDT 0 recs
The research
On the other hand, once you've cleared the danger zone, there's no reason you can't throw 230 innings a year.
by Jeff Sackmann on
Jul 14, 2007 11:01 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Didnt they score a ton of runs for him in 05 also
The only reason I seem to remember this was Cappy seemed to give up 4 runs and win 8-4 and Sheets would give up a solo home run and lose 1-0 at least it seemed like that.
So am I even in the ball park with this thought or totally mistaken?
by WSB Chris on Jul 14, 2007 10:41 AM CDT 0 recs
I actually did a little research
9-6
3-1
14-5
12-2
11-2
2-0
5-1
12-7
8-4
6-4
10-6
3-1
5-2
7-5
2-1
4-3
4-1
4-3
That is 9 games where the scored him 6 or more runs and two other where they got him 5 runs. I think you could make the argument that the offensive support really helped him to his only winning season of his career. He was not as good that season as the 18 wins makes him seem. The games go from end of the season at the top to start at the bottom so they actually started scoring him more runs as the season wore on. Also you can see a couple of games where they won 7-5 10-6 9-6 etc so they won him those games in spite of his pitching.
by WSB Chris on
Jul 14, 2007 10:59 AM CDT
up
0 recs
cool
Oh well.
by Jeff Sackmann on
Jul 14, 2007 11:02 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Rotation Woes
I'd love to add an outfield bat I like better than Menchkins as much as the next guy, but it's obvious to me that what this team really needs is a legit #2 starter. I'd feel a lot better about the rotation AND the bullpen with Suppan/Bush/Vargas and Cappy making up the 3,4,5 and long relief roles (freeing up Villanueva for more 7th or 8th inning work) than I do with the same guys occupying the 2-5 spots and feeling like we had to go to Villanueva every time the game was on the line in the 5th,6th and 7th innings.
The problem then is that there probably isn't a starter on the market that would do more than add to the list of back of the rotation guys we already have. The Melvin I saw interviewed last night sounded like a guy resigned to making a couple of bullpen moves before the deadline to avoid an August/September collapse, but probably not anything else. That once again makes me suspect that even if they weren't already looking to 2008 and 2009 rather than hoping they can find a guy to put them deep into the playoffs this year, the market is such that they'll end up biding their time and hoping they can sneak into the playoffs this season.
Ah, but what the hell do I know?
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 14, 2007 12:09 PM CDT 0 recs
I think you're right...but
I'm all for continuing to restock the team and making the Brewers a powerhouse for years to come. However, we're past the halfway point and in first place with a 3 1/2 game lead. There's a fine line to walk between winning now and winning down the line, and we need to walk it. The Cream City Crushers may be projected to peak in 2008 or 2009, but a lot can happen between now and then, and we're in first place now. If a deal can be made for a Buehrle or someone similar, I'd have to think long and hard about passing it up.
We're not at our peak yet, that's for sure, and there are quite a few players we could stand to jettison and replace with more productive ones. But there's something to be said for a bird in the hand. Matt Wise's salad tongs could attack Fielder in the offseason (admittedly, not likely), Ryan Braun could go all Ricky Williams on us, Corey Hart could injure himself in a shaving accident, and JJ Hardy could think "Hey, I'm JJ Hardy" and break a collarbone reaching to the top shelf for a box of Pop Tarts. If we were in third place and struggling for a .500 season, I'd think, sure, let's try to avoid a late-season collapse, but acknowledge that a playoff appearance isn't likely, and get ready to play to win next season. We're in first, though, and we're better than the rest of the division: we should keep an eye to next season, but figure out how to win in 2007.
by roguejim on
Jul 14, 2007 1:20 PM CDT
up
0 recs
CV to the rotation?
It might take a few starts to stretch him out, but where's the harm in having him start every fifth day and go 4 or so innings, then bring in Gallardo for 2 or 3? We do this until Carlos can go at least 6. We get our two best young pitchers on a regular working schedule (while limiting Gallardo's innings) and give ourselves a strong shot to win on those nights.
As I see it, the only downside is that we would need to find another guy to fill Carlos's current role of saving our bacon in the 5th/6th inning. But, maybe Cappy or Vargas (whoever gets sent to the pen) would actually work in that role?
by oaklandbrewerfan on Jul 14, 2007 1:58 PM CDT 0 recs
CV to the rotation?
Roguejim, you just spelled out the 2nd half of the argument that's been playing out in my head for the last couple of weeks...
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 14, 2007 4:21 PM CDT 0 recs
Watching Oswalt walk Cubs...
Oy. Make that Cubs up 4 in the 5th. Stinkin' Cubs.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Jul 14, 2007 4:24 PM CDT 0 recs
griswald's rotation
melvin needs to make a deal for a sp.
by Griswald on Jul 14, 2007 4:25 PM CDT 0 recs



















