Uhh, what?
This gem comes from Baseball Musings:
The big win is a sign of a good team. Milwaukee is 14-10 now in games decided by five runs or more. The Cubs are 17-8, which indicates to me that they in fact may be the superior team for the long run.
Uhh, what? Really? The fact that Milwaukee is 40-31 and Chicago is 33-36 in games decided by less than five runs (i.e., three-quarters of all games played) means the Cubs are better in the long run? If you score five or more runs, does it really matter if you give up four or zero so long as you win? The Brewers are 35-8 when scoring 5+, against the Cubs' 33-11, but I'm sure that's just because the Brewers are lucky. /sarcasm
What's next, the Cubs are better because their in-season pitching call-ups are doing better than Grant Balfour?
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
high variance in bullpen
I forgot to mention the big losses
by keephopealive on Jul 20, 2007 1:33 AM CDT up reply actions
the big win
Another desperate attempt to prove that despite W-L records, the Cubs are a better team than the Brewers. Someone should forward that tidbit to ESPN, they'd jump all over it.
by Dutch on Jul 20, 2007 7:33 AM CDT reply actions
Part of the problem
The Brewers and teams like them, on the other hand, are ignored in large part because I don't think a single baseball analyst at ESPN has any idea how to talk about building a team from within. They give lip service to teams like Oakland or Cleveland or Minnesota that develop guys in their minor league system, but they don't delve any further. Even the few good analysts over there couldn't tell you squat about balancing a 40-man roster or not rushing players through the minors, or timing it out to hit arbitration at the right time or, heaven forbid, locking up players before they hit the free agent market.
If the Brewers do get in the playoffs, I guarantee you that all you'll hear are these couple topics, correct or not:
- Ben Sheets will likely take free agency after next season and the Brewers will be doomed.
- Jeff Suppan has been a "clutch performer" and come up big as a free agent signing for the Brewers, steadying all the young guys in the rotation.
- Craig Counsell and Damian Miller are excellent veteran leaders, sharing insights they gained playing for the 2001 WS Champion Arizona Diamondbacks.
- Hart -- "Well, this kid is very tall, kind of like Derrek Lee, but he lacks the pop in his bat that Lee has. He still has a little power but his best asset is his speed, since he has <flip through game notes> 17 stolen bases."
- Hardy -- "He got off to a huge start this season and was a controversial all star pick. That reminds me, how 'bout Jimmy Rollins?"
- Braun -- "Braun came up and hit well earlier this year, but I still think Alex Gordon and Ryan Zimmerman will be the class of that draft. He might hold down the position with his bat, but I tell you, the Brewers would be much more comfortable if Corey Koskie could have come back with his glove to man the hot corner."
- Fielder -- "Prince is of the same build of his dad. I was talking to Cecil the other day, can you imagine a 12-year-old hitting a ball into the upper deck of old Tiger Stadium? Prince (or should I call him Cecil, Jr.?) was a starter on the all-star team this year -- everyone likes a big, fat guy."
- Estrada -- "You can't go wrong with a .300 hitting catcher."
- Jenkins -- "Jenkins has been here in Milwaukee the longest of anyone on the team. He's really a clubhouse leader, showing the young guys on the team how it's done."
- Hall -- "Hall's a utility player the Brewers stuck in center field this season. He's been a disappointment with the bat and his defense isn't up to par with the rest of the league. You have to wonder who the Brewers will go after in the free-agent market to upgrade this spot in their lineup."
- Weeks -- "Weeks has been bothered on and off by wrist issues and that's really held his bat back in his career. Plus, his defense is terrible. Mark my words, defense wins championships. The Brewers might have gotten lucky in a weak division this year, but unless they spend millions like the other teams getting players who can field their positions well, they won't win a thing, or my name isn't Steve Phillips."
well done.
also, great job getting that awesome quote into your signature.
Thanks
It just meshes so well with the K vs. TB Borchard watch, I think.
perfectly stated but...
by Zel123 on Jul 20, 2007 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions
don't forget
by Bill @ Brew Crew Ball on Jul 20, 2007 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah
Its getting old
Hint: Its not the Mets, Dodgers, Padres, or the almighty Cubs.
God...
by hyattff2003 on Jul 20, 2007 10:01 AM CDT reply actions
Imagine if we win
add another
by Bill @ Brew Crew Ball on Jul 20, 2007 12:52 PM CDT reply actions
and another
by DC Brewer on Jul 20, 2007 1:04 PM CDT reply actions
I hate power rankings
by Dutch on Jul 20, 2007 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Being naive
I blindly choose to think that it's not an anti-Milwaukee or even anti-Brewer sentiment: I think it's the belief that a small-budget team will succumb to a big-budget team. Thus, the Brewers' success this season has been a fluke, while the Cubs can afford all those salty veterans.
Not that I know of
I agree that it's more general than simply against the Brewers. If anything, people probably see a small-market team doing well and think it's a bunch of misfit Moneyball hacks that will fall apart soon.
Ahhh
your friends are cavemen!!!

by 



























